Why Mortgage Borrowers Persevere: An Explanation of First and Second Lien Performance Mismatch

Borrowers with a pair of mortgages collateralized by the same property sometimes continue to make payments on one while defaulting on the other. We articulate a framework for understanding this performance mismatch that emphasizes two types of borrowers: those with stable equity positions who percei...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Real estate economics 2017, Vol.45 (1), p.28-74
Hauptverfasser: Calem, Paul S., Sarama, Robert F.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 74
container_issue 1
container_start_page 28
container_title Real estate economics
container_volume 45
creator Calem, Paul S.
Sarama, Robert F.
description Borrowers with a pair of mortgages collateralized by the same property sometimes continue to make payments on one while defaulting on the other. We articulate a framework for understanding this performance mismatch that emphasizes two types of borrowers: those with stable equity positions who perceive they are facing moderate or temporary liquidity shocks, and those facing severe financial stress in combination with negative equity. The former have an incentive to enter mismatch and subsequently cure, while the latter would default on both contracts. Our empirical analysis using newly available, national samples of matched first‐ and second‐lien mortgages supports this view.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/1540-6229.12139
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1859752062</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4304080121</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3809-eb928715dfa4a77209e378823c9fe5e8bdc01c7eb0629f363ac7c422d878dde73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM1PwzAMxSMEEmNw5hqJc7ckXZuE25g6QOoE4kPciLLU3TptzUg6xv57Uoq44oOfZb2fLT2ELikZ0FBDmoxIlDImB5TRWB6h3t_mOMxEkEikjJyiM-9XhBAqOemh97flAc-saxZ6AfjGOmf34Dx-DA0-wcE1Htc4-9quda2bytbYlnhaOd9gXRf4GYwNkldQt0hp3UbXBvCs8hvdmOU5Oin12sPFr_bR6zR7mdxF-cPt_WScRyYWREYwl0xwmhSlHmnOGZEQcyFYbGQJCYh5YQg1HOYkZbKM01gbbkaMFYKLogAe99FVd3fr7McOfKNWdufq8FJRkUiesEAG17BzGWe9d1Cqras22h0UJaoNUbWRqTYy9RNiINKO2FdrOPxnV09ZNunAbzUGc2E</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1859752062</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Why Mortgage Borrowers Persevere: An Explanation of First and Second Lien Performance Mismatch</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Calem, Paul S. ; Sarama, Robert F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Calem, Paul S. ; Sarama, Robert F.</creatorcontrib><description>Borrowers with a pair of mortgages collateralized by the same property sometimes continue to make payments on one while defaulting on the other. We articulate a framework for understanding this performance mismatch that emphasizes two types of borrowers: those with stable equity positions who perceive they are facing moderate or temporary liquidity shocks, and those facing severe financial stress in combination with negative equity. The former have an incentive to enter mismatch and subsequently cure, while the latter would default on both contracts. Our empirical analysis using newly available, national samples of matched first‐ and second‐lien mortgages supports this view.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1080-8620</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1540-6229</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1540-6229.12139</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bloomington: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Default ; Mortgages</subject><ispartof>Real estate economics, 2017, Vol.45 (1), p.28-74</ispartof><rights>2016 American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association</rights><rights>2017 American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3809-eb928715dfa4a77209e378823c9fe5e8bdc01c7eb0629f363ac7c422d878dde73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3809-eb928715dfa4a77209e378823c9fe5e8bdc01c7eb0629f363ac7c422d878dde73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2F1540-6229.12139$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2F1540-6229.12139$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Calem, Paul S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sarama, Robert F.</creatorcontrib><title>Why Mortgage Borrowers Persevere: An Explanation of First and Second Lien Performance Mismatch</title><title>Real estate economics</title><description>Borrowers with a pair of mortgages collateralized by the same property sometimes continue to make payments on one while defaulting on the other. We articulate a framework for understanding this performance mismatch that emphasizes two types of borrowers: those with stable equity positions who perceive they are facing moderate or temporary liquidity shocks, and those facing severe financial stress in combination with negative equity. The former have an incentive to enter mismatch and subsequently cure, while the latter would default on both contracts. Our empirical analysis using newly available, national samples of matched first‐ and second‐lien mortgages supports this view.</description><subject>Default</subject><subject>Mortgages</subject><issn>1080-8620</issn><issn>1540-6229</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkM1PwzAMxSMEEmNw5hqJc7ckXZuE25g6QOoE4kPciLLU3TptzUg6xv57Uoq44oOfZb2fLT2ELikZ0FBDmoxIlDImB5TRWB6h3t_mOMxEkEikjJyiM-9XhBAqOemh97flAc-saxZ6AfjGOmf34Dx-DA0-wcE1Htc4-9quda2bytbYlnhaOd9gXRf4GYwNkldQt0hp3UbXBvCs8hvdmOU5Oin12sPFr_bR6zR7mdxF-cPt_WScRyYWREYwl0xwmhSlHmnOGZEQcyFYbGQJCYh5YQg1HOYkZbKM01gbbkaMFYKLogAe99FVd3fr7McOfKNWdufq8FJRkUiesEAG17BzGWe9d1Cqras22h0UJaoNUbWRqTYy9RNiINKO2FdrOPxnV09ZNunAbzUGc2E</recordid><startdate>2017</startdate><enddate>2017</enddate><creator>Calem, Paul S.</creator><creator>Sarama, Robert F.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2017</creationdate><title>Why Mortgage Borrowers Persevere: An Explanation of First and Second Lien Performance Mismatch</title><author>Calem, Paul S. ; Sarama, Robert F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3809-eb928715dfa4a77209e378823c9fe5e8bdc01c7eb0629f363ac7c422d878dde73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Default</topic><topic>Mortgages</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Calem, Paul S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sarama, Robert F.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Real estate economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Calem, Paul S.</au><au>Sarama, Robert F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Why Mortgage Borrowers Persevere: An Explanation of First and Second Lien Performance Mismatch</atitle><jtitle>Real estate economics</jtitle><date>2017</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>28</spage><epage>74</epage><pages>28-74</pages><issn>1080-8620</issn><eissn>1540-6229</eissn><abstract>Borrowers with a pair of mortgages collateralized by the same property sometimes continue to make payments on one while defaulting on the other. We articulate a framework for understanding this performance mismatch that emphasizes two types of borrowers: those with stable equity positions who perceive they are facing moderate or temporary liquidity shocks, and those facing severe financial stress in combination with negative equity. The former have an incentive to enter mismatch and subsequently cure, while the latter would default on both contracts. Our empirical analysis using newly available, national samples of matched first‐ and second‐lien mortgages supports this view.</abstract><cop>Bloomington</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/1540-6229.12139</doi><tpages>47</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1080-8620
ispartof Real estate economics, 2017, Vol.45 (1), p.28-74
issn 1080-8620
1540-6229
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1859752062
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete
subjects Default
Mortgages
title Why Mortgage Borrowers Persevere: An Explanation of First and Second Lien Performance Mismatch
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T12%3A25%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Why%20Mortgage%20Borrowers%20Persevere:%20An%20Explanation%20of%20First%20and%20Second%20Lien%20Performance%20Mismatch&rft.jtitle=Real%20estate%20economics&rft.au=Calem,%20Paul%20S.&rft.date=2017&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=28&rft.epage=74&rft.pages=28-74&rft.issn=1080-8620&rft.eissn=1540-6229&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1540-6229.12139&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4304080121%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1859752062&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true