Two Types of Wisdom
The concept of wisdom is largely ignored by contemporary philosophers. But given recent movements in the fields of ethics and epistemology, the time is ripe for a return to this concept. This article lays some groundwork for further philosophical work in ethics and epistemology on wisdom. Its focus...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Acta analytica : philosophy and psychology 2012-06, Vol.27 (2), p.81-97 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 97 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 81 |
| container_title | Acta analytica : philosophy and psychology |
| container_volume | 27 |
| creator | Baehr, Jason |
| description | The concept of wisdom is largely ignored by contemporary philosophers. But given recent movements in the fields of ethics and epistemology, the time is ripe for a return to this concept. This article lays some groundwork for further philosophical work in ethics and epistemology on wisdom. Its focus is the distinction between practical wisdom and theoretical wisdom or between
phronesis
and
sophia
. Several accounts of this distinction are considered and rejected. A more plausible, but also considerably more complex, account is offered. The discussion sheds light on the relation between practical wisdom and theoretical wisdom, and on the positive character of each. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s12136-012-0155-3 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1872585189</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4317495581</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-dd44500ebf15d18e27d006030dd04b2aac1079d13642b17f58ecb782c00b1f073</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1j71PwzAUxC0EEqEwMbFFYja854_YGVEFBakSSxCjFcc2akXrYLdC_e9xFQYWhqdb7u7dj5AbhDsEUPcZGfKGArJyUlJ-QirUStCGi_aUVMAlpxIlnJOLnNcAXINiFbnuvmPdHUaf6xjq91V2cXNJzkL_mf3Vr87I29NjN3-my9fFy_xhSQeOzY46J4QE8DagdKg9Uw6gAQ7OgbCs7wcE1boySzCLKkjtB6s0GwAsBlB8Rm6n3jHFr73PO7OO-7QtL02ZzqSWqNviwsk1pJhz8sGMabXp08EgmCO7mdhNYTdHdsNLhk2ZXLzbD5_-NP8b-gHKd1iU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1872585189</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Two Types of Wisdom</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Baehr, Jason</creator><creatorcontrib>Baehr, Jason</creatorcontrib><description>The concept of wisdom is largely ignored by contemporary philosophers. But given recent movements in the fields of ethics and epistemology, the time is ripe for a return to this concept. This article lays some groundwork for further philosophical work in ethics and epistemology on wisdom. Its focus is the distinction between practical wisdom and theoretical wisdom or between
phronesis
and
sophia
. Several accounts of this distinction are considered and rejected. A more plausible, but also considerably more complex, account is offered. The discussion sheds light on the relation between practical wisdom and theoretical wisdom, and on the positive character of each.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0353-5150</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1874-6349</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12136-012-0155-3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Education ; Epistemology ; Logic ; Metaphysics ; Philosophy ; Philosophy of Mind</subject><ispartof>Acta analytica : philosophy and psychology, 2012-06, Vol.27 (2), p.81-97</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012</rights><rights>Acta Analytica is a copyright of Springer, 2012.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-dd44500ebf15d18e27d006030dd04b2aac1079d13642b17f58ecb782c00b1f073</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-dd44500ebf15d18e27d006030dd04b2aac1079d13642b17f58ecb782c00b1f073</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12136-012-0155-3$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12136-012-0155-3$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Baehr, Jason</creatorcontrib><title>Two Types of Wisdom</title><title>Acta analytica : philosophy and psychology</title><addtitle>Acta Anal</addtitle><description>The concept of wisdom is largely ignored by contemporary philosophers. But given recent movements in the fields of ethics and epistemology, the time is ripe for a return to this concept. This article lays some groundwork for further philosophical work in ethics and epistemology on wisdom. Its focus is the distinction between practical wisdom and theoretical wisdom or between
phronesis
and
sophia
. Several accounts of this distinction are considered and rejected. A more plausible, but also considerably more complex, account is offered. The discussion sheds light on the relation between practical wisdom and theoretical wisdom, and on the positive character of each.</description><subject>Education</subject><subject>Epistemology</subject><subject>Logic</subject><subject>Metaphysics</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Philosophy of Mind</subject><issn>0353-5150</issn><issn>1874-6349</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1j71PwzAUxC0EEqEwMbFFYja854_YGVEFBakSSxCjFcc2akXrYLdC_e9xFQYWhqdb7u7dj5AbhDsEUPcZGfKGArJyUlJ-QirUStCGi_aUVMAlpxIlnJOLnNcAXINiFbnuvmPdHUaf6xjq91V2cXNJzkL_mf3Vr87I29NjN3-my9fFy_xhSQeOzY46J4QE8DagdKg9Uw6gAQ7OgbCs7wcE1boySzCLKkjtB6s0GwAsBlB8Rm6n3jHFr73PO7OO-7QtL02ZzqSWqNviwsk1pJhz8sGMabXp08EgmCO7mdhNYTdHdsNLhk2ZXLzbD5_-NP8b-gHKd1iU</recordid><startdate>20120601</startdate><enddate>20120601</enddate><creator>Baehr, Jason</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>AABKS</scope><scope>ABSDQ</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120601</creationdate><title>Two Types of Wisdom</title><author>Baehr, Jason</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-dd44500ebf15d18e27d006030dd04b2aac1079d13642b17f58ecb782c00b1f073</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Education</topic><topic>Epistemology</topic><topic>Logic</topic><topic>Metaphysics</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Philosophy of Mind</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Baehr, Jason</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Philosophy Collection</collection><collection>Philosophy Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Psychology Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Acta analytica : philosophy and psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Baehr, Jason</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Two Types of Wisdom</atitle><jtitle>Acta analytica : philosophy and psychology</jtitle><stitle>Acta Anal</stitle><date>2012-06-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>81</spage><epage>97</epage><pages>81-97</pages><issn>0353-5150</issn><eissn>1874-6349</eissn><abstract>The concept of wisdom is largely ignored by contemporary philosophers. But given recent movements in the fields of ethics and epistemology, the time is ripe for a return to this concept. This article lays some groundwork for further philosophical work in ethics and epistemology on wisdom. Its focus is the distinction between practical wisdom and theoretical wisdom or between
phronesis
and
sophia
. Several accounts of this distinction are considered and rejected. A more plausible, but also considerably more complex, account is offered. The discussion sheds light on the relation between practical wisdom and theoretical wisdom, and on the positive character of each.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s12136-012-0155-3</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0353-5150 |
| ispartof | Acta analytica : philosophy and psychology, 2012-06, Vol.27 (2), p.81-97 |
| issn | 0353-5150 1874-6349 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1872585189 |
| source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
| subjects | Education Epistemology Logic Metaphysics Philosophy Philosophy of Mind |
| title | Two Types of Wisdom |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T03%3A19%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Two%20Types%20of%20Wisdom&rft.jtitle=Acta%20analytica%20:%20philosophy%20and%20psychology&rft.au=Baehr,%20Jason&rft.date=2012-06-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=81&rft.epage=97&rft.pages=81-97&rft.issn=0353-5150&rft.eissn=1874-6349&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12136-012-0155-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4317495581%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1872585189&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |