Ecomyopia in the Anthropocene

The authors apply longue durée and semiotic approaches to a case study of flood management in the American Midwest to critique the suggestion that naming the current geological epoch the ‘Anthropocene’ might encourage global environmental sustainability. It is unlikely that the Anthropocene moniker...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Anthropology today 2017-02, Vol.33 (1), p.23-25
Hauptverfasser: Casagrande, D.G., Jones, E.C., Wyndham, F.S., Stepp, J.R., Zarger, R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 25
container_issue 1
container_start_page 23
container_title Anthropology today
container_volume 33
creator Casagrande, D.G.
Jones, E.C.
Wyndham, F.S.
Stepp, J.R.
Zarger, R.
description The authors apply longue durée and semiotic approaches to a case study of flood management in the American Midwest to critique the suggestion that naming the current geological epoch the ‘Anthropocene’ might encourage global environmental sustainability. It is unlikely that the Anthropocene moniker has the symbolic power to correct ecomyopia, which the authors define as the tendency to not recognize, to ignore, or fail to act on new information that contradicts political arrangements, social norms, or world views. Anthropogenic transformation of the Mississippi River watershed shifted world views toward the human domination of nature and afforded opportunities for social stratification and the consolidation of capital and control over resources, which has biased social responses to increasing flooding. Globally, biological systems have been replaced with technological systems of increasing complexity creating canalized trajectories of practice and thought in which societies become insulated from ecological realities. The global capitalist response to the Anthropocene will likely be to embrace technological hubris.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/1467-8322.12326
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1863541960</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>45171240</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>45171240</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3466-1c8d2e74cd57f76503fd43ae2cf6c4f593f8bbd2556952dd9476a3f963602d573</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM1Lw0AQxRdRMFbPnoSAeEy7n7PJsZTWCkUvFbwt6WaXJrTZuJsi-e9NjIo35_JgeL8Z3kPoluAp6WdGOMgkZZROCWUUzlD0uzlHEaaQJoLjt0t0FUKFMSZEkgjdLbU7dq4p87is43Zv4nnd7r1rnDa1uUYXNj8Ec_OtE_S6Wm4X62Tz8vi0mG8SzThAQnRaUCO5LoS0EgRmtuAsN1Rb0NyKjNl0tyuoEJAJWhQZl5AzmwEDTHuGTdD9eLfx7v1kQqsqd_J1_1KRFJjgJAPcu2ajS3sXgjdWNb485r5TBKuhAzUkVkNi9dVBT8BIfJQH0_1nV_Pn7foHfBjBKrTO_wUpw1Jx0ZdHOWafyilm_w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1863541960</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ecomyopia in the Anthropocene</title><source>Wiley Journals</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Casagrande, D.G. ; Jones, E.C. ; Wyndham, F.S. ; Stepp, J.R. ; Zarger, R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Casagrande, D.G. ; Jones, E.C. ; Wyndham, F.S. ; Stepp, J.R. ; Zarger, R.</creatorcontrib><description>The authors apply longue durée and semiotic approaches to a case study of flood management in the American Midwest to critique the suggestion that naming the current geological epoch the ‘Anthropocene’ might encourage global environmental sustainability. It is unlikely that the Anthropocene moniker has the symbolic power to correct ecomyopia, which the authors define as the tendency to not recognize, to ignore, or fail to act on new information that contradicts political arrangements, social norms, or world views. Anthropogenic transformation of the Mississippi River watershed shifted world views toward the human domination of nature and afforded opportunities for social stratification and the consolidation of capital and control over resources, which has biased social responses to increasing flooding. Globally, biological systems have been replaced with technological systems of increasing complexity creating canalized trajectories of practice and thought in which societies become insulated from ecological realities. The global capitalist response to the Anthropocene will likely be to embrace technological hubris.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0268-540X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-8322</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1467-8322.12326</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</publisher><subject>Cultural anthropology ; Ecology ; Floods</subject><ispartof>Anthropology today, 2017-02, Vol.33 (1), p.23-25</ispartof><rights>2017 RAI</rights><rights>RAI 2017</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3466-1c8d2e74cd57f76503fd43ae2cf6c4f593f8bbd2556952dd9476a3f963602d573</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3466-1c8d2e74cd57f76503fd43ae2cf6c4f593f8bbd2556952dd9476a3f963602d573</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/45171240$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/45171240$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Casagrande, D.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, E.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wyndham, F.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stepp, J.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zarger, R.</creatorcontrib><title>Ecomyopia in the Anthropocene</title><title>Anthropology today</title><description>The authors apply longue durée and semiotic approaches to a case study of flood management in the American Midwest to critique the suggestion that naming the current geological epoch the ‘Anthropocene’ might encourage global environmental sustainability. It is unlikely that the Anthropocene moniker has the symbolic power to correct ecomyopia, which the authors define as the tendency to not recognize, to ignore, or fail to act on new information that contradicts political arrangements, social norms, or world views. Anthropogenic transformation of the Mississippi River watershed shifted world views toward the human domination of nature and afforded opportunities for social stratification and the consolidation of capital and control over resources, which has biased social responses to increasing flooding. Globally, biological systems have been replaced with technological systems of increasing complexity creating canalized trajectories of practice and thought in which societies become insulated from ecological realities. The global capitalist response to the Anthropocene will likely be to embrace technological hubris.</description><subject>Cultural anthropology</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Floods</subject><issn>0268-540X</issn><issn>1467-8322</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkM1Lw0AQxRdRMFbPnoSAeEy7n7PJsZTWCkUvFbwt6WaXJrTZuJsi-e9NjIo35_JgeL8Z3kPoluAp6WdGOMgkZZROCWUUzlD0uzlHEaaQJoLjt0t0FUKFMSZEkgjdLbU7dq4p87is43Zv4nnd7r1rnDa1uUYXNj8Ec_OtE_S6Wm4X62Tz8vi0mG8SzThAQnRaUCO5LoS0EgRmtuAsN1Rb0NyKjNl0tyuoEJAJWhQZl5AzmwEDTHuGTdD9eLfx7v1kQqsqd_J1_1KRFJjgJAPcu2ajS3sXgjdWNb485r5TBKuhAzUkVkNi9dVBT8BIfJQH0_1nV_Pn7foHfBjBKrTO_wUpw1Jx0ZdHOWafyilm_w</recordid><startdate>20170201</startdate><enddate>20170201</enddate><creator>Casagrande, D.G.</creator><creator>Jones, E.C.</creator><creator>Wyndham, F.S.</creator><creator>Stepp, J.R.</creator><creator>Zarger, R.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170201</creationdate><title>Ecomyopia in the Anthropocene</title><author>Casagrande, D.G. ; Jones, E.C. ; Wyndham, F.S. ; Stepp, J.R. ; Zarger, R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3466-1c8d2e74cd57f76503fd43ae2cf6c4f593f8bbd2556952dd9476a3f963602d573</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Cultural anthropology</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Floods</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Casagrande, D.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, E.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wyndham, F.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stepp, J.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zarger, R.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Anthropology today</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Casagrande, D.G.</au><au>Jones, E.C.</au><au>Wyndham, F.S.</au><au>Stepp, J.R.</au><au>Zarger, R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ecomyopia in the Anthropocene</atitle><jtitle>Anthropology today</jtitle><date>2017-02-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>23</spage><epage>25</epage><pages>23-25</pages><issn>0268-540X</issn><eissn>1467-8322</eissn><abstract>The authors apply longue durée and semiotic approaches to a case study of flood management in the American Midwest to critique the suggestion that naming the current geological epoch the ‘Anthropocene’ might encourage global environmental sustainability. It is unlikely that the Anthropocene moniker has the symbolic power to correct ecomyopia, which the authors define as the tendency to not recognize, to ignore, or fail to act on new information that contradicts political arrangements, social norms, or world views. Anthropogenic transformation of the Mississippi River watershed shifted world views toward the human domination of nature and afforded opportunities for social stratification and the consolidation of capital and control over resources, which has biased social responses to increasing flooding. Globally, biological systems have been replaced with technological systems of increasing complexity creating canalized trajectories of practice and thought in which societies become insulated from ecological realities. The global capitalist response to the Anthropocene will likely be to embrace technological hubris.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/1467-8322.12326</doi><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0268-540X
ispartof Anthropology today, 2017-02, Vol.33 (1), p.23-25
issn 0268-540X
1467-8322
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1863541960
source Wiley Journals; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing
subjects Cultural anthropology
Ecology
Floods
title Ecomyopia in the Anthropocene
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T13%3A11%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ecomyopia%20in%20the%20Anthropocene&rft.jtitle=Anthropology%20today&rft.au=Casagrande,%20D.G.&rft.date=2017-02-01&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=23&rft.epage=25&rft.pages=23-25&rft.issn=0268-540X&rft.eissn=1467-8322&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1467-8322.12326&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E45171240%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1863541960&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=45171240&rfr_iscdi=true