Environmental health risk perception of hydraulic fracturing in the US

The advent of new technologies such as directional drilling (D 2 ) and the hydraulic fracturing technique (HF tech ) has made it possible to enhance energy production from petroleum reserves. The procedures involved have however aroused public sentiments and triggered the debate on the economic impo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cogent environmental science 2016-12, Vol.2 (1), p.1209994
Hauptverfasser: Olawoyin, Richard, McGlothlin, Charles, Conserve, Donaldson F., Ogutu, Jack
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page 1209994
container_title Cogent environmental science
container_volume 2
creator Olawoyin, Richard
McGlothlin, Charles
Conserve, Donaldson F.
Ogutu, Jack
description The advent of new technologies such as directional drilling (D 2 ) and the hydraulic fracturing technique (HF tech ) has made it possible to enhance energy production from petroleum reserves. The procedures involved have however aroused public sentiments and triggered the debate on the economic importance of petroleum recovery processes. Public perceptions of the environmental health consequences of these processes have been fuzzy. Public survey was conducted using the United States as a case study to foster the development of the most effective policy relative to environmental health sustainability and energy independence. Participants (n = 1243) were surveyed on the prevalence and concerns for HF tech in proxy communities in 2015. Key to the perception inquiry was the knowledge of respondents on HF tech and the concerns relative to the exploration processes. Ordinal logistic regression and Poisson regression (Pλ) were used to interpret the responses obtained from the participants. The study determined mixed public view for HF tech based on the analyses conducted. Young men, on average, had the least degree of concerns, while older residents (60+ years old) are more inclined to have friends who support HF tech in the communities (p-value = 0.082). Through this study, a clearer global profile of perceived public risks can be developed in countries using HF tech , in determining risk acceptability and proper governance for shale gas development. The detailed survey carried out is important for the development of effective strategies for managing risky decisions to emerging energy development issues while balancing the need for a sustainable environment.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/23311843.2016.1209994
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1862241397</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2500692042</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-27854806566fb5df757d54425eb6ea77bfff360014e2732a96c6aba59dbf73bb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9LAzEQxYMoWGo_ghDw3Jr_2b0ppVWh4EF7DtndxE3dJms2q_Tbu0sreOpphpn3Zh4_AG4xWmCUoXtCKcYZowuCsFhggvI8ZxdgMs7n4-LyX38NZl23QwhhJgSjbALWK__tYvB745NuYG10k2oYXfcJWxNL0yYXPAwW1ocq6r5xJbRRl6mPzn9A52GqDdy-3YArq5vOzE51Crbr1fvyeb55fXpZPm7mJcM0zYnMOMuQ4ELYgldWcllxxgg3hTBaysJaS8UYzxBJic5FKXSheV4VVtKioFNwd7zbxvDVmy6pXeijH14qwhESOUGMnFPhTBAyZMnloOJHVRlD10VjVRvdXseDwkiNbNUfWzWyVSe2g-_h6HPehrjXPyE2lUr60IQ4sPGl6xQ9f-IX0bd-eA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1862241397</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Environmental health risk perception of hydraulic fracturing in the US</title><source>Taylor &amp; Francis Open Access</source><source>Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</source><source>Free E-Journal (出版社公開部分のみ)</source><source>ProQuest Central</source><creator>Olawoyin, Richard ; McGlothlin, Charles ; Conserve, Donaldson F. ; Ogutu, Jack</creator><contributor>Wich, Serge</contributor><creatorcontrib>Olawoyin, Richard ; McGlothlin, Charles ; Conserve, Donaldson F. ; Ogutu, Jack ; Wich, Serge</creatorcontrib><description>The advent of new technologies such as directional drilling (D 2 ) and the hydraulic fracturing technique (HF tech ) has made it possible to enhance energy production from petroleum reserves. The procedures involved have however aroused public sentiments and triggered the debate on the economic importance of petroleum recovery processes. Public perceptions of the environmental health consequences of these processes have been fuzzy. Public survey was conducted using the United States as a case study to foster the development of the most effective policy relative to environmental health sustainability and energy independence. Participants (n = 1243) were surveyed on the prevalence and concerns for HF tech in proxy communities in 2015. Key to the perception inquiry was the knowledge of respondents on HF tech and the concerns relative to the exploration processes. Ordinal logistic regression and Poisson regression (Pλ) were used to interpret the responses obtained from the participants. The study determined mixed public view for HF tech based on the analyses conducted. Young men, on average, had the least degree of concerns, while older residents (60+ years old) are more inclined to have friends who support HF tech in the communities (p-value = 0.082). Through this study, a clearer global profile of perceived public risks can be developed in countries using HF tech , in determining risk acceptability and proper governance for shale gas development. The detailed survey carried out is important for the development of effective strategies for managing risky decisions to emerging energy development issues while balancing the need for a sustainable environment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2331-1843</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2331-1843</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2765-8511</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/23311843.2016.1209994</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Abingdon: Cogent</publisher><subject>communities ; Drilling ; Economic importance ; Environmental health ; environmental health impact ; Health risks ; Hydraulic fracturing ; Natural gas exploration ; New technology ; oil and gas ; perception ; Petroleum ; Polls &amp; surveys ; Regression analysis ; Risk perception ; Shale ; Shale gas ; Sustainability</subject><ispartof>Cogent environmental science, 2016-12, Vol.2 (1), p.1209994</ispartof><rights>2016 The Author(s). This open access article is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 license 2016</rights><rights>2016 The Author(s). This open access article is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 license. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-27854806566fb5df757d54425eb6ea77bfff360014e2732a96c6aba59dbf73bb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-27854806566fb5df757d54425eb6ea77bfff360014e2732a96c6aba59dbf73bb3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3310-5998</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/23311843.2016.1209994$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1862241397?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,21388,27502,27924,27925,33744,43805,59143,59144,64385,64389,72469</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Wich, Serge</contributor><creatorcontrib>Olawoyin, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGlothlin, Charles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conserve, Donaldson F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ogutu, Jack</creatorcontrib><title>Environmental health risk perception of hydraulic fracturing in the US</title><title>Cogent environmental science</title><description>The advent of new technologies such as directional drilling (D 2 ) and the hydraulic fracturing technique (HF tech ) has made it possible to enhance energy production from petroleum reserves. The procedures involved have however aroused public sentiments and triggered the debate on the economic importance of petroleum recovery processes. Public perceptions of the environmental health consequences of these processes have been fuzzy. Public survey was conducted using the United States as a case study to foster the development of the most effective policy relative to environmental health sustainability and energy independence. Participants (n = 1243) were surveyed on the prevalence and concerns for HF tech in proxy communities in 2015. Key to the perception inquiry was the knowledge of respondents on HF tech and the concerns relative to the exploration processes. Ordinal logistic regression and Poisson regression (Pλ) were used to interpret the responses obtained from the participants. The study determined mixed public view for HF tech based on the analyses conducted. Young men, on average, had the least degree of concerns, while older residents (60+ years old) are more inclined to have friends who support HF tech in the communities (p-value = 0.082). Through this study, a clearer global profile of perceived public risks can be developed in countries using HF tech , in determining risk acceptability and proper governance for shale gas development. The detailed survey carried out is important for the development of effective strategies for managing risky decisions to emerging energy development issues while balancing the need for a sustainable environment.</description><subject>communities</subject><subject>Drilling</subject><subject>Economic importance</subject><subject>Environmental health</subject><subject>environmental health impact</subject><subject>Health risks</subject><subject>Hydraulic fracturing</subject><subject>Natural gas exploration</subject><subject>New technology</subject><subject>oil and gas</subject><subject>perception</subject><subject>Petroleum</subject><subject>Polls &amp; surveys</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Risk perception</subject><subject>Shale</subject><subject>Shale gas</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><issn>2331-1843</issn><issn>2331-1843</issn><issn>2765-8511</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>0YH</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE9LAzEQxYMoWGo_ghDw3Jr_2b0ppVWh4EF7DtndxE3dJms2q_Tbu0sreOpphpn3Zh4_AG4xWmCUoXtCKcYZowuCsFhggvI8ZxdgMs7n4-LyX38NZl23QwhhJgSjbALWK__tYvB745NuYG10k2oYXfcJWxNL0yYXPAwW1ocq6r5xJbRRl6mPzn9A52GqDdy-3YArq5vOzE51Crbr1fvyeb55fXpZPm7mJcM0zYnMOMuQ4ELYgldWcllxxgg3hTBaysJaS8UYzxBJic5FKXSheV4VVtKioFNwd7zbxvDVmy6pXeijH14qwhESOUGMnFPhTBAyZMnloOJHVRlD10VjVRvdXseDwkiNbNUfWzWyVSe2g-_h6HPehrjXPyE2lUr60IQ4sPGl6xQ9f-IX0bd-eA</recordid><startdate>20161231</startdate><enddate>20161231</enddate><creator>Olawoyin, Richard</creator><creator>McGlothlin, Charles</creator><creator>Conserve, Donaldson F.</creator><creator>Ogutu, Jack</creator><general>Cogent</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><scope>0YH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3310-5998</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20161231</creationdate><title>Environmental health risk perception of hydraulic fracturing in the US</title><author>Olawoyin, Richard ; McGlothlin, Charles ; Conserve, Donaldson F. ; Ogutu, Jack</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-27854806566fb5df757d54425eb6ea77bfff360014e2732a96c6aba59dbf73bb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>communities</topic><topic>Drilling</topic><topic>Economic importance</topic><topic>Environmental health</topic><topic>environmental health impact</topic><topic>Health risks</topic><topic>Hydraulic fracturing</topic><topic>Natural gas exploration</topic><topic>New technology</topic><topic>oil and gas</topic><topic>perception</topic><topic>Petroleum</topic><topic>Polls &amp; surveys</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Risk perception</topic><topic>Shale</topic><topic>Shale gas</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Olawoyin, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGlothlin, Charles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conserve, Donaldson F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ogutu, Jack</creatorcontrib><collection>Taylor &amp; Francis Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><jtitle>Cogent environmental science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Olawoyin, Richard</au><au>McGlothlin, Charles</au><au>Conserve, Donaldson F.</au><au>Ogutu, Jack</au><au>Wich, Serge</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Environmental health risk perception of hydraulic fracturing in the US</atitle><jtitle>Cogent environmental science</jtitle><date>2016-12-31</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>2</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1209994</spage><pages>1209994-</pages><issn>2331-1843</issn><eissn>2331-1843</eissn><eissn>2765-8511</eissn><abstract>The advent of new technologies such as directional drilling (D 2 ) and the hydraulic fracturing technique (HF tech ) has made it possible to enhance energy production from petroleum reserves. The procedures involved have however aroused public sentiments and triggered the debate on the economic importance of petroleum recovery processes. Public perceptions of the environmental health consequences of these processes have been fuzzy. Public survey was conducted using the United States as a case study to foster the development of the most effective policy relative to environmental health sustainability and energy independence. Participants (n = 1243) were surveyed on the prevalence and concerns for HF tech in proxy communities in 2015. Key to the perception inquiry was the knowledge of respondents on HF tech and the concerns relative to the exploration processes. Ordinal logistic regression and Poisson regression (Pλ) were used to interpret the responses obtained from the participants. The study determined mixed public view for HF tech based on the analyses conducted. Young men, on average, had the least degree of concerns, while older residents (60+ years old) are more inclined to have friends who support HF tech in the communities (p-value = 0.082). Through this study, a clearer global profile of perceived public risks can be developed in countries using HF tech , in determining risk acceptability and proper governance for shale gas development. The detailed survey carried out is important for the development of effective strategies for managing risky decisions to emerging energy development issues while balancing the need for a sustainable environment.</abstract><cop>Abingdon</cop><pub>Cogent</pub><doi>10.1080/23311843.2016.1209994</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3310-5998</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2331-1843
ispartof Cogent environmental science, 2016-12, Vol.2 (1), p.1209994
issn 2331-1843
2331-1843
2765-8511
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1862241397
source Taylor & Francis Open Access; Directory of Open Access Journals; AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central; Free E-Journal (出版社公開部分のみ); ProQuest Central
subjects communities
Drilling
Economic importance
Environmental health
environmental health impact
Health risks
Hydraulic fracturing
Natural gas exploration
New technology
oil and gas
perception
Petroleum
Polls & surveys
Regression analysis
Risk perception
Shale
Shale gas
Sustainability
title Environmental health risk perception of hydraulic fracturing in the US
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T08%3A39%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Environmental%20health%20risk%20perception%20of%20hydraulic%20fracturing%20in%20the%20US&rft.jtitle=Cogent%20environmental%20science&rft.au=Olawoyin,%20Richard&rft.date=2016-12-31&rft.volume=2&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1209994&rft.pages=1209994-&rft.issn=2331-1843&rft.eissn=2331-1843&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/23311843.2016.1209994&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_infor%3E2500692042%3C/proquest_infor%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1862241397&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true