Examining study habits in undergraduate STEM courses from a situative perspective

Background A growing body of research in cognitive psychology and education research is illuminating which study strategies are effective for optimal learning, but little descriptive research focuses on how undergraduate students in STEM courses actually study in real-world settings. Using a practic...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of STEM education 2017-02, Vol.4 (1), p.1, Article 1
Hauptverfasser: Hora, Matthew T., Oleson, Amanda K.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page 1
container_title International journal of STEM education
container_volume 4
creator Hora, Matthew T.
Oleson, Amanda K.
description Background A growing body of research in cognitive psychology and education research is illuminating which study strategies are effective for optimal learning, but little descriptive research focuses on how undergraduate students in STEM courses actually study in real-world settings. Using a practice-based approach informed by situated cognition theory, we analyzed data from 61 STEM students about their study habits. Results Results indicate that studying is a multi-faceted process that is initiated by instructor- or self-generated cues, followed by marshaling resources and managing distractions, and then implementing study behaviors that include selecting a social setting and specific strategies. Variations in some study behaviors are also evident according to the timing of their studying (e.g., cramming), course level, discipline, and social setting. Three cases of individual student practices reveal how studying is also shaped by how the course is designed and taught, students’ own beliefs about studying, and aspects of their personal lives. Conclusions The results indicate that studying involves various social, digital, and curricular resources, that many students persist in utilizing low-impact study strategies (e.g., re-reading text), and that the use of study strategies varies across different situations. We suggest that the focus on changing teaching behaviors that is dominant within STEM education be broadened to include a focus on instructional design that supports student self-regulatory behaviors and the adoption of high-impact study strategies. Graphical abstract The stages of studying across three cases: Brianna, Larry, and Angelica.
doi_str_mv 10.1186/s40594-017-0055-6
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1865265096</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1181900</ericid><sourcerecordid>4312411871</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-507c25859e2126ad2f399fcd3127b88cfd69001eca86a10a96fcac4366fd1423</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtLxDAUhYMoOOj8ABdCwHU0SZO0WcpQX4yIOPuQyWPM4LQ1acX596ZUZDau7oVzzr2HD4ALgq8JqcRNYphLhjApEcacI3EEZpRIgcqK0uOD_RTMU9pijEnBCsLKGXitv_UuNKHZwNQPdg_f9Tr0CYYGDo11cRO1HXTv4NuqfoamHWJyCfrY7qCGKfRZC18Odi6mzplxPwcnXn8kN_-dZ2B1V68WD2j5cv-4uF0iw6jsEcelobzi0lFChbbUF1J6YwtCy3VVGW-FzD2d0ZXQBGspvNGGFUJ4SxgtzsDVdLaL7efgUq-2uVyTP6qMhFPBsRTZRSaXiW1K0XnVxbDTca8IViM7NbFTmZ0a2akxczllXAzmz18_ZTvJlbJOJz1lrdm4ePD536M__jN6tw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1865265096</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Examining study habits in undergraduate STEM courses from a situative perspective</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Hora, Matthew T. ; Oleson, Amanda K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hora, Matthew T. ; Oleson, Amanda K.</creatorcontrib><description>Background A growing body of research in cognitive psychology and education research is illuminating which study strategies are effective for optimal learning, but little descriptive research focuses on how undergraduate students in STEM courses actually study in real-world settings. Using a practice-based approach informed by situated cognition theory, we analyzed data from 61 STEM students about their study habits. Results Results indicate that studying is a multi-faceted process that is initiated by instructor- or self-generated cues, followed by marshaling resources and managing distractions, and then implementing study behaviors that include selecting a social setting and specific strategies. Variations in some study behaviors are also evident according to the timing of their studying (e.g., cramming), course level, discipline, and social setting. Three cases of individual student practices reveal how studying is also shaped by how the course is designed and taught, students’ own beliefs about studying, and aspects of their personal lives. Conclusions The results indicate that studying involves various social, digital, and curricular resources, that many students persist in utilizing low-impact study strategies (e.g., re-reading text), and that the use of study strategies varies across different situations. We suggest that the focus on changing teaching behaviors that is dominant within STEM education be broadened to include a focus on instructional design that supports student self-regulatory behaviors and the adoption of high-impact study strategies. Graphical abstract The stages of studying across three cases: Brianna, Larry, and Angelica.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2196-7822</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2196-7822</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s40594-017-0055-6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Academic Achievement ; Achievement Need ; Cognitive Psychology ; College students ; Education ; Educational Technology ; Epistemology ; Focus Groups ; Foreign Countries ; Learning Processes ; Learning Strategies ; Mathematics Education ; Predictor Variables ; Qualitative Research ; Science Education ; Semi Structured Interviews ; STEM Education ; Student Behavior ; Students ; Study Habits ; Study skills ; Teaching Methods ; Undergraduate Students ; Undergraduate Study</subject><ispartof>International journal of STEM education, 2017-02, Vol.4 (1), p.1, Article 1</ispartof><rights>The Author(s). 2017</rights><rights>International Journal of STEM Education is a copyright of Springer, 2017.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-507c25859e2126ad2f399fcd3127b88cfd69001eca86a10a96fcac4366fd1423</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-507c25859e2126ad2f399fcd3127b88cfd69001eca86a10a96fcac4366fd1423</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1186/s40594-017-0055-6$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1186/s40594-017-0055-6$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,27924,27925,41120,41488,42189,42557,51319,51576</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1181900$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hora, Matthew T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oleson, Amanda K.</creatorcontrib><title>Examining study habits in undergraduate STEM courses from a situative perspective</title><title>International journal of STEM education</title><addtitle>IJ STEM Ed</addtitle><description>Background A growing body of research in cognitive psychology and education research is illuminating which study strategies are effective for optimal learning, but little descriptive research focuses on how undergraduate students in STEM courses actually study in real-world settings. Using a practice-based approach informed by situated cognition theory, we analyzed data from 61 STEM students about their study habits. Results Results indicate that studying is a multi-faceted process that is initiated by instructor- or self-generated cues, followed by marshaling resources and managing distractions, and then implementing study behaviors that include selecting a social setting and specific strategies. Variations in some study behaviors are also evident according to the timing of their studying (e.g., cramming), course level, discipline, and social setting. Three cases of individual student practices reveal how studying is also shaped by how the course is designed and taught, students’ own beliefs about studying, and aspects of their personal lives. Conclusions The results indicate that studying involves various social, digital, and curricular resources, that many students persist in utilizing low-impact study strategies (e.g., re-reading text), and that the use of study strategies varies across different situations. We suggest that the focus on changing teaching behaviors that is dominant within STEM education be broadened to include a focus on instructional design that supports student self-regulatory behaviors and the adoption of high-impact study strategies. Graphical abstract The stages of studying across three cases: Brianna, Larry, and Angelica.</description><subject>Academic Achievement</subject><subject>Achievement Need</subject><subject>Cognitive Psychology</subject><subject>College students</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Educational Technology</subject><subject>Epistemology</subject><subject>Focus Groups</subject><subject>Foreign Countries</subject><subject>Learning Processes</subject><subject>Learning Strategies</subject><subject>Mathematics Education</subject><subject>Predictor Variables</subject><subject>Qualitative Research</subject><subject>Science Education</subject><subject>Semi Structured Interviews</subject><subject>STEM Education</subject><subject>Student Behavior</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Study Habits</subject><subject>Study skills</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><subject>Undergraduate Students</subject><subject>Undergraduate Study</subject><issn>2196-7822</issn><issn>2196-7822</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEtLxDAUhYMoOOj8ABdCwHU0SZO0WcpQX4yIOPuQyWPM4LQ1acX596ZUZDau7oVzzr2HD4ALgq8JqcRNYphLhjApEcacI3EEZpRIgcqK0uOD_RTMU9pijEnBCsLKGXitv_UuNKHZwNQPdg_f9Tr0CYYGDo11cRO1HXTv4NuqfoamHWJyCfrY7qCGKfRZC18Odi6mzplxPwcnXn8kN_-dZ2B1V68WD2j5cv-4uF0iw6jsEcelobzi0lFChbbUF1J6YwtCy3VVGW-FzD2d0ZXQBGspvNGGFUJ4SxgtzsDVdLaL7efgUq-2uVyTP6qMhFPBsRTZRSaXiW1K0XnVxbDTca8IViM7NbFTmZ0a2akxczllXAzmz18_ZTvJlbJOJz1lrdm4ePD536M__jN6tw</recordid><startdate>20170201</startdate><enddate>20170201</enddate><creator>Hora, Matthew T.</creator><creator>Oleson, Amanda K.</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170201</creationdate><title>Examining study habits in undergraduate STEM courses from a situative perspective</title><author>Hora, Matthew T. ; Oleson, Amanda K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-507c25859e2126ad2f399fcd3127b88cfd69001eca86a10a96fcac4366fd1423</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Academic Achievement</topic><topic>Achievement Need</topic><topic>Cognitive Psychology</topic><topic>College students</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Educational Technology</topic><topic>Epistemology</topic><topic>Focus Groups</topic><topic>Foreign Countries</topic><topic>Learning Processes</topic><topic>Learning Strategies</topic><topic>Mathematics Education</topic><topic>Predictor Variables</topic><topic>Qualitative Research</topic><topic>Science Education</topic><topic>Semi Structured Interviews</topic><topic>STEM Education</topic><topic>Student Behavior</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Study Habits</topic><topic>Study skills</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><topic>Undergraduate Students</topic><topic>Undergraduate Study</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hora, Matthew T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oleson, Amanda K.</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>International journal of STEM education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hora, Matthew T.</au><au>Oleson, Amanda K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1181900</ericid><atitle>Examining study habits in undergraduate STEM courses from a situative perspective</atitle><jtitle>International journal of STEM education</jtitle><stitle>IJ STEM Ed</stitle><date>2017-02-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><pages>1-</pages><artnum>1</artnum><issn>2196-7822</issn><eissn>2196-7822</eissn><abstract>Background A growing body of research in cognitive psychology and education research is illuminating which study strategies are effective for optimal learning, but little descriptive research focuses on how undergraduate students in STEM courses actually study in real-world settings. Using a practice-based approach informed by situated cognition theory, we analyzed data from 61 STEM students about their study habits. Results Results indicate that studying is a multi-faceted process that is initiated by instructor- or self-generated cues, followed by marshaling resources and managing distractions, and then implementing study behaviors that include selecting a social setting and specific strategies. Variations in some study behaviors are also evident according to the timing of their studying (e.g., cramming), course level, discipline, and social setting. Three cases of individual student practices reveal how studying is also shaped by how the course is designed and taught, students’ own beliefs about studying, and aspects of their personal lives. Conclusions The results indicate that studying involves various social, digital, and curricular resources, that many students persist in utilizing low-impact study strategies (e.g., re-reading text), and that the use of study strategies varies across different situations. We suggest that the focus on changing teaching behaviors that is dominant within STEM education be broadened to include a focus on instructional design that supports student self-regulatory behaviors and the adoption of high-impact study strategies. Graphical abstract The stages of studying across three cases: Brianna, Larry, and Angelica.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><doi>10.1186/s40594-017-0055-6</doi><tpages>19</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2196-7822
ispartof International journal of STEM education, 2017-02, Vol.4 (1), p.1, Article 1
issn 2196-7822
2196-7822
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1865265096
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Springer Nature OA Free Journals; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Academic Achievement
Achievement Need
Cognitive Psychology
College students
Education
Educational Technology
Epistemology
Focus Groups
Foreign Countries
Learning Processes
Learning Strategies
Mathematics Education
Predictor Variables
Qualitative Research
Science Education
Semi Structured Interviews
STEM Education
Student Behavior
Students
Study Habits
Study skills
Teaching Methods
Undergraduate Students
Undergraduate Study
title Examining study habits in undergraduate STEM courses from a situative perspective
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T12%3A48%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Examining%20study%20habits%20in%20undergraduate%20STEM%20courses%20from%20a%20situative%20perspective&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20STEM%20education&rft.au=Hora,%20Matthew%20T.&rft.date=2017-02-01&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.pages=1-&rft.artnum=1&rft.issn=2196-7822&rft.eissn=2196-7822&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s40594-017-0055-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4312411871%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1865265096&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1181900&rfr_iscdi=true