Why the Greenwich meridian moved

In 1884, the International Meridian Conference recommended that the prime meridian “to be employed as a common zero of longitude and standard of time-reckoning throughout the globe” pass through the “centre of the transit instrument at the Observatory of Greenwich”. Today, tourists visiting its meri...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of geodesy 2015-12, Vol.89 (12), p.1263-1272
Hauptverfasser: Malys, Stephen, Seago, John H., Pavlis, Nikolaos K., Seidelmann, P. Kenneth, Kaplan, George H.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1272
container_issue 12
container_start_page 1263
container_title Journal of geodesy
container_volume 89
creator Malys, Stephen
Seago, John H.
Pavlis, Nikolaos K.
Seidelmann, P. Kenneth
Kaplan, George H.
description In 1884, the International Meridian Conference recommended that the prime meridian “to be employed as a common zero of longitude and standard of time-reckoning throughout the globe” pass through the “centre of the transit instrument at the Observatory of Greenwich”. Today, tourists visiting its meridian line must walk east approximately 102 m before their satellite-navigation receivers indicate zero longitude. This offset can be accounted for by the difference between astronomical and geodetic coordinates—deflection of the vertical—in the east–west direction at Greenwich, and the imposed condition of continuity in astronomical time. The coordinates of satellite-navigation receivers are provided in reference frames that are related to the geocentric reference frame introduced by the Bureau International de l’Heure (BIH) in 1984. This BIH Terrestrial System provided the basis for orientation of subsequent geocentric reference frames, including all realizations of the World Geodetic System 1984 and the International Terrestrial Reference Frame. Despite the lateral offset of the original and current zero-longitude lines at Greenwich, the orientation of the meridian plane used to measure Universal Time has remained essentially unchanged.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00190-015-0844-y
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1865250204</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4312328011</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-3a3986a43c7c6b650df8b8ba07383304550a402e28d296f3116e70f422e6d9613</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1Kw0AURgdRsFYfwF3A9ei98z9LKdoKBTeKy2GSTEyKSepMquTtTYkLN67u5pzvwiHkGuEWAfRdAkALFFBSMELQ8YQsUHBGkVtxShZghaVaozgnFyntJlpLoxYke6vHbKhDto4hdN9NUWdtiE3Z-C5r-69QXpKzyn-kcPV7l-T18eFltaHb5_XT6n5LC8HsQLnn1igveKELlSsJZWVyk3vQ3HAOQkrwAlhgpmRWVRxRBQ2VYCyo0irkS3Iz7-5j_3kIaXC7_hC76aVDoySTwEBMFM5UEfuUYqjcPjatj6NDcMcQbg7hphDuGMKNk8NmJ01s9x7in-V_pR-14F26</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1865250204</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Why the Greenwich meridian moved</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Malys, Stephen ; Seago, John H. ; Pavlis, Nikolaos K. ; Seidelmann, P. Kenneth ; Kaplan, George H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Malys, Stephen ; Seago, John H. ; Pavlis, Nikolaos K. ; Seidelmann, P. Kenneth ; Kaplan, George H.</creatorcontrib><description>In 1884, the International Meridian Conference recommended that the prime meridian “to be employed as a common zero of longitude and standard of time-reckoning throughout the globe” pass through the “centre of the transit instrument at the Observatory of Greenwich”. Today, tourists visiting its meridian line must walk east approximately 102 m before their satellite-navigation receivers indicate zero longitude. This offset can be accounted for by the difference between astronomical and geodetic coordinates—deflection of the vertical—in the east–west direction at Greenwich, and the imposed condition of continuity in astronomical time. The coordinates of satellite-navigation receivers are provided in reference frames that are related to the geocentric reference frame introduced by the Bureau International de l’Heure (BIH) in 1984. This BIH Terrestrial System provided the basis for orientation of subsequent geocentric reference frames, including all realizations of the World Geodetic System 1984 and the International Terrestrial Reference Frame. Despite the lateral offset of the original and current zero-longitude lines at Greenwich, the orientation of the meridian plane used to measure Universal Time has remained essentially unchanged.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0949-7714</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1394</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00190-015-0844-y</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; Geodetics ; Geophysics/Geodesy ; Global positioning systems ; GPS ; Longitude ; Short Note</subject><ispartof>Journal of geodesy, 2015-12, Vol.89 (12), p.1263-1272</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2015</rights><rights>Journal of Geodesy is a copyright of Springer, 2015.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-3a3986a43c7c6b650df8b8ba07383304550a402e28d296f3116e70f422e6d9613</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-3a3986a43c7c6b650df8b8ba07383304550a402e28d296f3116e70f422e6d9613</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00190-015-0844-y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00190-015-0844-y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Malys, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seago, John H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pavlis, Nikolaos K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seidelmann, P. Kenneth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaplan, George H.</creatorcontrib><title>Why the Greenwich meridian moved</title><title>Journal of geodesy</title><addtitle>J Geod</addtitle><description>In 1884, the International Meridian Conference recommended that the prime meridian “to be employed as a common zero of longitude and standard of time-reckoning throughout the globe” pass through the “centre of the transit instrument at the Observatory of Greenwich”. Today, tourists visiting its meridian line must walk east approximately 102 m before their satellite-navigation receivers indicate zero longitude. This offset can be accounted for by the difference between astronomical and geodetic coordinates—deflection of the vertical—in the east–west direction at Greenwich, and the imposed condition of continuity in astronomical time. The coordinates of satellite-navigation receivers are provided in reference frames that are related to the geocentric reference frame introduced by the Bureau International de l’Heure (BIH) in 1984. This BIH Terrestrial System provided the basis for orientation of subsequent geocentric reference frames, including all realizations of the World Geodetic System 1984 and the International Terrestrial Reference Frame. Despite the lateral offset of the original and current zero-longitude lines at Greenwich, the orientation of the meridian plane used to measure Universal Time has remained essentially unchanged.</description><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Geodetics</subject><subject>Geophysics/Geodesy</subject><subject>Global positioning systems</subject><subject>GPS</subject><subject>Longitude</subject><subject>Short Note</subject><issn>0949-7714</issn><issn>1432-1394</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM1Kw0AURgdRsFYfwF3A9ei98z9LKdoKBTeKy2GSTEyKSepMquTtTYkLN67u5pzvwiHkGuEWAfRdAkALFFBSMELQ8YQsUHBGkVtxShZghaVaozgnFyntJlpLoxYke6vHbKhDto4hdN9NUWdtiE3Z-C5r-69QXpKzyn-kcPV7l-T18eFltaHb5_XT6n5LC8HsQLnn1igveKELlSsJZWVyk3vQ3HAOQkrwAlhgpmRWVRxRBQ2VYCyo0irkS3Iz7-5j_3kIaXC7_hC76aVDoySTwEBMFM5UEfuUYqjcPjatj6NDcMcQbg7hphDuGMKNk8NmJ01s9x7in-V_pR-14F26</recordid><startdate>20151201</startdate><enddate>20151201</enddate><creator>Malys, Stephen</creator><creator>Seago, John H.</creator><creator>Pavlis, Nikolaos K.</creator><creator>Seidelmann, P. Kenneth</creator><creator>Kaplan, George H.</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20151201</creationdate><title>Why the Greenwich meridian moved</title><author>Malys, Stephen ; Seago, John H. ; Pavlis, Nikolaos K. ; Seidelmann, P. Kenneth ; Kaplan, George H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-3a3986a43c7c6b650df8b8ba07383304550a402e28d296f3116e70f422e6d9613</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Geodetics</topic><topic>Geophysics/Geodesy</topic><topic>Global positioning systems</topic><topic>GPS</topic><topic>Longitude</topic><topic>Short Note</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Malys, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seago, John H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pavlis, Nikolaos K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seidelmann, P. Kenneth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaplan, George H.</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of geodesy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Malys, Stephen</au><au>Seago, John H.</au><au>Pavlis, Nikolaos K.</au><au>Seidelmann, P. Kenneth</au><au>Kaplan, George H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Why the Greenwich meridian moved</atitle><jtitle>Journal of geodesy</jtitle><stitle>J Geod</stitle><date>2015-12-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>89</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>1263</spage><epage>1272</epage><pages>1263-1272</pages><issn>0949-7714</issn><eissn>1432-1394</eissn><abstract>In 1884, the International Meridian Conference recommended that the prime meridian “to be employed as a common zero of longitude and standard of time-reckoning throughout the globe” pass through the “centre of the transit instrument at the Observatory of Greenwich”. Today, tourists visiting its meridian line must walk east approximately 102 m before their satellite-navigation receivers indicate zero longitude. This offset can be accounted for by the difference between astronomical and geodetic coordinates—deflection of the vertical—in the east–west direction at Greenwich, and the imposed condition of continuity in astronomical time. The coordinates of satellite-navigation receivers are provided in reference frames that are related to the geocentric reference frame introduced by the Bureau International de l’Heure (BIH) in 1984. This BIH Terrestrial System provided the basis for orientation of subsequent geocentric reference frames, including all realizations of the World Geodetic System 1984 and the International Terrestrial Reference Frame. Despite the lateral offset of the original and current zero-longitude lines at Greenwich, the orientation of the meridian plane used to measure Universal Time has remained essentially unchanged.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s00190-015-0844-y</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0949-7714
ispartof Journal of geodesy, 2015-12, Vol.89 (12), p.1263-1272
issn 0949-7714
1432-1394
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1865250204
source SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Earth and Environmental Science
Earth Sciences
Geodetics
Geophysics/Geodesy
Global positioning systems
GPS
Longitude
Short Note
title Why the Greenwich meridian moved
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T16%3A15%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Why%20the%20Greenwich%20meridian%20moved&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20geodesy&rft.au=Malys,%20Stephen&rft.date=2015-12-01&rft.volume=89&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1263&rft.epage=1272&rft.pages=1263-1272&rft.issn=0949-7714&rft.eissn=1432-1394&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00190-015-0844-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4312328011%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1865250204&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true