Why the Greenwich meridian moved
In 1884, the International Meridian Conference recommended that the prime meridian “to be employed as a common zero of longitude and standard of time-reckoning throughout the globe” pass through the “centre of the transit instrument at the Observatory of Greenwich”. Today, tourists visiting its meri...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of geodesy 2015-12, Vol.89 (12), p.1263-1272 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1272 |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 1263 |
container_title | Journal of geodesy |
container_volume | 89 |
creator | Malys, Stephen Seago, John H. Pavlis, Nikolaos K. Seidelmann, P. Kenneth Kaplan, George H. |
description | In 1884, the International Meridian Conference recommended that the prime meridian “to be employed as a common zero of longitude and standard of time-reckoning throughout the globe” pass through the “centre of the transit instrument at the Observatory of Greenwich”. Today, tourists visiting its meridian line must walk east approximately 102 m before their satellite-navigation receivers indicate zero longitude. This offset can be accounted for by the difference between astronomical and geodetic coordinates—deflection of the vertical—in the east–west direction at Greenwich, and the imposed condition of continuity in astronomical time. The coordinates of satellite-navigation receivers are provided in reference frames that are related to the geocentric reference frame introduced by the
Bureau International de l’Heure
(BIH) in 1984. This BIH Terrestrial System provided the basis for orientation of subsequent geocentric reference frames, including all realizations of the World Geodetic System 1984 and the International Terrestrial Reference Frame. Despite the lateral offset of the original and current zero-longitude lines at Greenwich, the orientation of the meridian plane used to measure Universal Time has remained essentially unchanged. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00190-015-0844-y |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1865250204</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4312328011</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-3a3986a43c7c6b650df8b8ba07383304550a402e28d296f3116e70f422e6d9613</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1Kw0AURgdRsFYfwF3A9ei98z9LKdoKBTeKy2GSTEyKSepMquTtTYkLN67u5pzvwiHkGuEWAfRdAkALFFBSMELQ8YQsUHBGkVtxShZghaVaozgnFyntJlpLoxYke6vHbKhDto4hdN9NUWdtiE3Z-C5r-69QXpKzyn-kcPV7l-T18eFltaHb5_XT6n5LC8HsQLnn1igveKELlSsJZWVyk3vQ3HAOQkrwAlhgpmRWVRxRBQ2VYCyo0irkS3Iz7-5j_3kIaXC7_hC76aVDoySTwEBMFM5UEfuUYqjcPjatj6NDcMcQbg7hphDuGMKNk8NmJ01s9x7in-V_pR-14F26</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1865250204</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Why the Greenwich meridian moved</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Malys, Stephen ; Seago, John H. ; Pavlis, Nikolaos K. ; Seidelmann, P. Kenneth ; Kaplan, George H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Malys, Stephen ; Seago, John H. ; Pavlis, Nikolaos K. ; Seidelmann, P. Kenneth ; Kaplan, George H.</creatorcontrib><description>In 1884, the International Meridian Conference recommended that the prime meridian “to be employed as a common zero of longitude and standard of time-reckoning throughout the globe” pass through the “centre of the transit instrument at the Observatory of Greenwich”. Today, tourists visiting its meridian line must walk east approximately 102 m before their satellite-navigation receivers indicate zero longitude. This offset can be accounted for by the difference between astronomical and geodetic coordinates—deflection of the vertical—in the east–west direction at Greenwich, and the imposed condition of continuity in astronomical time. The coordinates of satellite-navigation receivers are provided in reference frames that are related to the geocentric reference frame introduced by the
Bureau International de l’Heure
(BIH) in 1984. This BIH Terrestrial System provided the basis for orientation of subsequent geocentric reference frames, including all realizations of the World Geodetic System 1984 and the International Terrestrial Reference Frame. Despite the lateral offset of the original and current zero-longitude lines at Greenwich, the orientation of the meridian plane used to measure Universal Time has remained essentially unchanged.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0949-7714</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1394</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00190-015-0844-y</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; Geodetics ; Geophysics/Geodesy ; Global positioning systems ; GPS ; Longitude ; Short Note</subject><ispartof>Journal of geodesy, 2015-12, Vol.89 (12), p.1263-1272</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2015</rights><rights>Journal of Geodesy is a copyright of Springer, 2015.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-3a3986a43c7c6b650df8b8ba07383304550a402e28d296f3116e70f422e6d9613</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-3a3986a43c7c6b650df8b8ba07383304550a402e28d296f3116e70f422e6d9613</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00190-015-0844-y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00190-015-0844-y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Malys, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seago, John H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pavlis, Nikolaos K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seidelmann, P. Kenneth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaplan, George H.</creatorcontrib><title>Why the Greenwich meridian moved</title><title>Journal of geodesy</title><addtitle>J Geod</addtitle><description>In 1884, the International Meridian Conference recommended that the prime meridian “to be employed as a common zero of longitude and standard of time-reckoning throughout the globe” pass through the “centre of the transit instrument at the Observatory of Greenwich”. Today, tourists visiting its meridian line must walk east approximately 102 m before their satellite-navigation receivers indicate zero longitude. This offset can be accounted for by the difference between astronomical and geodetic coordinates—deflection of the vertical—in the east–west direction at Greenwich, and the imposed condition of continuity in astronomical time. The coordinates of satellite-navigation receivers are provided in reference frames that are related to the geocentric reference frame introduced by the
Bureau International de l’Heure
(BIH) in 1984. This BIH Terrestrial System provided the basis for orientation of subsequent geocentric reference frames, including all realizations of the World Geodetic System 1984 and the International Terrestrial Reference Frame. Despite the lateral offset of the original and current zero-longitude lines at Greenwich, the orientation of the meridian plane used to measure Universal Time has remained essentially unchanged.</description><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Geodetics</subject><subject>Geophysics/Geodesy</subject><subject>Global positioning systems</subject><subject>GPS</subject><subject>Longitude</subject><subject>Short Note</subject><issn>0949-7714</issn><issn>1432-1394</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM1Kw0AURgdRsFYfwF3A9ei98z9LKdoKBTeKy2GSTEyKSepMquTtTYkLN67u5pzvwiHkGuEWAfRdAkALFFBSMELQ8YQsUHBGkVtxShZghaVaozgnFyntJlpLoxYke6vHbKhDto4hdN9NUWdtiE3Z-C5r-69QXpKzyn-kcPV7l-T18eFltaHb5_XT6n5LC8HsQLnn1igveKELlSsJZWVyk3vQ3HAOQkrwAlhgpmRWVRxRBQ2VYCyo0irkS3Iz7-5j_3kIaXC7_hC76aVDoySTwEBMFM5UEfuUYqjcPjatj6NDcMcQbg7hphDuGMKNk8NmJ01s9x7in-V_pR-14F26</recordid><startdate>20151201</startdate><enddate>20151201</enddate><creator>Malys, Stephen</creator><creator>Seago, John H.</creator><creator>Pavlis, Nikolaos K.</creator><creator>Seidelmann, P. Kenneth</creator><creator>Kaplan, George H.</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20151201</creationdate><title>Why the Greenwich meridian moved</title><author>Malys, Stephen ; Seago, John H. ; Pavlis, Nikolaos K. ; Seidelmann, P. Kenneth ; Kaplan, George H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-3a3986a43c7c6b650df8b8ba07383304550a402e28d296f3116e70f422e6d9613</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Geodetics</topic><topic>Geophysics/Geodesy</topic><topic>Global positioning systems</topic><topic>GPS</topic><topic>Longitude</topic><topic>Short Note</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Malys, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seago, John H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pavlis, Nikolaos K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seidelmann, P. Kenneth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaplan, George H.</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of geodesy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Malys, Stephen</au><au>Seago, John H.</au><au>Pavlis, Nikolaos K.</au><au>Seidelmann, P. Kenneth</au><au>Kaplan, George H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Why the Greenwich meridian moved</atitle><jtitle>Journal of geodesy</jtitle><stitle>J Geod</stitle><date>2015-12-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>89</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>1263</spage><epage>1272</epage><pages>1263-1272</pages><issn>0949-7714</issn><eissn>1432-1394</eissn><abstract>In 1884, the International Meridian Conference recommended that the prime meridian “to be employed as a common zero of longitude and standard of time-reckoning throughout the globe” pass through the “centre of the transit instrument at the Observatory of Greenwich”. Today, tourists visiting its meridian line must walk east approximately 102 m before their satellite-navigation receivers indicate zero longitude. This offset can be accounted for by the difference between astronomical and geodetic coordinates—deflection of the vertical—in the east–west direction at Greenwich, and the imposed condition of continuity in astronomical time. The coordinates of satellite-navigation receivers are provided in reference frames that are related to the geocentric reference frame introduced by the
Bureau International de l’Heure
(BIH) in 1984. This BIH Terrestrial System provided the basis for orientation of subsequent geocentric reference frames, including all realizations of the World Geodetic System 1984 and the International Terrestrial Reference Frame. Despite the lateral offset of the original and current zero-longitude lines at Greenwich, the orientation of the meridian plane used to measure Universal Time has remained essentially unchanged.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s00190-015-0844-y</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0949-7714 |
ispartof | Journal of geodesy, 2015-12, Vol.89 (12), p.1263-1272 |
issn | 0949-7714 1432-1394 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1865250204 |
source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Earth and Environmental Science Earth Sciences Geodetics Geophysics/Geodesy Global positioning systems GPS Longitude Short Note |
title | Why the Greenwich meridian moved |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T16%3A15%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Why%20the%20Greenwich%20meridian%20moved&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20geodesy&rft.au=Malys,%20Stephen&rft.date=2015-12-01&rft.volume=89&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1263&rft.epage=1272&rft.pages=1263-1272&rft.issn=0949-7714&rft.eissn=1432-1394&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00190-015-0844-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4312328011%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1865250204&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |