Resiliency in the Face of Adversity: A Short Longitudinal Test of the Trait Hypothesis
Resilience represents coping with adversity and is in line with a more positive paradigm for viewing responses to adversity. Most research has focused on resilience as coping-a state-based response to adversity. However, a competing hypothesis views resilience or resiliency as a trait that exists ac...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of general psychology 2017-04, Vol.144 (2), p.89-109 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 109 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 89 |
| container_title | The Journal of general psychology |
| container_volume | 144 |
| creator | Karaırmak, Özlem Figley, Charles |
| description | Resilience represents coping with adversity and is in line with a more positive paradigm for viewing responses to adversity. Most research has focused on resilience as coping-a state-based response to adversity. However, a competing hypothesis views resilience or resiliency as a trait that exists across time and types of adversity. We tested undergraduates enrolled in social work classes at a large southern university at two time periods during a single semester using measures of adversity, positive and negative affect, and trait-based resiliency. Consistent with the trait-based resiliency, and in contrast to state-based resilience, resiliency scores were not strongly correlated with adversity at both testing points but were with positive affect, and resiliency scores remained the same over time despite adversity variations. There was no gender or ethnic group difference in resilience scores. Black/African Americans reported significantly less negative affect and more positive affect than White/Caucasians. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1080/00221309.2016.1276043 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1883171805</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1901743002</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c427t-b82f5e0f362ad01b7b91cac66c6277dadcb54d75bbaeb543eac4709060838f973</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1L7DAUhoMoOn78BCXgxk3Hk6RtUlcO4lwvDAg6ug1pmmqk04xJ66X_3pQZXbi4rnIOPO_JOTwInRKYEhBwCUApYVBMKZB8SijPIWU7aEKKFBIQQuyiycgkI3SADkN4g7HnbB8dUMFyShmboOcHE2xjTasHbFvcvRo8V9pgV-NZ9WF8sN1whWf48dX5Di9c-2K7vrKtavDShG7kxszSK9vhu2HtYhdsOEZ7tWqCOdm-R-hpfru8uUsW93_-3swWiU4p75JS0DozUMdtVAWk5GVBtNJ5rnPKeaUqXWZpxbOyVCZWzCidciggB8FEXXB2hC42c9fevfdxIbmyQZumUa1xfZCkAMJTFg__HRWCEUFSkUb0_Af65nofb95SnAjIIpVtKO1dCN7Ucu3tSvlBEpCjI_nlSI6O5NZRzJ1tp_flylTfqS8pEbjeALatnV-pf843lezU0Dhfe9VqGyT7_x-fjCCeJw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1883171805</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Resiliency in the Face of Adversity: A Short Longitudinal Test of the Trait Hypothesis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Karaırmak, Özlem ; Figley, Charles</creator><creatorcontrib>Karaırmak, Özlem ; Figley, Charles</creatorcontrib><description>Resilience represents coping with adversity and is in line with a more positive paradigm for viewing responses to adversity. Most research has focused on resilience as coping-a state-based response to adversity. However, a competing hypothesis views resilience or resiliency as a trait that exists across time and types of adversity. We tested undergraduates enrolled in social work classes at a large southern university at two time periods during a single semester using measures of adversity, positive and negative affect, and trait-based resiliency. Consistent with the trait-based resiliency, and in contrast to state-based resilience, resiliency scores were not strongly correlated with adversity at both testing points but were with positive affect, and resiliency scores remained the same over time despite adversity variations. There was no gender or ethnic group difference in resilience scores. Black/African Americans reported significantly less negative affect and more positive affect than White/Caucasians.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-1309</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1940-0888</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/00221309.2016.1276043</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28362233</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JGPSAY</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Psychology Press</publisher><subject>Adaptation, Psychological ; Adaptive behavior ; Adolescent ; Adult ; Affect ; Behavioral psychology ; Coping ; ego development ; emotion ; Emotions ; Female ; Humans ; Hypotheses ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Personality ; Racial differences ; resilience ; Resilience, Psychological ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>The Journal of general psychology, 2017-04, Vol.144 (2), p.89-109</ispartof><rights>2017 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 2017</rights><rights>2017 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c427t-b82f5e0f362ad01b7b91cac66c6277dadcb54d75bbaeb543eac4709060838f973</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c427t-b82f5e0f362ad01b7b91cac66c6277dadcb54d75bbaeb543eac4709060838f973</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28362233$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Karaırmak, Özlem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Figley, Charles</creatorcontrib><title>Resiliency in the Face of Adversity: A Short Longitudinal Test of the Trait Hypothesis</title><title>The Journal of general psychology</title><addtitle>J Gen Psychol</addtitle><description>Resilience represents coping with adversity and is in line with a more positive paradigm for viewing responses to adversity. Most research has focused on resilience as coping-a state-based response to adversity. However, a competing hypothesis views resilience or resiliency as a trait that exists across time and types of adversity. We tested undergraduates enrolled in social work classes at a large southern university at two time periods during a single semester using measures of adversity, positive and negative affect, and trait-based resiliency. Consistent with the trait-based resiliency, and in contrast to state-based resilience, resiliency scores were not strongly correlated with adversity at both testing points but were with positive affect, and resiliency scores remained the same over time despite adversity variations. There was no gender or ethnic group difference in resilience scores. Black/African Americans reported significantly less negative affect and more positive affect than White/Caucasians.</description><subject>Adaptation, Psychological</subject><subject>Adaptive behavior</subject><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Affect</subject><subject>Behavioral psychology</subject><subject>Coping</subject><subject>ego development</subject><subject>emotion</subject><subject>Emotions</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Personality</subject><subject>Racial differences</subject><subject>resilience</subject><subject>Resilience, Psychological</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0022-1309</issn><issn>1940-0888</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1L7DAUhoMoOn78BCXgxk3Hk6RtUlcO4lwvDAg6ug1pmmqk04xJ66X_3pQZXbi4rnIOPO_JOTwInRKYEhBwCUApYVBMKZB8SijPIWU7aEKKFBIQQuyiycgkI3SADkN4g7HnbB8dUMFyShmboOcHE2xjTasHbFvcvRo8V9pgV-NZ9WF8sN1whWf48dX5Di9c-2K7vrKtavDShG7kxszSK9vhu2HtYhdsOEZ7tWqCOdm-R-hpfru8uUsW93_-3swWiU4p75JS0DozUMdtVAWk5GVBtNJ5rnPKeaUqXWZpxbOyVCZWzCidciggB8FEXXB2hC42c9fevfdxIbmyQZumUa1xfZCkAMJTFg__HRWCEUFSkUb0_Af65nofb95SnAjIIpVtKO1dCN7Ucu3tSvlBEpCjI_nlSI6O5NZRzJ1tp_flylTfqS8pEbjeALatnV-pf843lezU0Dhfe9VqGyT7_x-fjCCeJw</recordid><startdate>20170403</startdate><enddate>20170403</enddate><creator>Karaırmak, Özlem</creator><creator>Figley, Charles</creator><general>Psychology Press</general><general>Taylor & Francis Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170403</creationdate><title>Resiliency in the Face of Adversity: A Short Longitudinal Test of the Trait Hypothesis</title><author>Karaırmak, Özlem ; Figley, Charles</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c427t-b82f5e0f362ad01b7b91cac66c6277dadcb54d75bbaeb543eac4709060838f973</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adaptation, Psychological</topic><topic>Adaptive behavior</topic><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Affect</topic><topic>Behavioral psychology</topic><topic>Coping</topic><topic>ego development</topic><topic>emotion</topic><topic>Emotions</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Personality</topic><topic>Racial differences</topic><topic>resilience</topic><topic>Resilience, Psychological</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Karaırmak, Özlem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Figley, Charles</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of general psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Karaırmak, Özlem</au><au>Figley, Charles</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Resiliency in the Face of Adversity: A Short Longitudinal Test of the Trait Hypothesis</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of general psychology</jtitle><addtitle>J Gen Psychol</addtitle><date>2017-04-03</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>144</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>89</spage><epage>109</epage><pages>89-109</pages><issn>0022-1309</issn><eissn>1940-0888</eissn><coden>JGPSAY</coden><abstract>Resilience represents coping with adversity and is in line with a more positive paradigm for viewing responses to adversity. Most research has focused on resilience as coping-a state-based response to adversity. However, a competing hypothesis views resilience or resiliency as a trait that exists across time and types of adversity. We tested undergraduates enrolled in social work classes at a large southern university at two time periods during a single semester using measures of adversity, positive and negative affect, and trait-based resiliency. Consistent with the trait-based resiliency, and in contrast to state-based resilience, resiliency scores were not strongly correlated with adversity at both testing points but were with positive affect, and resiliency scores remained the same over time despite adversity variations. There was no gender or ethnic group difference in resilience scores. Black/African Americans reported significantly less negative affect and more positive affect than White/Caucasians.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Psychology Press</pub><pmid>28362233</pmid><doi>10.1080/00221309.2016.1276043</doi><tpages>21</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0022-1309 |
| ispartof | The Journal of general psychology, 2017-04, Vol.144 (2), p.89-109 |
| issn | 0022-1309 1940-0888 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1883171805 |
| source | MEDLINE; Business Source Complete |
| subjects | Adaptation, Psychological Adaptive behavior Adolescent Adult Affect Behavioral psychology Coping ego development emotion Emotions Female Humans Hypotheses Male Middle Aged Personality Racial differences resilience Resilience, Psychological Young Adult |
| title | Resiliency in the Face of Adversity: A Short Longitudinal Test of the Trait Hypothesis |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T14%3A28%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Resiliency%20in%20the%20Face%20of%20Adversity:%20A%20Short%20Longitudinal%20Test%20of%20the%20Trait%20Hypothesis&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20general%20psychology&rft.au=Kara%C4%B1rmak,%20%C3%96zlem&rft.date=2017-04-03&rft.volume=144&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=89&rft.epage=109&rft.pages=89-109&rft.issn=0022-1309&rft.eissn=1940-0888&rft.coden=JGPSAY&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/00221309.2016.1276043&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_infor%3E1901743002%3C/proquest_infor%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1883171805&rft_id=info:pmid/28362233&rfr_iscdi=true |