Environmental health risk perception of hydraulic fracturing in the US
The advent of new technologies such as directional drilling (D 2 ) and the hydraulic fracturing technique (HF tech ) has made it possible to enhance energy production from petroleum reserves. The procedures involved have however aroused public sentiments and triggered the debate on the economic impo...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Cogent environmental science 2016-12, Vol.2 (1), p.1209994 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 1209994 |
container_title | Cogent environmental science |
container_volume | 2 |
creator | Olawoyin, Richard McGlothlin, Charles Conserve, Donaldson F. Ogutu, Jack |
description | The advent of new technologies such as directional drilling (D
2
) and the hydraulic fracturing technique (HF
tech
) has made it possible to enhance energy production from petroleum reserves. The procedures involved have however aroused public sentiments and triggered the debate on the economic importance of petroleum recovery processes. Public perceptions of the environmental health consequences of these processes have been fuzzy. Public survey was conducted using the United States as a case study to foster the development of the most effective policy relative to environmental health sustainability and energy independence. Participants (n = 1243) were surveyed on the prevalence and concerns for HF
tech
in proxy communities in 2015. Key to the perception inquiry was the knowledge of respondents on HF
tech
and the concerns relative to the exploration processes. Ordinal logistic regression and Poisson regression (Pλ) were used to interpret the responses obtained from the participants. The study determined mixed public view for HF
tech
based on the analyses conducted. Young men, on average, had the least degree of concerns, while older residents (60+ years old) are more inclined to have friends who support HF
tech
in the communities (p-value = 0.082). Through this study, a clearer global profile of perceived public risks can be developed in countries using HF
tech
, in determining risk acceptability and proper governance for shale gas development. The detailed survey carried out is important for the development of effective strategies for managing risky decisions to emerging energy development issues while balancing the need for a sustainable environment. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/23311843.2016.1209994 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1862241397</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2500692042</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-27854806566fb5df757d54425eb6ea77bfff360014e2732a96c6aba59dbf73bb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9LAzEQxYMoWGo_ghDw3Jr_2b0ppVWh4EF7DtndxE3dJms2q_Tbu0sreOpphpn3Zh4_AG4xWmCUoXtCKcYZowuCsFhggvI8ZxdgMs7n4-LyX38NZl23QwhhJgSjbALWK__tYvB745NuYG10k2oYXfcJWxNL0yYXPAwW1ocq6r5xJbRRl6mPzn9A52GqDdy-3YArq5vOzE51Crbr1fvyeb55fXpZPm7mJcM0zYnMOMuQ4ELYgldWcllxxgg3hTBaysJaS8UYzxBJic5FKXSheV4VVtKioFNwd7zbxvDVmy6pXeijH14qwhESOUGMnFPhTBAyZMnloOJHVRlD10VjVRvdXseDwkiNbNUfWzWyVSe2g-_h6HPehrjXPyE2lUr60IQ4sPGl6xQ9f-IX0bd-eA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1862241397</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Environmental health risk perception of hydraulic fracturing in the US</title><source>Taylor & Francis Open Access</source><source>Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</source><source>Free E-Journal (出版社公開部分のみ)</source><source>ProQuest Central</source><creator>Olawoyin, Richard ; McGlothlin, Charles ; Conserve, Donaldson F. ; Ogutu, Jack</creator><contributor>Wich, Serge</contributor><creatorcontrib>Olawoyin, Richard ; McGlothlin, Charles ; Conserve, Donaldson F. ; Ogutu, Jack ; Wich, Serge</creatorcontrib><description>The advent of new technologies such as directional drilling (D
2
) and the hydraulic fracturing technique (HF
tech
) has made it possible to enhance energy production from petroleum reserves. The procedures involved have however aroused public sentiments and triggered the debate on the economic importance of petroleum recovery processes. Public perceptions of the environmental health consequences of these processes have been fuzzy. Public survey was conducted using the United States as a case study to foster the development of the most effective policy relative to environmental health sustainability and energy independence. Participants (n = 1243) were surveyed on the prevalence and concerns for HF
tech
in proxy communities in 2015. Key to the perception inquiry was the knowledge of respondents on HF
tech
and the concerns relative to the exploration processes. Ordinal logistic regression and Poisson regression (Pλ) were used to interpret the responses obtained from the participants. The study determined mixed public view for HF
tech
based on the analyses conducted. Young men, on average, had the least degree of concerns, while older residents (60+ years old) are more inclined to have friends who support HF
tech
in the communities (p-value = 0.082). Through this study, a clearer global profile of perceived public risks can be developed in countries using HF
tech
, in determining risk acceptability and proper governance for shale gas development. The detailed survey carried out is important for the development of effective strategies for managing risky decisions to emerging energy development issues while balancing the need for a sustainable environment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2331-1843</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2331-1843</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2765-8511</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/23311843.2016.1209994</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Abingdon: Cogent</publisher><subject>communities ; Drilling ; Economic importance ; Environmental health ; environmental health impact ; Health risks ; Hydraulic fracturing ; Natural gas exploration ; New technology ; oil and gas ; perception ; Petroleum ; Polls & surveys ; Regression analysis ; Risk perception ; Shale ; Shale gas ; Sustainability</subject><ispartof>Cogent environmental science, 2016-12, Vol.2 (1), p.1209994</ispartof><rights>2016 The Author(s). This open access article is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 license 2016</rights><rights>2016 The Author(s). This open access article is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 license. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-27854806566fb5df757d54425eb6ea77bfff360014e2732a96c6aba59dbf73bb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-27854806566fb5df757d54425eb6ea77bfff360014e2732a96c6aba59dbf73bb3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3310-5998</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/23311843.2016.1209994$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1862241397?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,21388,27502,27924,27925,33744,43805,59143,59144,64385,64389,72469</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Wich, Serge</contributor><creatorcontrib>Olawoyin, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGlothlin, Charles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conserve, Donaldson F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ogutu, Jack</creatorcontrib><title>Environmental health risk perception of hydraulic fracturing in the US</title><title>Cogent environmental science</title><description>The advent of new technologies such as directional drilling (D
2
) and the hydraulic fracturing technique (HF
tech
) has made it possible to enhance energy production from petroleum reserves. The procedures involved have however aroused public sentiments and triggered the debate on the economic importance of petroleum recovery processes. Public perceptions of the environmental health consequences of these processes have been fuzzy. Public survey was conducted using the United States as a case study to foster the development of the most effective policy relative to environmental health sustainability and energy independence. Participants (n = 1243) were surveyed on the prevalence and concerns for HF
tech
in proxy communities in 2015. Key to the perception inquiry was the knowledge of respondents on HF
tech
and the concerns relative to the exploration processes. Ordinal logistic regression and Poisson regression (Pλ) were used to interpret the responses obtained from the participants. The study determined mixed public view for HF
tech
based on the analyses conducted. Young men, on average, had the least degree of concerns, while older residents (60+ years old) are more inclined to have friends who support HF
tech
in the communities (p-value = 0.082). Through this study, a clearer global profile of perceived public risks can be developed in countries using HF
tech
, in determining risk acceptability and proper governance for shale gas development. The detailed survey carried out is important for the development of effective strategies for managing risky decisions to emerging energy development issues while balancing the need for a sustainable environment.</description><subject>communities</subject><subject>Drilling</subject><subject>Economic importance</subject><subject>Environmental health</subject><subject>environmental health impact</subject><subject>Health risks</subject><subject>Hydraulic fracturing</subject><subject>Natural gas exploration</subject><subject>New technology</subject><subject>oil and gas</subject><subject>perception</subject><subject>Petroleum</subject><subject>Polls & surveys</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Risk perception</subject><subject>Shale</subject><subject>Shale gas</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><issn>2331-1843</issn><issn>2331-1843</issn><issn>2765-8511</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>0YH</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE9LAzEQxYMoWGo_ghDw3Jr_2b0ppVWh4EF7DtndxE3dJms2q_Tbu0sreOpphpn3Zh4_AG4xWmCUoXtCKcYZowuCsFhggvI8ZxdgMs7n4-LyX38NZl23QwhhJgSjbALWK__tYvB745NuYG10k2oYXfcJWxNL0yYXPAwW1ocq6r5xJbRRl6mPzn9A52GqDdy-3YArq5vOzE51Crbr1fvyeb55fXpZPm7mJcM0zYnMOMuQ4ELYgldWcllxxgg3hTBaysJaS8UYzxBJic5FKXSheV4VVtKioFNwd7zbxvDVmy6pXeijH14qwhESOUGMnFPhTBAyZMnloOJHVRlD10VjVRvdXseDwkiNbNUfWzWyVSe2g-_h6HPehrjXPyE2lUr60IQ4sPGl6xQ9f-IX0bd-eA</recordid><startdate>20161231</startdate><enddate>20161231</enddate><creator>Olawoyin, Richard</creator><creator>McGlothlin, Charles</creator><creator>Conserve, Donaldson F.</creator><creator>Ogutu, Jack</creator><general>Cogent</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>0YH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3310-5998</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20161231</creationdate><title>Environmental health risk perception of hydraulic fracturing in the US</title><author>Olawoyin, Richard ; McGlothlin, Charles ; Conserve, Donaldson F. ; Ogutu, Jack</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-27854806566fb5df757d54425eb6ea77bfff360014e2732a96c6aba59dbf73bb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>communities</topic><topic>Drilling</topic><topic>Economic importance</topic><topic>Environmental health</topic><topic>environmental health impact</topic><topic>Health risks</topic><topic>Hydraulic fracturing</topic><topic>Natural gas exploration</topic><topic>New technology</topic><topic>oil and gas</topic><topic>perception</topic><topic>Petroleum</topic><topic>Polls & surveys</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Risk perception</topic><topic>Shale</topic><topic>Shale gas</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Olawoyin, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGlothlin, Charles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conserve, Donaldson F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ogutu, Jack</creatorcontrib><collection>Taylor & Francis Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><jtitle>Cogent environmental science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Olawoyin, Richard</au><au>McGlothlin, Charles</au><au>Conserve, Donaldson F.</au><au>Ogutu, Jack</au><au>Wich, Serge</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Environmental health risk perception of hydraulic fracturing in the US</atitle><jtitle>Cogent environmental science</jtitle><date>2016-12-31</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>2</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1209994</spage><pages>1209994-</pages><issn>2331-1843</issn><eissn>2331-1843</eissn><eissn>2765-8511</eissn><abstract>The advent of new technologies such as directional drilling (D
2
) and the hydraulic fracturing technique (HF
tech
) has made it possible to enhance energy production from petroleum reserves. The procedures involved have however aroused public sentiments and triggered the debate on the economic importance of petroleum recovery processes. Public perceptions of the environmental health consequences of these processes have been fuzzy. Public survey was conducted using the United States as a case study to foster the development of the most effective policy relative to environmental health sustainability and energy independence. Participants (n = 1243) were surveyed on the prevalence and concerns for HF
tech
in proxy communities in 2015. Key to the perception inquiry was the knowledge of respondents on HF
tech
and the concerns relative to the exploration processes. Ordinal logistic regression and Poisson regression (Pλ) were used to interpret the responses obtained from the participants. The study determined mixed public view for HF
tech
based on the analyses conducted. Young men, on average, had the least degree of concerns, while older residents (60+ years old) are more inclined to have friends who support HF
tech
in the communities (p-value = 0.082). Through this study, a clearer global profile of perceived public risks can be developed in countries using HF
tech
, in determining risk acceptability and proper governance for shale gas development. The detailed survey carried out is important for the development of effective strategies for managing risky decisions to emerging energy development issues while balancing the need for a sustainable environment.</abstract><cop>Abingdon</cop><pub>Cogent</pub><doi>10.1080/23311843.2016.1209994</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3310-5998</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2331-1843 |
ispartof | Cogent environmental science, 2016-12, Vol.2 (1), p.1209994 |
issn | 2331-1843 2331-1843 2765-8511 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1862241397 |
source | Taylor & Francis Open Access; Directory of Open Access Journals; AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central; Free E-Journal (出版社公開部分のみ); ProQuest Central |
subjects | communities Drilling Economic importance Environmental health environmental health impact Health risks Hydraulic fracturing Natural gas exploration New technology oil and gas perception Petroleum Polls & surveys Regression analysis Risk perception Shale Shale gas Sustainability |
title | Environmental health risk perception of hydraulic fracturing in the US |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T08%3A39%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Environmental%20health%20risk%20perception%20of%20hydraulic%20fracturing%20in%20the%20US&rft.jtitle=Cogent%20environmental%20science&rft.au=Olawoyin,%20Richard&rft.date=2016-12-31&rft.volume=2&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1209994&rft.pages=1209994-&rft.issn=2331-1843&rft.eissn=2331-1843&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/23311843.2016.1209994&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_infor%3E2500692042%3C/proquest_infor%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1862241397&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |