Influences of drip and flood irrigation on soil carbon dioxide emission and soil carbon sequestration of maize cropland in the North China Plain

The need is pressing to investigate soil CO2 (carbon dioxide) emissions and soil organic carbon dynamics under water-saving irrigation practices in agricultural systems for exploring the potentials of soil carbon sequestration. A field experiment was conducted to compare the influences of drip irrig...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of arid land 2017-04, Vol.9 (2), p.222-233
Hauptverfasser: Guo, Shufang, Qi, Yuchun, Peng, Qin, Dong, Yunshe, He, Yunlong, Yan, Zhongqing, Wang, Liqin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 233
container_issue 2
container_start_page 222
container_title Journal of arid land
container_volume 9
creator Guo, Shufang
Qi, Yuchun
Peng, Qin
Dong, Yunshe
He, Yunlong
Yan, Zhongqing
Wang, Liqin
description The need is pressing to investigate soil CO2 (carbon dioxide) emissions and soil organic carbon dynamics under water-saving irrigation practices in agricultural systems for exploring the potentials of soil carbon sequestration. A field experiment was conducted to compare the influences of drip irrigation (DI) and flood irrigation (FI) on soil organic carbon dynamics and the spatial and temporal variations in CO2 emissions during the summer maize growing season in the North China Plain using the static closed chamber method. The mean CO2 efflux over the growing season was larger under DI than that under FI. The cumulative CO2 emissions at the field scale were 1959.10 and 1759.12 g/m2 under DI and FI, respectively. The cumulative CO2 emission on plant rows (OR) was larger than that between plant rows (BR) under FI, and the cumulative CO2 emission on the irrigation pipes (OP) was larger than that between irrigation pipes (BP) under DI. The cumulative CO2 emissions of OP, BP and bare area (BA) under DI were larger than those of OR, BR and BA under FI, respectively. Additionally, DI promoted root respiration more effectively than FI did. The average proportion of root respiration contributing to the soil CO2 emissions of OP under DI was larger than that of OR under FI. A general conclusion drawn from this study is that soil CO2 emission was significantly influenced by the soil water content, soil temperature and air temperature under both DI and FI. Larger concentrations of dissolved organic carbon (DOC), microbial biomass carbon (MBC) and total organic carbon (TOC) were observed under FI than those under DI. The observed high concentrations (DOC, MBC, and TOC) under FI might be resulted from the irrigation-associated soil saturation that in turn inhibited microbial activity and lowered decomposition rate of soil organic matter. However, DI increased the soil organic matter quality (the ratio of MBC to TOC) at the depth of 10-20 cm compared with FI. Our results suggest that the transformation from conventional FI to integrated DI can increase the CO2 emissions and DI needs to be combined with other management practices to reduce the CO2 emissions from summer maize fields in the North China Plain.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s40333-017-0011-9
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1880758758</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cqvip_id>671511968</cqvip_id><sourcerecordid>1880758758</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-9583824d0abbed47f0c0cee7d2dabdc08576a70cd133e67f8af1325fa4ad73263</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kN9KwzAUxoMoOOYewLug19WkaZP0UoZ_BkO90OuQNsma0SVb0oH6FD6yqR2yKw8HTiDf73yHD4BLjG4wQuw2FogQkiHMMoQwzqoTMMlxVWSMcXIKJpiyIqOMsnMwi3GNUlFeVAWegO-FM91eu0ZH6A1UwW6hdAqaznsFbQh2JXvrHUwdve1gI0Od3sr6D6s01Bsb4_A_QMeCqHd7HftwoA3cSPulYRP8thu01sG-1fDZh76F89Y6CV87ad0FODOyi3p2mFPw_nD_Nn_Kli-Pi_ndMmsIp31WlZzwvFBI1rVWBTOoQY3WTOVK1qpBvGRUMtQoTIimzHBpMMlLIwupGMkpmYLrce82-N9Lxdrvg0uWAnOOWMlTJxUeVenuGIM2YhvsRoZPgZEYshdj9iJlL4bsRZWYfGRi0rqVDkeb_4GuDkatd6td4v6cKMMlxhXl5AehPJSY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1880758758</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Influences of drip and flood irrigation on soil carbon dioxide emission and soil carbon sequestration of maize cropland in the North China Plain</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Guo, Shufang ; Qi, Yuchun ; Peng, Qin ; Dong, Yunshe ; He, Yunlong ; Yan, Zhongqing ; Wang, Liqin</creator><creatorcontrib>Guo, Shufang ; Qi, Yuchun ; Peng, Qin ; Dong, Yunshe ; He, Yunlong ; Yan, Zhongqing ; Wang, Liqin</creatorcontrib><description>The need is pressing to investigate soil CO2 (carbon dioxide) emissions and soil organic carbon dynamics under water-saving irrigation practices in agricultural systems for exploring the potentials of soil carbon sequestration. A field experiment was conducted to compare the influences of drip irrigation (DI) and flood irrigation (FI) on soil organic carbon dynamics and the spatial and temporal variations in CO2 emissions during the summer maize growing season in the North China Plain using the static closed chamber method. The mean CO2 efflux over the growing season was larger under DI than that under FI. The cumulative CO2 emissions at the field scale were 1959.10 and 1759.12 g/m2 under DI and FI, respectively. The cumulative CO2 emission on plant rows (OR) was larger than that between plant rows (BR) under FI, and the cumulative CO2 emission on the irrigation pipes (OP) was larger than that between irrigation pipes (BP) under DI. The cumulative CO2 emissions of OP, BP and bare area (BA) under DI were larger than those of OR, BR and BA under FI, respectively. Additionally, DI promoted root respiration more effectively than FI did. The average proportion of root respiration contributing to the soil CO2 emissions of OP under DI was larger than that of OR under FI. A general conclusion drawn from this study is that soil CO2 emission was significantly influenced by the soil water content, soil temperature and air temperature under both DI and FI. Larger concentrations of dissolved organic carbon (DOC), microbial biomass carbon (MBC) and total organic carbon (TOC) were observed under FI than those under DI. The observed high concentrations (DOC, MBC, and TOC) under FI might be resulted from the irrigation-associated soil saturation that in turn inhibited microbial activity and lowered decomposition rate of soil organic matter. However, DI increased the soil organic matter quality (the ratio of MBC to TOC) at the depth of 10-20 cm compared with FI. Our results suggest that the transformation from conventional FI to integrated DI can increase the CO2 emissions and DI needs to be combined with other management practices to reduce the CO2 emissions from summer maize fields in the North China Plain.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1674-6767</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2194-7783</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s40333-017-0011-9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Heidelberg: Science Press</publisher><subject>Agricultural practices ; Air temperature ; Biological activity ; Carbon dioxide ; Carbon dioxide emissions ; Carbon sequestration ; Cereal crops ; Corn ; Dissolved organic carbon ; Dynamics ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Efflux ; Emission analysis ; Geography ; Irrigation ; Irrigation pipes ; Microorganisms ; Moisture content ; Organic matter ; Organic soils ; Physical Geography ; Pipes ; Plant Ecology ; Respiration ; Saturation ; Soil ; Soil dynamics ; Soil investigations ; Soil temperature ; Soil water ; Summer ; Sustainable Development ; Temporal variations ; Total organic carbon ; Water conservation ; Water content</subject><ispartof>Journal of arid land, 2017-04, Vol.9 (2), p.222-233</ispartof><rights>Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, the Chinese Academy of Sciences and Springer - Verlag GmbH 2017</rights><rights>Copyright Springer Science &amp; Business Media 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-9583824d0abbed47f0c0cee7d2dabdc08576a70cd133e67f8af1325fa4ad73263</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-9583824d0abbed47f0c0cee7d2dabdc08576a70cd133e67f8af1325fa4ad73263</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttp://image.cqvip.com/vip1000/qk/71019X/71019X.jpg</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s40333-017-0011-9$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40333-017-0011-9$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,27931,27932,41495,42564,51326</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Guo, Shufang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qi, Yuchun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peng, Qin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dong, Yunshe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>He, Yunlong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yan, Zhongqing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Liqin</creatorcontrib><title>Influences of drip and flood irrigation on soil carbon dioxide emission and soil carbon sequestration of maize cropland in the North China Plain</title><title>Journal of arid land</title><addtitle>J. Arid Land</addtitle><addtitle>Journal of Arid Land</addtitle><description>The need is pressing to investigate soil CO2 (carbon dioxide) emissions and soil organic carbon dynamics under water-saving irrigation practices in agricultural systems for exploring the potentials of soil carbon sequestration. A field experiment was conducted to compare the influences of drip irrigation (DI) and flood irrigation (FI) on soil organic carbon dynamics and the spatial and temporal variations in CO2 emissions during the summer maize growing season in the North China Plain using the static closed chamber method. The mean CO2 efflux over the growing season was larger under DI than that under FI. The cumulative CO2 emissions at the field scale were 1959.10 and 1759.12 g/m2 under DI and FI, respectively. The cumulative CO2 emission on plant rows (OR) was larger than that between plant rows (BR) under FI, and the cumulative CO2 emission on the irrigation pipes (OP) was larger than that between irrigation pipes (BP) under DI. The cumulative CO2 emissions of OP, BP and bare area (BA) under DI were larger than those of OR, BR and BA under FI, respectively. Additionally, DI promoted root respiration more effectively than FI did. The average proportion of root respiration contributing to the soil CO2 emissions of OP under DI was larger than that of OR under FI. A general conclusion drawn from this study is that soil CO2 emission was significantly influenced by the soil water content, soil temperature and air temperature under both DI and FI. Larger concentrations of dissolved organic carbon (DOC), microbial biomass carbon (MBC) and total organic carbon (TOC) were observed under FI than those under DI. The observed high concentrations (DOC, MBC, and TOC) under FI might be resulted from the irrigation-associated soil saturation that in turn inhibited microbial activity and lowered decomposition rate of soil organic matter. However, DI increased the soil organic matter quality (the ratio of MBC to TOC) at the depth of 10-20 cm compared with FI. Our results suggest that the transformation from conventional FI to integrated DI can increase the CO2 emissions and DI needs to be combined with other management practices to reduce the CO2 emissions from summer maize fields in the North China Plain.</description><subject>Agricultural practices</subject><subject>Air temperature</subject><subject>Biological activity</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide emissions</subject><subject>Carbon sequestration</subject><subject>Cereal crops</subject><subject>Corn</subject><subject>Dissolved organic carbon</subject><subject>Dynamics</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Efflux</subject><subject>Emission analysis</subject><subject>Geography</subject><subject>Irrigation</subject><subject>Irrigation pipes</subject><subject>Microorganisms</subject><subject>Moisture content</subject><subject>Organic matter</subject><subject>Organic soils</subject><subject>Physical Geography</subject><subject>Pipes</subject><subject>Plant Ecology</subject><subject>Respiration</subject><subject>Saturation</subject><subject>Soil</subject><subject>Soil dynamics</subject><subject>Soil investigations</subject><subject>Soil temperature</subject><subject>Soil water</subject><subject>Summer</subject><subject>Sustainable Development</subject><subject>Temporal variations</subject><subject>Total organic carbon</subject><subject>Water conservation</subject><subject>Water content</subject><issn>1674-6767</issn><issn>2194-7783</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kN9KwzAUxoMoOOYewLug19WkaZP0UoZ_BkO90OuQNsma0SVb0oH6FD6yqR2yKw8HTiDf73yHD4BLjG4wQuw2FogQkiHMMoQwzqoTMMlxVWSMcXIKJpiyIqOMsnMwi3GNUlFeVAWegO-FM91eu0ZH6A1UwW6hdAqaznsFbQh2JXvrHUwdve1gI0Od3sr6D6s01Bsb4_A_QMeCqHd7HftwoA3cSPulYRP8thu01sG-1fDZh76F89Y6CV87ad0FODOyi3p2mFPw_nD_Nn_Kli-Pi_ndMmsIp31WlZzwvFBI1rVWBTOoQY3WTOVK1qpBvGRUMtQoTIimzHBpMMlLIwupGMkpmYLrce82-N9Lxdrvg0uWAnOOWMlTJxUeVenuGIM2YhvsRoZPgZEYshdj9iJlL4bsRZWYfGRi0rqVDkeb_4GuDkatd6td4v6cKMMlxhXl5AehPJSY</recordid><startdate>20170401</startdate><enddate>20170401</enddate><creator>Guo, Shufang</creator><creator>Qi, Yuchun</creator><creator>Peng, Qin</creator><creator>Dong, Yunshe</creator><creator>He, Yunlong</creator><creator>Yan, Zhongqing</creator><creator>Wang, Liqin</creator><general>Science Press</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>2RA</scope><scope>92L</scope><scope>CQIGP</scope><scope>W94</scope><scope>~WA</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170401</creationdate><title>Influences of drip and flood irrigation on soil carbon dioxide emission and soil carbon sequestration of maize cropland in the North China Plain</title><author>Guo, Shufang ; Qi, Yuchun ; Peng, Qin ; Dong, Yunshe ; He, Yunlong ; Yan, Zhongqing ; Wang, Liqin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-9583824d0abbed47f0c0cee7d2dabdc08576a70cd133e67f8af1325fa4ad73263</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Agricultural practices</topic><topic>Air temperature</topic><topic>Biological activity</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide emissions</topic><topic>Carbon sequestration</topic><topic>Cereal crops</topic><topic>Corn</topic><topic>Dissolved organic carbon</topic><topic>Dynamics</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Efflux</topic><topic>Emission analysis</topic><topic>Geography</topic><topic>Irrigation</topic><topic>Irrigation pipes</topic><topic>Microorganisms</topic><topic>Moisture content</topic><topic>Organic matter</topic><topic>Organic soils</topic><topic>Physical Geography</topic><topic>Pipes</topic><topic>Plant Ecology</topic><topic>Respiration</topic><topic>Saturation</topic><topic>Soil</topic><topic>Soil dynamics</topic><topic>Soil investigations</topic><topic>Soil temperature</topic><topic>Soil water</topic><topic>Summer</topic><topic>Sustainable Development</topic><topic>Temporal variations</topic><topic>Total organic carbon</topic><topic>Water conservation</topic><topic>Water content</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Guo, Shufang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qi, Yuchun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peng, Qin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dong, Yunshe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>He, Yunlong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yan, Zhongqing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Liqin</creatorcontrib><collection>中文科技期刊数据库</collection><collection>中文科技期刊数据库-CALIS站点</collection><collection>中文科技期刊数据库-7.0平台</collection><collection>中文科技期刊数据库-自然科学</collection><collection>中文科技期刊数据库- 镜像站点</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Journal of arid land</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Guo, Shufang</au><au>Qi, Yuchun</au><au>Peng, Qin</au><au>Dong, Yunshe</au><au>He, Yunlong</au><au>Yan, Zhongqing</au><au>Wang, Liqin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Influences of drip and flood irrigation on soil carbon dioxide emission and soil carbon sequestration of maize cropland in the North China Plain</atitle><jtitle>Journal of arid land</jtitle><stitle>J. Arid Land</stitle><addtitle>Journal of Arid Land</addtitle><date>2017-04-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>222</spage><epage>233</epage><pages>222-233</pages><issn>1674-6767</issn><eissn>2194-7783</eissn><abstract>The need is pressing to investigate soil CO2 (carbon dioxide) emissions and soil organic carbon dynamics under water-saving irrigation practices in agricultural systems for exploring the potentials of soil carbon sequestration. A field experiment was conducted to compare the influences of drip irrigation (DI) and flood irrigation (FI) on soil organic carbon dynamics and the spatial and temporal variations in CO2 emissions during the summer maize growing season in the North China Plain using the static closed chamber method. The mean CO2 efflux over the growing season was larger under DI than that under FI. The cumulative CO2 emissions at the field scale were 1959.10 and 1759.12 g/m2 under DI and FI, respectively. The cumulative CO2 emission on plant rows (OR) was larger than that between plant rows (BR) under FI, and the cumulative CO2 emission on the irrigation pipes (OP) was larger than that between irrigation pipes (BP) under DI. The cumulative CO2 emissions of OP, BP and bare area (BA) under DI were larger than those of OR, BR and BA under FI, respectively. Additionally, DI promoted root respiration more effectively than FI did. The average proportion of root respiration contributing to the soil CO2 emissions of OP under DI was larger than that of OR under FI. A general conclusion drawn from this study is that soil CO2 emission was significantly influenced by the soil water content, soil temperature and air temperature under both DI and FI. Larger concentrations of dissolved organic carbon (DOC), microbial biomass carbon (MBC) and total organic carbon (TOC) were observed under FI than those under DI. The observed high concentrations (DOC, MBC, and TOC) under FI might be resulted from the irrigation-associated soil saturation that in turn inhibited microbial activity and lowered decomposition rate of soil organic matter. However, DI increased the soil organic matter quality (the ratio of MBC to TOC) at the depth of 10-20 cm compared with FI. Our results suggest that the transformation from conventional FI to integrated DI can increase the CO2 emissions and DI needs to be combined with other management practices to reduce the CO2 emissions from summer maize fields in the North China Plain.</abstract><cop>Heidelberg</cop><pub>Science Press</pub><doi>10.1007/s40333-017-0011-9</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1674-6767
ispartof Journal of arid land, 2017-04, Vol.9 (2), p.222-233
issn 1674-6767
2194-7783
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1880758758
source SpringerNature Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Agricultural practices
Air temperature
Biological activity
Carbon dioxide
Carbon dioxide emissions
Carbon sequestration
Cereal crops
Corn
Dissolved organic carbon
Dynamics
Earth and Environmental Science
Efflux
Emission analysis
Geography
Irrigation
Irrigation pipes
Microorganisms
Moisture content
Organic matter
Organic soils
Physical Geography
Pipes
Plant Ecology
Respiration
Saturation
Soil
Soil dynamics
Soil investigations
Soil temperature
Soil water
Summer
Sustainable Development
Temporal variations
Total organic carbon
Water conservation
Water content
title Influences of drip and flood irrigation on soil carbon dioxide emission and soil carbon sequestration of maize cropland in the North China Plain
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-04T15%3A39%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Influences%20of%20drip%20and%20flood%20irrigation%20on%20soil%20carbon%20dioxide%20emission%20and%20soil%20carbon%20sequestration%20of%20maize%20cropland%20in%20the%20North%20China%20Plain&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20arid%20land&rft.au=Guo,%20Shufang&rft.date=2017-04-01&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=222&rft.epage=233&rft.pages=222-233&rft.issn=1674-6767&rft.eissn=2194-7783&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s40333-017-0011-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1880758758%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1880758758&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cqvip_id=671511968&rfr_iscdi=true