The Impact of Patient’s Socio-Demographic Characterictics, Comorbidities and Attitudes on Flu Vaccination Uptake in Family Practice Settings / Vpliv Bolnikovih Psihosocialnih Značilnosti, Komorbidnosti In Stališč Na Odločitev O Cepljenju Proti Gripi V Ambulantah Družinske Medicine
Objectives. In Slovenia, the role of family physicians in primary care and preventive procedures is very important. Influenza vaccination rates in Slovenia are low. The reasons for low vaccination rates in Slovenia were not clear. We suppose that patient’s beliefs and attitudes are important factors...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Zdravstveno varstvo 2015-09, Vol.54 (3), p.204-211 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 211 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 204 |
container_title | Zdravstveno varstvo |
container_volume | 54 |
creator | Kravos, Andrej Kračun, Lucija Kravos, Klara Iljaž, Rade |
description | Objectives. In Slovenia, the role of family physicians in primary care and preventive procedures is very important. Influenza vaccination rates in Slovenia are low. The reasons for low vaccination rates in Slovenia were not clear. We suppose that patient’s beliefs and attitudes are important factors. We assessed patients’ opinions regarding the acceptance of flu vaccination by their family physicians and their beliefs and attitudes about flu and vaccination. The aim was to check out factors that influence the decision to take the vaccine in family physician offices.
Methods. This was a cross-sectional, multicenter, observational study in the Styria region in Slovenia. We included patients from seven family physicians during regular office visits. They filled in a questionnaire about their general demographic data and attitudes regarding influenza and vaccination. The main outcome was the decision to be vaccinated.
Results. The logistic regression model identified five predictors for influenza vaccination, namely: heart disease, previous vaccination, an agreement with the beliefs ‘the vaccination is an efficient measure to prevent influenza’, ‘after the vaccination there are usually no important side effects’ and ‘the vaccination is also recommended for a healthy adult person’. The belief that vaccinations harm the immune system is negatively associated with vaccination.
Conclusions. Patients’ beliefs are an important factor to decide for vaccination or not. Family physician teams should discuss with patients their beliefs and concerns about vaccination.
Uvod. V Sloveniji ima zdravnik družinske medicine pomembno vlogo pri izvajanju preventive. Delež cepljenih proti gripi je v Sloveniji nizek. Razlogi za to niso povsem jasni. Preučevali smo mnenje bolnikov glede cepljenja proti gripi pri njihovem družinskem zdravniku ter njihova stališča in prepričanja o gripi in cepljenju. Cilj naloge je bil odkriti dejavnike, ki vplivajo na odločitev o cepljenju v ambulanti družinske medicine.
Metode. Raziskava je bila presečna multicentrična opazovalna. Vključili smo bolnike iz 7 ambulant družinske medicine na Štajerskem v Sloveniji. Vzorec je zajemal bolnike, ki so prišli v ambulanto. Izpolnili so vprašalnik z demografskimi podatki ter stališči o gripi in cepljenju. Glavni opazovani dogodek je bil odločitev za cepljenje.
Rezultati. V logističnem regresijskem modelu so bili najpomembnejši napovedni dejavniki odločitve za cepljenje srčna bolezen, cepljenje v preteklosti, s |
doi_str_mv | 10.1515/sjph-2015-0029 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1865308034</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4312454221</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2054-8b4af21329a02c8f1533f7df5761073afcc227149d19fa721d1fa4b9a6f38c903</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptUrtu2zAUVYsWaJBm7XyBrlHCh2RJQBfXaVKjaR3AiYcuAk1R1nUkUiUpF976A_mAjv2RTsmP9EtK1xkylAvvJc8594A8UfSGkhOa0vTUrfsmZoSmMSGseB4d0DxNYpZkoxdP6lfRkXNrEhYvWMbpwTO4bhRMu15ID6aGK-FRaf_nx08HcyPRxGeqMysr-gYlTBphA1BZlB6lO4aJ6YxdYoWB5UDoCsbeox-q0BkN5-0ACyEl6iAb-pvei1sFGG5Eh-0WrnZyKBXMVeDplYNTWPQtbuC9aTXemg02cOWwMS6YEeGoga9a3N9hq43zeAyfHh38a2GqYe5Fiw-_7u_gi4BZ1ZoA9moDM5iovl0rvR7CWBPAFxZ7hAWMu-XQCu1FA2d2ePiN2gWTn1WFwbh6Hb2sRevU0eN-GN2cf7iefIwvZxfTyfgyloyE182XiagZ5awQhMm8pinndVbVaTaiJOOilpKxjCZFRYtaZIxWtBbJshCjmueyIPwwervX7a35Nijny7UZrA4jS5qPUk5ywpOAOtmjpDXOWVWXvcVO2G1JSbkLQrkLQrkLQrkLQiC82xO-izZ8XKVWdtiG4on6f4lpwhlJ-F9P5sO0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1865308034</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Impact of Patient’s Socio-Demographic Characterictics, Comorbidities and Attitudes on Flu Vaccination Uptake in Family Practice Settings / Vpliv Bolnikovih Psihosocialnih Značilnosti, Komorbidnosti In Stališč Na Odločitev O Cepljenju Proti Gripi V Ambulantah Družinske Medicine</title><source>De Gruyter Open Access Journals</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Kravos, Andrej ; Kračun, Lucija ; Kravos, Klara ; Iljaž, Rade</creator><creatorcontrib>Kravos, Andrej ; Kračun, Lucija ; Kravos, Klara ; Iljaž, Rade</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives. In Slovenia, the role of family physicians in primary care and preventive procedures is very important. Influenza vaccination rates in Slovenia are low. The reasons for low vaccination rates in Slovenia were not clear. We suppose that patient’s beliefs and attitudes are important factors. We assessed patients’ opinions regarding the acceptance of flu vaccination by their family physicians and their beliefs and attitudes about flu and vaccination. The aim was to check out factors that influence the decision to take the vaccine in family physician offices.
Methods. This was a cross-sectional, multicenter, observational study in the Styria region in Slovenia. We included patients from seven family physicians during regular office visits. They filled in a questionnaire about their general demographic data and attitudes regarding influenza and vaccination. The main outcome was the decision to be vaccinated.
Results. The logistic regression model identified five predictors for influenza vaccination, namely: heart disease, previous vaccination, an agreement with the beliefs ‘the vaccination is an efficient measure to prevent influenza’, ‘after the vaccination there are usually no important side effects’ and ‘the vaccination is also recommended for a healthy adult person’. The belief that vaccinations harm the immune system is negatively associated with vaccination.
Conclusions. Patients’ beliefs are an important factor to decide for vaccination or not. Family physician teams should discuss with patients their beliefs and concerns about vaccination.
Uvod. V Sloveniji ima zdravnik družinske medicine pomembno vlogo pri izvajanju preventive. Delež cepljenih proti gripi je v Sloveniji nizek. Razlogi za to niso povsem jasni. Preučevali smo mnenje bolnikov glede cepljenja proti gripi pri njihovem družinskem zdravniku ter njihova stališča in prepričanja o gripi in cepljenju. Cilj naloge je bil odkriti dejavnike, ki vplivajo na odločitev o cepljenju v ambulanti družinske medicine.
Metode. Raziskava je bila presečna multicentrična opazovalna. Vključili smo bolnike iz 7 ambulant družinske medicine na Štajerskem v Sloveniji. Vzorec je zajemal bolnike, ki so prišli v ambulanto. Izpolnili so vprašalnik z demografskimi podatki ter stališči o gripi in cepljenju. Glavni opazovani dogodek je bil odločitev za cepljenje.
Rezultati. V logističnem regresijskem modelu so bili najpomembnejši napovedni dejavniki odločitve za cepljenje srčna bolezen, cepljenje v preteklosti, strinjanje, da je cepljenje najbolj učinkovit ukrep proti gripi, strinjanje, da cepljenje običajno nima pomembnih stranskih učinkov, in strinjanje, da je cepljenje priporočljivo tudi za odraslo zdravo osebo. Prepričanje, da cepljenje škodi imunskemu sistemu, je negativni napovedni dejavnik odločitve za cepljenje.
Zaključki. Stališča bolnikov so pomemben dejavnik pri odločitvi za cepljenje. V ambulantah družinske medicine bi se morali z bolniki več pogovarjati o njihovih stališčih in pomislekih o cepljenju.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1854-2476</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0351-0026</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1854-2476</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1515/sjph-2015-0029</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ljubljana: De Gruyter Open</publisher><subject>Attitudes ; cepljenje ; chronic diseases ; Comorbidity ; Demographics ; družinska medicina ; Families & family life ; family practice ; gripa ; influenza ; kronične bolezni ; Society ; stališča ; vaccination ; Vaccines</subject><ispartof>Zdravstveno varstvo, 2015-09, Vol.54 (3), p.204-211</ispartof><rights>Copyright De Gruyter Open Sp. z o.o. 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2054-8b4af21329a02c8f1533f7df5761073afcc227149d19fa721d1fa4b9a6f38c903</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/sjph-2015-0029/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwalterdegruyter$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/sjph-2015-0029/html$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwalterdegruyter$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,860,27903,27904,66904,68688</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kravos, Andrej</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kračun, Lucija</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kravos, Klara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iljaž, Rade</creatorcontrib><title>The Impact of Patient’s Socio-Demographic Characterictics, Comorbidities and Attitudes on Flu Vaccination Uptake in Family Practice Settings / Vpliv Bolnikovih Psihosocialnih Značilnosti, Komorbidnosti In Stališč Na Odločitev O Cepljenju Proti Gripi V Ambulantah Družinske Medicine</title><title>Zdravstveno varstvo</title><description>Objectives. In Slovenia, the role of family physicians in primary care and preventive procedures is very important. Influenza vaccination rates in Slovenia are low. The reasons for low vaccination rates in Slovenia were not clear. We suppose that patient’s beliefs and attitudes are important factors. We assessed patients’ opinions regarding the acceptance of flu vaccination by their family physicians and their beliefs and attitudes about flu and vaccination. The aim was to check out factors that influence the decision to take the vaccine in family physician offices.
Methods. This was a cross-sectional, multicenter, observational study in the Styria region in Slovenia. We included patients from seven family physicians during regular office visits. They filled in a questionnaire about their general demographic data and attitudes regarding influenza and vaccination. The main outcome was the decision to be vaccinated.
Results. The logistic regression model identified five predictors for influenza vaccination, namely: heart disease, previous vaccination, an agreement with the beliefs ‘the vaccination is an efficient measure to prevent influenza’, ‘after the vaccination there are usually no important side effects’ and ‘the vaccination is also recommended for a healthy adult person’. The belief that vaccinations harm the immune system is negatively associated with vaccination.
Conclusions. Patients’ beliefs are an important factor to decide for vaccination or not. Family physician teams should discuss with patients their beliefs and concerns about vaccination.
Uvod. V Sloveniji ima zdravnik družinske medicine pomembno vlogo pri izvajanju preventive. Delež cepljenih proti gripi je v Sloveniji nizek. Razlogi za to niso povsem jasni. Preučevali smo mnenje bolnikov glede cepljenja proti gripi pri njihovem družinskem zdravniku ter njihova stališča in prepričanja o gripi in cepljenju. Cilj naloge je bil odkriti dejavnike, ki vplivajo na odločitev o cepljenju v ambulanti družinske medicine.
Metode. Raziskava je bila presečna multicentrična opazovalna. Vključili smo bolnike iz 7 ambulant družinske medicine na Štajerskem v Sloveniji. Vzorec je zajemal bolnike, ki so prišli v ambulanto. Izpolnili so vprašalnik z demografskimi podatki ter stališči o gripi in cepljenju. Glavni opazovani dogodek je bil odločitev za cepljenje.
Rezultati. V logističnem regresijskem modelu so bili najpomembnejši napovedni dejavniki odločitve za cepljenje srčna bolezen, cepljenje v preteklosti, strinjanje, da je cepljenje najbolj učinkovit ukrep proti gripi, strinjanje, da cepljenje običajno nima pomembnih stranskih učinkov, in strinjanje, da je cepljenje priporočljivo tudi za odraslo zdravo osebo. Prepričanje, da cepljenje škodi imunskemu sistemu, je negativni napovedni dejavnik odločitve za cepljenje.
Zaključki. Stališča bolnikov so pomemben dejavnik pri odločitvi za cepljenje. V ambulantah družinske medicine bi se morali z bolniki več pogovarjati o njihovih stališčih in pomislekih o cepljenju.</description><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>cepljenje</subject><subject>chronic diseases</subject><subject>Comorbidity</subject><subject>Demographics</subject><subject>družinska medicina</subject><subject>Families & family life</subject><subject>family practice</subject><subject>gripa</subject><subject>influenza</subject><subject>kronične bolezni</subject><subject>Society</subject><subject>stališča</subject><subject>vaccination</subject><subject>Vaccines</subject><issn>1854-2476</issn><issn>0351-0026</issn><issn>1854-2476</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNptUrtu2zAUVYsWaJBm7XyBrlHCh2RJQBfXaVKjaR3AiYcuAk1R1nUkUiUpF976A_mAjv2RTsmP9EtK1xkylAvvJc8594A8UfSGkhOa0vTUrfsmZoSmMSGseB4d0DxNYpZkoxdP6lfRkXNrEhYvWMbpwTO4bhRMu15ID6aGK-FRaf_nx08HcyPRxGeqMysr-gYlTBphA1BZlB6lO4aJ6YxdYoWB5UDoCsbeox-q0BkN5-0ACyEl6iAb-pvei1sFGG5Eh-0WrnZyKBXMVeDplYNTWPQtbuC9aTXemg02cOWwMS6YEeGoga9a3N9hq43zeAyfHh38a2GqYe5Fiw-_7u_gi4BZ1ZoA9moDM5iovl0rvR7CWBPAFxZ7hAWMu-XQCu1FA2d2ePiN2gWTn1WFwbh6Hb2sRevU0eN-GN2cf7iefIwvZxfTyfgyloyE182XiagZ5awQhMm8pinndVbVaTaiJOOilpKxjCZFRYtaZIxWtBbJshCjmueyIPwwervX7a35Nijny7UZrA4jS5qPUk5ywpOAOtmjpDXOWVWXvcVO2G1JSbkLQrkLQrkLQrkLQiC82xO-izZ8XKVWdtiG4on6f4lpwhlJ-F9P5sO0</recordid><startdate>20150901</startdate><enddate>20150901</enddate><creator>Kravos, Andrej</creator><creator>Kračun, Lucija</creator><creator>Kravos, Klara</creator><creator>Iljaž, Rade</creator><general>De Gruyter Open</general><general>Institute of Public Health of the Republic of Slovenia</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150901</creationdate><title>The Impact of Patient’s Socio-Demographic Characterictics, Comorbidities and Attitudes on Flu Vaccination Uptake in Family Practice Settings / Vpliv Bolnikovih Psihosocialnih Značilnosti, Komorbidnosti In Stališč Na Odločitev O Cepljenju Proti Gripi V Ambulantah Družinske Medicine</title><author>Kravos, Andrej ; Kračun, Lucija ; Kravos, Klara ; Iljaž, Rade</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2054-8b4af21329a02c8f1533f7df5761073afcc227149d19fa721d1fa4b9a6f38c903</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>cepljenje</topic><topic>chronic diseases</topic><topic>Comorbidity</topic><topic>Demographics</topic><topic>družinska medicina</topic><topic>Families & family life</topic><topic>family practice</topic><topic>gripa</topic><topic>influenza</topic><topic>kronične bolezni</topic><topic>Society</topic><topic>stališča</topic><topic>vaccination</topic><topic>Vaccines</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kravos, Andrej</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kračun, Lucija</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kravos, Klara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iljaž, Rade</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Zdravstveno varstvo</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kravos, Andrej</au><au>Kračun, Lucija</au><au>Kravos, Klara</au><au>Iljaž, Rade</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Impact of Patient’s Socio-Demographic Characterictics, Comorbidities and Attitudes on Flu Vaccination Uptake in Family Practice Settings / Vpliv Bolnikovih Psihosocialnih Značilnosti, Komorbidnosti In Stališč Na Odločitev O Cepljenju Proti Gripi V Ambulantah Družinske Medicine</atitle><jtitle>Zdravstveno varstvo</jtitle><date>2015-09-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>54</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>204</spage><epage>211</epage><pages>204-211</pages><issn>1854-2476</issn><issn>0351-0026</issn><eissn>1854-2476</eissn><abstract>Objectives. In Slovenia, the role of family physicians in primary care and preventive procedures is very important. Influenza vaccination rates in Slovenia are low. The reasons for low vaccination rates in Slovenia were not clear. We suppose that patient’s beliefs and attitudes are important factors. We assessed patients’ opinions regarding the acceptance of flu vaccination by their family physicians and their beliefs and attitudes about flu and vaccination. The aim was to check out factors that influence the decision to take the vaccine in family physician offices.
Methods. This was a cross-sectional, multicenter, observational study in the Styria region in Slovenia. We included patients from seven family physicians during regular office visits. They filled in a questionnaire about their general demographic data and attitudes regarding influenza and vaccination. The main outcome was the decision to be vaccinated.
Results. The logistic regression model identified five predictors for influenza vaccination, namely: heart disease, previous vaccination, an agreement with the beliefs ‘the vaccination is an efficient measure to prevent influenza’, ‘after the vaccination there are usually no important side effects’ and ‘the vaccination is also recommended for a healthy adult person’. The belief that vaccinations harm the immune system is negatively associated with vaccination.
Conclusions. Patients’ beliefs are an important factor to decide for vaccination or not. Family physician teams should discuss with patients their beliefs and concerns about vaccination.
Uvod. V Sloveniji ima zdravnik družinske medicine pomembno vlogo pri izvajanju preventive. Delež cepljenih proti gripi je v Sloveniji nizek. Razlogi za to niso povsem jasni. Preučevali smo mnenje bolnikov glede cepljenja proti gripi pri njihovem družinskem zdravniku ter njihova stališča in prepričanja o gripi in cepljenju. Cilj naloge je bil odkriti dejavnike, ki vplivajo na odločitev o cepljenju v ambulanti družinske medicine.
Metode. Raziskava je bila presečna multicentrična opazovalna. Vključili smo bolnike iz 7 ambulant družinske medicine na Štajerskem v Sloveniji. Vzorec je zajemal bolnike, ki so prišli v ambulanto. Izpolnili so vprašalnik z demografskimi podatki ter stališči o gripi in cepljenju. Glavni opazovani dogodek je bil odločitev za cepljenje.
Rezultati. V logističnem regresijskem modelu so bili najpomembnejši napovedni dejavniki odločitve za cepljenje srčna bolezen, cepljenje v preteklosti, strinjanje, da je cepljenje najbolj učinkovit ukrep proti gripi, strinjanje, da cepljenje običajno nima pomembnih stranskih učinkov, in strinjanje, da je cepljenje priporočljivo tudi za odraslo zdravo osebo. Prepričanje, da cepljenje škodi imunskemu sistemu, je negativni napovedni dejavnik odločitve za cepljenje.
Zaključki. Stališča bolnikov so pomemben dejavnik pri odločitvi za cepljenje. V ambulantah družinske medicine bi se morali z bolniki več pogovarjati o njihovih stališčih in pomislekih o cepljenju.</abstract><cop>Ljubljana</cop><pub>De Gruyter Open</pub><doi>10.1515/sjph-2015-0029</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1854-2476 |
ispartof | Zdravstveno varstvo, 2015-09, Vol.54 (3), p.204-211 |
issn | 1854-2476 0351-0026 1854-2476 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1865308034 |
source | De Gruyter Open Access Journals; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; PubMed Central |
subjects | Attitudes cepljenje chronic diseases Comorbidity Demographics družinska medicina Families & family life family practice gripa influenza kronične bolezni Society stališča vaccination Vaccines |
title | The Impact of Patient’s Socio-Demographic Characterictics, Comorbidities and Attitudes on Flu Vaccination Uptake in Family Practice Settings / Vpliv Bolnikovih Psihosocialnih Značilnosti, Komorbidnosti In Stališč Na Odločitev O Cepljenju Proti Gripi V Ambulantah Družinske Medicine |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T14%3A55%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Impact%20of%20Patient%E2%80%99s%20Socio-Demographic%20Characterictics,%20Comorbidities%20and%20Attitudes%20on%20Flu%20Vaccination%20Uptake%20in%20Family%20Practice%20Settings%20/%20Vpliv%20Bolnikovih%20Psihosocialnih%20Zna%C4%8Dilnosti,%20Komorbidnosti%20In%20Stali%C5%A1%C4%8D%20Na%20Odlo%C4%8Ditev%20O%20Cepljenju%20Proti%20Gripi%20V%20Ambulantah%20Dru%C5%BEinske%20Medicine&rft.jtitle=Zdravstveno%20varstvo&rft.au=Kravos,%20Andrej&rft.date=2015-09-01&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=204&rft.epage=211&rft.pages=204-211&rft.issn=1854-2476&rft.eissn=1854-2476&rft_id=info:doi/10.1515/sjph-2015-0029&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4312454221%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1865308034&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |