The Impact of Procedural Justice on Opinions of Public Policy: Solid Waste Management as an Example1

This study assessed the applicability of Tyler and Lind's (1992) relational model of authority to the context of local government policies on solid waste management. Tests of the hypothesized relations proposed by Tyler and Lind, accomplished through structural equation modeling, revealed that...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of applied social psychology 1996-07, Vol.26 (14), p.1259-1285
Hauptverfasser: Ebreo, Angela, Linn, Nancy, Vining, Joanne
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1285
container_issue 14
container_start_page 1259
container_title Journal of applied social psychology
container_volume 26
creator Ebreo, Angela
Linn, Nancy
Vining, Joanne
description This study assessed the applicability of Tyler and Lind's (1992) relational model of authority to the context of local government policies on solid waste management. Tests of the hypothesized relations proposed by Tyler and Lind, accomplished through structural equation modeling, revealed that our data supported the relations between the various constructs of the model. Perceptions of both process control and relational process were found to be positively related to procedural fairness judgments, while procedural fairness judgments were weakly related to evaluations of government entities. Contrary to our expectations, a similar structural equation model test of an extension of the Tyler and Lind model showed that the model constructs were unrelated to respondents' opinions of public policies. The results also indicated that respondents living in communities with different infrastructures and political climates differed slightly in their perceptions of procedural justice and related constructs, but did not differ in their endorsement of the various solid waste management policies.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1996.tb01780.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_wiley</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1873340564</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4317860001</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p859-484d77bc65839c46ccf0d438209b74f13279fc240509d0235cf7df22eb8cf5f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kF1LwzAUhoMoOKf_Ieh1az6aNvHKMaZuTDbYwMuQpom29Mumxe3fm7rhuTgvh_OeDx4A7jEKsY_HIsSMiQBzHIdYiDjsU4QTjsLDBZj8ty7BBCGCA4GIuAY3zhW-FAzxCcj2XwYuq1bpHjYWbrtGm2zoVAlXg-tzbWBTw02b13lTuz_HkJa5htvG5-MT3HnN4IdyvYHvqlafpjJ1D5WDqoaLg6ra0uBbcGVV6czdWadg97LYz9-C9eZ1OZ-tg5b7TyMeZUmS6phxKnQUa21RFlFOkEiTyGJKEmE1iRBDIkOEMm2TzBJiUq4ts3QKHk5b2675HozrZdEMXe0PSswTSv1gHHnX88n1k5fmKNsur1R3lBjJEags5EhNjtTkCFSegcqDXM12W0yYoL-eZGw1</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1873340564</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Impact of Procedural Justice on Opinions of Public Policy: Solid Waste Management as an Example1</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Ebreo, Angela ; Linn, Nancy ; Vining, Joanne</creator><creatorcontrib>Ebreo, Angela ; Linn, Nancy ; Vining, Joanne</creatorcontrib><description>This study assessed the applicability of Tyler and Lind's (1992) relational model of authority to the context of local government policies on solid waste management. Tests of the hypothesized relations proposed by Tyler and Lind, accomplished through structural equation modeling, revealed that our data supported the relations between the various constructs of the model. Perceptions of both process control and relational process were found to be positively related to procedural fairness judgments, while procedural fairness judgments were weakly related to evaluations of government entities. Contrary to our expectations, a similar structural equation model test of an extension of the Tyler and Lind model showed that the model constructs were unrelated to respondents' opinions of public policies. The results also indicated that respondents living in communities with different infrastructures and political climates differed slightly in their perceptions of procedural justice and related constructs, but did not differ in their endorsement of the various solid waste management policies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9029</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1559-1816</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1996.tb01780.x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JASPBX</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Process controls ; Waste management ; Waste management industry</subject><ispartof>Journal of applied social psychology, 1996-07, Vol.26 (14), p.1259-1285</ispartof><rights>Copyright Wiley Subscription Services, Inc. Jul 1996</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1559-1816.1996.tb01780.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1559-1816.1996.tb01780.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,33751,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ebreo, Angela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Linn, Nancy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vining, Joanne</creatorcontrib><title>The Impact of Procedural Justice on Opinions of Public Policy: Solid Waste Management as an Example1</title><title>Journal of applied social psychology</title><description>This study assessed the applicability of Tyler and Lind's (1992) relational model of authority to the context of local government policies on solid waste management. Tests of the hypothesized relations proposed by Tyler and Lind, accomplished through structural equation modeling, revealed that our data supported the relations between the various constructs of the model. Perceptions of both process control and relational process were found to be positively related to procedural fairness judgments, while procedural fairness judgments were weakly related to evaluations of government entities. Contrary to our expectations, a similar structural equation model test of an extension of the Tyler and Lind model showed that the model constructs were unrelated to respondents' opinions of public policies. The results also indicated that respondents living in communities with different infrastructures and political climates differed slightly in their perceptions of procedural justice and related constructs, but did not differ in their endorsement of the various solid waste management policies.</description><subject>Process controls</subject><subject>Waste management</subject><subject>Waste management industry</subject><issn>0021-9029</issn><issn>1559-1816</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kF1LwzAUhoMoOKf_Ieh1az6aNvHKMaZuTDbYwMuQpom29Mumxe3fm7rhuTgvh_OeDx4A7jEKsY_HIsSMiQBzHIdYiDjsU4QTjsLDBZj8ty7BBCGCA4GIuAY3zhW-FAzxCcj2XwYuq1bpHjYWbrtGm2zoVAlXg-tzbWBTw02b13lTuz_HkJa5htvG5-MT3HnN4IdyvYHvqlafpjJ1D5WDqoaLg6ra0uBbcGVV6czdWadg97LYz9-C9eZ1OZ-tg5b7TyMeZUmS6phxKnQUa21RFlFOkEiTyGJKEmE1iRBDIkOEMm2TzBJiUq4ts3QKHk5b2675HozrZdEMXe0PSswTSv1gHHnX88n1k5fmKNsur1R3lBjJEags5EhNjtTkCFSegcqDXM12W0yYoL-eZGw1</recordid><startdate>199607</startdate><enddate>199607</enddate><creator>Ebreo, Angela</creator><creator>Linn, Nancy</creator><creator>Vining, Joanne</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199607</creationdate><title>The Impact of Procedural Justice on Opinions of Public Policy: Solid Waste Management as an Example1</title><author>Ebreo, Angela ; Linn, Nancy ; Vining, Joanne</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p859-484d77bc65839c46ccf0d438209b74f13279fc240509d0235cf7df22eb8cf5f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>Process controls</topic><topic>Waste management</topic><topic>Waste management industry</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ebreo, Angela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Linn, Nancy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vining, Joanne</creatorcontrib><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Journal of applied social psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ebreo, Angela</au><au>Linn, Nancy</au><au>Vining, Joanne</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Impact of Procedural Justice on Opinions of Public Policy: Solid Waste Management as an Example1</atitle><jtitle>Journal of applied social psychology</jtitle><date>1996-07</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>14</issue><spage>1259</spage><epage>1285</epage><pages>1259-1285</pages><issn>0021-9029</issn><eissn>1559-1816</eissn><coden>JASPBX</coden><abstract>This study assessed the applicability of Tyler and Lind's (1992) relational model of authority to the context of local government policies on solid waste management. Tests of the hypothesized relations proposed by Tyler and Lind, accomplished through structural equation modeling, revealed that our data supported the relations between the various constructs of the model. Perceptions of both process control and relational process were found to be positively related to procedural fairness judgments, while procedural fairness judgments were weakly related to evaluations of government entities. Contrary to our expectations, a similar structural equation model test of an extension of the Tyler and Lind model showed that the model constructs were unrelated to respondents' opinions of public policies. The results also indicated that respondents living in communities with different infrastructures and political climates differed slightly in their perceptions of procedural justice and related constructs, but did not differ in their endorsement of the various solid waste management policies.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1559-1816.1996.tb01780.x</doi><tpages>27</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-9029
ispartof Journal of applied social psychology, 1996-07, Vol.26 (14), p.1259-1285
issn 0021-9029
1559-1816
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1873340564
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Process controls
Waste management
Waste management industry
title The Impact of Procedural Justice on Opinions of Public Policy: Solid Waste Management as an Example1
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T18%3A13%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_wiley&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Impact%20of%20Procedural%20Justice%20on%20Opinions%20of%20Public%20Policy:%20Solid%20Waste%20Management%20as%20an%20Example1&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20applied%20social%20psychology&rft.au=Ebreo,%20Angela&rft.date=1996-07&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=14&rft.spage=1259&rft.epage=1285&rft.pages=1259-1285&rft.issn=0021-9029&rft.eissn=1559-1816&rft.coden=JASPBX&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1996.tb01780.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_wiley%3E4317860001%3C/proquest_wiley%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1873340564&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true