Source rupture processes of the 2016 Kumamoto, Japan, earthquakes estimated from strong-motion waveforms

The detailed source rupture process of the M 7.3 event (April 16, 2016, 01:25, JST) of the 2016 Kumamoto, Japan, earthquakes was derived from strong-motion waveforms using multiple-time-window linear waveform inversion. Based on the observations of surface ruptures, the spatial distribution of after...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Earth, planets, and space planets, and space, 2016-10, Vol.68 (1), p.1, Article 161
Hauptverfasser: Kubo, Hisahiko, Suzuki, Wataru, Aoi, Shin, Sekiguchi, Haruko
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page 1
container_title Earth, planets, and space
container_volume 68
creator Kubo, Hisahiko
Suzuki, Wataru
Aoi, Shin
Sekiguchi, Haruko
description The detailed source rupture process of the M 7.3 event (April 16, 2016, 01:25, JST) of the 2016 Kumamoto, Japan, earthquakes was derived from strong-motion waveforms using multiple-time-window linear waveform inversion. Based on the observations of surface ruptures, the spatial distribution of aftershocks, and the geodetic data, a realistic curved fault model was developed for source-process analysis of this event. The seismic moment and maximum slip were estimated as 5.5 × 10 19  Nm ( M w 7.1) and 3.8 m, respectively. The source model of the M 7.3 event had two significant ruptures. One rupture propagated toward the northeastern shallow region at 4 s after rupture initiation and continued with large slips to approximately 16 s. This rupture caused a large slip region 10–30 km northeast of the hypocenter that reached the caldera of Mt. Aso. Another rupture propagated toward the surface from the hypocenter at 2–6 s and then propagated toward the northeast along the near surface at 6–10 s. A comparison with the result of using a single fault plane model demonstrated that the use of the curved fault model led to improved waveform fit at the stations south of the fault. The source process of the M 6.5 event (April 14, 2016, 21:26, JST) was also estimated. In the source model obtained for the M 6.5 event, the seismic moment was 1.7 × 10 18  Nm ( M w 6.1), and the rupture with large slips propagated from the hypocenter to the surface along the north-northeast direction at 1–6 s. The results in this study are consistent with observations of the surface ruptures. Graphical Abstract .
doi_str_mv 10.1186/s40623-016-0536-8
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1865241180</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4312285631</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a411t-66dd12507d8e6e856d2ccc6500e1b1d31f486f792cd09113d993999a25a7846e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kDtPAzEQhC0EEiHwA-gs0ebAa985doki3pEogNoy57084M6J7QPx73F0FGmodotvZneGkHNglwBKXsWSSS4KBrJglZCFOiAjUIoVlVZwuLcfk5MY14wJVkoxIssX34caaeg3qQ9IN8HXGCNG6hualkh5tqRPfWtbn_yEPtqN7SYUbUjLbW8_MogxrVqb0NEm-JbGFHy3KDK-8h39tl_Y-NDGU3LU2M-IZ39zTN5ub15n98X8-e5hdj0vbAmQCimdA16xqVMoUVXS8bquZcUYwjs4AU2pZDPVvHZMAwintdBaW17ZqSolijG5GHxzkm2ffzPrnLDLJ03uqeL5imKZgoGqg48xYGM2IYcIPwaY2RVqhkJNTm92hRqVNXzQxMx2Cwx7zv-KfgEw3nh5</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1865241180</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Source rupture processes of the 2016 Kumamoto, Japan, earthquakes estimated from strong-motion waveforms</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</source><source>Freely Accessible Japanese Titles</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Kubo, Hisahiko ; Suzuki, Wataru ; Aoi, Shin ; Sekiguchi, Haruko</creator><creatorcontrib>Kubo, Hisahiko ; Suzuki, Wataru ; Aoi, Shin ; Sekiguchi, Haruko</creatorcontrib><description>The detailed source rupture process of the M 7.3 event (April 16, 2016, 01:25, JST) of the 2016 Kumamoto, Japan, earthquakes was derived from strong-motion waveforms using multiple-time-window linear waveform inversion. Based on the observations of surface ruptures, the spatial distribution of aftershocks, and the geodetic data, a realistic curved fault model was developed for source-process analysis of this event. The seismic moment and maximum slip were estimated as 5.5 × 10 19  Nm ( M w 7.1) and 3.8 m, respectively. The source model of the M 7.3 event had two significant ruptures. One rupture propagated toward the northeastern shallow region at 4 s after rupture initiation and continued with large slips to approximately 16 s. This rupture caused a large slip region 10–30 km northeast of the hypocenter that reached the caldera of Mt. Aso. Another rupture propagated toward the surface from the hypocenter at 2–6 s and then propagated toward the northeast along the near surface at 6–10 s. A comparison with the result of using a single fault plane model demonstrated that the use of the curved fault model led to improved waveform fit at the stations south of the fault. The source process of the M 6.5 event (April 14, 2016, 21:26, JST) was also estimated. In the source model obtained for the M 6.5 event, the seismic moment was 1.7 × 10 18  Nm ( M w 6.1), and the rupture with large slips propagated from the hypocenter to the surface along the north-northeast direction at 1–6 s. The results in this study are consistent with observations of the surface ruptures. Graphical Abstract .</description><identifier>ISSN: 1880-5981</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1880-5981</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s40623-016-0536-8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>2016 Kumamoto earthquake sequence and its impact on earthquake science and hazard assessment ; 4. Seismology ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; Geology ; Geophysics/Geodesy ; Letter</subject><ispartof>Earth, planets, and space, 2016-10, Vol.68 (1), p.1, Article 161</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2016</rights><rights>Earth, Planets and Space is a copyright of Springer, 2016.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a411t-66dd12507d8e6e856d2ccc6500e1b1d31f486f792cd09113d993999a25a7846e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a411t-66dd12507d8e6e856d2ccc6500e1b1d31f486f792cd09113d993999a25a7846e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1933-7899</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1186/s40623-016-0536-8$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1186/s40623-016-0536-8$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,27923,27924,41119,41487,42188,42556,51318,51575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kubo, Hisahiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suzuki, Wataru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aoi, Shin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sekiguchi, Haruko</creatorcontrib><title>Source rupture processes of the 2016 Kumamoto, Japan, earthquakes estimated from strong-motion waveforms</title><title>Earth, planets, and space</title><addtitle>Earth Planets Space</addtitle><description>The detailed source rupture process of the M 7.3 event (April 16, 2016, 01:25, JST) of the 2016 Kumamoto, Japan, earthquakes was derived from strong-motion waveforms using multiple-time-window linear waveform inversion. Based on the observations of surface ruptures, the spatial distribution of aftershocks, and the geodetic data, a realistic curved fault model was developed for source-process analysis of this event. The seismic moment and maximum slip were estimated as 5.5 × 10 19  Nm ( M w 7.1) and 3.8 m, respectively. The source model of the M 7.3 event had two significant ruptures. One rupture propagated toward the northeastern shallow region at 4 s after rupture initiation and continued with large slips to approximately 16 s. This rupture caused a large slip region 10–30 km northeast of the hypocenter that reached the caldera of Mt. Aso. Another rupture propagated toward the surface from the hypocenter at 2–6 s and then propagated toward the northeast along the near surface at 6–10 s. A comparison with the result of using a single fault plane model demonstrated that the use of the curved fault model led to improved waveform fit at the stations south of the fault. The source process of the M 6.5 event (April 14, 2016, 21:26, JST) was also estimated. In the source model obtained for the M 6.5 event, the seismic moment was 1.7 × 10 18  Nm ( M w 6.1), and the rupture with large slips propagated from the hypocenter to the surface along the north-northeast direction at 1–6 s. The results in this study are consistent with observations of the surface ruptures. Graphical Abstract .</description><subject>2016 Kumamoto earthquake sequence and its impact on earthquake science and hazard assessment</subject><subject>4. Seismology</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Geology</subject><subject>Geophysics/Geodesy</subject><subject>Letter</subject><issn>1880-5981</issn><issn>1880-5981</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kDtPAzEQhC0EEiHwA-gs0ebAa985doki3pEogNoy57084M6J7QPx73F0FGmodotvZneGkHNglwBKXsWSSS4KBrJglZCFOiAjUIoVlVZwuLcfk5MY14wJVkoxIssX34caaeg3qQ9IN8HXGCNG6hualkh5tqRPfWtbn_yEPtqN7SYUbUjLbW8_MogxrVqb0NEm-JbGFHy3KDK-8h39tl_Y-NDGU3LU2M-IZ39zTN5ub15n98X8-e5hdj0vbAmQCimdA16xqVMoUVXS8bquZcUYwjs4AU2pZDPVvHZMAwintdBaW17ZqSolijG5GHxzkm2ffzPrnLDLJ03uqeL5imKZgoGqg48xYGM2IYcIPwaY2RVqhkJNTm92hRqVNXzQxMx2Cwx7zv-KfgEw3nh5</recordid><startdate>20161003</startdate><enddate>20161003</enddate><creator>Kubo, Hisahiko</creator><creator>Suzuki, Wataru</creator><creator>Aoi, Shin</creator><creator>Sekiguchi, Haruko</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1933-7899</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20161003</creationdate><title>Source rupture processes of the 2016 Kumamoto, Japan, earthquakes estimated from strong-motion waveforms</title><author>Kubo, Hisahiko ; Suzuki, Wataru ; Aoi, Shin ; Sekiguchi, Haruko</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a411t-66dd12507d8e6e856d2ccc6500e1b1d31f486f792cd09113d993999a25a7846e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>2016 Kumamoto earthquake sequence and its impact on earthquake science and hazard assessment</topic><topic>4. Seismology</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Geology</topic><topic>Geophysics/Geodesy</topic><topic>Letter</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kubo, Hisahiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suzuki, Wataru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aoi, Shin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sekiguchi, Haruko</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Earth, planets, and space</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kubo, Hisahiko</au><au>Suzuki, Wataru</au><au>Aoi, Shin</au><au>Sekiguchi, Haruko</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Source rupture processes of the 2016 Kumamoto, Japan, earthquakes estimated from strong-motion waveforms</atitle><jtitle>Earth, planets, and space</jtitle><stitle>Earth Planets Space</stitle><date>2016-10-03</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>68</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><pages>1-</pages><artnum>161</artnum><issn>1880-5981</issn><eissn>1880-5981</eissn><abstract>The detailed source rupture process of the M 7.3 event (April 16, 2016, 01:25, JST) of the 2016 Kumamoto, Japan, earthquakes was derived from strong-motion waveforms using multiple-time-window linear waveform inversion. Based on the observations of surface ruptures, the spatial distribution of aftershocks, and the geodetic data, a realistic curved fault model was developed for source-process analysis of this event. The seismic moment and maximum slip were estimated as 5.5 × 10 19  Nm ( M w 7.1) and 3.8 m, respectively. The source model of the M 7.3 event had two significant ruptures. One rupture propagated toward the northeastern shallow region at 4 s after rupture initiation and continued with large slips to approximately 16 s. This rupture caused a large slip region 10–30 km northeast of the hypocenter that reached the caldera of Mt. Aso. Another rupture propagated toward the surface from the hypocenter at 2–6 s and then propagated toward the northeast along the near surface at 6–10 s. A comparison with the result of using a single fault plane model demonstrated that the use of the curved fault model led to improved waveform fit at the stations south of the fault. The source process of the M 6.5 event (April 14, 2016, 21:26, JST) was also estimated. In the source model obtained for the M 6.5 event, the seismic moment was 1.7 × 10 18  Nm ( M w 6.1), and the rupture with large slips propagated from the hypocenter to the surface along the north-northeast direction at 1–6 s. The results in this study are consistent with observations of the surface ruptures. Graphical Abstract .</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1186/s40623-016-0536-8</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1933-7899</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1880-5981
ispartof Earth, planets, and space, 2016-10, Vol.68 (1), p.1, Article 161
issn 1880-5981
1880-5981
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1865241180
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Springer Nature OA Free Journals; Freely Accessible Japanese Titles; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects 2016 Kumamoto earthquake sequence and its impact on earthquake science and hazard assessment
4. Seismology
Earth and Environmental Science
Earth Sciences
Geology
Geophysics/Geodesy
Letter
title Source rupture processes of the 2016 Kumamoto, Japan, earthquakes estimated from strong-motion waveforms
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T07%3A34%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Source%20rupture%20processes%20of%20the%202016%20Kumamoto,%20Japan,%20earthquakes%20estimated%20from%20strong-motion%20waveforms&rft.jtitle=Earth,%20planets,%20and%20space&rft.au=Kubo,%20Hisahiko&rft.date=2016-10-03&rft.volume=68&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.pages=1-&rft.artnum=161&rft.issn=1880-5981&rft.eissn=1880-5981&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s40623-016-0536-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4312285631%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1865241180&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true