Consultative Authoritarianism and Its Limits

Consultative authoritarianism challenges existing conceptions of nondemocratic governance. Citizen participation channels are designed to improve policymaking and increase feelings of regime responsiveness, but how successful are these limited reforms in stemming pressure for broader change? The art...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Comparative political studies 2017-03, Vol.50 (3), p.329-361
1. Verfasser: Truex, Rory
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 361
container_issue 3
container_start_page 329
container_title Comparative political studies
container_volume 50
creator Truex, Rory
description Consultative authoritarianism challenges existing conceptions of nondemocratic governance. Citizen participation channels are designed to improve policymaking and increase feelings of regime responsiveness, but how successful are these limited reforms in stemming pressure for broader change? The article develops a new theoretical lens to explain how common citizens perceive the introduction of partially liberalizing reforms and tests the implications using an original survey experiment of Chinese netizens. Respondents randomly exposed to the National People’s Congress’ (NPC) new online participation portals show greater satisfaction with the regime and feelings of government responsiveness, but these effects are limited to less educated, politically excluded citizens.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0010414014534196
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1864987651</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0010414014534196</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1864987651</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-a7696bf0e67b90fadbdd150e47034b1bdebb9455b331191c3641496866c232dd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1LxDAQxYMoWFfvHgtejWaar-a4LLouFLzouSRNqlm27Zqkgv-9LfUggqdheL_3ZngIXQO5A5DynhAgDBgBxikDJU5QBpwXmJaFOkXZLONZP0cXMe6nteBFmaHbzdDH8ZB08p8uX4_pfQg-6eB172OX697muxTzync-xUt01upDdFc_c4VeHx9eNk-4et7uNusKN5SohLUUSpiWOCGNIq22xlrgxDFJKDNgrDNGMc4NpQAKGiqmx5QohWgKWlhLV-hmyT2G4WN0MdX7YQz9dLKGUjBVSsFhoshCNWGIMbi2Pgbf6fBVA6nnTuq_nUwWvFiifnO_Qv_jvwEFP17I</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1864987651</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Consultative Authoritarianism and Its Limits</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Truex, Rory</creator><creatorcontrib>Truex, Rory</creatorcontrib><description>Consultative authoritarianism challenges existing conceptions of nondemocratic governance. Citizen participation channels are designed to improve policymaking and increase feelings of regime responsiveness, but how successful are these limited reforms in stemming pressure for broader change? The article develops a new theoretical lens to explain how common citizens perceive the introduction of partially liberalizing reforms and tests the implications using an original survey experiment of Chinese netizens. Respondents randomly exposed to the National People’s Congress’ (NPC) new online participation portals show greater satisfaction with the regime and feelings of government responsiveness, but these effects are limited to less educated, politically excluded citizens.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0010-4140</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-3829</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0010414014534196</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Authoritarianism ; Citizen participation ; Governance ; Internet ; Legislatures ; Policy making ; Political participation ; Political science ; Political theory ; Reforms ; Respondents ; Responsiveness ; Satisfaction ; Social exchange theory</subject><ispartof>Comparative political studies, 2017-03, Vol.50 (3), p.329-361</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-a7696bf0e67b90fadbdd150e47034b1bdebb9455b331191c3641496866c232dd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-a7696bf0e67b90fadbdd150e47034b1bdebb9455b331191c3641496866c232dd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0010414014534196$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0010414014534196$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,43621,43622</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Truex, Rory</creatorcontrib><title>Consultative Authoritarianism and Its Limits</title><title>Comparative political studies</title><description>Consultative authoritarianism challenges existing conceptions of nondemocratic governance. Citizen participation channels are designed to improve policymaking and increase feelings of regime responsiveness, but how successful are these limited reforms in stemming pressure for broader change? The article develops a new theoretical lens to explain how common citizens perceive the introduction of partially liberalizing reforms and tests the implications using an original survey experiment of Chinese netizens. Respondents randomly exposed to the National People’s Congress’ (NPC) new online participation portals show greater satisfaction with the regime and feelings of government responsiveness, but these effects are limited to less educated, politically excluded citizens.</description><subject>Authoritarianism</subject><subject>Citizen participation</subject><subject>Governance</subject><subject>Internet</subject><subject>Legislatures</subject><subject>Policy making</subject><subject>Political participation</subject><subject>Political science</subject><subject>Political theory</subject><subject>Reforms</subject><subject>Respondents</subject><subject>Responsiveness</subject><subject>Satisfaction</subject><subject>Social exchange theory</subject><issn>0010-4140</issn><issn>1552-3829</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM1LxDAQxYMoWFfvHgtejWaar-a4LLouFLzouSRNqlm27Zqkgv-9LfUggqdheL_3ZngIXQO5A5DynhAgDBgBxikDJU5QBpwXmJaFOkXZLONZP0cXMe6nteBFmaHbzdDH8ZB08p8uX4_pfQg-6eB172OX697muxTzync-xUt01upDdFc_c4VeHx9eNk-4et7uNusKN5SohLUUSpiWOCGNIq22xlrgxDFJKDNgrDNGMc4NpQAKGiqmx5QohWgKWlhLV-hmyT2G4WN0MdX7YQz9dLKGUjBVSsFhoshCNWGIMbi2Pgbf6fBVA6nnTuq_nUwWvFiifnO_Qv_jvwEFP17I</recordid><startdate>201703</startdate><enddate>201703</enddate><creator>Truex, Rory</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201703</creationdate><title>Consultative Authoritarianism and Its Limits</title><author>Truex, Rory</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-a7696bf0e67b90fadbdd150e47034b1bdebb9455b331191c3641496866c232dd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Authoritarianism</topic><topic>Citizen participation</topic><topic>Governance</topic><topic>Internet</topic><topic>Legislatures</topic><topic>Policy making</topic><topic>Political participation</topic><topic>Political science</topic><topic>Political theory</topic><topic>Reforms</topic><topic>Respondents</topic><topic>Responsiveness</topic><topic>Satisfaction</topic><topic>Social exchange theory</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Truex, Rory</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Comparative political studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Truex, Rory</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Consultative Authoritarianism and Its Limits</atitle><jtitle>Comparative political studies</jtitle><date>2017-03</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>329</spage><epage>361</epage><pages>329-361</pages><issn>0010-4140</issn><eissn>1552-3829</eissn><abstract>Consultative authoritarianism challenges existing conceptions of nondemocratic governance. Citizen participation channels are designed to improve policymaking and increase feelings of regime responsiveness, but how successful are these limited reforms in stemming pressure for broader change? The article develops a new theoretical lens to explain how common citizens perceive the introduction of partially liberalizing reforms and tests the implications using an original survey experiment of Chinese netizens. Respondents randomly exposed to the National People’s Congress’ (NPC) new online participation portals show greater satisfaction with the regime and feelings of government responsiveness, but these effects are limited to less educated, politically excluded citizens.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0010414014534196</doi><tpages>33</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0010-4140
ispartof Comparative political studies, 2017-03, Vol.50 (3), p.329-361
issn 0010-4140
1552-3829
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1864987651
source Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; HeinOnline Law Journal Library; SAGE Complete A-Z List
subjects Authoritarianism
Citizen participation
Governance
Internet
Legislatures
Policy making
Political participation
Political science
Political theory
Reforms
Respondents
Responsiveness
Satisfaction
Social exchange theory
title Consultative Authoritarianism and Its Limits
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T04%3A38%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Consultative%20Authoritarianism%20and%20Its%20Limits&rft.jtitle=Comparative%20political%20studies&rft.au=Truex,%20Rory&rft.date=2017-03&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=329&rft.epage=361&rft.pages=329-361&rft.issn=0010-4140&rft.eissn=1552-3829&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0010414014534196&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1864987651%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1864987651&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0010414014534196&rfr_iscdi=true