Propagation from the start: the spread of a concept-based instructional tool
We describe the propagation of a technology-based educational innovation through its first 3 years of public use. The innovation studied is the Concept Warehouse (CW), a database-driven website developed to support the use of concept-based pedagogies. This tool was initially developed for instructor...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Educational technology research and development 2017-02, Vol.65 (1), p.177-202 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 202 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 177 |
container_title | Educational technology research and development |
container_volume | 65 |
creator | Friedrichsen, Debra M. Smith, Christina Koretsky, Milo D. |
description | We describe the propagation of a technology-based educational innovation through its first 3 years of public use. The innovation studied is the Concept Warehouse (CW), a database-driven website developed to support the use of concept-based pedagogies. This tool was initially developed for instructors in undergraduate chemical engineering courses, but has spread to other disciplines as well. In this time, it has grown to over 650 registered instructors representing over 170 institutions. While this study is specific to a particular case, the intent of this article is to provide an exemplar of real-time propagation that informs other researchers and developers. We frame our analysis with Diffusion of Innovation Theory and use a design research methodology that focuses on communication channels, types of knowledge, and stages of the innovation-decision process. Data sources include usage records and survey responses which are analyzed with network d agrams and non-parametric statistics. We find that in comparison to mass media, interpersonal communications tended to result in higher proportions of how-to knowledge and implementation. Three types of opinion leaders were identified through user data and network diagrams. All played critical roles in the tool's propagation, especially the project collaborators—opinion leaders who actively promoted the CW, in part, because it also propagates their own innovations. Finally, users with self-identified prior principles knowledge showed statistically significantly greater progress in gaining how-to knowledge, but no significant difference in progressing to the implementation stage of the innovationdecision process when compared to users without. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11423-016-9473-2 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1858236068</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A713965305</galeid><ericid>EJ1126186</ericid><jstor_id>45018535</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A713965305</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-94c9a60652388a42eaf504bbfa88bef64636c61210bd27bded7db9411de652e93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU9PAyEQxTdGE2v1A3gw2cTzVgYWlvXWNPVfmuhBz4Rlh7pNu6xAD357adY03oQDE2Z-L49Hll0DmQEh1V0AKCkrCIiiLitW0JNsApyLQnACp6kmJS1A0Po8uwhhQ9KqhJxkqzfvBr3WsXN9br3b5fET8xC1j_djOXjUbe5srnPjeoNDLBodsM27PkS_NwdSb_Po3PYyO7N6G_Dq95xmHw_L98VTsXp9fF7MV4VhdR2TQVNrQQSnTEpdUtSWk7JprJayQStKwYQRQIE0La2aFtuqbeoSoMXEYM2m2e2oO3j3tccQ1cbtfXIRFEguKUviMk3Nxqm13qLqeuui1ybtFnddegraLt3PK2C14IzwBMAIGO9C8GjV4Lud9t8KiDqkrMaUVUpZHVJWNDE3I4O-M8f55QsAFSBF6tOxn3Ls-jX6P1b_F92E6PxRtUxfKTnj7AdDQJGs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1858236068</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Propagation from the start: the spread of a concept-based instructional tool</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Education Source</source><creator>Friedrichsen, Debra M. ; Smith, Christina ; Koretsky, Milo D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Friedrichsen, Debra M. ; Smith, Christina ; Koretsky, Milo D.</creatorcontrib><description>We describe the propagation of a technology-based educational innovation through its first 3 years of public use. The innovation studied is the Concept Warehouse (CW), a database-driven website developed to support the use of concept-based pedagogies. This tool was initially developed for instructors in undergraduate chemical engineering courses, but has spread to other disciplines as well. In this time, it has grown to over 650 registered instructors representing over 170 institutions. While this study is specific to a particular case, the intent of this article is to provide an exemplar of real-time propagation that informs other researchers and developers. We frame our analysis with Diffusion of Innovation Theory and use a design research methodology that focuses on communication channels, types of knowledge, and stages of the innovation-decision process. Data sources include usage records and survey responses which are analyzed with network d agrams and non-parametric statistics. We find that in comparison to mass media, interpersonal communications tended to result in higher proportions of how-to knowledge and implementation. Three types of opinion leaders were identified through user data and network diagrams. All played critical roles in the tool's propagation, especially the project collaborators—opinion leaders who actively promoted the CW, in part, because it also propagates their own innovations. Finally, users with self-identified prior principles knowledge showed statistically significantly greater progress in gaining how-to knowledge, but no significant difference in progressing to the implementation stage of the innovationdecision process when compared to users without.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1042-1629</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1556-6501</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11423-016-9473-2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer Science+Business Media</publisher><subject>Concept Formation ; Concept Teaching ; Design and construction ; DEVELOPMENT ARTICLE ; Education ; Educational Innovation ; Educational Practices ; Educational Strategies ; Educational Technology ; Innovations ; Instructional Development ; Interpersonal Communication ; Knowledge ; Learning and Instruction ; Participant Satisfaction ; Research Methodology ; Teaching Methods ; Undergraduate Study ; Visual Aids ; Warehouses ; Web sites</subject><ispartof>Educational technology research and development, 2017-02, Vol.65 (1), p.177-202</ispartof><rights>2017 Association for Educational Communications and Technology</rights><rights>Association for Educational Communications and Technology 2016</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2017 Springer</rights><rights>Educational Technology Research and Development is a copyright of Springer, 2017.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-94c9a60652388a42eaf504bbfa88bef64636c61210bd27bded7db9411de652e93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-94c9a60652388a42eaf504bbfa88bef64636c61210bd27bded7db9411de652e93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/45018535$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/45018535$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,805,27933,27934,41497,42566,51328,58026,58259</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1126186$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Friedrichsen, Debra M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Christina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koretsky, Milo D.</creatorcontrib><title>Propagation from the start: the spread of a concept-based instructional tool</title><title>Educational technology research and development</title><addtitle>Education Tech Research Dev</addtitle><description>We describe the propagation of a technology-based educational innovation through its first 3 years of public use. The innovation studied is the Concept Warehouse (CW), a database-driven website developed to support the use of concept-based pedagogies. This tool was initially developed for instructors in undergraduate chemical engineering courses, but has spread to other disciplines as well. In this time, it has grown to over 650 registered instructors representing over 170 institutions. While this study is specific to a particular case, the intent of this article is to provide an exemplar of real-time propagation that informs other researchers and developers. We frame our analysis with Diffusion of Innovation Theory and use a design research methodology that focuses on communication channels, types of knowledge, and stages of the innovation-decision process. Data sources include usage records and survey responses which are analyzed with network d agrams and non-parametric statistics. We find that in comparison to mass media, interpersonal communications tended to result in higher proportions of how-to knowledge and implementation. Three types of opinion leaders were identified through user data and network diagrams. All played critical roles in the tool's propagation, especially the project collaborators—opinion leaders who actively promoted the CW, in part, because it also propagates their own innovations. Finally, users with self-identified prior principles knowledge showed statistically significantly greater progress in gaining how-to knowledge, but no significant difference in progressing to the implementation stage of the innovationdecision process when compared to users without.</description><subject>Concept Formation</subject><subject>Concept Teaching</subject><subject>Design and construction</subject><subject>DEVELOPMENT ARTICLE</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Educational Innovation</subject><subject>Educational Practices</subject><subject>Educational Strategies</subject><subject>Educational Technology</subject><subject>Innovations</subject><subject>Instructional Development</subject><subject>Interpersonal Communication</subject><subject>Knowledge</subject><subject>Learning and Instruction</subject><subject>Participant Satisfaction</subject><subject>Research Methodology</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><subject>Undergraduate Study</subject><subject>Visual Aids</subject><subject>Warehouses</subject><subject>Web sites</subject><issn>1042-1629</issn><issn>1556-6501</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU9PAyEQxTdGE2v1A3gw2cTzVgYWlvXWNPVfmuhBz4Rlh7pNu6xAD357adY03oQDE2Z-L49Hll0DmQEh1V0AKCkrCIiiLitW0JNsApyLQnACp6kmJS1A0Po8uwhhQ9KqhJxkqzfvBr3WsXN9br3b5fET8xC1j_djOXjUbe5srnPjeoNDLBodsM27PkS_NwdSb_Po3PYyO7N6G_Dq95xmHw_L98VTsXp9fF7MV4VhdR2TQVNrQQSnTEpdUtSWk7JprJayQStKwYQRQIE0La2aFtuqbeoSoMXEYM2m2e2oO3j3tccQ1cbtfXIRFEguKUviMk3Nxqm13qLqeuui1ybtFnddegraLt3PK2C14IzwBMAIGO9C8GjV4Lud9t8KiDqkrMaUVUpZHVJWNDE3I4O-M8f55QsAFSBF6tOxn3Ls-jX6P1b_F92E6PxRtUxfKTnj7AdDQJGs</recordid><startdate>20170201</startdate><enddate>20170201</enddate><creator>Friedrichsen, Debra M.</creator><creator>Smith, Christina</creator><creator>Koretsky, Milo D.</creator><general>Springer Science+Business Media</general><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8A4</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170201</creationdate><title>Propagation from the start: the spread of a concept-based instructional tool</title><author>Friedrichsen, Debra M. ; Smith, Christina ; Koretsky, Milo D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-94c9a60652388a42eaf504bbfa88bef64636c61210bd27bded7db9411de652e93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Concept Formation</topic><topic>Concept Teaching</topic><topic>Design and construction</topic><topic>DEVELOPMENT ARTICLE</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Educational Innovation</topic><topic>Educational Practices</topic><topic>Educational Strategies</topic><topic>Educational Technology</topic><topic>Innovations</topic><topic>Instructional Development</topic><topic>Interpersonal Communication</topic><topic>Knowledge</topic><topic>Learning and Instruction</topic><topic>Participant Satisfaction</topic><topic>Research Methodology</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><topic>Undergraduate Study</topic><topic>Visual Aids</topic><topic>Warehouses</topic><topic>Web sites</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Friedrichsen, Debra M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Christina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koretsky, Milo D.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Education Periodicals</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Educational technology research and development</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Friedrichsen, Debra M.</au><au>Smith, Christina</au><au>Koretsky, Milo D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1126186</ericid><atitle>Propagation from the start: the spread of a concept-based instructional tool</atitle><jtitle>Educational technology research and development</jtitle><stitle>Education Tech Research Dev</stitle><date>2017-02-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>65</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>177</spage><epage>202</epage><pages>177-202</pages><issn>1042-1629</issn><eissn>1556-6501</eissn><abstract>We describe the propagation of a technology-based educational innovation through its first 3 years of public use. The innovation studied is the Concept Warehouse (CW), a database-driven website developed to support the use of concept-based pedagogies. This tool was initially developed for instructors in undergraduate chemical engineering courses, but has spread to other disciplines as well. In this time, it has grown to over 650 registered instructors representing over 170 institutions. While this study is specific to a particular case, the intent of this article is to provide an exemplar of real-time propagation that informs other researchers and developers. We frame our analysis with Diffusion of Innovation Theory and use a design research methodology that focuses on communication channels, types of knowledge, and stages of the innovation-decision process. Data sources include usage records and survey responses which are analyzed with network d agrams and non-parametric statistics. We find that in comparison to mass media, interpersonal communications tended to result in higher proportions of how-to knowledge and implementation. Three types of opinion leaders were identified through user data and network diagrams. All played critical roles in the tool's propagation, especially the project collaborators—opinion leaders who actively promoted the CW, in part, because it also propagates their own innovations. Finally, users with self-identified prior principles knowledge showed statistically significantly greater progress in gaining how-to knowledge, but no significant difference in progressing to the implementation stage of the innovationdecision process when compared to users without.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer Science+Business Media</pub><doi>10.1007/s11423-016-9473-2</doi><tpages>26</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1042-1629 |
ispartof | Educational technology research and development, 2017-02, Vol.65 (1), p.177-202 |
issn | 1042-1629 1556-6501 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1858236068 |
source | SpringerNature Journals; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Education Source |
subjects | Concept Formation Concept Teaching Design and construction DEVELOPMENT ARTICLE Education Educational Innovation Educational Practices Educational Strategies Educational Technology Innovations Instructional Development Interpersonal Communication Knowledge Learning and Instruction Participant Satisfaction Research Methodology Teaching Methods Undergraduate Study Visual Aids Warehouses Web sites |
title | Propagation from the start: the spread of a concept-based instructional tool |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-03T03%3A14%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Propagation%20from%20the%20start:%20the%20spread%20of%20a%20concept-based%20instructional%20tool&rft.jtitle=Educational%20technology%20research%20and%20development&rft.au=Friedrichsen,%20Debra%20M.&rft.date=2017-02-01&rft.volume=65&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=177&rft.epage=202&rft.pages=177-202&rft.issn=1042-1629&rft.eissn=1556-6501&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11423-016-9473-2&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA713965305%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1858236068&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A713965305&rft_ericid=EJ1126186&rft_jstor_id=45018535&rfr_iscdi=true |