Testing feedback orientations: the case of Turkish prospective teachers

The aim of this study is to examine prospective teachers' feedback orientations. Instructional feedback orientation has four aspects, namely utility, sensitivity, confidentiality and retention. The results show that while perceptions about usefulness of feedback are not related to perceptions f...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of Educational Sciences & Psychology 2016-07, Vol.VI (LXVIII) (2)
1. Verfasser: Kilmen, Sevilay
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 2
container_start_page
container_title Journal of Educational Sciences & Psychology
container_volume VI (LXVIII)
creator Kilmen, Sevilay
description The aim of this study is to examine prospective teachers' feedback orientations. Instructional feedback orientation has four aspects, namely utility, sensitivity, confidentiality and retention. The results show that while perceptions about usefulness of feedback are not related to perceptions feedback given in a private or public context. Students who found feedback useful keep feedback in mind better and they are less sensitive to feedback. Students who are more sensitive to feedback prefer confidentiality and they are not able to recall feedback better. The results of the MANOVA reveal that prospective teachers' perceptions about feedback retention significantly differed in terms of gender. Female students are more able to recall feedback than male students. Another result of the study is that students who had taken measurement and evaluation courses showed higher mean feedback utility than the others.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1871513868</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4316923531</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_18715138683</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjUsOgjAURRujiUTZQxPHJC1QWp0aPwtgTmp9SMG02FdcvwxYgKN7knOSuyJJnpcyU0Ko9cJVIeWWpIg9Y4wzUeb8mJBbDRite9EW4PnQZqA-WHBRR-sdnmjsgBqNQH1L6ykMFjs6Bo8jmGi_QCNo00HAPdm0-o2QLrsjh-ulPt-zOf5M80fT-ym4WTVcSS54oSpV_Ff9ALGAPg8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1871513868</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Testing feedback orientations: the case of Turkish prospective teachers</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Kilmen, Sevilay</creator><creatorcontrib>Kilmen, Sevilay</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of this study is to examine prospective teachers' feedback orientations. Instructional feedback orientation has four aspects, namely utility, sensitivity, confidentiality and retention. The results show that while perceptions about usefulness of feedback are not related to perceptions feedback given in a private or public context. Students who found feedback useful keep feedback in mind better and they are less sensitive to feedback. Students who are more sensitive to feedback prefer confidentiality and they are not able to recall feedback better. The results of the MANOVA reveal that prospective teachers' perceptions about feedback retention significantly differed in terms of gender. Female students are more able to recall feedback than male students. Another result of the study is that students who had taken measurement and evaluation courses showed higher mean feedback utility than the others.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2247-6377</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2247-8558</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ploiesti: PG University Ploiesti Publishling House</publisher><subject>Feedback ; Teacher attitudes ; Teacher education</subject><ispartof>Journal of Educational Sciences &amp; Psychology, 2016-07, Vol.VI (LXVIII) (2)</ispartof><rights>Copyright PG University Ploiesti Publishing House 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kilmen, Sevilay</creatorcontrib><title>Testing feedback orientations: the case of Turkish prospective teachers</title><title>Journal of Educational Sciences &amp; Psychology</title><description>The aim of this study is to examine prospective teachers' feedback orientations. Instructional feedback orientation has four aspects, namely utility, sensitivity, confidentiality and retention. The results show that while perceptions about usefulness of feedback are not related to perceptions feedback given in a private or public context. Students who found feedback useful keep feedback in mind better and they are less sensitive to feedback. Students who are more sensitive to feedback prefer confidentiality and they are not able to recall feedback better. The results of the MANOVA reveal that prospective teachers' perceptions about feedback retention significantly differed in terms of gender. Female students are more able to recall feedback than male students. Another result of the study is that students who had taken measurement and evaluation courses showed higher mean feedback utility than the others.</description><subject>Feedback</subject><subject>Teacher attitudes</subject><subject>Teacher education</subject><issn>2247-6377</issn><issn>2247-8558</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNjUsOgjAURRujiUTZQxPHJC1QWp0aPwtgTmp9SMG02FdcvwxYgKN7knOSuyJJnpcyU0Ko9cJVIeWWpIg9Y4wzUeb8mJBbDRite9EW4PnQZqA-WHBRR-sdnmjsgBqNQH1L6ykMFjs6Bo8jmGi_QCNo00HAPdm0-o2QLrsjh-ulPt-zOf5M80fT-ym4WTVcSS54oSpV_Ff9ALGAPg8</recordid><startdate>20160701</startdate><enddate>20160701</enddate><creator>Kilmen, Sevilay</creator><general>PG University Ploiesti Publishling House</general><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BYOGL</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160701</creationdate><title>Testing feedback orientations: the case of Turkish prospective teachers</title><author>Kilmen, Sevilay</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_18715138683</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Feedback</topic><topic>Teacher attitudes</topic><topic>Teacher education</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kilmen, Sevilay</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>East Europe, Central Europe Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of Educational Sciences &amp; Psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kilmen, Sevilay</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Testing feedback orientations: the case of Turkish prospective teachers</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Educational Sciences &amp; Psychology</jtitle><date>2016-07-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>VI (LXVIII)</volume><issue>2</issue><issn>2247-6377</issn><eissn>2247-8558</eissn><abstract>The aim of this study is to examine prospective teachers' feedback orientations. Instructional feedback orientation has four aspects, namely utility, sensitivity, confidentiality and retention. The results show that while perceptions about usefulness of feedback are not related to perceptions feedback given in a private or public context. Students who found feedback useful keep feedback in mind better and they are less sensitive to feedback. Students who are more sensitive to feedback prefer confidentiality and they are not able to recall feedback better. The results of the MANOVA reveal that prospective teachers' perceptions about feedback retention significantly differed in terms of gender. Female students are more able to recall feedback than male students. Another result of the study is that students who had taken measurement and evaluation courses showed higher mean feedback utility than the others.</abstract><cop>Ploiesti</cop><pub>PG University Ploiesti Publishling House</pub><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2247-6377
ispartof Journal of Educational Sciences & Psychology, 2016-07, Vol.VI (LXVIII) (2)
issn 2247-6377
2247-8558
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1871513868
source EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Feedback
Teacher attitudes
Teacher education
title Testing feedback orientations: the case of Turkish prospective teachers
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T15%3A00%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Testing%20feedback%20orientations:%20the%20case%20of%20Turkish%20prospective%20teachers&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Educational%20Sciences%20&%20Psychology&rft.au=Kilmen,%20Sevilay&rft.date=2016-07-01&rft.volume=VI%20(LXVIII)&rft.issue=2&rft.issn=2247-6377&rft.eissn=2247-8558&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E4316923531%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1871513868&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true