Why Mortgage Borrowers Persevere: An Explanation of First and Second Lien Performance Mismatch
Borrowers with a pair of mortgages collateralized by the same property sometimes continue to make payments on one while defaulting on the other. We articulate a framework for understanding this performance mismatch that emphasizes two types of borrowers: those with stable equity positions who percei...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Real estate economics 2017, Vol.45 (1), p.28-74 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 74 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 28 |
container_title | Real estate economics |
container_volume | 45 |
creator | Calem, Paul S. Sarama, Robert F. |
description | Borrowers with a pair of mortgages collateralized by the same property sometimes continue to make payments on one while defaulting on the other. We articulate a framework for understanding this performance mismatch that emphasizes two types of borrowers: those with stable equity positions who perceive they are facing moderate or temporary liquidity shocks, and those facing severe financial stress in combination with negative equity. The former have an incentive to enter mismatch and subsequently cure, while the latter would default on both contracts. Our empirical analysis using newly available, national samples of matched first‐ and second‐lien mortgages supports this view. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/1540-6229.12139 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1859752062</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4304080121</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3809-eb928715dfa4a77209e378823c9fe5e8bdc01c7eb0629f363ac7c422d878dde73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM1PwzAMxSMEEmNw5hqJc7ckXZuE25g6QOoE4kPciLLU3TptzUg6xv57Uoq44oOfZb2fLT2ELikZ0FBDmoxIlDImB5TRWB6h3t_mOMxEkEikjJyiM-9XhBAqOemh97flAc-saxZ6AfjGOmf34Dx-DA0-wcE1Htc4-9quda2bytbYlnhaOd9gXRf4GYwNkldQt0hp3UbXBvCs8hvdmOU5Oin12sPFr_bR6zR7mdxF-cPt_WScRyYWREYwl0xwmhSlHmnOGZEQcyFYbGQJCYh5YQg1HOYkZbKM01gbbkaMFYKLogAe99FVd3fr7McOfKNWdufq8FJRkUiesEAG17BzGWe9d1Cqras22h0UJaoNUbWRqTYy9RNiINKO2FdrOPxnV09ZNunAbzUGc2E</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1859752062</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Why Mortgage Borrowers Persevere: An Explanation of First and Second Lien Performance Mismatch</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Calem, Paul S. ; Sarama, Robert F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Calem, Paul S. ; Sarama, Robert F.</creatorcontrib><description>Borrowers with a pair of mortgages collateralized by the same property sometimes continue to make payments on one while defaulting on the other. We articulate a framework for understanding this performance mismatch that emphasizes two types of borrowers: those with stable equity positions who perceive they are facing moderate or temporary liquidity shocks, and those facing severe financial stress in combination with negative equity. The former have an incentive to enter mismatch and subsequently cure, while the latter would default on both contracts. Our empirical analysis using newly available, national samples of matched first‐ and second‐lien mortgages supports this view.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1080-8620</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1540-6229</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1540-6229.12139</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bloomington: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Default ; Mortgages</subject><ispartof>Real estate economics, 2017, Vol.45 (1), p.28-74</ispartof><rights>2016 American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association</rights><rights>2017 American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3809-eb928715dfa4a77209e378823c9fe5e8bdc01c7eb0629f363ac7c422d878dde73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3809-eb928715dfa4a77209e378823c9fe5e8bdc01c7eb0629f363ac7c422d878dde73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2F1540-6229.12139$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2F1540-6229.12139$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Calem, Paul S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sarama, Robert F.</creatorcontrib><title>Why Mortgage Borrowers Persevere: An Explanation of First and Second Lien Performance Mismatch</title><title>Real estate economics</title><description>Borrowers with a pair of mortgages collateralized by the same property sometimes continue to make payments on one while defaulting on the other. We articulate a framework for understanding this performance mismatch that emphasizes two types of borrowers: those with stable equity positions who perceive they are facing moderate or temporary liquidity shocks, and those facing severe financial stress in combination with negative equity. The former have an incentive to enter mismatch and subsequently cure, while the latter would default on both contracts. Our empirical analysis using newly available, national samples of matched first‐ and second‐lien mortgages supports this view.</description><subject>Default</subject><subject>Mortgages</subject><issn>1080-8620</issn><issn>1540-6229</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkM1PwzAMxSMEEmNw5hqJc7ckXZuE25g6QOoE4kPciLLU3TptzUg6xv57Uoq44oOfZb2fLT2ELikZ0FBDmoxIlDImB5TRWB6h3t_mOMxEkEikjJyiM-9XhBAqOemh97flAc-saxZ6AfjGOmf34Dx-DA0-wcE1Htc4-9quda2bytbYlnhaOd9gXRf4GYwNkldQt0hp3UbXBvCs8hvdmOU5Oin12sPFr_bR6zR7mdxF-cPt_WScRyYWREYwl0xwmhSlHmnOGZEQcyFYbGQJCYh5YQg1HOYkZbKM01gbbkaMFYKLogAe99FVd3fr7McOfKNWdufq8FJRkUiesEAG17BzGWe9d1Cqras22h0UJaoNUbWRqTYy9RNiINKO2FdrOPxnV09ZNunAbzUGc2E</recordid><startdate>2017</startdate><enddate>2017</enddate><creator>Calem, Paul S.</creator><creator>Sarama, Robert F.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2017</creationdate><title>Why Mortgage Borrowers Persevere: An Explanation of First and Second Lien Performance Mismatch</title><author>Calem, Paul S. ; Sarama, Robert F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3809-eb928715dfa4a77209e378823c9fe5e8bdc01c7eb0629f363ac7c422d878dde73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Default</topic><topic>Mortgages</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Calem, Paul S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sarama, Robert F.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Real estate economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Calem, Paul S.</au><au>Sarama, Robert F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Why Mortgage Borrowers Persevere: An Explanation of First and Second Lien Performance Mismatch</atitle><jtitle>Real estate economics</jtitle><date>2017</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>28</spage><epage>74</epage><pages>28-74</pages><issn>1080-8620</issn><eissn>1540-6229</eissn><abstract>Borrowers with a pair of mortgages collateralized by the same property sometimes continue to make payments on one while defaulting on the other. We articulate a framework for understanding this performance mismatch that emphasizes two types of borrowers: those with stable equity positions who perceive they are facing moderate or temporary liquidity shocks, and those facing severe financial stress in combination with negative equity. The former have an incentive to enter mismatch and subsequently cure, while the latter would default on both contracts. Our empirical analysis using newly available, national samples of matched first‐ and second‐lien mortgages supports this view.</abstract><cop>Bloomington</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/1540-6229.12139</doi><tpages>47</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1080-8620 |
ispartof | Real estate economics, 2017, Vol.45 (1), p.28-74 |
issn | 1080-8620 1540-6229 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1859752062 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete |
subjects | Default Mortgages |
title | Why Mortgage Borrowers Persevere: An Explanation of First and Second Lien Performance Mismatch |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T12%3A25%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Why%20Mortgage%20Borrowers%20Persevere:%20An%20Explanation%20of%20First%20and%20Second%20Lien%20Performance%20Mismatch&rft.jtitle=Real%20estate%20economics&rft.au=Calem,%20Paul%20S.&rft.date=2017&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=28&rft.epage=74&rft.pages=28-74&rft.issn=1080-8620&rft.eissn=1540-6229&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1540-6229.12139&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4304080121%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1859752062&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |