Facilitating a student-educator conceptual model of dispositions towards critical thinking through interactive management

Critical thinking (CT) is a metacognitive process, consisting of a number of subskills and dispositions that, when used appropriately, increases the chances of producing a logical conclusion to an argument or solution to a problem. Though the CT literature argues that dispositions are as important t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Educational technology research and development 2017-02, Vol.65 (1), p.47-73
Hauptverfasser: Dwyer, Christopher P., Hogan, Michael J., Harney, Owen M., Kavanagh, Caroline
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 73
container_issue 1
container_start_page 47
container_title Educational technology research and development
container_volume 65
creator Dwyer, Christopher P.
Hogan, Michael J.
Harney, Owen M.
Kavanagh, Caroline
description Critical thinking (CT) is a metacognitive process, consisting of a number of subskills and dispositions that, when used appropriately, increases the chances of producing a logical conclusion to an argument or solution to a problem. Though the CT literature argues that dispositions are as important to CT as is the ability to perform CT skills, the majority of research in the area has focused on CT skills. In addition, though most CT interventions are designed based on academic or expert definitions of CT, students are rarely, if ever, asked to guide their instruction by describing their perspectives on what constitutes CT. Thus, the current study used interactive management to examine similarities and differences in the way students and educators conceptualise CT dispositions. Interactive management (IM) is a computer-assisted process that allows a group to build a consensus-based structural model describing relations between elements in a system. Consistent with previous research, it is suggested that addressing how students conceptualise CT may provide a starting point to negotiate and innovative the CT curriculum and learning process. Furthermore, evaluating similarities and differences in the way students and educators understand CT dispositions may facilitate the building of complementary and integrative models of CT dispositions that reflect the full range of perspectives in University teaching environments. Results of the current study suggest that while students' conceptualisation of CT dispositions was largely consistent with both the educators' conceptualisation and dispositions highlighted in the extant literature, students' descriptions were broader, less abstract and more concrete accounts of CT dispositions; and were also primarily focused on utility or function rather than ideal principles of action. Results are discussed in light of research and theory on CT and best practice for CT instruction.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11423-016-9460-7
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1858236069</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A713965303</galeid><ericid>EJ1126170</ericid><jstor_id>45018530</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A713965303</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-858b64306340b1cd3ebdecd88436d353ee6d86e25b23191e2b5f329cdc3c2c183</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUcFu1TAQjBBIlMIHcECyxDmt106c5FhVLVBV4gJny7E3eX4k9sN2QP179imo4oZ98Gp3Znbkqar3wK-A8-46AzRC1hxUPTSK192L6gLaVtWq5fCSat6IGpQYXldvcj5yOp3qL6qne2P94ospPszMsFw2h6HU6DZrSkzMxmDxVDazsDU6XFicmPP5FLMvPobMSvxtksvMJmpYgpWDDz_OauWQ4jYfmA8Fk7HF_0K2mmBmXGnF2-rVZJaM7_6-l9X3-7tvt5_rx6-fvtzePNZWDkOp-7YfVSO5kg0fwTqJo0Pr-r6RyslWIirXKxTtKCQMgGJsJykG66y0wkIvL6uPu-4pxZ8b5qKPcUuBVmogcSEVVwOhrnbUbBbUPkyxkGW6DldPf4CTp_5NB3JQreSSCLATbIo5J5z0KfnVpCcNXJ8j0XskmiLR50h0R5wPOweTt8_4uwcAoaDjNBf7PNMszJj-sfp_0WOmvJ5VG8q9Pzv9Ayego_o</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1858236069</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Facilitating a student-educator conceptual model of dispositions towards critical thinking through interactive management</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Education Source</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Dwyer, Christopher P. ; Hogan, Michael J. ; Harney, Owen M. ; Kavanagh, Caroline</creator><creatorcontrib>Dwyer, Christopher P. ; Hogan, Michael J. ; Harney, Owen M. ; Kavanagh, Caroline</creatorcontrib><description>Critical thinking (CT) is a metacognitive process, consisting of a number of subskills and dispositions that, when used appropriately, increases the chances of producing a logical conclusion to an argument or solution to a problem. Though the CT literature argues that dispositions are as important to CT as is the ability to perform CT skills, the majority of research in the area has focused on CT skills. In addition, though most CT interventions are designed based on academic or expert definitions of CT, students are rarely, if ever, asked to guide their instruction by describing their perspectives on what constitutes CT. Thus, the current study used interactive management to examine similarities and differences in the way students and educators conceptualise CT dispositions. Interactive management (IM) is a computer-assisted process that allows a group to build a consensus-based structural model describing relations between elements in a system. Consistent with previous research, it is suggested that addressing how students conceptualise CT may provide a starting point to negotiate and innovative the CT curriculum and learning process. Furthermore, evaluating similarities and differences in the way students and educators understand CT dispositions may facilitate the building of complementary and integrative models of CT dispositions that reflect the full range of perspectives in University teaching environments. Results of the current study suggest that while students' conceptualisation of CT dispositions was largely consistent with both the educators' conceptualisation and dispositions highlighted in the extant literature, students' descriptions were broader, less abstract and more concrete accounts of CT dispositions; and were also primarily focused on utility or function rather than ideal principles of action. Results are discussed in light of research and theory on CT and best practice for CT instruction.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1042-1629</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1556-6501</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11423-016-9460-7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer Science+Business Media</publisher><subject>Best Practices ; College Students ; Computer Assisted Instruction ; Critical Thinking ; Curriculum Development ; Education ; Educational Technology ; Instructional Innovation ; Intelligence ; Interaction ; Learning and Instruction ; Learning Processes ; Metacognition ; Personality Traits ; RESEARCH ARTICLE ; Student Attitudes ; Systems Approach ; Teaching Methods ; Thinking Skills</subject><ispartof>Educational technology research and development, 2017-02, Vol.65 (1), p.47-73</ispartof><rights>2017 Association for Educational Communications and Technology</rights><rights>Association for Educational Communications and Technology 2016</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2017 Springer</rights><rights>Educational Technology Research and Development is a copyright of Springer, 2017.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-858b64306340b1cd3ebdecd88436d353ee6d86e25b23191e2b5f329cdc3c2c183</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-858b64306340b1cd3ebdecd88436d353ee6d86e25b23191e2b5f329cdc3c2c183</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/45018530$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/45018530$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27903,27904,41467,42536,51298,57996,58229</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1126170$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dwyer, Christopher P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hogan, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harney, Owen M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kavanagh, Caroline</creatorcontrib><title>Facilitating a student-educator conceptual model of dispositions towards critical thinking through interactive management</title><title>Educational technology research and development</title><addtitle>Education Tech Research Dev</addtitle><description>Critical thinking (CT) is a metacognitive process, consisting of a number of subskills and dispositions that, when used appropriately, increases the chances of producing a logical conclusion to an argument or solution to a problem. Though the CT literature argues that dispositions are as important to CT as is the ability to perform CT skills, the majority of research in the area has focused on CT skills. In addition, though most CT interventions are designed based on academic or expert definitions of CT, students are rarely, if ever, asked to guide their instruction by describing their perspectives on what constitutes CT. Thus, the current study used interactive management to examine similarities and differences in the way students and educators conceptualise CT dispositions. Interactive management (IM) is a computer-assisted process that allows a group to build a consensus-based structural model describing relations between elements in a system. Consistent with previous research, it is suggested that addressing how students conceptualise CT may provide a starting point to negotiate and innovative the CT curriculum and learning process. Furthermore, evaluating similarities and differences in the way students and educators understand CT dispositions may facilitate the building of complementary and integrative models of CT dispositions that reflect the full range of perspectives in University teaching environments. Results of the current study suggest that while students' conceptualisation of CT dispositions was largely consistent with both the educators' conceptualisation and dispositions highlighted in the extant literature, students' descriptions were broader, less abstract and more concrete accounts of CT dispositions; and were also primarily focused on utility or function rather than ideal principles of action. Results are discussed in light of research and theory on CT and best practice for CT instruction.</description><subject>Best Practices</subject><subject>College Students</subject><subject>Computer Assisted Instruction</subject><subject>Critical Thinking</subject><subject>Curriculum Development</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Educational Technology</subject><subject>Instructional Innovation</subject><subject>Intelligence</subject><subject>Interaction</subject><subject>Learning and Instruction</subject><subject>Learning Processes</subject><subject>Metacognition</subject><subject>Personality Traits</subject><subject>RESEARCH ARTICLE</subject><subject>Student Attitudes</subject><subject>Systems Approach</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><subject>Thinking Skills</subject><issn>1042-1629</issn><issn>1556-6501</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUcFu1TAQjBBIlMIHcECyxDmt106c5FhVLVBV4gJny7E3eX4k9sN2QP179imo4oZ98Gp3Znbkqar3wK-A8-46AzRC1hxUPTSK192L6gLaVtWq5fCSat6IGpQYXldvcj5yOp3qL6qne2P94ospPszMsFw2h6HU6DZrSkzMxmDxVDazsDU6XFicmPP5FLMvPobMSvxtksvMJmpYgpWDDz_OauWQ4jYfmA8Fk7HF_0K2mmBmXGnF2-rVZJaM7_6-l9X3-7tvt5_rx6-fvtzePNZWDkOp-7YfVSO5kg0fwTqJo0Pr-r6RyslWIirXKxTtKCQMgGJsJykG66y0wkIvL6uPu-4pxZ8b5qKPcUuBVmogcSEVVwOhrnbUbBbUPkyxkGW6DldPf4CTp_5NB3JQreSSCLATbIo5J5z0KfnVpCcNXJ8j0XskmiLR50h0R5wPOweTt8_4uwcAoaDjNBf7PNMszJj-sfp_0WOmvJ5VG8q9Pzv9Ayego_o</recordid><startdate>20170201</startdate><enddate>20170201</enddate><creator>Dwyer, Christopher P.</creator><creator>Hogan, Michael J.</creator><creator>Harney, Owen M.</creator><creator>Kavanagh, Caroline</creator><general>Springer Science+Business Media</general><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8A4</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170201</creationdate><title>Facilitating a student-educator conceptual model of dispositions towards critical thinking through interactive management</title><author>Dwyer, Christopher P. ; Hogan, Michael J. ; Harney, Owen M. ; Kavanagh, Caroline</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-858b64306340b1cd3ebdecd88436d353ee6d86e25b23191e2b5f329cdc3c2c183</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Best Practices</topic><topic>College Students</topic><topic>Computer Assisted Instruction</topic><topic>Critical Thinking</topic><topic>Curriculum Development</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Educational Technology</topic><topic>Instructional Innovation</topic><topic>Intelligence</topic><topic>Interaction</topic><topic>Learning and Instruction</topic><topic>Learning Processes</topic><topic>Metacognition</topic><topic>Personality Traits</topic><topic>RESEARCH ARTICLE</topic><topic>Student Attitudes</topic><topic>Systems Approach</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><topic>Thinking Skills</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dwyer, Christopher P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hogan, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harney, Owen M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kavanagh, Caroline</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Education Periodicals</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Educational technology research and development</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dwyer, Christopher P.</au><au>Hogan, Michael J.</au><au>Harney, Owen M.</au><au>Kavanagh, Caroline</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1126170</ericid><atitle>Facilitating a student-educator conceptual model of dispositions towards critical thinking through interactive management</atitle><jtitle>Educational technology research and development</jtitle><stitle>Education Tech Research Dev</stitle><date>2017-02-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>65</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>47</spage><epage>73</epage><pages>47-73</pages><issn>1042-1629</issn><eissn>1556-6501</eissn><abstract>Critical thinking (CT) is a metacognitive process, consisting of a number of subskills and dispositions that, when used appropriately, increases the chances of producing a logical conclusion to an argument or solution to a problem. Though the CT literature argues that dispositions are as important to CT as is the ability to perform CT skills, the majority of research in the area has focused on CT skills. In addition, though most CT interventions are designed based on academic or expert definitions of CT, students are rarely, if ever, asked to guide their instruction by describing their perspectives on what constitutes CT. Thus, the current study used interactive management to examine similarities and differences in the way students and educators conceptualise CT dispositions. Interactive management (IM) is a computer-assisted process that allows a group to build a consensus-based structural model describing relations between elements in a system. Consistent with previous research, it is suggested that addressing how students conceptualise CT may provide a starting point to negotiate and innovative the CT curriculum and learning process. Furthermore, evaluating similarities and differences in the way students and educators understand CT dispositions may facilitate the building of complementary and integrative models of CT dispositions that reflect the full range of perspectives in University teaching environments. Results of the current study suggest that while students' conceptualisation of CT dispositions was largely consistent with both the educators' conceptualisation and dispositions highlighted in the extant literature, students' descriptions were broader, less abstract and more concrete accounts of CT dispositions; and were also primarily focused on utility or function rather than ideal principles of action. Results are discussed in light of research and theory on CT and best practice for CT instruction.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer Science+Business Media</pub><doi>10.1007/s11423-016-9460-7</doi><tpages>27</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1042-1629
ispartof Educational technology research and development, 2017-02, Vol.65 (1), p.47-73
issn 1042-1629
1556-6501
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1858236069
source Jstor Complete Legacy; Education Source; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
subjects Best Practices
College Students
Computer Assisted Instruction
Critical Thinking
Curriculum Development
Education
Educational Technology
Instructional Innovation
Intelligence
Interaction
Learning and Instruction
Learning Processes
Metacognition
Personality Traits
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Student Attitudes
Systems Approach
Teaching Methods
Thinking Skills
title Facilitating a student-educator conceptual model of dispositions towards critical thinking through interactive management
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T03%3A41%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Facilitating%20a%20student-educator%20conceptual%20model%20of%20dispositions%20towards%20critical%20thinking%20through%20interactive%20management&rft.jtitle=Educational%20technology%20research%20and%20development&rft.au=Dwyer,%20Christopher%20P.&rft.date=2017-02-01&rft.volume=65&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=47&rft.epage=73&rft.pages=47-73&rft.issn=1042-1629&rft.eissn=1556-6501&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11423-016-9460-7&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA713965303%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1858236069&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A713965303&rft_ericid=EJ1126170&rft_jstor_id=45018530&rfr_iscdi=true