Comparison of two different radiation fractionation schedules with concurrent chemotherapy in head and neck malignancy

Introduction: The worldwide incidence of head and neck malignancy exceeds half a million cases annually. In radiotherapy (RT), conventional fractionation comprises giving five fractions per week from Monday to Friday. Accelerated RT includes administration of six fractions per week is being advocate...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Indian journal of cancer 2016-04, Vol.53 (2), p.265-269
Hauptverfasser: Alam, M, Perween, R, Siddiqui, S
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 269
container_issue 2
container_start_page 265
container_title Indian journal of cancer
container_volume 53
creator Alam, M
Perween, R
Siddiqui, S
description Introduction: The worldwide incidence of head and neck malignancy exceeds half a million cases annually. In radiotherapy (RT), conventional fractionation comprises giving five fractions per week from Monday to Friday. Accelerated RT includes administration of six fractions per week is being advocated. It gives better locoregional control and the median overall treatment time is 39 days as compared to 46 days in conventional group. Our study involved comparison of conventional versus accelerated RT with concurrent chemotherapy, in evaluation of local control and toxicity in the two arms. Materials and Methods: Sixty patients of locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma head and neck region were studied. All the patients received cisplatin (30 mg/m2) weekly during the therapy. The patients received RT dose of 70 Gray (Gy) in 35 fractions (#). The patients were randomly assorted into two groups: Group 1 - Study group (n = 30) - Six fractions RT per week (Monday-Saturday). Group 2 - Control group (n = 30) - Five fractions RT per week (Monday-Friday). During and after the treatment, locoregional control, acute and late radiation toxicity were assessed. Results and Observation: There was no significant difference between the two schedules regarding locoregional control rate. The Grade 3 or higher acute toxicities were significantly higher in the accelerated arm although there was no significant difference in late toxicities between the two arms. Conclusion: Accelerated fractionation regimen was not more efficacious than conventional fractionation in the treatment of previously untreated head and neck carcinoma.
doi_str_mv 10.4103/0019-509X.197740
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1859845297</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A477294711</galeid><sourcerecordid>A477294711</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c522s-4fdcfb667817b4f33e5c187b73ce8738db396f255722f90b5e7b8f58ac5b620e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptksGP1CAUxhujccfVuydDYuKtI9BS6HGd6GqyiRdNvBFKH1N2Whih3cn899Lt7rqTTDjA4_2-R97Hy7L3BK9LgovPGJM6Z7j-syY15yV-ka1IXYu8TMHLbPWUvsjexHiLMS1oKV5nF1RgTiparrK7jR_2KtjoHfIGjQePWmsMBHAjCqq1arQpZYLS82GJou6gnXqI6GDHDmnv9BTuFSkx-LGDoPZHZB3qQLVIuRY50Ds0qN5unXL6-DZ7ZVQf4d3Dfpn9_vb11-Z7fvPz-sfm6ibXjNKYl6bVpqkqLghvSlMUwDQRvOGFBsEL0TZFXRnKGKfU1LhhwBthmFCaNRXFUFxmH5e6--D_ThBHeeun4NKTkghWi5LRmv-ntqoHaZ3xY-p3sFHLq2QlrUtOSKLyM9QWXOq29w6MTdcn_PoMn1YLg9VnBZ-eCZJ1_dhF30-z5_EUxAuog48xgJH7YAcVjpJgOQ-GnH9ezj8vl8FIkg8PRkzNAO2T4HESEvBlAQ6-HyHEXT8dIMjE7pw_nBTOnxWWtGLycYaKf-ptyCQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1859845297</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of two different radiation fractionation schedules with concurrent chemotherapy in head and neck malignancy</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Medknow Open Access Medical Journals</source><source>Bioline International</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Alam, M ; Perween, R ; Siddiqui, S</creator><creatorcontrib>Alam, M ; Perween, R ; Siddiqui, S</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction: The worldwide incidence of head and neck malignancy exceeds half a million cases annually. In radiotherapy (RT), conventional fractionation comprises giving five fractions per week from Monday to Friday. Accelerated RT includes administration of six fractions per week is being advocated. It gives better locoregional control and the median overall treatment time is 39 days as compared to 46 days in conventional group. Our study involved comparison of conventional versus accelerated RT with concurrent chemotherapy, in evaluation of local control and toxicity in the two arms. Materials and Methods: Sixty patients of locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma head and neck region were studied. All the patients received cisplatin (30 mg/m2) weekly during the therapy. The patients received RT dose of 70 Gray (Gy) in 35 fractions (#). The patients were randomly assorted into two groups: Group 1 - Study group (n = 30) - Six fractions RT per week (Monday-Saturday). Group 2 - Control group (n = 30) - Five fractions RT per week (Monday-Friday). During and after the treatment, locoregional control, acute and late radiation toxicity were assessed. Results and Observation: There was no significant difference between the two schedules regarding locoregional control rate. The Grade 3 or higher acute toxicities were significantly higher in the accelerated arm although there was no significant difference in late toxicities between the two arms. Conclusion: Accelerated fractionation regimen was not more efficacious than conventional fractionation in the treatment of previously untreated head and neck carcinoma.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0019-509X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1998-4774</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4103/0019-509X.197740</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28071624</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>India: Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd</publisher><subject>Care and treatment ; Chemotherapy ; Dose Fractionation ; Female ; Head and neck cancer ; Head and Neck Neoplasms - drug therapy ; Head and Neck Neoplasms - pathology ; Head and Neck Neoplasms - radiotherapy ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Radiotherapy ; Radiotherapy Dosage - standards</subject><ispartof>Indian journal of cancer, 2016-04, Vol.53 (2), p.265-269</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2016 Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright Medknow Publications &amp; Media Pvt Ltd Apr-Jun 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c522s-4fdcfb667817b4f33e5c187b73ce8738db396f255722f90b5e7b8f58ac5b620e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c522s-4fdcfb667817b4f33e5c187b73ce8738db396f255722f90b5e7b8f58ac5b620e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,27467,27933,27934</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28071624$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Alam, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perween, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siddiqui, S</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of two different radiation fractionation schedules with concurrent chemotherapy in head and neck malignancy</title><title>Indian journal of cancer</title><addtitle>Indian J Cancer</addtitle><description>Introduction: The worldwide incidence of head and neck malignancy exceeds half a million cases annually. In radiotherapy (RT), conventional fractionation comprises giving five fractions per week from Monday to Friday. Accelerated RT includes administration of six fractions per week is being advocated. It gives better locoregional control and the median overall treatment time is 39 days as compared to 46 days in conventional group. Our study involved comparison of conventional versus accelerated RT with concurrent chemotherapy, in evaluation of local control and toxicity in the two arms. Materials and Methods: Sixty patients of locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma head and neck region were studied. All the patients received cisplatin (30 mg/m2) weekly during the therapy. The patients received RT dose of 70 Gray (Gy) in 35 fractions (#). The patients were randomly assorted into two groups: Group 1 - Study group (n = 30) - Six fractions RT per week (Monday-Saturday). Group 2 - Control group (n = 30) - Five fractions RT per week (Monday-Friday). During and after the treatment, locoregional control, acute and late radiation toxicity were assessed. Results and Observation: There was no significant difference between the two schedules regarding locoregional control rate. The Grade 3 or higher acute toxicities were significantly higher in the accelerated arm although there was no significant difference in late toxicities between the two arms. Conclusion: Accelerated fractionation regimen was not more efficacious than conventional fractionation in the treatment of previously untreated head and neck carcinoma.</description><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Chemotherapy</subject><subject>Dose Fractionation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Head and neck cancer</subject><subject>Head and Neck Neoplasms - drug therapy</subject><subject>Head and Neck Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Head and Neck Neoplasms - radiotherapy</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Radiotherapy</subject><subject>Radiotherapy Dosage - standards</subject><issn>0019-509X</issn><issn>1998-4774</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNptksGP1CAUxhujccfVuydDYuKtI9BS6HGd6GqyiRdNvBFKH1N2Whih3cn899Lt7rqTTDjA4_2-R97Hy7L3BK9LgovPGJM6Z7j-syY15yV-ka1IXYu8TMHLbPWUvsjexHiLMS1oKV5nF1RgTiparrK7jR_2KtjoHfIGjQePWmsMBHAjCqq1arQpZYLS82GJou6gnXqI6GDHDmnv9BTuFSkx-LGDoPZHZB3qQLVIuRY50Ds0qN5unXL6-DZ7ZVQf4d3Dfpn9_vb11-Z7fvPz-sfm6ibXjNKYl6bVpqkqLghvSlMUwDQRvOGFBsEL0TZFXRnKGKfU1LhhwBthmFCaNRXFUFxmH5e6--D_ThBHeeun4NKTkghWi5LRmv-ntqoHaZ3xY-p3sFHLq2QlrUtOSKLyM9QWXOq29w6MTdcn_PoMn1YLg9VnBZ-eCZJ1_dhF30-z5_EUxAuog48xgJH7YAcVjpJgOQ-GnH9ezj8vl8FIkg8PRkzNAO2T4HESEvBlAQ6-HyHEXT8dIMjE7pw_nBTOnxWWtGLycYaKf-ptyCQ</recordid><startdate>20160401</startdate><enddate>20160401</enddate><creator>Alam, M</creator><creator>Perween, R</creator><creator>Siddiqui, S</creator><general>Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Medknow Publications &amp; Media Pvt. Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160401</creationdate><title>Comparison of two different radiation fractionation schedules with concurrent chemotherapy in head and neck malignancy</title><author>Alam, M ; Perween, R ; Siddiqui, S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c522s-4fdcfb667817b4f33e5c187b73ce8738db396f255722f90b5e7b8f58ac5b620e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Chemotherapy</topic><topic>Dose Fractionation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Head and neck cancer</topic><topic>Head and Neck Neoplasms - drug therapy</topic><topic>Head and Neck Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Head and Neck Neoplasms - radiotherapy</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Radiotherapy</topic><topic>Radiotherapy Dosage - standards</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Alam, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perween, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siddiqui, S</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Indian journal of cancer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Alam, M</au><au>Perween, R</au><au>Siddiqui, S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of two different radiation fractionation schedules with concurrent chemotherapy in head and neck malignancy</atitle><jtitle>Indian journal of cancer</jtitle><addtitle>Indian J Cancer</addtitle><date>2016-04-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>53</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>265</spage><epage>269</epage><pages>265-269</pages><issn>0019-509X</issn><eissn>1998-4774</eissn><abstract>Introduction: The worldwide incidence of head and neck malignancy exceeds half a million cases annually. In radiotherapy (RT), conventional fractionation comprises giving five fractions per week from Monday to Friday. Accelerated RT includes administration of six fractions per week is being advocated. It gives better locoregional control and the median overall treatment time is 39 days as compared to 46 days in conventional group. Our study involved comparison of conventional versus accelerated RT with concurrent chemotherapy, in evaluation of local control and toxicity in the two arms. Materials and Methods: Sixty patients of locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma head and neck region were studied. All the patients received cisplatin (30 mg/m2) weekly during the therapy. The patients received RT dose of 70 Gray (Gy) in 35 fractions (#). The patients were randomly assorted into two groups: Group 1 - Study group (n = 30) - Six fractions RT per week (Monday-Saturday). Group 2 - Control group (n = 30) - Five fractions RT per week (Monday-Friday). During and after the treatment, locoregional control, acute and late radiation toxicity were assessed. Results and Observation: There was no significant difference between the two schedules regarding locoregional control rate. The Grade 3 or higher acute toxicities were significantly higher in the accelerated arm although there was no significant difference in late toxicities between the two arms. Conclusion: Accelerated fractionation regimen was not more efficacious than conventional fractionation in the treatment of previously untreated head and neck carcinoma.</abstract><cop>India</cop><pub>Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd</pub><pmid>28071624</pmid><doi>10.4103/0019-509X.197740</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0019-509X
ispartof Indian journal of cancer, 2016-04, Vol.53 (2), p.265-269
issn 0019-509X
1998-4774
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1859845297
source MEDLINE; Medknow Open Access Medical Journals; Bioline International; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Care and treatment
Chemotherapy
Dose Fractionation
Female
Head and neck cancer
Head and Neck Neoplasms - drug therapy
Head and Neck Neoplasms - pathology
Head and Neck Neoplasms - radiotherapy
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Radiotherapy
Radiotherapy Dosage - standards
title Comparison of two different radiation fractionation schedules with concurrent chemotherapy in head and neck malignancy
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-03T13%3A01%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20two%20different%20radiation%20fractionation%20schedules%20with%20concurrent%20chemotherapy%20in%20head%20and%20neck%20malignancy&rft.jtitle=Indian%20journal%20of%20cancer&rft.au=Alam,%20M&rft.date=2016-04-01&rft.volume=53&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=265&rft.epage=269&rft.pages=265-269&rft.issn=0019-509X&rft.eissn=1998-4774&rft_id=info:doi/10.4103/0019-509X.197740&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA477294711%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1859845297&rft_id=info:pmid/28071624&rft_galeid=A477294711&rfr_iscdi=true