Exploring competing perspectives on government-driven entrepreneurial ecosystems: lessons from Centres for Creative Economy and Innovation (CCEI) of South Korea
Recent research suggests competing aspects of how to promote an entrepreneurial ecosystem for sustainable economic growth from a linear entrepreneurial ecosystem to non-linear ones involving diverse stakeholders beyond the dichotomy between state and market. Competing views and interests embedded in...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | European planning studies 2017-05, Vol.25 (5), p.827-847 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 847 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 5 |
| container_start_page | 827 |
| container_title | European planning studies |
| container_volume | 25 |
| creator | Jung, Kwangho Eun, Jong-Hwan Lee, Seung-Hee |
| description | Recent research suggests competing aspects of how to promote an entrepreneurial ecosystem for sustainable economic growth from a linear entrepreneurial ecosystem to non-linear ones involving diverse stakeholders beyond the dichotomy between state and market. Competing views and interests embedded in these multiple stakeholders can contribute to understanding how an entrepreneurial ecosystem can emerge, flourish and vanish. However, little systematic research has explored what aspects multiple stakeholders have for a new rising entrepreneurial ecosystem. This paper, relying on Q-methodology, explores different perspectives of stakeholders surrounding the Centres for a Creative Economy and Innovation (CCEIs) in South Korea. Application of Q-methodology with a qualitative and statistical approach allows us to clarify various competing stakeholder perspectives on entrepreneurial ecosystems embodied by the 17 government driven CCEIs. We found six different views on how to evaluate the role and function of the CCEIs deeply connected with strong state intervention and big conglomerate companies (BCCs): (1) the BCC-led CCEI ecosystem, (2) the CCEI own ecosystem, (3) a strong critic of the state-led CCEI ecosystem, (4) a negative viewpoint on the politics-led CCEI ecosystem, (5) the state-led CCEI ecosystem and (6) a strong critic of the current Korean venture capital system. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1080/09654313.2017.1282083 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1877801286</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4320866851</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-bfb1eba3c42fc533a2f030742a02fb0752580d17e381affe83ca42ef98c7a4823</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc9u1DAQxi0EEkvLIyBZ4lIOWfwva4cTKFpgRSUOhbPl9Y5LqsQT7GRh36aPisOWC4eePB79vm9G8xHyirM1Z4a9Zc2mVpLLtWBcr7kwghn5hKy42jRV3Sj1lKwWplqg5-RFzneMcVHXmxW53_4ee0xdvKUehxGmpRoh5RH81B0hU4z0Fo-Q4gBxqg6pNCMtZYIxQYQ5da6n4DGf8gRDfkd7yBljpiHhQNu_ZPlgom0Ct3jSrceIw4m6eKC7GPFY2mXMVdtud28oBnqD8_SDfsEiuCTPguszvHx4L8j3j9tv7efq-uunXfvhuvJS86nahz2HvZNeieBrKZ0ITDKthGMi7JmuRW3YgWuQhrsQwEjvlIDQGK-dMkJekKuz75jw5wx5skOXPfS9i4BzttwYxRpda17Q1_-hdzinWLYrlNam3NZsClWfKZ8w5wTBjqkbXDpZzuySm_2Xm11ysw-5Fd37s66L5WiD-4WpP9jJnUpMIbnou2zl4xZ_AGZpojE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1877801286</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Exploring competing perspectives on government-driven entrepreneurial ecosystems: lessons from Centres for Creative Economy and Innovation (CCEI) of South Korea</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Jung, Kwangho ; Eun, Jong-Hwan ; Lee, Seung-Hee</creator><creatorcontrib>Jung, Kwangho ; Eun, Jong-Hwan ; Lee, Seung-Hee</creatorcontrib><description>Recent research suggests competing aspects of how to promote an entrepreneurial ecosystem for sustainable economic growth from a linear entrepreneurial ecosystem to non-linear ones involving diverse stakeholders beyond the dichotomy between state and market. Competing views and interests embedded in these multiple stakeholders can contribute to understanding how an entrepreneurial ecosystem can emerge, flourish and vanish. However, little systematic research has explored what aspects multiple stakeholders have for a new rising entrepreneurial ecosystem. This paper, relying on Q-methodology, explores different perspectives of stakeholders surrounding the Centres for a Creative Economy and Innovation (CCEIs) in South Korea. Application of Q-methodology with a qualitative and statistical approach allows us to clarify various competing stakeholder perspectives on entrepreneurial ecosystems embodied by the 17 government driven CCEIs. We found six different views on how to evaluate the role and function of the CCEIs deeply connected with strong state intervention and big conglomerate companies (BCCs): (1) the BCC-led CCEI ecosystem, (2) the CCEI own ecosystem, (3) a strong critic of the state-led CCEI ecosystem, (4) a negative viewpoint on the politics-led CCEI ecosystem, (5) the state-led CCEI ecosystem and (6) a strong critic of the current Korean venture capital system.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0965-4313</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-5944</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2017.1282083</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Abingdon: Routledge</publisher><subject>Centres for Creative Economy and Innovation ; collaborations between small and big companies ; Companies ; Competition ; Creative economy ; Creative industries ; Economic development ; Economic growth ; Economics ; Ecosystems ; Entrepreneurs ; Entrepreneurship ; government driving innovation ; Innovation ; Innovations ; Interest groups ; Markets ; Qualitative research ; South Korea ; State intervention ; Venture capital</subject><ispartof>European planning studies, 2017-05, Vol.25 (5), p.827-847</ispartof><rights>2017 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group 2017</rights><rights>2017 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-bfb1eba3c42fc533a2f030742a02fb0752580d17e381affe83ca42ef98c7a4823</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-bfb1eba3c42fc533a2f030742a02fb0752580d17e381affe83ca42ef98c7a4823</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27843,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jung, Kwangho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eun, Jong-Hwan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Seung-Hee</creatorcontrib><title>Exploring competing perspectives on government-driven entrepreneurial ecosystems: lessons from Centres for Creative Economy and Innovation (CCEI) of South Korea</title><title>European planning studies</title><description>Recent research suggests competing aspects of how to promote an entrepreneurial ecosystem for sustainable economic growth from a linear entrepreneurial ecosystem to non-linear ones involving diverse stakeholders beyond the dichotomy between state and market. Competing views and interests embedded in these multiple stakeholders can contribute to understanding how an entrepreneurial ecosystem can emerge, flourish and vanish. However, little systematic research has explored what aspects multiple stakeholders have for a new rising entrepreneurial ecosystem. This paper, relying on Q-methodology, explores different perspectives of stakeholders surrounding the Centres for a Creative Economy and Innovation (CCEIs) in South Korea. Application of Q-methodology with a qualitative and statistical approach allows us to clarify various competing stakeholder perspectives on entrepreneurial ecosystems embodied by the 17 government driven CCEIs. We found six different views on how to evaluate the role and function of the CCEIs deeply connected with strong state intervention and big conglomerate companies (BCCs): (1) the BCC-led CCEI ecosystem, (2) the CCEI own ecosystem, (3) a strong critic of the state-led CCEI ecosystem, (4) a negative viewpoint on the politics-led CCEI ecosystem, (5) the state-led CCEI ecosystem and (6) a strong critic of the current Korean venture capital system.</description><subject>Centres for Creative Economy and Innovation</subject><subject>collaborations between small and big companies</subject><subject>Companies</subject><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Creative economy</subject><subject>Creative industries</subject><subject>Economic development</subject><subject>Economic growth</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Entrepreneurs</subject><subject>Entrepreneurship</subject><subject>government driving innovation</subject><subject>Innovation</subject><subject>Innovations</subject><subject>Interest groups</subject><subject>Markets</subject><subject>Qualitative research</subject><subject>South Korea</subject><subject>State intervention</subject><subject>Venture capital</subject><issn>0965-4313</issn><issn>1469-5944</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc9u1DAQxi0EEkvLIyBZ4lIOWfwva4cTKFpgRSUOhbPl9Y5LqsQT7GRh36aPisOWC4eePB79vm9G8xHyirM1Z4a9Zc2mVpLLtWBcr7kwghn5hKy42jRV3Sj1lKwWplqg5-RFzneMcVHXmxW53_4ee0xdvKUehxGmpRoh5RH81B0hU4z0Fo-Q4gBxqg6pNCMtZYIxQYQ5da6n4DGf8gRDfkd7yBljpiHhQNu_ZPlgom0Ct3jSrceIw4m6eKC7GPFY2mXMVdtud28oBnqD8_SDfsEiuCTPguszvHx4L8j3j9tv7efq-uunXfvhuvJS86nahz2HvZNeieBrKZ0ITDKthGMi7JmuRW3YgWuQhrsQwEjvlIDQGK-dMkJekKuz75jw5wx5skOXPfS9i4BzttwYxRpda17Q1_-hdzinWLYrlNam3NZsClWfKZ8w5wTBjqkbXDpZzuySm_2Xm11ysw-5Fd37s66L5WiD-4WpP9jJnUpMIbnou2zl4xZ_AGZpojE</recordid><startdate>20170504</startdate><enddate>20170504</enddate><creator>Jung, Kwangho</creator><creator>Eun, Jong-Hwan</creator><creator>Lee, Seung-Hee</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170504</creationdate><title>Exploring competing perspectives on government-driven entrepreneurial ecosystems: lessons from Centres for Creative Economy and Innovation (CCEI) of South Korea</title><author>Jung, Kwangho ; Eun, Jong-Hwan ; Lee, Seung-Hee</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-bfb1eba3c42fc533a2f030742a02fb0752580d17e381affe83ca42ef98c7a4823</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Centres for Creative Economy and Innovation</topic><topic>collaborations between small and big companies</topic><topic>Companies</topic><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Creative economy</topic><topic>Creative industries</topic><topic>Economic development</topic><topic>Economic growth</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Entrepreneurs</topic><topic>Entrepreneurship</topic><topic>government driving innovation</topic><topic>Innovation</topic><topic>Innovations</topic><topic>Interest groups</topic><topic>Markets</topic><topic>Qualitative research</topic><topic>South Korea</topic><topic>State intervention</topic><topic>Venture capital</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jung, Kwangho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eun, Jong-Hwan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Seung-Hee</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>European planning studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jung, Kwangho</au><au>Eun, Jong-Hwan</au><au>Lee, Seung-Hee</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Exploring competing perspectives on government-driven entrepreneurial ecosystems: lessons from Centres for Creative Economy and Innovation (CCEI) of South Korea</atitle><jtitle>European planning studies</jtitle><date>2017-05-04</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>827</spage><epage>847</epage><pages>827-847</pages><issn>0965-4313</issn><eissn>1469-5944</eissn><abstract>Recent research suggests competing aspects of how to promote an entrepreneurial ecosystem for sustainable economic growth from a linear entrepreneurial ecosystem to non-linear ones involving diverse stakeholders beyond the dichotomy between state and market. Competing views and interests embedded in these multiple stakeholders can contribute to understanding how an entrepreneurial ecosystem can emerge, flourish and vanish. However, little systematic research has explored what aspects multiple stakeholders have for a new rising entrepreneurial ecosystem. This paper, relying on Q-methodology, explores different perspectives of stakeholders surrounding the Centres for a Creative Economy and Innovation (CCEIs) in South Korea. Application of Q-methodology with a qualitative and statistical approach allows us to clarify various competing stakeholder perspectives on entrepreneurial ecosystems embodied by the 17 government driven CCEIs. We found six different views on how to evaluate the role and function of the CCEIs deeply connected with strong state intervention and big conglomerate companies (BCCs): (1) the BCC-led CCEI ecosystem, (2) the CCEI own ecosystem, (3) a strong critic of the state-led CCEI ecosystem, (4) a negative viewpoint on the politics-led CCEI ecosystem, (5) the state-led CCEI ecosystem and (6) a strong critic of the current Korean venture capital system.</abstract><cop>Abingdon</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/09654313.2017.1282083</doi><tpages>21</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0965-4313 |
| ispartof | European planning studies, 2017-05, Vol.25 (5), p.827-847 |
| issn | 0965-4313 1469-5944 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1877801286 |
| source | PAIS Index; Business Source Complete |
| subjects | Centres for Creative Economy and Innovation collaborations between small and big companies Companies Competition Creative economy Creative industries Economic development Economic growth Economics Ecosystems Entrepreneurs Entrepreneurship government driving innovation Innovation Innovations Interest groups Markets Qualitative research South Korea State intervention Venture capital |
| title | Exploring competing perspectives on government-driven entrepreneurial ecosystems: lessons from Centres for Creative Economy and Innovation (CCEI) of South Korea |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T19%3A00%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Exploring%20competing%20perspectives%20on%20government-driven%20entrepreneurial%20ecosystems:%20lessons%20from%20Centres%20for%20Creative%20Economy%20and%20Innovation%20(CCEI)%20of%20South%20Korea&rft.jtitle=European%20planning%20studies&rft.au=Jung,%20Kwangho&rft.date=2017-05-04&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=827&rft.epage=847&rft.pages=827-847&rft.issn=0965-4313&rft.eissn=1469-5944&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/09654313.2017.1282083&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4320866851%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1877801286&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |