Whither “Confucian Management”?
This article asks whether “Confucian Management” may be seen as the dominant influence in contemporary China. The philosophical legacy of Confucius on modern management theory and practice has received a good deal of attention in recent times, and here I attempt to assess its possible continuity. In...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Frontiers of philosophy in China 2016-01, Vol.11 (4), p.608-632 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 632 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 608 |
| container_title | Frontiers of philosophy in China |
| container_volume | 11 |
| creator | Warner, Malcolm |
| description | This article asks whether “Confucian Management” may be seen as the dominant influence in contemporary China. The philosophical legacy of Confucius on modern management theory and practice has received a good deal of attention in recent times, and here I attempt to assess its possible continuity. In order to carry out this task, I apply a bibliometric analysis called the “Culturomics” approach, looking at the literature on “Chinese Management” published in Mandarin in the last century, from 1900 onwards. After the presentation of the empirical data, the discussion section is set out, followed by the article’s conclusions. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.3868/s030-005-016-0042-9 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1860823554</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cqvip_id>671127615</cqvip_id><jstor_id>44157036</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>44157036</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b325t-10da80a00cfc65ff376500a0012ef6c1b627d38faae167103110bb848f9717b73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1OwzAQhS0EEqVwAoRU0XVgxo5_ygahij8JxAYEO8tJ7TRV67ROumDXg8DlehIcBRArVmNr3rx58xFyjHDGlFDnNTBIAHgCKGJNaTLaIT0UkiWM87fdn3fKxD45qOtZ1FKKvEeGr9Oymdow2G4-xpV367w0fvBovCnswvpmu_m8PCR7zsxre_Rd--Tl5vp5fJc8PN3ej68ekoxR3iQIE6PAAOQuF9w5JgWH9o_UOpFjJqicMOWMsTENAkOELFOpciOJMpOsT4ad7zJUq7WtGz2r1sHHlRqVAEXjLWlUnXSqWd1UQS9DuTDhXacpcglMxP5F15-WRTzMTpbB1rV2ofJNaUP0At1C0y00HUHoCE230PQoDp92w_m08sWq9MXvghgZqRTIowg7URbK-fxPyH-MvwDfrHiX</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1860823554</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Whither “Confucian Management”?</title><source>JSTOR</source><creator>Warner, Malcolm</creator><creatorcontrib>Warner, Malcolm</creatorcontrib><description>This article asks whether “Confucian Management” may be seen as the dominant influence in contemporary China. The philosophical legacy of Confucius on modern management theory and practice has received a good deal of attention in recent times, and here I attempt to assess its possible continuity. In order to carry out this task, I apply a bibliometric analysis called the “Culturomics” approach, looking at the literature on “Chinese Management” published in Mandarin in the last century, from 1900 onwards. After the presentation of the empirical data, the discussion section is set out, followed by the article’s conclusions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1673-3436</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1673-355X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3868/s030-005-016-0042-9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>The Netherlands: BRILL</publisher><subject>Asia ; Bibliometrics ; Business management ; Capitalism ; China ; Confucian ; Confucianism ; Confucius (551-479 BC) ; Corporations ; Eastern philosophy ; Industrial management ; management ; Management education ; Management philosophies ; Management principles ; Management science ; Management theory ; paradigm ; Philosophers ; philosophy ; SPECIAL THEME</subject><ispartof>Frontiers of philosophy in China, 2016-01, Vol.11 (4), p.608-632</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2016 by Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands</rights><rights>Copyright reserved, 2017, Higher Education Press and Brill</rights><rights>Copyright Brill Academic Publishers, Inc. 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttp://image.cqvip.com/vip1000/qk/71379X/71379X.jpg</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/44157036$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/44157036$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,800,27905,27906,57998,58231</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Warner, Malcolm</creatorcontrib><title>Whither “Confucian Management”?</title><title>Frontiers of philosophy in China</title><addtitle>Front. Philos. China</addtitle><addtitle>Frontiers of Philosophy in China</addtitle><description>This article asks whether “Confucian Management” may be seen as the dominant influence in contemporary China. The philosophical legacy of Confucius on modern management theory and practice has received a good deal of attention in recent times, and here I attempt to assess its possible continuity. In order to carry out this task, I apply a bibliometric analysis called the “Culturomics” approach, looking at the literature on “Chinese Management” published in Mandarin in the last century, from 1900 onwards. After the presentation of the empirical data, the discussion section is set out, followed by the article’s conclusions.</description><subject>Asia</subject><subject>Bibliometrics</subject><subject>Business management</subject><subject>Capitalism</subject><subject>China</subject><subject>Confucian</subject><subject>Confucianism</subject><subject>Confucius (551-479 BC)</subject><subject>Corporations</subject><subject>Eastern philosophy</subject><subject>Industrial management</subject><subject>management</subject><subject>Management education</subject><subject>Management philosophies</subject><subject>Management principles</subject><subject>Management science</subject><subject>Management theory</subject><subject>paradigm</subject><subject>Philosophers</subject><subject>philosophy</subject><subject>SPECIAL THEME</subject><issn>1673-3436</issn><issn>1673-355X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1OwzAQhS0EEqVwAoRU0XVgxo5_ygahij8JxAYEO8tJ7TRV67ROumDXg8DlehIcBRArVmNr3rx58xFyjHDGlFDnNTBIAHgCKGJNaTLaIT0UkiWM87fdn3fKxD45qOtZ1FKKvEeGr9Oymdow2G4-xpV367w0fvBovCnswvpmu_m8PCR7zsxre_Rd--Tl5vp5fJc8PN3ej68ekoxR3iQIE6PAAOQuF9w5JgWH9o_UOpFjJqicMOWMsTENAkOELFOpciOJMpOsT4ad7zJUq7WtGz2r1sHHlRqVAEXjLWlUnXSqWd1UQS9DuTDhXacpcglMxP5F15-WRTzMTpbB1rV2ofJNaUP0At1C0y00HUHoCE230PQoDp92w_m08sWq9MXvghgZqRTIowg7URbK-fxPyH-MvwDfrHiX</recordid><startdate>20160101</startdate><enddate>20160101</enddate><creator>Warner, Malcolm</creator><general>BRILL</general><general>Higher Education Press</general><general>Higher Education Press and Koninklijke Brill NV</general><general>Higher Education Press Limited Company</general><scope>2RA</scope><scope>92L</scope><scope>CQIGP</scope><scope>W93</scope><scope>~WA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160101</creationdate><title>Whither “Confucian Management”?</title><author>Warner, Malcolm</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b325t-10da80a00cfc65ff376500a0012ef6c1b627d38faae167103110bb848f9717b73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Asia</topic><topic>Bibliometrics</topic><topic>Business management</topic><topic>Capitalism</topic><topic>China</topic><topic>Confucian</topic><topic>Confucianism</topic><topic>Confucius (551-479 BC)</topic><topic>Corporations</topic><topic>Eastern philosophy</topic><topic>Industrial management</topic><topic>management</topic><topic>Management education</topic><topic>Management philosophies</topic><topic>Management principles</topic><topic>Management science</topic><topic>Management theory</topic><topic>paradigm</topic><topic>Philosophers</topic><topic>philosophy</topic><topic>SPECIAL THEME</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Warner, Malcolm</creatorcontrib><collection>维普_期刊</collection><collection>中文科技期刊数据库-CALIS站点</collection><collection>维普中文期刊数据库</collection><collection>中文科技期刊数据库-社会科学</collection><collection>中文科技期刊数据库- 镜像站点</collection><jtitle>Frontiers of philosophy in China</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Warner, Malcolm</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Whither “Confucian Management”?</atitle><jtitle>Frontiers of philosophy in China</jtitle><stitle>Front. Philos. China</stitle><addtitle>Frontiers of Philosophy in China</addtitle><date>2016-01-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>608</spage><epage>632</epage><pages>608-632</pages><issn>1673-3436</issn><eissn>1673-355X</eissn><abstract>This article asks whether “Confucian Management” may be seen as the dominant influence in contemporary China. The philosophical legacy of Confucius on modern management theory and practice has received a good deal of attention in recent times, and here I attempt to assess its possible continuity. In order to carry out this task, I apply a bibliometric analysis called the “Culturomics” approach, looking at the literature on “Chinese Management” published in Mandarin in the last century, from 1900 onwards. After the presentation of the empirical data, the discussion section is set out, followed by the article’s conclusions.</abstract><cop>The Netherlands</cop><pub>BRILL</pub><doi>10.3868/s030-005-016-0042-9</doi><tpages>25</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1673-3436 |
| ispartof | Frontiers of philosophy in China, 2016-01, Vol.11 (4), p.608-632 |
| issn | 1673-3436 1673-355X |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1860823554 |
| source | JSTOR |
| subjects | Asia Bibliometrics Business management Capitalism China Confucian Confucianism Confucius (551-479 BC) Corporations Eastern philosophy Industrial management management Management education Management philosophies Management principles Management science Management theory paradigm Philosophers philosophy SPECIAL THEME |
| title | Whither “Confucian Management”? |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T14%3A30%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Whither%20%E2%80%9CConfucian%20Management%E2%80%9D?&rft.jtitle=Frontiers%20of%20philosophy%20in%20China&rft.au=Warner,%20Malcolm&rft.date=2016-01-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=608&rft.epage=632&rft.pages=608-632&rft.issn=1673-3436&rft.eissn=1673-355X&rft_id=info:doi/10.3868/s030-005-016-0042-9&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E44157036%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1860823554&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cqvip_id=671127615&rft_jstor_id=44157036&rfr_iscdi=true |