Suspect Interviews and False Confessions

In this article, we review two influential methods of police interviewing practice and their associations with false confessions. These are the Reid technique, which is commonly used by police forces in the United States, and the PEACE model, which is routinely used in the United Kingdom. Several au...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Current Directions in Psychological Science 2011-02, Vol.20 (1), p.33-37
Hauptverfasser: Gudjonsson, Gisli H., Pearse, John
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 37
container_issue 1
container_start_page 33
container_title Current Directions in Psychological Science
container_volume 20
creator Gudjonsson, Gisli H.
Pearse, John
description In this article, we review two influential methods of police interviewing practice and their associations with false confessions. These are the Reid technique, which is commonly used by police forces in the United States, and the PEACE model, which is routinely used in the United Kingdom. Several authors have recently expressed concerns about the guilt-presumptive and confrontational aspects of the Reid technique and its association with false confessions and recommend that it be replaced by the PEACE model. Anecdotal case studies and DNA exonerations have shown that false confessions are more common than previously thought and are typically associated with two main causes: manipulative/coercive interrogation techniques and suspects' vulnerabilities in interviews. The main challenge for the future is to develop interview techniques that maximize the number of noncoerced true confessions while minimizing the rate of false confessions. In the meantime, the electronic recording of police interviews, which provides invaluable transparency and accountability, is the single best protection against police-induced false confessions.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0963721410396824
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1883050726</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>23045712</jstor_id><sage_id>10.1177_0963721410396824</sage_id><sourcerecordid>23045712</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-a77341d2ab7cb4f07ce8aa20609f24e97a013b62544f69ed8241875e751527e13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEFLxEAMhQdRcF29exEKXrxUk5nppD1KcXVhwYN6LtNuKrtou05axX9vS0VE8BR473svIUqdIlwiEl1B5gxptAgmc6m2e2qG1lGcDuK-mo12PPqH6khkCwDaWJqpi4dedlx10bLpOLxv-EMi36yjhX8RjvK2qVlk0zZyrA7qUTv5nnP1tLh5zO_i1f3tMr9exZUx2MWeyFhca19SVdoaqOLUew0OslpbzsgDmtLpxNraZbweLsWUEqYEE02MZq7Op95daN96lq7Ytn1ohpUFpqmBBEi7gYKJqkIrErgudmHz6sNngVCM_yj-_mOIxFNE_DP_Kv2fP5v4rXRt-OnXBmxCqM0X7pRmQw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1883050726</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Suspect Interviews and False Confessions</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Gudjonsson, Gisli H. ; Pearse, John</creator><creatorcontrib>Gudjonsson, Gisli H. ; Pearse, John</creatorcontrib><description>In this article, we review two influential methods of police interviewing practice and their associations with false confessions. These are the Reid technique, which is commonly used by police forces in the United States, and the PEACE model, which is routinely used in the United Kingdom. Several authors have recently expressed concerns about the guilt-presumptive and confrontational aspects of the Reid technique and its association with false confessions and recommend that it be replaced by the PEACE model. Anecdotal case studies and DNA exonerations have shown that false confessions are more common than previously thought and are typically associated with two main causes: manipulative/coercive interrogation techniques and suspects' vulnerabilities in interviews. The main challenge for the future is to develop interview techniques that maximize the number of noncoerced true confessions while minimizing the rate of false confessions. In the meantime, the electronic recording of police interviews, which provides invaluable transparency and accountability, is the single best protection against police-induced false confessions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0963-7214</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-8721</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0963721410396824</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications</publisher><subject>Admission of guilt ; Confessions ; Criminal investigation ; Criminal psychology ; Guilt ; Interrogations ; Interviews ; Peacefulness ; Police ; Police training ; Psychological interviews ; Questioning ; Recorded interviews</subject><ispartof>Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2011-02, Vol.20 (1), p.33-37</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2011 Association for Psychological Science</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-a77341d2ab7cb4f07ce8aa20609f24e97a013b62544f69ed8241875e751527e13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-a77341d2ab7cb4f07ce8aa20609f24e97a013b62544f69ed8241875e751527e13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/23045712$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/23045712$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>313,314,780,784,792,803,21819,27922,27924,27925,43621,43622,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gudjonsson, Gisli H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pearse, John</creatorcontrib><title>Suspect Interviews and False Confessions</title><title>Current Directions in Psychological Science</title><addtitle>Curr Dir Psychol Sci</addtitle><description>In this article, we review two influential methods of police interviewing practice and their associations with false confessions. These are the Reid technique, which is commonly used by police forces in the United States, and the PEACE model, which is routinely used in the United Kingdom. Several authors have recently expressed concerns about the guilt-presumptive and confrontational aspects of the Reid technique and its association with false confessions and recommend that it be replaced by the PEACE model. Anecdotal case studies and DNA exonerations have shown that false confessions are more common than previously thought and are typically associated with two main causes: manipulative/coercive interrogation techniques and suspects' vulnerabilities in interviews. The main challenge for the future is to develop interview techniques that maximize the number of noncoerced true confessions while minimizing the rate of false confessions. In the meantime, the electronic recording of police interviews, which provides invaluable transparency and accountability, is the single best protection against police-induced false confessions.</description><subject>Admission of guilt</subject><subject>Confessions</subject><subject>Criminal investigation</subject><subject>Criminal psychology</subject><subject>Guilt</subject><subject>Interrogations</subject><subject>Interviews</subject><subject>Peacefulness</subject><subject>Police</subject><subject>Police training</subject><subject>Psychological interviews</subject><subject>Questioning</subject><subject>Recorded interviews</subject><issn>0963-7214</issn><issn>1467-8721</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kEFLxEAMhQdRcF29exEKXrxUk5nppD1KcXVhwYN6LtNuKrtou05axX9vS0VE8BR473svIUqdIlwiEl1B5gxptAgmc6m2e2qG1lGcDuK-mo12PPqH6khkCwDaWJqpi4dedlx10bLpOLxv-EMi36yjhX8RjvK2qVlk0zZyrA7qUTv5nnP1tLh5zO_i1f3tMr9exZUx2MWeyFhca19SVdoaqOLUew0OslpbzsgDmtLpxNraZbweLsWUEqYEE02MZq7Op95daN96lq7Ytn1ohpUFpqmBBEi7gYKJqkIrErgudmHz6sNngVCM_yj-_mOIxFNE_DP_Kv2fP5v4rXRt-OnXBmxCqM0X7pRmQw</recordid><startdate>20110201</startdate><enddate>20110201</enddate><creator>Gudjonsson, Gisli H.</creator><creator>Pearse, John</creator><general>Sage Publications</general><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110201</creationdate><title>Suspect Interviews and False Confessions</title><author>Gudjonsson, Gisli H. ; Pearse, John</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-a77341d2ab7cb4f07ce8aa20609f24e97a013b62544f69ed8241875e751527e13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Admission of guilt</topic><topic>Confessions</topic><topic>Criminal investigation</topic><topic>Criminal psychology</topic><topic>Guilt</topic><topic>Interrogations</topic><topic>Interviews</topic><topic>Peacefulness</topic><topic>Police</topic><topic>Police training</topic><topic>Psychological interviews</topic><topic>Questioning</topic><topic>Recorded interviews</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gudjonsson, Gisli H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pearse, John</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Current Directions in Psychological Science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gudjonsson, Gisli H.</au><au>Pearse, John</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Suspect Interviews and False Confessions</atitle><jtitle>Current Directions in Psychological Science</jtitle><addtitle>Curr Dir Psychol Sci</addtitle><date>2011-02-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>33</spage><epage>37</epage><pages>33-37</pages><issn>0963-7214</issn><eissn>1467-8721</eissn><abstract>In this article, we review two influential methods of police interviewing practice and their associations with false confessions. These are the Reid technique, which is commonly used by police forces in the United States, and the PEACE model, which is routinely used in the United Kingdom. Several authors have recently expressed concerns about the guilt-presumptive and confrontational aspects of the Reid technique and its association with false confessions and recommend that it be replaced by the PEACE model. Anecdotal case studies and DNA exonerations have shown that false confessions are more common than previously thought and are typically associated with two main causes: manipulative/coercive interrogation techniques and suspects' vulnerabilities in interviews. The main challenge for the future is to develop interview techniques that maximize the number of noncoerced true confessions while minimizing the rate of false confessions. In the meantime, the electronic recording of police interviews, which provides invaluable transparency and accountability, is the single best protection against police-induced false confessions.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>Sage Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0963721410396824</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0963-7214
ispartof Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2011-02, Vol.20 (1), p.33-37
issn 0963-7214
1467-8721
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1883050726
source Access via SAGE; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing
subjects Admission of guilt
Confessions
Criminal investigation
Criminal psychology
Guilt
Interrogations
Interviews
Peacefulness
Police
Police training
Psychological interviews
Questioning
Recorded interviews
title Suspect Interviews and False Confessions
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T17%3A21%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Suspect%20Interviews%20and%20False%20Confessions&rft.jtitle=Current%20Directions%20in%20Psychological%20Science&rft.au=Gudjonsson,%20Gisli%20H.&rft.date=2011-02-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=33&rft.epage=37&rft.pages=33-37&rft.issn=0963-7214&rft.eissn=1467-8721&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0963721410396824&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E23045712%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1883050726&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=23045712&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0963721410396824&rfr_iscdi=true