Candidacy rules and party unity: The impact of multiple candidacies on legislative voting behaviour in Italy
A common approach among scholars is depicting electoral democracy as a two-round competition for offices, starting with elections and continuing with the allocation of legislative offices among legislators. But what happens when the allocation of seats does not end at Round 1 (elections), but contin...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Acta politica 2017, Vol.52 (1), p.43-63 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 63 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 43 |
container_title | Acta politica |
container_volume | 52 |
creator | Pinto, Luca |
description | A common approach among scholars is depicting electoral democracy as a two-round competition for offices, starting with elections and continuing with the allocation of legislative offices among legislators. But what happens when the allocation of seats does not end at Round 1 (elections), but continues as a first stage of Round 2? This may occur when candidacy rules allow candidates to be nominated and elected in more than one district. Multiple candidacies create a pool of vacant parliamentary seats, whose allocation depends mostly on party leaders’ choices. Multi-candidacies increase therefore the centralization of candidate selection process, granting leaders greater post-election influence and decreasing the incentives to vote against party line for those MPs whose parliamentary office depends mostly on the leaders’ will. Data on legislators’ voting behaviour in the Italian Chamber of Deputies (2006–2011) support this notion. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1057/ap.2015.24 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1867930030</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4313348081</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-ce7606e47a423a440c30889ce4e9e5369b76bc4d47c28839fa28519f221ea32a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplkEtLAzEUhYMoWKsbf0HAnTL15jGZGXdSfBQKbuo6pOmdNpLOjEmmMP_eKXUhuDpc-M65h0PILYMZg7x4NN2MA8tnXJ6RCSsky5hk6pxMAIBlqmRwSa5i_ALgHISaED83zcZtjB1o6D1GOp60MyENtG9cGp7oaofU7TtjE21ruu99cp1Han99bvS0DfW4ddGb5A5ID21yzZaucWcOru0DdQ1dJOOHa3JRGx_x5len5PP1ZTV_z5Yfb4v58zKzvMpTZrFQoFAWRnJhpAQroCwrixIrzIWq1oVaW7mRheVlKara8DJnVc05QyO4EVNyd8rtQvvdY0z6a6zRjC81K1VRCQABI3V_omxoYwxY6y64vQmDZqCPa2rT6eOamssRfjjBcYSaLYY_kf_pHzLzdgo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1867930030</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Candidacy rules and party unity: The impact of multiple candidacies on legislative voting behaviour in Italy</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Pinto, Luca</creator><creatorcontrib>Pinto, Luca</creatorcontrib><description>A common approach among scholars is depicting electoral democracy as a two-round competition for offices, starting with elections and continuing with the allocation of legislative offices among legislators. But what happens when the allocation of seats does not end at Round 1 (elections), but continues as a first stage of Round 2? This may occur when candidacy rules allow candidates to be nominated and elected in more than one district. Multiple candidacies create a pool of vacant parliamentary seats, whose allocation depends mostly on party leaders’ choices. Multi-candidacies increase therefore the centralization of candidate selection process, granting leaders greater post-election influence and decreasing the incentives to vote against party line for those MPs whose parliamentary office depends mostly on the leaders’ will. Data on legislators’ voting behaviour in the Italian Chamber of Deputies (2006–2011) support this notion.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-6810</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1741-1416</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1057/ap.2015.24</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Palgrave Macmillan UK</publisher><subject>Candidates ; Centralization ; Comparative Politics ; Competition ; Democracy ; Elections ; Electoral systems ; European Politics ; Incentives ; Intellectuals ; Legislators ; Nominations ; Original Article ; Political leadership ; Political Science ; Political Science and International Relations ; Political Science and International Studies ; Voter behavior ; Voting ; Voting rules</subject><ispartof>Acta politica, 2017, Vol.52 (1), p.43-63</ispartof><rights>Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2016</rights><rights>Copyright Palgrave Macmillan Jan 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-ce7606e47a423a440c30889ce4e9e5369b76bc4d47c28839fa28519f221ea32a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-ce7606e47a423a440c30889ce4e9e5369b76bc4d47c28839fa28519f221ea32a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1057/ap.2015.24$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1057/ap.2015.24$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,12845,27344,27924,27925,33774,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pinto, Luca</creatorcontrib><title>Candidacy rules and party unity: The impact of multiple candidacies on legislative voting behaviour in Italy</title><title>Acta politica</title><addtitle>Acta Polit</addtitle><description>A common approach among scholars is depicting electoral democracy as a two-round competition for offices, starting with elections and continuing with the allocation of legislative offices among legislators. But what happens when the allocation of seats does not end at Round 1 (elections), but continues as a first stage of Round 2? This may occur when candidacy rules allow candidates to be nominated and elected in more than one district. Multiple candidacies create a pool of vacant parliamentary seats, whose allocation depends mostly on party leaders’ choices. Multi-candidacies increase therefore the centralization of candidate selection process, granting leaders greater post-election influence and decreasing the incentives to vote against party line for those MPs whose parliamentary office depends mostly on the leaders’ will. Data on legislators’ voting behaviour in the Italian Chamber of Deputies (2006–2011) support this notion.</description><subject>Candidates</subject><subject>Centralization</subject><subject>Comparative Politics</subject><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Democracy</subject><subject>Elections</subject><subject>Electoral systems</subject><subject>European Politics</subject><subject>Incentives</subject><subject>Intellectuals</subject><subject>Legislators</subject><subject>Nominations</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Political leadership</subject><subject>Political Science</subject><subject>Political Science and International Relations</subject><subject>Political Science and International Studies</subject><subject>Voter behavior</subject><subject>Voting</subject><subject>Voting rules</subject><issn>0001-6810</issn><issn>1741-1416</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNplkEtLAzEUhYMoWKsbf0HAnTL15jGZGXdSfBQKbuo6pOmdNpLOjEmmMP_eKXUhuDpc-M65h0PILYMZg7x4NN2MA8tnXJ6RCSsky5hk6pxMAIBlqmRwSa5i_ALgHISaED83zcZtjB1o6D1GOp60MyENtG9cGp7oaofU7TtjE21ruu99cp1Han99bvS0DfW4ddGb5A5ID21yzZaucWcOru0DdQ1dJOOHa3JRGx_x5len5PP1ZTV_z5Yfb4v58zKzvMpTZrFQoFAWRnJhpAQroCwrixIrzIWq1oVaW7mRheVlKara8DJnVc05QyO4EVNyd8rtQvvdY0z6a6zRjC81K1VRCQABI3V_omxoYwxY6y64vQmDZqCPa2rT6eOamssRfjjBcYSaLYY_kf_pHzLzdgo</recordid><startdate>2017</startdate><enddate>2017</enddate><creator>Pinto, Luca</creator><general>Palgrave Macmillan UK</general><general>Palgrave Macmillan</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2017</creationdate><title>Candidacy rules and party unity: The impact of multiple candidacies on legislative voting behaviour in Italy</title><author>Pinto, Luca</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-ce7606e47a423a440c30889ce4e9e5369b76bc4d47c28839fa28519f221ea32a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Candidates</topic><topic>Centralization</topic><topic>Comparative Politics</topic><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Democracy</topic><topic>Elections</topic><topic>Electoral systems</topic><topic>European Politics</topic><topic>Incentives</topic><topic>Intellectuals</topic><topic>Legislators</topic><topic>Nominations</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Political leadership</topic><topic>Political Science</topic><topic>Political Science and International Relations</topic><topic>Political Science and International Studies</topic><topic>Voter behavior</topic><topic>Voting</topic><topic>Voting rules</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pinto, Luca</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Acta politica</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pinto, Luca</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Candidacy rules and party unity: The impact of multiple candidacies on legislative voting behaviour in Italy</atitle><jtitle>Acta politica</jtitle><stitle>Acta Polit</stitle><date>2017</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>52</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>43</spage><epage>63</epage><pages>43-63</pages><issn>0001-6810</issn><eissn>1741-1416</eissn><abstract>A common approach among scholars is depicting electoral democracy as a two-round competition for offices, starting with elections and continuing with the allocation of legislative offices among legislators. But what happens when the allocation of seats does not end at Round 1 (elections), but continues as a first stage of Round 2? This may occur when candidacy rules allow candidates to be nominated and elected in more than one district. Multiple candidacies create a pool of vacant parliamentary seats, whose allocation depends mostly on party leaders’ choices. Multi-candidacies increase therefore the centralization of candidate selection process, granting leaders greater post-election influence and decreasing the incentives to vote against party line for those MPs whose parliamentary office depends mostly on the leaders’ will. Data on legislators’ voting behaviour in the Italian Chamber of Deputies (2006–2011) support this notion.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Palgrave Macmillan UK</pub><doi>10.1057/ap.2015.24</doi><tpages>21</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0001-6810 |
ispartof | Acta politica, 2017, Vol.52 (1), p.43-63 |
issn | 0001-6810 1741-1416 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1867930030 |
source | SpringerLink Journals; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Sociological Abstracts |
subjects | Candidates Centralization Comparative Politics Competition Democracy Elections Electoral systems European Politics Incentives Intellectuals Legislators Nominations Original Article Political leadership Political Science Political Science and International Relations Political Science and International Studies Voter behavior Voting Voting rules |
title | Candidacy rules and party unity: The impact of multiple candidacies on legislative voting behaviour in Italy |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T10%3A31%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Candidacy%20rules%20and%20party%20unity:%20The%20impact%20of%20multiple%20candidacies%20on%20legislative%20voting%20behaviour%20in%20Italy&rft.jtitle=Acta%20politica&rft.au=Pinto,%20Luca&rft.date=2017&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=43&rft.epage=63&rft.pages=43-63&rft.issn=0001-6810&rft.eissn=1741-1416&rft_id=info:doi/10.1057/ap.2015.24&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4313348081%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1867930030&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |