COMPARISONS OF INVASIVE AND NON-INVASIVE CARDIAC OUTPUT MEASURMENT METHODS IN PULMONARY HYPERTENSION
Background: Current guidelines recommend right heart catheterization and invasive cardiac output (CO) measurement with Fick or Thermodilution (TD) for diagnosis and clinical follow-up in pulmonary hypertension (PH). According to related literature, this study is the largest study for the comparison...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2017-03, Vol.69 (11), p.1915-1915 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1915 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 11 |
| container_start_page | 1915 |
| container_title | Journal of the American College of Cardiology |
| container_volume | 69 |
| creator | Simsek, Evrim Demir, Emre Kayikcioglu, Meral Nalbantgil, Sanem Huseynov, Rashad Mogolkoc, Nesrin Can, Levent Kultursay, Hakan |
| description | Background: Current guidelines recommend right heart catheterization and invasive cardiac output (CO) measurement with Fick or Thermodilution (TD) for diagnosis and clinical follow-up in pulmonary hypertension (PH). According to related literature, this study is the largest study for the comparison of ICG vs. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0735-1097(17)35304-4 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1878913925</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0735109717353044</els_id><sourcerecordid>4320999947</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1855-d54a8329c128de2c43de45ea82db73b74fa68d4f16093cf2f12234446a492ae83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkFtLw0AQhRdRsF5-ghDwRR-ie81uXpSQpjbQ7pZcBJ-WdLOBaG01W4X-e9NWFHzxaYbhnG9mDgAXCN4giILbHHLCfARDfoX4NWEEUp8egAFiTPiEhfwQDH4kx-DEuWcIYSBQOAB1rKazKEtzJXNPjbxUPkZ5-ph4kRx6Ukn_ZxBH2TCNYk-VxawsvGkS5WU2TeS2LcZqmPdeb1ZOpkpG2ZM3fpolWZHIPFXyDBw11cLZ8-96CspRUsRjf6Ie0jia-AYJxvya0UoQHBqERW2xoaS2lNlK4HrOyZzTpgpETRsUwJCYBjcIY0IpDSoa4soKcgou99y3bvX-Yd1aP68-umW_UiPBRYhIiFmvYnuV6VbOdbbRb137WnUbjaDeBqp3geptWhpxvQtU0953v_fZ_oXP1nbamdYuja3bzpq1rlftv4S7PwSzaJetqRYvdmPd77HaYQ33kC0D8R2Bki9tn4ig</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1878913925</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>COMPARISONS OF INVASIVE AND NON-INVASIVE CARDIAC OUTPUT MEASURMENT METHODS IN PULMONARY HYPERTENSION</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Simsek, Evrim ; Demir, Emre ; Kayikcioglu, Meral ; Nalbantgil, Sanem ; Huseynov, Rashad ; Mogolkoc, Nesrin ; Can, Levent ; Kultursay, Hakan</creator><creatorcontrib>Simsek, Evrim ; Demir, Emre ; Kayikcioglu, Meral ; Nalbantgil, Sanem ; Huseynov, Rashad ; Mogolkoc, Nesrin ; Can, Levent ; Kultursay, Hakan</creatorcontrib><description>Background: Current guidelines recommend right heart catheterization and invasive cardiac output (CO) measurement with Fick or Thermodilution (TD) for diagnosis and clinical follow-up in pulmonary hypertension (PH). According to related literature, this study is the largest study for the comparison of ICG vs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0735-1097</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-3597</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0735-1097(17)35304-4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Cardiology ; Cardiovascular ; Internal Medicine ; Intubation ; Methods ; Pulmonary arteries ; Pulmonary hypertension</subject><ispartof>Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2017-03, Vol.69 (11), p.1915-1915</ispartof><rights>American College of Cardiology Foundation</rights><rights>2017 American College of Cardiology Foundation</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Mar 21, 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0735109717353044$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Simsek, Evrim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Demir, Emre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kayikcioglu, Meral</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nalbantgil, Sanem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huseynov, Rashad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mogolkoc, Nesrin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Can, Levent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kultursay, Hakan</creatorcontrib><title>COMPARISONS OF INVASIVE AND NON-INVASIVE CARDIAC OUTPUT MEASURMENT METHODS IN PULMONARY HYPERTENSION</title><title>Journal of the American College of Cardiology</title><description>Background: Current guidelines recommend right heart catheterization and invasive cardiac output (CO) measurement with Fick or Thermodilution (TD) for diagnosis and clinical follow-up in pulmonary hypertension (PH). According to related literature, this study is the largest study for the comparison of ICG vs.</description><subject>Cardiology</subject><subject>Cardiovascular</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Intubation</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Pulmonary arteries</subject><subject>Pulmonary hypertension</subject><issn>0735-1097</issn><issn>1558-3597</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkFtLw0AQhRdRsF5-ghDwRR-ie81uXpSQpjbQ7pZcBJ-WdLOBaG01W4X-e9NWFHzxaYbhnG9mDgAXCN4giILbHHLCfARDfoX4NWEEUp8egAFiTPiEhfwQDH4kx-DEuWcIYSBQOAB1rKazKEtzJXNPjbxUPkZ5-ph4kRx6Ukn_ZxBH2TCNYk-VxawsvGkS5WU2TeS2LcZqmPdeb1ZOpkpG2ZM3fpolWZHIPFXyDBw11cLZ8-96CspRUsRjf6Ie0jia-AYJxvya0UoQHBqERW2xoaS2lNlK4HrOyZzTpgpETRsUwJCYBjcIY0IpDSoa4soKcgou99y3bvX-Yd1aP68-umW_UiPBRYhIiFmvYnuV6VbOdbbRb137WnUbjaDeBqp3geptWhpxvQtU0953v_fZ_oXP1nbamdYuja3bzpq1rlftv4S7PwSzaJetqRYvdmPd77HaYQ33kC0D8R2Bki9tn4ig</recordid><startdate>20170321</startdate><enddate>20170321</enddate><creator>Simsek, Evrim</creator><creator>Demir, Emre</creator><creator>Kayikcioglu, Meral</creator><creator>Nalbantgil, Sanem</creator><creator>Huseynov, Rashad</creator><creator>Mogolkoc, Nesrin</creator><creator>Can, Levent</creator><creator>Kultursay, Hakan</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170321</creationdate><title>COMPARISONS OF INVASIVE AND NON-INVASIVE CARDIAC OUTPUT MEASURMENT METHODS IN PULMONARY HYPERTENSION</title><author>Simsek, Evrim ; Demir, Emre ; Kayikcioglu, Meral ; Nalbantgil, Sanem ; Huseynov, Rashad ; Mogolkoc, Nesrin ; Can, Levent ; Kultursay, Hakan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1855-d54a8329c128de2c43de45ea82db73b74fa68d4f16093cf2f12234446a492ae83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Cardiology</topic><topic>Cardiovascular</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Intubation</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Pulmonary arteries</topic><topic>Pulmonary hypertension</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Simsek, Evrim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Demir, Emre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kayikcioglu, Meral</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nalbantgil, Sanem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huseynov, Rashad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mogolkoc, Nesrin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Can, Levent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kultursay, Hakan</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><jtitle>Journal of the American College of Cardiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Simsek, Evrim</au><au>Demir, Emre</au><au>Kayikcioglu, Meral</au><au>Nalbantgil, Sanem</au><au>Huseynov, Rashad</au><au>Mogolkoc, Nesrin</au><au>Can, Levent</au><au>Kultursay, Hakan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>COMPARISONS OF INVASIVE AND NON-INVASIVE CARDIAC OUTPUT MEASURMENT METHODS IN PULMONARY HYPERTENSION</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the American College of Cardiology</jtitle><date>2017-03-21</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>69</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1915</spage><epage>1915</epage><pages>1915-1915</pages><issn>0735-1097</issn><eissn>1558-3597</eissn><abstract>Background: Current guidelines recommend right heart catheterization and invasive cardiac output (CO) measurement with Fick or Thermodilution (TD) for diagnosis and clinical follow-up in pulmonary hypertension (PH). According to related literature, this study is the largest study for the comparison of ICG vs.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/S0735-1097(17)35304-4</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0735-1097 |
| ispartof | Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2017-03, Vol.69 (11), p.1915-1915 |
| issn | 0735-1097 1558-3597 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1878913925 |
| source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | Cardiology Cardiovascular Internal Medicine Intubation Methods Pulmonary arteries Pulmonary hypertension |
| title | COMPARISONS OF INVASIVE AND NON-INVASIVE CARDIAC OUTPUT MEASURMENT METHODS IN PULMONARY HYPERTENSION |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T10%3A07%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=COMPARISONS%20OF%20INVASIVE%20AND%20NON-INVASIVE%20CARDIAC%20OUTPUT%20MEASURMENT%20METHODS%20IN%20PULMONARY%20HYPERTENSION&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20American%20College%20of%20Cardiology&rft.au=Simsek,%20Evrim&rft.date=2017-03-21&rft.volume=69&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1915&rft.epage=1915&rft.pages=1915-1915&rft.issn=0735-1097&rft.eissn=1558-3597&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0735-1097(17)35304-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4320999947%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1878913925&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0735109717353044&rfr_iscdi=true |