Re-inhabiting place in contemporary rural communities: Moving toward a critical pedagogy of place
Heather Zimmerman and Jennifer Weible’s (Cult Stud Sci Educ, 2016 ) use of place-based pedagogy in high school science education honors their participants’ lived experiences and the rural communities from which they come. They raise an unresolved tension in their findings: Why did the youth in their...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Cultural studies of science education 2017-03, Vol.12 (1), p.33-43 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Heather Zimmerman and Jennifer Weible’s (Cult Stud Sci Educ,
2016
) use of place-based pedagogy in high school science education honors their participants’ lived experiences and the rural communities from which they come. They raise an unresolved tension in their findings: Why did the youth in their study, who clearly learned a lot about the local watershed, not feel empowered or knowledgeable enough to propose collective, action-oriented strategies to address the poor quality of the water? We use this tension as a focus point of our response, drawing on one author’s (Huffling’s) biography and David Gruenewald’s (Educ Res 32:3–12,
2003
. doi:
10.3102/0013189X032004003
) critical pedagogy of place to re-imagine the curriculum that Zimmerman and Weible describe. We provide strategies that align with Gruenewald’s (
2003
) constructs of decolonization and reinhabitation that could promote youths’ collective empowerment. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1871-1502 1871-1510 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s11422-016-9756-2 |