Injection Effects on Sediment Transport in Closed-Conduit Flows
Experiments were conducted to investigate injection effects on sediment transport in closed-conduit flows. The results show that the sediment transport rate essentially remains unchanged when the ratio of the injection velocity and that at boiling, Vi / Vcr < 10. However, significant sediment tra...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Acta geophysica 2016-02, Vol.64 (1), p.125-148 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 148 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 125 |
container_title | Acta geophysica |
container_volume | 64 |
creator | Cao, Deping Chiew, Yee-Meng Yang, Shu-Qing |
description | Experiments were conducted to investigate injection effects on sediment transport in closed-conduit flows. The results show that the sediment transport rate essentially remains unchanged when the ratio of the injection velocity and that at boiling,
Vi
/
Vcr
< 10. However, significant sediment transport rate is observed when
Vi
/
Vcr
increases beyond this limit. In the literature, three semi-empirical models have been developed to relate seepage effects on the sediment transport rate. The experimentally measured data in the pre- and post-boiling condition (Liu and Chiew 2014, and the present study, respectively) are compared with these models. The results show that the models of Francalanci
et al.
(2008) and Nielsen
et al.
(2001) perform poorly in predicting injection effects on the sediment transport. Although Yang’s (2013) model could reasonably predict the influence of injection on the sediment transport rate in the post-boiling condition, it similarly fails when applied to the pre-boiling condition. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1515/acgeo-2015-0064 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1865247708</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4312325761</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a494t-e4ca82bd2c8eb8526fcba33622b4af5d2a066c9018854657b68e8c9aca69b7323</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkDFPwzAUhC0EEqUws0ZiNrUd23EGhFDUQqVKDJTZchwnSpXaxU5U9d_jkA4MDEzvhvvung6Ae4weMcNsoXRjHCQIM4gQpxdghkXOYEYZuzxrzjJyDW5C2I0OhMkMPK_tzui-dTZZ1nVUIYnyw1Tt3tg-2Xplw8H5PmltUnQumAoWzlZD2yerzh3DLbiqVRfM3fnOwedquS3e4Ob9dV28bKCiOe2hoVoJUlZEC1MKRnitS5WmnJCSqppVRCHOdY6wEIzGN0sujNC50ornZZaSdA4eptyDd1-DCb3cucHbWCmx4IzQLEMiuhaTS3sXgje1PPh2r_xJYiTHleTPSnJcSY4bROJpIo6q642vTOOHUxS_4v8mOcWYsMijiQ-xyTb_ANNvlut-sg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1865247708</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Injection Effects on Sediment Transport in Closed-Conduit Flows</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Cao, Deping ; Chiew, Yee-Meng ; Yang, Shu-Qing</creator><creatorcontrib>Cao, Deping ; Chiew, Yee-Meng ; Yang, Shu-Qing</creatorcontrib><description>Experiments were conducted to investigate injection effects on sediment transport in closed-conduit flows. The results show that the sediment transport rate essentially remains unchanged when the ratio of the injection velocity and that at boiling,
Vi
/
Vcr
< 10. However, significant sediment transport rate is observed when
Vi
/
Vcr
increases beyond this limit. In the literature, three semi-empirical models have been developed to relate seepage effects on the sediment transport rate. The experimentally measured data in the pre- and post-boiling condition (Liu and Chiew 2014, and the present study, respectively) are compared with these models. The results show that the models of Francalanci
et al.
(2008) and Nielsen
et al.
(2001) perform poorly in predicting injection effects on the sediment transport. Although Yang’s (2013) model could reasonably predict the influence of injection on the sediment transport rate in the post-boiling condition, it similarly fails when applied to the pre-boiling condition.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1895-6572</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1895-7455</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1515/acgeo-2015-0064</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Boundary conditions ; closed-conduit flow ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; Flow velocity ; Geophysics/Geodesy ; Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences ; Injection ; quick condition ; Sediment transport ; Structural Geology ; Viscosity</subject><ispartof>Acta geophysica, 2016-02, Vol.64 (1), p.125-148</ispartof><rights>Cao et al. 2015</rights><rights>Acta Geophysica is a copyright of Springer, 2015.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a494t-e4ca82bd2c8eb8526fcba33622b4af5d2a066c9018854657b68e8c9aca69b7323</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a494t-e4ca82bd2c8eb8526fcba33622b4af5d2a066c9018854657b68e8c9aca69b7323</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1515/acgeo-2015-0064$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1515/acgeo-2015-0064$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27928,27929,41492,42561,51323</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cao, Deping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiew, Yee-Meng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Shu-Qing</creatorcontrib><title>Injection Effects on Sediment Transport in Closed-Conduit Flows</title><title>Acta geophysica</title><addtitle>Acta Geophys</addtitle><description>Experiments were conducted to investigate injection effects on sediment transport in closed-conduit flows. The results show that the sediment transport rate essentially remains unchanged when the ratio of the injection velocity and that at boiling,
Vi
/
Vcr
< 10. However, significant sediment transport rate is observed when
Vi
/
Vcr
increases beyond this limit. In the literature, three semi-empirical models have been developed to relate seepage effects on the sediment transport rate. The experimentally measured data in the pre- and post-boiling condition (Liu and Chiew 2014, and the present study, respectively) are compared with these models. The results show that the models of Francalanci
et al.
(2008) and Nielsen
et al.
(2001) perform poorly in predicting injection effects on the sediment transport. Although Yang’s (2013) model could reasonably predict the influence of injection on the sediment transport rate in the post-boiling condition, it similarly fails when applied to the pre-boiling condition.</description><subject>Boundary conditions</subject><subject>closed-conduit flow</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Flow velocity</subject><subject>Geophysics/Geodesy</subject><subject>Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Injection</subject><subject>quick condition</subject><subject>Sediment transport</subject><subject>Structural Geology</subject><subject>Viscosity</subject><issn>1895-6572</issn><issn>1895-7455</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkDFPwzAUhC0EEqUws0ZiNrUd23EGhFDUQqVKDJTZchwnSpXaxU5U9d_jkA4MDEzvhvvung6Ae4weMcNsoXRjHCQIM4gQpxdghkXOYEYZuzxrzjJyDW5C2I0OhMkMPK_tzui-dTZZ1nVUIYnyw1Tt3tg-2Xplw8H5PmltUnQumAoWzlZD2yerzh3DLbiqVRfM3fnOwedquS3e4Ob9dV28bKCiOe2hoVoJUlZEC1MKRnitS5WmnJCSqppVRCHOdY6wEIzGN0sujNC50ornZZaSdA4eptyDd1-DCb3cucHbWCmx4IzQLEMiuhaTS3sXgje1PPh2r_xJYiTHleTPSnJcSY4bROJpIo6q642vTOOHUxS_4v8mOcWYsMijiQ-xyTb_ANNvlut-sg</recordid><startdate>20160201</startdate><enddate>20160201</enddate><creator>Cao, Deping</creator><creator>Chiew, Yee-Meng</creator><creator>Yang, Shu-Qing</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>De Gruyter</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160201</creationdate><title>Injection Effects on Sediment Transport in Closed-Conduit Flows</title><author>Cao, Deping ; Chiew, Yee-Meng ; Yang, Shu-Qing</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a494t-e4ca82bd2c8eb8526fcba33622b4af5d2a066c9018854657b68e8c9aca69b7323</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Boundary conditions</topic><topic>closed-conduit flow</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Flow velocity</topic><topic>Geophysics/Geodesy</topic><topic>Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Injection</topic><topic>quick condition</topic><topic>Sediment transport</topic><topic>Structural Geology</topic><topic>Viscosity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cao, Deping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiew, Yee-Meng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Shu-Qing</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Acta geophysica</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cao, Deping</au><au>Chiew, Yee-Meng</au><au>Yang, Shu-Qing</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Injection Effects on Sediment Transport in Closed-Conduit Flows</atitle><jtitle>Acta geophysica</jtitle><stitle>Acta Geophys</stitle><date>2016-02-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>64</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>125</spage><epage>148</epage><pages>125-148</pages><issn>1895-6572</issn><eissn>1895-7455</eissn><abstract>Experiments were conducted to investigate injection effects on sediment transport in closed-conduit flows. The results show that the sediment transport rate essentially remains unchanged when the ratio of the injection velocity and that at boiling,
Vi
/
Vcr
< 10. However, significant sediment transport rate is observed when
Vi
/
Vcr
increases beyond this limit. In the literature, three semi-empirical models have been developed to relate seepage effects on the sediment transport rate. The experimentally measured data in the pre- and post-boiling condition (Liu and Chiew 2014, and the present study, respectively) are compared with these models. The results show that the models of Francalanci
et al.
(2008) and Nielsen
et al.
(2001) perform poorly in predicting injection effects on the sediment transport. Although Yang’s (2013) model could reasonably predict the influence of injection on the sediment transport rate in the post-boiling condition, it similarly fails when applied to the pre-boiling condition.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><doi>10.1515/acgeo-2015-0064</doi><tpages>24</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1895-6572 |
ispartof | Acta geophysica, 2016-02, Vol.64 (1), p.125-148 |
issn | 1895-6572 1895-7455 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1865247708 |
source | SpringerNature Journals |
subjects | Boundary conditions closed-conduit flow Earth and Environmental Science Earth Sciences Flow velocity Geophysics/Geodesy Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences Injection quick condition Sediment transport Structural Geology Viscosity |
title | Injection Effects on Sediment Transport in Closed-Conduit Flows |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-16T16%3A10%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Injection%20Effects%20on%20Sediment%20Transport%20in%20Closed-Conduit%20Flows&rft.jtitle=Acta%20geophysica&rft.au=Cao,%20Deping&rft.date=2016-02-01&rft.volume=64&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=125&rft.epage=148&rft.pages=125-148&rft.issn=1895-6572&rft.eissn=1895-7455&rft_id=info:doi/10.1515/acgeo-2015-0064&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4312325761%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1865247708&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |