The knowledge economy and its cultures: Neoliberal technologies and Latin American reterritorializations
Cultural goods are increasingly significant under neoliberal conditions of regulatory restructuring that favor investments in informational capital in so-called "knowledge economies." Linguistic difference, linguistic practice, and increasingly standardized genres of representation have be...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | HAU journal of ethnographic theory 2016-12, Vol.6 (3), p.247-275 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 275 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 247 |
container_title | HAU journal of ethnographic theory |
container_volume | 6 |
creator | Coombe, Rosemary J. |
description | Cultural goods are increasingly significant under neoliberal conditions of regulatory restructuring that favor investments in informational capital in so-called "knowledge economies." Linguistic difference, linguistic practice, and increasingly standardized genres of representation have been constitutive of new technologies of government and reterritorialization in Latin America in the last quarter-century as global policy regimes that valorize diversity have been interpreted and implemented. The argument is presented through a critical multiscalar survey of recent ethnographic research in Latin American contexts in which we can trace the ways and means through which international trade, intellectual property, and biodiversity regimes have influenced representations and management of knowledge to effect new forms of spatialization. Indigenous social collectives constituted as self-managing communities have embraced possessive, if not necessarily proprietary, attitudes toward traditional knowledge, plant genetic resources, and food sources, learning to mark goods and services to indicate culturally specific conditions of origin. As culturalized communities become subjects of neoliberal government, however, they are called upon to project their distinctive assets so as to make them politically and economically legible to new interlocutors. This has provoked new forms of reflexivity around assets, goods, values, and norms, and provided new resources for rights-based struggles in an emerging field of cultural politics in which neoliberal multiculturalism is vernacularized in more embedded markets and more pluralist polities. |
doi_str_mv | 10.14318/hau6.3.018 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1879780219</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4321072847</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c219t-7d64108096d6e88d152a0a5b9098a7b7922c516914e89534e6f890c1c673038f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkEtLAzEUhYMoWGpX_oEBwY3MeG8yeS2l-IJCN-06pJmMbZ1OajKD9N8brWdzz-LjHvgIuUWosGaoHrd2FBWrANUFmVCodYmI_DJ3LnmZGXZNZintIUcAIqMTcr_a-uKzD9-dbz584V3ow-FU2L4pdkMq3NgNY_Tphly1tkt-9n-nZP3yvJq_lYvl6_v8aVE6inooZSNqBAVaNMIr1SCnFizfaNDKyo3UlDqOQmPtleas9qJVGhw6IRkw1bIpuTv_PcbwNfo0mH0YY58nDSqppYK8k6mHM-ViSCn61hzj7mDjySCYPxfm14VhJrtgP8d7Tls</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1879780219</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The knowledge economy and its cultures: Neoliberal technologies and Latin American reterritorializations</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Free E- Journals</source><creator>Coombe, Rosemary J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Coombe, Rosemary J.</creatorcontrib><description>Cultural goods are increasingly significant under neoliberal conditions of regulatory restructuring that favor investments in informational capital in so-called "knowledge economies." Linguistic difference, linguistic practice, and increasingly standardized genres of representation have been constitutive of new technologies of government and reterritorialization in Latin America in the last quarter-century as global policy regimes that valorize diversity have been interpreted and implemented. The argument is presented through a critical multiscalar survey of recent ethnographic research in Latin American contexts in which we can trace the ways and means through which international trade, intellectual property, and biodiversity regimes have influenced representations and management of knowledge to effect new forms of spatialization. Indigenous social collectives constituted as self-managing communities have embraced possessive, if not necessarily proprietary, attitudes toward traditional knowledge, plant genetic resources, and food sources, learning to mark goods and services to indicate culturally specific conditions of origin. As culturalized communities become subjects of neoliberal government, however, they are called upon to project their distinctive assets so as to make them politically and economically legible to new interlocutors. This has provoked new forms of reflexivity around assets, goods, values, and norms, and provided new resources for rights-based struggles in an emerging field of cultural politics in which neoliberal multiculturalism is vernacularized in more embedded markets and more pluralist polities.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2575-1433</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2049-1115</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.14318/hau6.3.018</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chicago: University of Chicago Press</publisher><subject>Ethnography ; Knowledge ; Linguistics ; Neoliberalism</subject><ispartof>HAU journal of ethnographic theory, 2016-12, Vol.6 (3), p.247-275</ispartof><rights>Copyright University of Edinburgh, School of Social and Political Sciences 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c219t-7d64108096d6e88d152a0a5b9098a7b7922c516914e89534e6f890c1c673038f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Coombe, Rosemary J.</creatorcontrib><title>The knowledge economy and its cultures: Neoliberal technologies and Latin American reterritorializations</title><title>HAU journal of ethnographic theory</title><description>Cultural goods are increasingly significant under neoliberal conditions of regulatory restructuring that favor investments in informational capital in so-called "knowledge economies." Linguistic difference, linguistic practice, and increasingly standardized genres of representation have been constitutive of new technologies of government and reterritorialization in Latin America in the last quarter-century as global policy regimes that valorize diversity have been interpreted and implemented. The argument is presented through a critical multiscalar survey of recent ethnographic research in Latin American contexts in which we can trace the ways and means through which international trade, intellectual property, and biodiversity regimes have influenced representations and management of knowledge to effect new forms of spatialization. Indigenous social collectives constituted as self-managing communities have embraced possessive, if not necessarily proprietary, attitudes toward traditional knowledge, plant genetic resources, and food sources, learning to mark goods and services to indicate culturally specific conditions of origin. As culturalized communities become subjects of neoliberal government, however, they are called upon to project their distinctive assets so as to make them politically and economically legible to new interlocutors. This has provoked new forms of reflexivity around assets, goods, values, and norms, and provided new resources for rights-based struggles in an emerging field of cultural politics in which neoliberal multiculturalism is vernacularized in more embedded markets and more pluralist polities.</description><subject>Ethnography</subject><subject>Knowledge</subject><subject>Linguistics</subject><subject>Neoliberalism</subject><issn>2575-1433</issn><issn>2049-1115</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNotkEtLAzEUhYMoWGpX_oEBwY3MeG8yeS2l-IJCN-06pJmMbZ1OajKD9N8brWdzz-LjHvgIuUWosGaoHrd2FBWrANUFmVCodYmI_DJ3LnmZGXZNZintIUcAIqMTcr_a-uKzD9-dbz584V3ow-FU2L4pdkMq3NgNY_Tphly1tkt-9n-nZP3yvJq_lYvl6_v8aVE6inooZSNqBAVaNMIr1SCnFizfaNDKyo3UlDqOQmPtleas9qJVGhw6IRkw1bIpuTv_PcbwNfo0mH0YY58nDSqppYK8k6mHM-ViSCn61hzj7mDjySCYPxfm14VhJrtgP8d7Tls</recordid><startdate>20161201</startdate><enddate>20161201</enddate><creator>Coombe, Rosemary J.</creator><general>University of Chicago Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20161201</creationdate><title>The knowledge economy and its cultures</title><author>Coombe, Rosemary J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c219t-7d64108096d6e88d152a0a5b9098a7b7922c516914e89534e6f890c1c673038f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Ethnography</topic><topic>Knowledge</topic><topic>Linguistics</topic><topic>Neoliberalism</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Coombe, Rosemary J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>HAU journal of ethnographic theory</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Coombe, Rosemary J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The knowledge economy and its cultures: Neoliberal technologies and Latin American reterritorializations</atitle><jtitle>HAU journal of ethnographic theory</jtitle><date>2016-12-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>247</spage><epage>275</epage><pages>247-275</pages><issn>2575-1433</issn><eissn>2049-1115</eissn><abstract>Cultural goods are increasingly significant under neoliberal conditions of regulatory restructuring that favor investments in informational capital in so-called "knowledge economies." Linguistic difference, linguistic practice, and increasingly standardized genres of representation have been constitutive of new technologies of government and reterritorialization in Latin America in the last quarter-century as global policy regimes that valorize diversity have been interpreted and implemented. The argument is presented through a critical multiscalar survey of recent ethnographic research in Latin American contexts in which we can trace the ways and means through which international trade, intellectual property, and biodiversity regimes have influenced representations and management of knowledge to effect new forms of spatialization. Indigenous social collectives constituted as self-managing communities have embraced possessive, if not necessarily proprietary, attitudes toward traditional knowledge, plant genetic resources, and food sources, learning to mark goods and services to indicate culturally specific conditions of origin. As culturalized communities become subjects of neoliberal government, however, they are called upon to project their distinctive assets so as to make them politically and economically legible to new interlocutors. This has provoked new forms of reflexivity around assets, goods, values, and norms, and provided new resources for rights-based struggles in an emerging field of cultural politics in which neoliberal multiculturalism is vernacularized in more embedded markets and more pluralist polities.</abstract><cop>Chicago</cop><pub>University of Chicago Press</pub><doi>10.14318/hau6.3.018</doi><tpages>29</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2575-1433 |
ispartof | HAU journal of ethnographic theory, 2016-12, Vol.6 (3), p.247-275 |
issn | 2575-1433 2049-1115 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1879780219 |
source | EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Free E- Journals |
subjects | Ethnography Knowledge Linguistics Neoliberalism |
title | The knowledge economy and its cultures: Neoliberal technologies and Latin American reterritorializations |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T07%3A18%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20knowledge%20economy%20and%20its%20cultures:%20Neoliberal%20technologies%20and%20Latin%20American%20reterritorializations&rft.jtitle=HAU%20journal%20of%20ethnographic%20theory&rft.au=Coombe,%20Rosemary%20J.&rft.date=2016-12-01&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=247&rft.epage=275&rft.pages=247-275&rft.issn=2575-1433&rft.eissn=2049-1115&rft_id=info:doi/10.14318/hau6.3.018&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4321072847%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1879780219&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |