Evaluation of Strategies for Crossbreeding of Dairy Cattle in Brazil

To compare breeding strategies, economic performance was calculated for 376 cows of six red and white Holstein-Friesian x Guzera crossbred groups (1/4 to ≥31/32 European grades), based on their accumulated dairy production (914 lactations on 60 farms) and on culling or death observations of 87 nonfr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of dairy science 1990-07, Vol.73 (7), p.1887-1901
Hauptverfasser: Madalena, F.E., Teodoro, R.L., Lemos, A.M., Monteiro, J.B.N., Barbosa, R.T.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1901
container_issue 7
container_start_page 1887
container_title Journal of dairy science
container_volume 73
creator Madalena, F.E.
Teodoro, R.L.
Lemos, A.M.
Monteiro, J.B.N.
Barbosa, R.T.
description To compare breeding strategies, economic performance was calculated for 376 cows of six red and white Holstein-Friesian x Guzera crossbred groups (1/4 to ≥31/32 European grades), based on their accumulated dairy production (914 lactations on 60 farms) and on culling or death observations of 87 nonfreshening heifers. Performance was predicted from a genetic model based on additive-dominance and inter se mating effects for the following: utilization of F1 females, upgrading to Holstein-Friesian, new synthetic breed, crisscrossing, and modified crisscrossing (of Holstein-Friesian sires for two generations and zebu sires for one generation). On the better-managed farms, profit per day of herd life for those strategies, was equivalent to, respectively, 1.82, 1.36, –.33, .75, and 1.36kg of milk, whereas corresponding equivalence on low management level farms was 4.64, –.95, 1.37, 2.72, and 2.23kg. Differences between groups in culling and mortality rates were considerable in the low management level, influencing herd life and heifer cost and reducing profit of high European grades. Important economic gains may accrue from choice of a breeding strategy to match the appropriate animal genetic resources to husbandry practices. Continuous F1 heifer replacement programs may have sound economic basis, particularly for low management level farms. Crisscrossing was the second best alternative for those farms. On the better-managed farms, modified crisscrossing and upgrading had similar performance under present prices, but the former would be more profitable under higher pricing of fat and protein.
doi_str_mv 10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(90)78869-8
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1877068728</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0022030290788698</els_id><sourcerecordid>1877068728</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c514t-f482ab2d8c1b9a8ba4372b39feffae097e0cfc5c4d08a6bfef3d92ed2660091d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkMFO3DAQhq0KpG6hL9BTqkqIHgJjZxPbR5qFFmklDgvnkeOMF69CsrWzVPD0dRrUMyfL_r_fM_oY-8rhouCVuty18SICCJFDAeJcw3epVKVz9YEteCnKvOBaHbHFf-Qj-xTjLl25gHLBVtfPpjuY0Q99NrhsMwYz0tZTzNwQsjoMMTaBqPX9dspXxoeXrDbj2FHm--xHMK--O2XHznSRPr-dJ-zh5vq-_pWv737e1lfr3JZ8OeZuqYRpRKssb7RRjVkWUjSFduScIdCSwDpb2mULylRNei5aLagVVQWgeVucsG_zv_sw_D5QHHE3HEKfRiJXUkKlpFCJ0jNlp-0DOdwH_2TCC3LASRomabiZjOBkBDXgP2k4dc_m7qPfPv7xgTA-ma7bHxo-tWSBMo1SMoFfZtCZAc02-IgPG82hBClSWM8hJRnPngJG66m3SWMgO2I7-Hfs8heXg4y9</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1877068728</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of Strategies for Crossbreeding of Dairy Cattle in Brazil</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Madalena, F.E. ; Teodoro, R.L. ; Lemos, A.M. ; Monteiro, J.B.N. ; Barbosa, R.T.</creator><creatorcontrib>Madalena, F.E. ; Teodoro, R.L. ; Lemos, A.M. ; Monteiro, J.B.N. ; Barbosa, R.T.</creatorcontrib><description>To compare breeding strategies, economic performance was calculated for 376 cows of six red and white Holstein-Friesian x Guzera crossbred groups (1/4 to ≥31/32 European grades), based on their accumulated dairy production (914 lactations on 60 farms) and on culling or death observations of 87 nonfreshening heifers. Performance was predicted from a genetic model based on additive-dominance and inter se mating effects for the following: utilization of F1 females, upgrading to Holstein-Friesian, new synthetic breed, crisscrossing, and modified crisscrossing (of Holstein-Friesian sires for two generations and zebu sires for one generation). On the better-managed farms, profit per day of herd life for those strategies, was equivalent to, respectively, 1.82, 1.36, –.33, .75, and 1.36kg of milk, whereas corresponding equivalence on low management level farms was 4.64, –.95, 1.37, 2.72, and 2.23kg. Differences between groups in culling and mortality rates were considerable in the low management level, influencing herd life and heifer cost and reducing profit of high European grades. Important economic gains may accrue from choice of a breeding strategy to match the appropriate animal genetic resources to husbandry practices. Continuous F1 heifer replacement programs may have sound economic basis, particularly for low management level farms. Crisscrossing was the second best alternative for those farms. On the better-managed farms, modified crisscrossing and upgrading had similar performance under present prices, but the former would be more profitable under higher pricing of fat and protein.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-0302</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3198</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(90)78869-8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Champaign: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>BOVIN ; BOVIN LAITIER ; BRASIL ; BRAZIL ; BREED DIFFERENCES ; BREEDING METHODS ; BREEDING PROGRAMS ; BREEDS ; BRESIL ; CATTLE ; CEBU ; CROISEMENT ; CROSSBREEDING ; CRUZAMIENTO ; CULLING ; DAIRY CATTLE ; DEATH ; ELIMINACION ; GANADO BOVINO ; GANADO DE LECHE ; GENETICA ; GENETICS ; GENETIQUE ; HETEROSIS ; METHODE D'AMELIORATION ; METODOS DE MEJORAMIENTO ; MILK PRODUCTION ; MODELE ; MODELOS ; MORT ; MUERTE ; PRODUCCION LECHERA ; PRODUCTION LAITIERE ; PROFITABILITY ; RACE ; RAZAS ; REFORME ; RENTABILIDAD ; RENTABILITE ; TROPICAL ZONES ; VIGOR HIBRIDO ; VIGUEUR HYBRIDE ; ZEBU ; ZEBU CATTLE ; Zebu crosses, Brazil, breeding strategies ; ZONA TROPICAL ; ZONE TROPICALE ; ZOOTECHNIE ; ZOOTECHNY ; ZOOTECNIA</subject><ispartof>Journal of dairy science, 1990-07, Vol.73 (7), p.1887-1901</ispartof><rights>1990 American Dairy Science Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c514t-f482ab2d8c1b9a8ba4372b39feffae097e0cfc5c4d08a6bfef3d92ed2660091d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c514t-f482ab2d8c1b9a8ba4372b39feffae097e0cfc5c4d08a6bfef3d92ed2660091d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(90)78869-8$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27869,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Madalena, F.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teodoro, R.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lemos, A.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monteiro, J.B.N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barbosa, R.T.</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of Strategies for Crossbreeding of Dairy Cattle in Brazil</title><title>Journal of dairy science</title><description>To compare breeding strategies, economic performance was calculated for 376 cows of six red and white Holstein-Friesian x Guzera crossbred groups (1/4 to ≥31/32 European grades), based on their accumulated dairy production (914 lactations on 60 farms) and on culling or death observations of 87 nonfreshening heifers. Performance was predicted from a genetic model based on additive-dominance and inter se mating effects for the following: utilization of F1 females, upgrading to Holstein-Friesian, new synthetic breed, crisscrossing, and modified crisscrossing (of Holstein-Friesian sires for two generations and zebu sires for one generation). On the better-managed farms, profit per day of herd life for those strategies, was equivalent to, respectively, 1.82, 1.36, –.33, .75, and 1.36kg of milk, whereas corresponding equivalence on low management level farms was 4.64, –.95, 1.37, 2.72, and 2.23kg. Differences between groups in culling and mortality rates were considerable in the low management level, influencing herd life and heifer cost and reducing profit of high European grades. Important economic gains may accrue from choice of a breeding strategy to match the appropriate animal genetic resources to husbandry practices. Continuous F1 heifer replacement programs may have sound economic basis, particularly for low management level farms. Crisscrossing was the second best alternative for those farms. On the better-managed farms, modified crisscrossing and upgrading had similar performance under present prices, but the former would be more profitable under higher pricing of fat and protein.</description><subject>BOVIN</subject><subject>BOVIN LAITIER</subject><subject>BRASIL</subject><subject>BRAZIL</subject><subject>BREED DIFFERENCES</subject><subject>BREEDING METHODS</subject><subject>BREEDING PROGRAMS</subject><subject>BREEDS</subject><subject>BRESIL</subject><subject>CATTLE</subject><subject>CEBU</subject><subject>CROISEMENT</subject><subject>CROSSBREEDING</subject><subject>CRUZAMIENTO</subject><subject>CULLING</subject><subject>DAIRY CATTLE</subject><subject>DEATH</subject><subject>ELIMINACION</subject><subject>GANADO BOVINO</subject><subject>GANADO DE LECHE</subject><subject>GENETICA</subject><subject>GENETICS</subject><subject>GENETIQUE</subject><subject>HETEROSIS</subject><subject>METHODE D'AMELIORATION</subject><subject>METODOS DE MEJORAMIENTO</subject><subject>MILK PRODUCTION</subject><subject>MODELE</subject><subject>MODELOS</subject><subject>MORT</subject><subject>MUERTE</subject><subject>PRODUCCION LECHERA</subject><subject>PRODUCTION LAITIERE</subject><subject>PROFITABILITY</subject><subject>RACE</subject><subject>RAZAS</subject><subject>REFORME</subject><subject>RENTABILIDAD</subject><subject>RENTABILITE</subject><subject>TROPICAL ZONES</subject><subject>VIGOR HIBRIDO</subject><subject>VIGUEUR HYBRIDE</subject><subject>ZEBU</subject><subject>ZEBU CATTLE</subject><subject>Zebu crosses, Brazil, breeding strategies</subject><subject>ZONA TROPICAL</subject><subject>ZONE TROPICALE</subject><subject>ZOOTECHNIE</subject><subject>ZOOTECHNY</subject><subject>ZOOTECNIA</subject><issn>0022-0302</issn><issn>1525-3198</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1990</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkMFO3DAQhq0KpG6hL9BTqkqIHgJjZxPbR5qFFmklDgvnkeOMF69CsrWzVPD0dRrUMyfL_r_fM_oY-8rhouCVuty18SICCJFDAeJcw3epVKVz9YEteCnKvOBaHbHFf-Qj-xTjLl25gHLBVtfPpjuY0Q99NrhsMwYz0tZTzNwQsjoMMTaBqPX9dspXxoeXrDbj2FHm--xHMK--O2XHznSRPr-dJ-zh5vq-_pWv737e1lfr3JZ8OeZuqYRpRKssb7RRjVkWUjSFduScIdCSwDpb2mULylRNei5aLagVVQWgeVucsG_zv_sw_D5QHHE3HEKfRiJXUkKlpFCJ0jNlp-0DOdwH_2TCC3LASRomabiZjOBkBDXgP2k4dc_m7qPfPv7xgTA-ma7bHxo-tWSBMo1SMoFfZtCZAc02-IgPG82hBClSWM8hJRnPngJG66m3SWMgO2I7-Hfs8heXg4y9</recordid><startdate>19900701</startdate><enddate>19900701</enddate><creator>Madalena, F.E.</creator><creator>Teodoro, R.L.</creator><creator>Lemos, A.M.</creator><creator>Monteiro, J.B.N.</creator><creator>Barbosa, R.T.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Am Dairy Sci Assoc</general><general>American Dairy Science Association</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7WH</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19900701</creationdate><title>Evaluation of Strategies for Crossbreeding of Dairy Cattle in Brazil</title><author>Madalena, F.E. ; Teodoro, R.L. ; Lemos, A.M. ; Monteiro, J.B.N. ; Barbosa, R.T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c514t-f482ab2d8c1b9a8ba4372b39feffae097e0cfc5c4d08a6bfef3d92ed2660091d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1990</creationdate><topic>BOVIN</topic><topic>BOVIN LAITIER</topic><topic>BRASIL</topic><topic>BRAZIL</topic><topic>BREED DIFFERENCES</topic><topic>BREEDING METHODS</topic><topic>BREEDING PROGRAMS</topic><topic>BREEDS</topic><topic>BRESIL</topic><topic>CATTLE</topic><topic>CEBU</topic><topic>CROISEMENT</topic><topic>CROSSBREEDING</topic><topic>CRUZAMIENTO</topic><topic>CULLING</topic><topic>DAIRY CATTLE</topic><topic>DEATH</topic><topic>ELIMINACION</topic><topic>GANADO BOVINO</topic><topic>GANADO DE LECHE</topic><topic>GENETICA</topic><topic>GENETICS</topic><topic>GENETIQUE</topic><topic>HETEROSIS</topic><topic>METHODE D'AMELIORATION</topic><topic>METODOS DE MEJORAMIENTO</topic><topic>MILK PRODUCTION</topic><topic>MODELE</topic><topic>MODELOS</topic><topic>MORT</topic><topic>MUERTE</topic><topic>PRODUCCION LECHERA</topic><topic>PRODUCTION LAITIERE</topic><topic>PROFITABILITY</topic><topic>RACE</topic><topic>RAZAS</topic><topic>REFORME</topic><topic>RENTABILIDAD</topic><topic>RENTABILITE</topic><topic>TROPICAL ZONES</topic><topic>VIGOR HIBRIDO</topic><topic>VIGUEUR HYBRIDE</topic><topic>ZEBU</topic><topic>ZEBU CATTLE</topic><topic>Zebu crosses, Brazil, breeding strategies</topic><topic>ZONA TROPICAL</topic><topic>ZONE TROPICALE</topic><topic>ZOOTECHNIE</topic><topic>ZOOTECHNY</topic><topic>ZOOTECNIA</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Madalena, F.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teodoro, R.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lemos, A.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monteiro, J.B.N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barbosa, R.T.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 50</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><jtitle>Journal of dairy science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Madalena, F.E.</au><au>Teodoro, R.L.</au><au>Lemos, A.M.</au><au>Monteiro, J.B.N.</au><au>Barbosa, R.T.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of Strategies for Crossbreeding of Dairy Cattle in Brazil</atitle><jtitle>Journal of dairy science</jtitle><date>1990-07-01</date><risdate>1990</risdate><volume>73</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1887</spage><epage>1901</epage><pages>1887-1901</pages><issn>0022-0302</issn><eissn>1525-3198</eissn><abstract>To compare breeding strategies, economic performance was calculated for 376 cows of six red and white Holstein-Friesian x Guzera crossbred groups (1/4 to ≥31/32 European grades), based on their accumulated dairy production (914 lactations on 60 farms) and on culling or death observations of 87 nonfreshening heifers. Performance was predicted from a genetic model based on additive-dominance and inter se mating effects for the following: utilization of F1 females, upgrading to Holstein-Friesian, new synthetic breed, crisscrossing, and modified crisscrossing (of Holstein-Friesian sires for two generations and zebu sires for one generation). On the better-managed farms, profit per day of herd life for those strategies, was equivalent to, respectively, 1.82, 1.36, –.33, .75, and 1.36kg of milk, whereas corresponding equivalence on low management level farms was 4.64, –.95, 1.37, 2.72, and 2.23kg. Differences between groups in culling and mortality rates were considerable in the low management level, influencing herd life and heifer cost and reducing profit of high European grades. Important economic gains may accrue from choice of a breeding strategy to match the appropriate animal genetic resources to husbandry practices. Continuous F1 heifer replacement programs may have sound economic basis, particularly for low management level farms. Crisscrossing was the second best alternative for those farms. On the better-managed farms, modified crisscrossing and upgrading had similar performance under present prices, but the former would be more profitable under higher pricing of fat and protein.</abstract><cop>Champaign</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(90)78869-8</doi><tpages>15</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-0302
ispartof Journal of dairy science, 1990-07, Vol.73 (7), p.1887-1901
issn 0022-0302
1525-3198
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1877068728
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete; Periodicals Index Online; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects BOVIN
BOVIN LAITIER
BRASIL
BRAZIL
BREED DIFFERENCES
BREEDING METHODS
BREEDING PROGRAMS
BREEDS
BRESIL
CATTLE
CEBU
CROISEMENT
CROSSBREEDING
CRUZAMIENTO
CULLING
DAIRY CATTLE
DEATH
ELIMINACION
GANADO BOVINO
GANADO DE LECHE
GENETICA
GENETICS
GENETIQUE
HETEROSIS
METHODE D'AMELIORATION
METODOS DE MEJORAMIENTO
MILK PRODUCTION
MODELE
MODELOS
MORT
MUERTE
PRODUCCION LECHERA
PRODUCTION LAITIERE
PROFITABILITY
RACE
RAZAS
REFORME
RENTABILIDAD
RENTABILITE
TROPICAL ZONES
VIGOR HIBRIDO
VIGUEUR HYBRIDE
ZEBU
ZEBU CATTLE
Zebu crosses, Brazil, breeding strategies
ZONA TROPICAL
ZONE TROPICALE
ZOOTECHNIE
ZOOTECHNY
ZOOTECNIA
title Evaluation of Strategies for Crossbreeding of Dairy Cattle in Brazil
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T06%3A58%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20Strategies%20for%20Crossbreeding%20of%20Dairy%20Cattle%20in%20Brazil&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20dairy%20science&rft.au=Madalena,%20F.E.&rft.date=1990-07-01&rft.volume=73&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1887&rft.epage=1901&rft.pages=1887-1901&rft.issn=0022-0302&rft.eissn=1525-3198&rft_id=info:doi/10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(90)78869-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1877068728%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1877068728&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0022030290788698&rfr_iscdi=true