G624 Do you know where all the children in your acute trust are seen? How do you safeguard their standard of care and experience?

AimsTo share with the audience the process of identifying all the areas in a large acute trust that children attend for either outpatients, diagnostics or clinics, which are outside of child health services.To demonstrate how a RAG rating tool can be used to improve the quality standards of these ar...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Archives of disease in childhood 2016-04, Vol.101 (Suppl 1), p.A369
Hauptverfasser: Pye, K, Grant, K
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue Suppl 1
container_start_page A369
container_title Archives of disease in childhood
container_volume 101
creator Pye, K
Grant, K
description AimsTo share with the audience the process of identifying all the areas in a large acute trust that children attend for either outpatients, diagnostics or clinics, which are outside of child health services.To demonstrate how a RAG rating tool can be used to improve the quality standards of these areasMethodsFollowing a recent CQC visit, it was identified that there are significant amounts of children being cared for and seen for procedures/investigations that currently are not overseen or managed by child health services. Whilst there was an understanding of some of the key issues this project highlighted 28 areas that required review. These areas consisted of predominantly OP areas, interventional radiology and therapy areas. Once these areas were identified, walkabouts conducted by the lead nurse for children in the trust. These walkabouts were to assess areas against the NSF Standards for Hospital Service (2004) for children were RAG rated. All children’s services outside of child health services were given a link matron and improvements notice if rag rating was poor. Finding presented to trust safeguarding child strategy group.ResultsThis table shows the improvements made between the first and second RAG rating assessments.Abstract G624 Table 1First review resultsSecond review resultsNumber of areas children seen outside children’s services:2828Red rated52Amber rated126Green1120ConclusionThis exercise has demonstrated the importance of having a lead nurse for children in the trust. This allows for outreach to all the small specialty clinics which are predominately adult focused. This has also identified areas off excellent practice that required no input, as many were rated green on first assessment. Simple steps such as involving the play service and scrutinising safeguarding training levels can make a big difference to services. Through RAG rating and action planning, assurances can be given about the quality of children’s care, wherever they attend within the trust.
doi_str_mv 10.1136/archdischild-2016-310863.609
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_bmj_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1870655790</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4316567981</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b760-99541876f1eeeea3e58eb6da707415f47a1d8990738dd5199cb080029e5de3ad3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkMFOwzAMhiMEEmPwDpHg2uEsbZqcJjRgQ5rEZfcoa1za0bUjaTV2Q0K8KE9CSjngi2Xr_3_LHyE3DCaMcXFrXFbY0mdFWdloCkxEnIEUfCJAnZARi4UM6zg-JSMA4JGSUp6TC--3AGwqJR-Rz4WYxt8fX_cNPTYdfa2bAz0U6JCaqqJtgfQ33WFNy7qXOGqyrkXaus631AShR6xndBmMdgjxJseXzjjb-0tHfWtq249NTrPeEUaK73t0JdYZzi7JWW4qj1d_fUzWjw_r-TJaPS-e5neraJMKiJRKYiZTkTMMZTgmEjfCmhTSmCV5nBpmpVKQcmltwpTKNiABpgoTi9xYPibXQ-zeNW8d-lZvwzt1uKhDLogkSRUEVTqoNrut3rtyZ9xRM9A9cP0fuO6B6wG4DsD5DxcheQI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1870655790</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>G624 Do you know where all the children in your acute trust are seen? How do you safeguard their standard of care and experience?</title><source>BMJ Journals - NESLi2</source><creator>Pye, K ; Grant, K</creator><creatorcontrib>Pye, K ; Grant, K</creatorcontrib><description>AimsTo share with the audience the process of identifying all the areas in a large acute trust that children attend for either outpatients, diagnostics or clinics, which are outside of child health services.To demonstrate how a RAG rating tool can be used to improve the quality standards of these areasMethodsFollowing a recent CQC visit, it was identified that there are significant amounts of children being cared for and seen for procedures/investigations that currently are not overseen or managed by child health services. Whilst there was an understanding of some of the key issues this project highlighted 28 areas that required review. These areas consisted of predominantly OP areas, interventional radiology and therapy areas. Once these areas were identified, walkabouts conducted by the lead nurse for children in the trust. These walkabouts were to assess areas against the NSF Standards for Hospital Service (2004) for children were RAG rated. All children’s services outside of child health services were given a link matron and improvements notice if rag rating was poor. Finding presented to trust safeguarding child strategy group.ResultsThis table shows the improvements made between the first and second RAG rating assessments.Abstract G624 Table 1First review resultsSecond review resultsNumber of areas children seen outside children’s services:2828Red rated52Amber rated126Green1120ConclusionThis exercise has demonstrated the importance of having a lead nurse for children in the trust. This allows for outreach to all the small specialty clinics which are predominately adult focused. This has also identified areas off excellent practice that required no input, as many were rated green on first assessment. Simple steps such as involving the play service and scrutinising safeguarding training levels can make a big difference to services. Through RAG rating and action planning, assurances can be given about the quality of children’s care, wherever they attend within the trust.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-9888</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-2044</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2016-310863.609</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ADCHAK</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: BMJ Publishing Group LTD</publisher><subject>Child Health ; Health Services ; Radiology</subject><ispartof>Archives of disease in childhood, 2016-04, Vol.101 (Suppl 1), p.A369</ispartof><rights>2016, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions</rights><rights>Copyright: 2016 (c) 2016, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://adc.bmj.com/content/101/Suppl_1/A369.1.full.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://adc.bmj.com/content/101/Suppl_1/A369.1.full$$EHTML$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>114,115,314,776,780,23550,27901,27902,77569,77600</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pye, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grant, K</creatorcontrib><title>G624 Do you know where all the children in your acute trust are seen? How do you safeguard their standard of care and experience?</title><title>Archives of disease in childhood</title><description>AimsTo share with the audience the process of identifying all the areas in a large acute trust that children attend for either outpatients, diagnostics or clinics, which are outside of child health services.To demonstrate how a RAG rating tool can be used to improve the quality standards of these areasMethodsFollowing a recent CQC visit, it was identified that there are significant amounts of children being cared for and seen for procedures/investigations that currently are not overseen or managed by child health services. Whilst there was an understanding of some of the key issues this project highlighted 28 areas that required review. These areas consisted of predominantly OP areas, interventional radiology and therapy areas. Once these areas were identified, walkabouts conducted by the lead nurse for children in the trust. These walkabouts were to assess areas against the NSF Standards for Hospital Service (2004) for children were RAG rated. All children’s services outside of child health services were given a link matron and improvements notice if rag rating was poor. Finding presented to trust safeguarding child strategy group.ResultsThis table shows the improvements made between the first and second RAG rating assessments.Abstract G624 Table 1First review resultsSecond review resultsNumber of areas children seen outside children’s services:2828Red rated52Amber rated126Green1120ConclusionThis exercise has demonstrated the importance of having a lead nurse for children in the trust. This allows for outreach to all the small specialty clinics which are predominately adult focused. This has also identified areas off excellent practice that required no input, as many were rated green on first assessment. Simple steps such as involving the play service and scrutinising safeguarding training levels can make a big difference to services. Through RAG rating and action planning, assurances can be given about the quality of children’s care, wherever they attend within the trust.</description><subject>Child Health</subject><subject>Health Services</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><issn>0003-9888</issn><issn>1468-2044</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkMFOwzAMhiMEEmPwDpHg2uEsbZqcJjRgQ5rEZfcoa1za0bUjaTV2Q0K8KE9CSjngi2Xr_3_LHyE3DCaMcXFrXFbY0mdFWdloCkxEnIEUfCJAnZARi4UM6zg-JSMA4JGSUp6TC--3AGwqJR-Rz4WYxt8fX_cNPTYdfa2bAz0U6JCaqqJtgfQ33WFNy7qXOGqyrkXaus631AShR6xndBmMdgjxJseXzjjb-0tHfWtq249NTrPeEUaK73t0JdYZzi7JWW4qj1d_fUzWjw_r-TJaPS-e5neraJMKiJRKYiZTkTMMZTgmEjfCmhTSmCV5nBpmpVKQcmltwpTKNiABpgoTi9xYPibXQ-zeNW8d-lZvwzt1uKhDLogkSRUEVTqoNrut3rtyZ9xRM9A9cP0fuO6B6wG4DsD5DxcheQI</recordid><startdate>201604</startdate><enddate>201604</enddate><creator>Pye, K</creator><creator>Grant, K</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8A4</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PJZUB</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PPXIY</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQGLB</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201604</creationdate><title>G624 Do you know where all the children in your acute trust are seen? How do you safeguard their standard of care and experience?</title><author>Pye, K ; Grant, K</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b760-99541876f1eeeea3e58eb6da707415f47a1d8990738dd5199cb080029e5de3ad3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Child Health</topic><topic>Health Services</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pye, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grant, K</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Periodicals</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Research Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Health &amp; Nursing</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Applied &amp; Life Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Archives of disease in childhood</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pye, K</au><au>Grant, K</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>G624 Do you know where all the children in your acute trust are seen? How do you safeguard their standard of care and experience?</atitle><jtitle>Archives of disease in childhood</jtitle><date>2016-04</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>101</volume><issue>Suppl 1</issue><spage>A369</spage><pages>A369-</pages><issn>0003-9888</issn><eissn>1468-2044</eissn><coden>ADCHAK</coden><abstract>AimsTo share with the audience the process of identifying all the areas in a large acute trust that children attend for either outpatients, diagnostics or clinics, which are outside of child health services.To demonstrate how a RAG rating tool can be used to improve the quality standards of these areasMethodsFollowing a recent CQC visit, it was identified that there are significant amounts of children being cared for and seen for procedures/investigations that currently are not overseen or managed by child health services. Whilst there was an understanding of some of the key issues this project highlighted 28 areas that required review. These areas consisted of predominantly OP areas, interventional radiology and therapy areas. Once these areas were identified, walkabouts conducted by the lead nurse for children in the trust. These walkabouts were to assess areas against the NSF Standards for Hospital Service (2004) for children were RAG rated. All children’s services outside of child health services were given a link matron and improvements notice if rag rating was poor. Finding presented to trust safeguarding child strategy group.ResultsThis table shows the improvements made between the first and second RAG rating assessments.Abstract G624 Table 1First review resultsSecond review resultsNumber of areas children seen outside children’s services:2828Red rated52Amber rated126Green1120ConclusionThis exercise has demonstrated the importance of having a lead nurse for children in the trust. This allows for outreach to all the small specialty clinics which are predominately adult focused. This has also identified areas off excellent practice that required no input, as many were rated green on first assessment. Simple steps such as involving the play service and scrutinising safeguarding training levels can make a big difference to services. Through RAG rating and action planning, assurances can be given about the quality of children’s care, wherever they attend within the trust.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</pub><doi>10.1136/archdischild-2016-310863.609</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-9888
ispartof Archives of disease in childhood, 2016-04, Vol.101 (Suppl 1), p.A369
issn 0003-9888
1468-2044
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1870655790
source BMJ Journals - NESLi2
subjects Child Health
Health Services
Radiology
title G624 Do you know where all the children in your acute trust are seen? How do you safeguard their standard of care and experience?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T18%3A01%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_bmj_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=G624%E2%80%85Do%20you%20know%20where%20all%20the%20children%20in%20your%20acute%20trust%20are%20seen?%20How%20do%20you%20safeguard%20their%20standard%20of%20care%20and%20experience?&rft.jtitle=Archives%20of%20disease%20in%20childhood&rft.au=Pye,%20K&rft.date=2016-04&rft.volume=101&rft.issue=Suppl%201&rft.spage=A369&rft.pages=A369-&rft.issn=0003-9888&rft.eissn=1468-2044&rft.coden=ADCHAK&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/archdischild-2016-310863.609&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_bmj_p%3E4316567981%3C/proquest_bmj_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1870655790&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true