Suspect Interviews and False Confessions
In this article, we review two influential methods of police interviewing practice and their associations with false confessions. These are the Reid technique, which is commonly used by police forces in the United States, and the PEACE model, which is routinely used in the United Kingdom. Several au...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Current Directions in Psychological Science 2011-02, Vol.20 (1), p.33-37 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 37 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 33 |
container_title | Current Directions in Psychological Science |
container_volume | 20 |
creator | Gudjonsson, Gisli H. Pearse, John |
description | In this article, we review two influential methods of police interviewing practice and their associations with false confessions. These are the Reid technique, which is commonly used by police forces in the United States, and the PEACE model, which is routinely used in the United Kingdom. Several authors have recently expressed concerns about the guilt-presumptive and confrontational aspects of the Reid technique and its association with false confessions and recommend that it be replaced by the PEACE model. Anecdotal case studies and DNA exonerations have shown that false confessions are more common than previously thought and are typically associated with two main causes: manipulative/coercive interrogation techniques and suspects' vulnerabilities in interviews. The main challenge for the future is to develop interview techniques that maximize the number of noncoerced true confessions while minimizing the rate of false confessions. In the meantime, the electronic recording of police interviews, which provides invaluable transparency and accountability, is the single best protection against police-induced false confessions. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0963721410396824 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1883050726</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>23045712</jstor_id><sage_id>10.1177_0963721410396824</sage_id><sourcerecordid>23045712</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-a77341d2ab7cb4f07ce8aa20609f24e97a013b62544f69ed8241875e751527e13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEFLxEAMhQdRcF29exEKXrxUk5nppD1KcXVhwYN6LtNuKrtou05axX9vS0VE8BR473svIUqdIlwiEl1B5gxptAgmc6m2e2qG1lGcDuK-mo12PPqH6khkCwDaWJqpi4dedlx10bLpOLxv-EMi36yjhX8RjvK2qVlk0zZyrA7qUTv5nnP1tLh5zO_i1f3tMr9exZUx2MWeyFhca19SVdoaqOLUew0OslpbzsgDmtLpxNraZbweLsWUEqYEE02MZq7Op95daN96lq7Ytn1ohpUFpqmBBEi7gYKJqkIrErgudmHz6sNngVCM_yj-_mOIxFNE_DP_Kv2fP5v4rXRt-OnXBmxCqM0X7pRmQw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1883050726</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Suspect Interviews and False Confessions</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Gudjonsson, Gisli H. ; Pearse, John</creator><creatorcontrib>Gudjonsson, Gisli H. ; Pearse, John</creatorcontrib><description>In this article, we review two influential methods of police interviewing practice and their associations with false confessions. These are the Reid technique, which is commonly used by police forces in the United States, and the PEACE model, which is routinely used in the United Kingdom. Several authors have recently expressed concerns about the guilt-presumptive and confrontational aspects of the Reid technique and its association with false confessions and recommend that it be replaced by the PEACE model. Anecdotal case studies and DNA exonerations have shown that false confessions are more common than previously thought and are typically associated with two main causes: manipulative/coercive interrogation techniques and suspects' vulnerabilities in interviews. The main challenge for the future is to develop interview techniques that maximize the number of noncoerced true confessions while minimizing the rate of false confessions. In the meantime, the electronic recording of police interviews, which provides invaluable transparency and accountability, is the single best protection against police-induced false confessions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0963-7214</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-8721</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0963721410396824</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications</publisher><subject>Admission of guilt ; Confessions ; Criminal investigation ; Criminal psychology ; Guilt ; Interrogations ; Interviews ; Peacefulness ; Police ; Police training ; Psychological interviews ; Questioning ; Recorded interviews</subject><ispartof>Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2011-02, Vol.20 (1), p.33-37</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2011 Association for Psychological Science</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-a77341d2ab7cb4f07ce8aa20609f24e97a013b62544f69ed8241875e751527e13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-a77341d2ab7cb4f07ce8aa20609f24e97a013b62544f69ed8241875e751527e13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/23045712$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/23045712$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>313,314,780,784,792,803,21819,27922,27924,27925,43621,43622,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gudjonsson, Gisli H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pearse, John</creatorcontrib><title>Suspect Interviews and False Confessions</title><title>Current Directions in Psychological Science</title><addtitle>Curr Dir Psychol Sci</addtitle><description>In this article, we review two influential methods of police interviewing practice and their associations with false confessions. These are the Reid technique, which is commonly used by police forces in the United States, and the PEACE model, which is routinely used in the United Kingdom. Several authors have recently expressed concerns about the guilt-presumptive and confrontational aspects of the Reid technique and its association with false confessions and recommend that it be replaced by the PEACE model. Anecdotal case studies and DNA exonerations have shown that false confessions are more common than previously thought and are typically associated with two main causes: manipulative/coercive interrogation techniques and suspects' vulnerabilities in interviews. The main challenge for the future is to develop interview techniques that maximize the number of noncoerced true confessions while minimizing the rate of false confessions. In the meantime, the electronic recording of police interviews, which provides invaluable transparency and accountability, is the single best protection against police-induced false confessions.</description><subject>Admission of guilt</subject><subject>Confessions</subject><subject>Criminal investigation</subject><subject>Criminal psychology</subject><subject>Guilt</subject><subject>Interrogations</subject><subject>Interviews</subject><subject>Peacefulness</subject><subject>Police</subject><subject>Police training</subject><subject>Psychological interviews</subject><subject>Questioning</subject><subject>Recorded interviews</subject><issn>0963-7214</issn><issn>1467-8721</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kEFLxEAMhQdRcF29exEKXrxUk5nppD1KcXVhwYN6LtNuKrtou05axX9vS0VE8BR473svIUqdIlwiEl1B5gxptAgmc6m2e2qG1lGcDuK-mo12PPqH6khkCwDaWJqpi4dedlx10bLpOLxv-EMi36yjhX8RjvK2qVlk0zZyrA7qUTv5nnP1tLh5zO_i1f3tMr9exZUx2MWeyFhca19SVdoaqOLUew0OslpbzsgDmtLpxNraZbweLsWUEqYEE02MZq7Op95daN96lq7Ytn1ohpUFpqmBBEi7gYKJqkIrErgudmHz6sNngVCM_yj-_mOIxFNE_DP_Kv2fP5v4rXRt-OnXBmxCqM0X7pRmQw</recordid><startdate>20110201</startdate><enddate>20110201</enddate><creator>Gudjonsson, Gisli H.</creator><creator>Pearse, John</creator><general>Sage Publications</general><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110201</creationdate><title>Suspect Interviews and False Confessions</title><author>Gudjonsson, Gisli H. ; Pearse, John</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-a77341d2ab7cb4f07ce8aa20609f24e97a013b62544f69ed8241875e751527e13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Admission of guilt</topic><topic>Confessions</topic><topic>Criminal investigation</topic><topic>Criminal psychology</topic><topic>Guilt</topic><topic>Interrogations</topic><topic>Interviews</topic><topic>Peacefulness</topic><topic>Police</topic><topic>Police training</topic><topic>Psychological interviews</topic><topic>Questioning</topic><topic>Recorded interviews</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gudjonsson, Gisli H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pearse, John</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Current Directions in Psychological Science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gudjonsson, Gisli H.</au><au>Pearse, John</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Suspect Interviews and False Confessions</atitle><jtitle>Current Directions in Psychological Science</jtitle><addtitle>Curr Dir Psychol Sci</addtitle><date>2011-02-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>33</spage><epage>37</epage><pages>33-37</pages><issn>0963-7214</issn><eissn>1467-8721</eissn><abstract>In this article, we review two influential methods of police interviewing practice and their associations with false confessions. These are the Reid technique, which is commonly used by police forces in the United States, and the PEACE model, which is routinely used in the United Kingdom. Several authors have recently expressed concerns about the guilt-presumptive and confrontational aspects of the Reid technique and its association with false confessions and recommend that it be replaced by the PEACE model. Anecdotal case studies and DNA exonerations have shown that false confessions are more common than previously thought and are typically associated with two main causes: manipulative/coercive interrogation techniques and suspects' vulnerabilities in interviews. The main challenge for the future is to develop interview techniques that maximize the number of noncoerced true confessions while minimizing the rate of false confessions. In the meantime, the electronic recording of police interviews, which provides invaluable transparency and accountability, is the single best protection against police-induced false confessions.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>Sage Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0963721410396824</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0963-7214 |
ispartof | Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2011-02, Vol.20 (1), p.33-37 |
issn | 0963-7214 1467-8721 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1883050726 |
source | Access via SAGE; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing |
subjects | Admission of guilt Confessions Criminal investigation Criminal psychology Guilt Interrogations Interviews Peacefulness Police Police training Psychological interviews Questioning Recorded interviews |
title | Suspect Interviews and False Confessions |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T17%3A21%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Suspect%20Interviews%20and%20False%20Confessions&rft.jtitle=Current%20Directions%20in%20Psychological%20Science&rft.au=Gudjonsson,%20Gisli%20H.&rft.date=2011-02-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=33&rft.epage=37&rft.pages=33-37&rft.issn=0963-7214&rft.eissn=1467-8721&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0963721410396824&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E23045712%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1883050726&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=23045712&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0963721410396824&rfr_iscdi=true |