The Impact of Procedural Justice on Opinions of Public Policy: Solid Waste Management as an Example1
This study assessed the applicability of Tyler and Lind's (1992) relational model of authority to the context of local government policies on solid waste management. Tests of the hypothesized relations proposed by Tyler and Lind, accomplished through structural equation modeling, revealed that...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of applied social psychology 1996-07, Vol.26 (14), p.1259-1285 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1285 |
---|---|
container_issue | 14 |
container_start_page | 1259 |
container_title | Journal of applied social psychology |
container_volume | 26 |
creator | Ebreo, Angela Linn, Nancy Vining, Joanne |
description | This study assessed the applicability of Tyler and Lind's (1992) relational model of authority to the context of local government policies on solid waste management. Tests of the hypothesized relations proposed by Tyler and Lind, accomplished through structural equation modeling, revealed that our data supported the relations between the various constructs of the model. Perceptions of both process control and relational process were found to be positively related to procedural fairness judgments, while procedural fairness judgments were weakly related to evaluations of government entities. Contrary to our expectations, a similar structural equation model test of an extension of the Tyler and Lind model showed that the model constructs were unrelated to respondents' opinions of public policies. The results also indicated that respondents living in communities with different infrastructures and political climates differed slightly in their perceptions of procedural justice and related constructs, but did not differ in their endorsement of the various solid waste management policies. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1996.tb01780.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_wiley</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1873340564</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4317860001</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p859-484d77bc65839c46ccf0d438209b74f13279fc240509d0235cf7df22eb8cf5f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kF1LwzAUhoMoOKf_Ieh1az6aNvHKMaZuTDbYwMuQpom29Mumxe3fm7rhuTgvh_OeDx4A7jEKsY_HIsSMiQBzHIdYiDjsU4QTjsLDBZj8ty7BBCGCA4GIuAY3zhW-FAzxCcj2XwYuq1bpHjYWbrtGm2zoVAlXg-tzbWBTw02b13lTuz_HkJa5htvG5-MT3HnN4IdyvYHvqlafpjJ1D5WDqoaLg6ra0uBbcGVV6czdWadg97LYz9-C9eZ1OZ-tg5b7TyMeZUmS6phxKnQUa21RFlFOkEiTyGJKEmE1iRBDIkOEMm2TzBJiUq4ts3QKHk5b2675HozrZdEMXe0PSswTSv1gHHnX88n1k5fmKNsur1R3lBjJEags5EhNjtTkCFSegcqDXM12W0yYoL-eZGw1</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1873340564</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Impact of Procedural Justice on Opinions of Public Policy: Solid Waste Management as an Example1</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Ebreo, Angela ; Linn, Nancy ; Vining, Joanne</creator><creatorcontrib>Ebreo, Angela ; Linn, Nancy ; Vining, Joanne</creatorcontrib><description>This study assessed the applicability of Tyler and Lind's (1992) relational model of authority to the context of local government policies on solid waste management. Tests of the hypothesized relations proposed by Tyler and Lind, accomplished through structural equation modeling, revealed that our data supported the relations between the various constructs of the model. Perceptions of both process control and relational process were found to be positively related to procedural fairness judgments, while procedural fairness judgments were weakly related to evaluations of government entities. Contrary to our expectations, a similar structural equation model test of an extension of the Tyler and Lind model showed that the model constructs were unrelated to respondents' opinions of public policies. The results also indicated that respondents living in communities with different infrastructures and political climates differed slightly in their perceptions of procedural justice and related constructs, but did not differ in their endorsement of the various solid waste management policies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9029</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1559-1816</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1996.tb01780.x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JASPBX</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Process controls ; Waste management ; Waste management industry</subject><ispartof>Journal of applied social psychology, 1996-07, Vol.26 (14), p.1259-1285</ispartof><rights>Copyright Wiley Subscription Services, Inc. Jul 1996</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1559-1816.1996.tb01780.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1559-1816.1996.tb01780.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,33751,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ebreo, Angela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Linn, Nancy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vining, Joanne</creatorcontrib><title>The Impact of Procedural Justice on Opinions of Public Policy: Solid Waste Management as an Example1</title><title>Journal of applied social psychology</title><description>This study assessed the applicability of Tyler and Lind's (1992) relational model of authority to the context of local government policies on solid waste management. Tests of the hypothesized relations proposed by Tyler and Lind, accomplished through structural equation modeling, revealed that our data supported the relations between the various constructs of the model. Perceptions of both process control and relational process were found to be positively related to procedural fairness judgments, while procedural fairness judgments were weakly related to evaluations of government entities. Contrary to our expectations, a similar structural equation model test of an extension of the Tyler and Lind model showed that the model constructs were unrelated to respondents' opinions of public policies. The results also indicated that respondents living in communities with different infrastructures and political climates differed slightly in their perceptions of procedural justice and related constructs, but did not differ in their endorsement of the various solid waste management policies.</description><subject>Process controls</subject><subject>Waste management</subject><subject>Waste management industry</subject><issn>0021-9029</issn><issn>1559-1816</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kF1LwzAUhoMoOKf_Ieh1az6aNvHKMaZuTDbYwMuQpom29Mumxe3fm7rhuTgvh_OeDx4A7jEKsY_HIsSMiQBzHIdYiDjsU4QTjsLDBZj8ty7BBCGCA4GIuAY3zhW-FAzxCcj2XwYuq1bpHjYWbrtGm2zoVAlXg-tzbWBTw02b13lTuz_HkJa5htvG5-MT3HnN4IdyvYHvqlafpjJ1D5WDqoaLg6ra0uBbcGVV6czdWadg97LYz9-C9eZ1OZ-tg5b7TyMeZUmS6phxKnQUa21RFlFOkEiTyGJKEmE1iRBDIkOEMm2TzBJiUq4ts3QKHk5b2675HozrZdEMXe0PSswTSv1gHHnX88n1k5fmKNsur1R3lBjJEags5EhNjtTkCFSegcqDXM12W0yYoL-eZGw1</recordid><startdate>199607</startdate><enddate>199607</enddate><creator>Ebreo, Angela</creator><creator>Linn, Nancy</creator><creator>Vining, Joanne</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199607</creationdate><title>The Impact of Procedural Justice on Opinions of Public Policy: Solid Waste Management as an Example1</title><author>Ebreo, Angela ; Linn, Nancy ; Vining, Joanne</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p859-484d77bc65839c46ccf0d438209b74f13279fc240509d0235cf7df22eb8cf5f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>Process controls</topic><topic>Waste management</topic><topic>Waste management industry</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ebreo, Angela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Linn, Nancy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vining, Joanne</creatorcontrib><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Journal of applied social psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ebreo, Angela</au><au>Linn, Nancy</au><au>Vining, Joanne</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Impact of Procedural Justice on Opinions of Public Policy: Solid Waste Management as an Example1</atitle><jtitle>Journal of applied social psychology</jtitle><date>1996-07</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>14</issue><spage>1259</spage><epage>1285</epage><pages>1259-1285</pages><issn>0021-9029</issn><eissn>1559-1816</eissn><coden>JASPBX</coden><abstract>This study assessed the applicability of Tyler and Lind's (1992) relational model of authority to the context of local government policies on solid waste management. Tests of the hypothesized relations proposed by Tyler and Lind, accomplished through structural equation modeling, revealed that our data supported the relations between the various constructs of the model. Perceptions of both process control and relational process were found to be positively related to procedural fairness judgments, while procedural fairness judgments were weakly related to evaluations of government entities. Contrary to our expectations, a similar structural equation model test of an extension of the Tyler and Lind model showed that the model constructs were unrelated to respondents' opinions of public policies. The results also indicated that respondents living in communities with different infrastructures and political climates differed slightly in their perceptions of procedural justice and related constructs, but did not differ in their endorsement of the various solid waste management policies.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1559-1816.1996.tb01780.x</doi><tpages>27</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0021-9029 |
ispartof | Journal of applied social psychology, 1996-07, Vol.26 (14), p.1259-1285 |
issn | 0021-9029 1559-1816 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1873340564 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Sociological Abstracts |
subjects | Process controls Waste management Waste management industry |
title | The Impact of Procedural Justice on Opinions of Public Policy: Solid Waste Management as an Example1 |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T18%3A13%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_wiley&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Impact%20of%20Procedural%20Justice%20on%20Opinions%20of%20Public%20Policy:%20Solid%20Waste%20Management%20as%20an%20Example1&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20applied%20social%20psychology&rft.au=Ebreo,%20Angela&rft.date=1996-07&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=14&rft.spage=1259&rft.epage=1285&rft.pages=1259-1285&rft.issn=0021-9029&rft.eissn=1559-1816&rft.coden=JASPBX&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1996.tb01780.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_wiley%3E4317860001%3C/proquest_wiley%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1873340564&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |