Consultative Authoritarianism and Its Limits
Consultative authoritarianism challenges existing conceptions of nondemocratic governance. Citizen participation channels are designed to improve policymaking and increase feelings of regime responsiveness, but how successful are these limited reforms in stemming pressure for broader change? The art...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Comparative political studies 2017-03, Vol.50 (3), p.329-361 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 361 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 329 |
container_title | Comparative political studies |
container_volume | 50 |
creator | Truex, Rory |
description | Consultative authoritarianism challenges existing conceptions of nondemocratic governance. Citizen participation channels are designed to improve policymaking and increase feelings of regime responsiveness, but how successful are these limited reforms in stemming pressure for broader change? The article develops a new theoretical lens to explain how common citizens perceive the introduction of partially liberalizing reforms and tests the implications using an original survey experiment of Chinese netizens. Respondents randomly exposed to the National People’s Congress’ (NPC) new online participation portals show greater satisfaction with the regime and feelings of government responsiveness, but these effects are limited to less educated, politically excluded citizens. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0010414014534196 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1864987651</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0010414014534196</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1864987651</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-a7696bf0e67b90fadbdd150e47034b1bdebb9455b331191c3641496866c232dd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1LxDAQxYMoWFfvHgtejWaar-a4LLouFLzouSRNqlm27Zqkgv-9LfUggqdheL_3ZngIXQO5A5DynhAgDBgBxikDJU5QBpwXmJaFOkXZLONZP0cXMe6nteBFmaHbzdDH8ZB08p8uX4_pfQg-6eB172OX697muxTzync-xUt01upDdFc_c4VeHx9eNk-4et7uNusKN5SohLUUSpiWOCGNIq22xlrgxDFJKDNgrDNGMc4NpQAKGiqmx5QohWgKWlhLV-hmyT2G4WN0MdX7YQz9dLKGUjBVSsFhoshCNWGIMbi2Pgbf6fBVA6nnTuq_nUwWvFiifnO_Qv_jvwEFP17I</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1864987651</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Consultative Authoritarianism and Its Limits</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Truex, Rory</creator><creatorcontrib>Truex, Rory</creatorcontrib><description>Consultative authoritarianism challenges existing conceptions of nondemocratic governance. Citizen participation channels are designed to improve policymaking and increase feelings of regime responsiveness, but how successful are these limited reforms in stemming pressure for broader change? The article develops a new theoretical lens to explain how common citizens perceive the introduction of partially liberalizing reforms and tests the implications using an original survey experiment of Chinese netizens. Respondents randomly exposed to the National People’s Congress’ (NPC) new online participation portals show greater satisfaction with the regime and feelings of government responsiveness, but these effects are limited to less educated, politically excluded citizens.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0010-4140</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-3829</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0010414014534196</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Authoritarianism ; Citizen participation ; Governance ; Internet ; Legislatures ; Policy making ; Political participation ; Political science ; Political theory ; Reforms ; Respondents ; Responsiveness ; Satisfaction ; Social exchange theory</subject><ispartof>Comparative political studies, 2017-03, Vol.50 (3), p.329-361</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-a7696bf0e67b90fadbdd150e47034b1bdebb9455b331191c3641496866c232dd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-a7696bf0e67b90fadbdd150e47034b1bdebb9455b331191c3641496866c232dd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0010414014534196$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0010414014534196$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,43621,43622</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Truex, Rory</creatorcontrib><title>Consultative Authoritarianism and Its Limits</title><title>Comparative political studies</title><description>Consultative authoritarianism challenges existing conceptions of nondemocratic governance. Citizen participation channels are designed to improve policymaking and increase feelings of regime responsiveness, but how successful are these limited reforms in stemming pressure for broader change? The article develops a new theoretical lens to explain how common citizens perceive the introduction of partially liberalizing reforms and tests the implications using an original survey experiment of Chinese netizens. Respondents randomly exposed to the National People’s Congress’ (NPC) new online participation portals show greater satisfaction with the regime and feelings of government responsiveness, but these effects are limited to less educated, politically excluded citizens.</description><subject>Authoritarianism</subject><subject>Citizen participation</subject><subject>Governance</subject><subject>Internet</subject><subject>Legislatures</subject><subject>Policy making</subject><subject>Political participation</subject><subject>Political science</subject><subject>Political theory</subject><subject>Reforms</subject><subject>Respondents</subject><subject>Responsiveness</subject><subject>Satisfaction</subject><subject>Social exchange theory</subject><issn>0010-4140</issn><issn>1552-3829</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM1LxDAQxYMoWFfvHgtejWaar-a4LLouFLzouSRNqlm27Zqkgv-9LfUggqdheL_3ZngIXQO5A5DynhAgDBgBxikDJU5QBpwXmJaFOkXZLONZP0cXMe6nteBFmaHbzdDH8ZB08p8uX4_pfQg-6eB172OX697muxTzync-xUt01upDdFc_c4VeHx9eNk-4et7uNusKN5SohLUUSpiWOCGNIq22xlrgxDFJKDNgrDNGMc4NpQAKGiqmx5QohWgKWlhLV-hmyT2G4WN0MdX7YQz9dLKGUjBVSsFhoshCNWGIMbi2Pgbf6fBVA6nnTuq_nUwWvFiifnO_Qv_jvwEFP17I</recordid><startdate>201703</startdate><enddate>201703</enddate><creator>Truex, Rory</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201703</creationdate><title>Consultative Authoritarianism and Its Limits</title><author>Truex, Rory</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-a7696bf0e67b90fadbdd150e47034b1bdebb9455b331191c3641496866c232dd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Authoritarianism</topic><topic>Citizen participation</topic><topic>Governance</topic><topic>Internet</topic><topic>Legislatures</topic><topic>Policy making</topic><topic>Political participation</topic><topic>Political science</topic><topic>Political theory</topic><topic>Reforms</topic><topic>Respondents</topic><topic>Responsiveness</topic><topic>Satisfaction</topic><topic>Social exchange theory</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Truex, Rory</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Comparative political studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Truex, Rory</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Consultative Authoritarianism and Its Limits</atitle><jtitle>Comparative political studies</jtitle><date>2017-03</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>329</spage><epage>361</epage><pages>329-361</pages><issn>0010-4140</issn><eissn>1552-3829</eissn><abstract>Consultative authoritarianism challenges existing conceptions of nondemocratic governance. Citizen participation channels are designed to improve policymaking and increase feelings of regime responsiveness, but how successful are these limited reforms in stemming pressure for broader change? The article develops a new theoretical lens to explain how common citizens perceive the introduction of partially liberalizing reforms and tests the implications using an original survey experiment of Chinese netizens. Respondents randomly exposed to the National People’s Congress’ (NPC) new online participation portals show greater satisfaction with the regime and feelings of government responsiveness, but these effects are limited to less educated, politically excluded citizens.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0010414014534196</doi><tpages>33</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0010-4140 |
ispartof | Comparative political studies, 2017-03, Vol.50 (3), p.329-361 |
issn | 0010-4140 1552-3829 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1864987651 |
source | Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; HeinOnline Law Journal Library; SAGE Complete A-Z List |
subjects | Authoritarianism Citizen participation Governance Internet Legislatures Policy making Political participation Political science Political theory Reforms Respondents Responsiveness Satisfaction Social exchange theory |
title | Consultative Authoritarianism and Its Limits |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T04%3A38%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Consultative%20Authoritarianism%20and%20Its%20Limits&rft.jtitle=Comparative%20political%20studies&rft.au=Truex,%20Rory&rft.date=2017-03&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=329&rft.epage=361&rft.pages=329-361&rft.issn=0010-4140&rft.eissn=1552-3829&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0010414014534196&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1864987651%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1864987651&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0010414014534196&rfr_iscdi=true |