Editorial
The authors conduct a literature review and find three common deficiencies in ISRM practice: 1) information security risk identification is commonly perfunctory, 2) information security risks are commonly estimated with little reference to the organization's actual situation, and 3) information...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | JITTA 2016-11, Vol.17 (3), p.1 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The authors conduct a literature review and find three common deficiencies in ISRM practice: 1) information security risk identification is commonly perfunctory, 2) information security risks are commonly estimated with little reference to the organization's actual situation, and 3) information security risk assessment is commonly performed on an intermittent, non-historical basis. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1532-4516 1552-6496 |