JUSTICE SCALIA'S BOTTOM-UP APPROACH TO SHAPING THE LAW

Justice Antonin Scalia is among the most famous Supreme Court Justices in history. He is known for his originalism and conservative positions, as well as his witty and acerbic legal opinions. One of the reasons Justice Scalia's opinions are so memorable is his effective use of rhetorical device...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The William and Mary Bill of Rights journal 2016-10, Vol.25 (1), p.297
1. Verfasser: Ryan, Meghan J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page 297
container_title The William and Mary Bill of Rights journal
container_volume 25
creator Ryan, Meghan J
description Justice Antonin Scalia is among the most famous Supreme Court Justices in history. He is known for his originalism and conservative positions, as well as his witty and acerbic legal opinions. One of the reasons Justice Scalia's opinions are so memorable is his effective use of rhetorical devices, which convey colorful images and understandable ideas. One might expect that such powerful opinions would be effective in shaping the law, but Justice Scalia's judicial philosophy was often too conservative to persuade a majority of his fellow Justices on the Supreme Court. Further, his regular criticisms of his Supreme Court colleagues were not conducive to building majority support for his reasoning. Hoping to still have a lasting impact on the law, Justice Scalia seemed to direct his rhetoric at a different audience. Instead of focusing on persuading his Supreme Court colleagues, Justice Scalia concentrated on persuading the general public. Instead of shaping law in the traditional trickle-down manner, Justice Scalia sought to shape it from the bottom up.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1861824711</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4308320401</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_18618247113</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYuA0tDQx1jU0No1gAbINzEx1LYxMTTgYuIqLswwMDA1NDE04Gcy8QoNDPJ1dFYKdHX08HdWDFZz8Q0L8fXVDAxQcAwKC_B2dPRRC_BWCPRwDPP3cFUI8XBV8HMN5GFjTEnOKU3mhNDeDsptriLOHbkFRfmFpanFJfFZ-aVEeUCre0MLM0MLIxNzQ0Jg4VQAYpDDq</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1861824711</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>JUSTICE SCALIA'S BOTTOM-UP APPROACH TO SHAPING THE LAW</title><source>Political Science Complete</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><creator>Ryan, Meghan J</creator><creatorcontrib>Ryan, Meghan J</creatorcontrib><description>Justice Antonin Scalia is among the most famous Supreme Court Justices in history. He is known for his originalism and conservative positions, as well as his witty and acerbic legal opinions. One of the reasons Justice Scalia's opinions are so memorable is his effective use of rhetorical devices, which convey colorful images and understandable ideas. One might expect that such powerful opinions would be effective in shaping the law, but Justice Scalia's judicial philosophy was often too conservative to persuade a majority of his fellow Justices on the Supreme Court. Further, his regular criticisms of his Supreme Court colleagues were not conducive to building majority support for his reasoning. Hoping to still have a lasting impact on the law, Justice Scalia seemed to direct his rhetoric at a different audience. Instead of focusing on persuading his Supreme Court colleagues, Justice Scalia concentrated on persuading the general public. Instead of shaping law in the traditional trickle-down manner, Justice Scalia sought to shape it from the bottom up.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1065-8254</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-135X</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Williamsburg: Bill of Rights Journal</publisher><subject>Attorneys ; Audiences ; Grass roots movement ; Law ; Legislators ; Public opinion ; Rhetoric ; Scholars ; Supreme Court decisions ; Writing</subject><ispartof>The William and Mary Bill of Rights journal, 2016-10, Vol.25 (1), p.297</ispartof><rights>Copyright Bill of Rights Journal Oct 2016</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ryan, Meghan J</creatorcontrib><title>JUSTICE SCALIA'S BOTTOM-UP APPROACH TO SHAPING THE LAW</title><title>The William and Mary Bill of Rights journal</title><description>Justice Antonin Scalia is among the most famous Supreme Court Justices in history. He is known for his originalism and conservative positions, as well as his witty and acerbic legal opinions. One of the reasons Justice Scalia's opinions are so memorable is his effective use of rhetorical devices, which convey colorful images and understandable ideas. One might expect that such powerful opinions would be effective in shaping the law, but Justice Scalia's judicial philosophy was often too conservative to persuade a majority of his fellow Justices on the Supreme Court. Further, his regular criticisms of his Supreme Court colleagues were not conducive to building majority support for his reasoning. Hoping to still have a lasting impact on the law, Justice Scalia seemed to direct his rhetoric at a different audience. Instead of focusing on persuading his Supreme Court colleagues, Justice Scalia concentrated on persuading the general public. Instead of shaping law in the traditional trickle-down manner, Justice Scalia sought to shape it from the bottom up.</description><subject>Attorneys</subject><subject>Audiences</subject><subject>Grass roots movement</subject><subject>Law</subject><subject>Legislators</subject><subject>Public opinion</subject><subject>Rhetoric</subject><subject>Scholars</subject><subject>Supreme Court decisions</subject><subject>Writing</subject><issn>1065-8254</issn><issn>1943-135X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><sourceid>QXPDG</sourceid><recordid>eNpjYuA0tDQx1jU0No1gAbINzEx1LYxMTTgYuIqLswwMDA1NDE04Gcy8QoNDPJ1dFYKdHX08HdWDFZz8Q0L8fXVDAxQcAwKC_B2dPRRC_BWCPRwDPP3cFUI8XBV8HMN5GFjTEnOKU3mhNDeDsptriLOHbkFRfmFpanFJfFZ-aVEeUCre0MLM0MLIxNzQ0Jg4VQAYpDDq</recordid><startdate>20161001</startdate><enddate>20161001</enddate><creator>Ryan, Meghan J</creator><general>Bill of Rights Journal</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>884</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>M0I</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>QXPDG</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20161001</creationdate><title>JUSTICE SCALIA'S BOTTOM-UP APPROACH TO SHAPING THE LAW</title><author>Ryan, Meghan J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_18618247113</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Attorneys</topic><topic>Audiences</topic><topic>Grass roots movement</topic><topic>Law</topic><topic>Legislators</topic><topic>Public opinion</topic><topic>Rhetoric</topic><topic>Scholars</topic><topic>Supreme Court decisions</topic><topic>Writing</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ryan, Meghan J</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Alt-PressWatch (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Alt-PressWatch</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Diversity Collection</collection><jtitle>The William and Mary Bill of Rights journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ryan, Meghan J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>JUSTICE SCALIA'S BOTTOM-UP APPROACH TO SHAPING THE LAW</atitle><jtitle>The William and Mary Bill of Rights journal</jtitle><date>2016-10-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>297</spage><pages>297-</pages><issn>1065-8254</issn><eissn>1943-135X</eissn><abstract>Justice Antonin Scalia is among the most famous Supreme Court Justices in history. He is known for his originalism and conservative positions, as well as his witty and acerbic legal opinions. One of the reasons Justice Scalia's opinions are so memorable is his effective use of rhetorical devices, which convey colorful images and understandable ideas. One might expect that such powerful opinions would be effective in shaping the law, but Justice Scalia's judicial philosophy was often too conservative to persuade a majority of his fellow Justices on the Supreme Court. Further, his regular criticisms of his Supreme Court colleagues were not conducive to building majority support for his reasoning. Hoping to still have a lasting impact on the law, Justice Scalia seemed to direct his rhetoric at a different audience. Instead of focusing on persuading his Supreme Court colleagues, Justice Scalia concentrated on persuading the general public. Instead of shaping law in the traditional trickle-down manner, Justice Scalia sought to shape it from the bottom up.</abstract><cop>Williamsburg</cop><pub>Bill of Rights Journal</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1065-8254
ispartof The William and Mary Bill of Rights journal, 2016-10, Vol.25 (1), p.297
issn 1065-8254
1943-135X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1861824711
source Political Science Complete; HeinOnline Law Journal Library
subjects Attorneys
Audiences
Grass roots movement
Law
Legislators
Public opinion
Rhetoric
Scholars
Supreme Court decisions
Writing
title JUSTICE SCALIA'S BOTTOM-UP APPROACH TO SHAPING THE LAW
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T15%3A04%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=JUSTICE%20SCALIA'S%20BOTTOM-UP%20APPROACH%20TO%20SHAPING%20THE%20LAW&rft.jtitle=The%20William%20and%20Mary%20Bill%20of%20Rights%20journal&rft.au=Ryan,%20Meghan%20J&rft.date=2016-10-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=297&rft.pages=297-&rft.issn=1065-8254&rft.eissn=1943-135X&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E4308320401%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1861824711&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true