Efficacy and safety of autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation in elderly patients with multiple myeloma: a retrospective national multi-site cohort study

We aimed to test the efficacy and toxicity of autologous hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) in Multiple Myeloma (MM) patients aged ≥65 years compared to patients aged 60–64. Two hundred twenty consecutive patients (age ≥65, n  = 87) with MM aged 60 and above, who underwent HCT as part of an upfront...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of hematology 2017-02, Vol.96 (2), p.271-278
Hauptverfasser: Cohen, Yael C, Zuckerman, Tsila, Yeshurun, Moshe, Perez, Galit, Magen, Hila, Henig, Israel, Levi, Itai, Shargian, Liat, Trestman, Svetlana, Rouvio, Uri, Naparstek, Elizabeth, Ganon-Elazar, Eti, Avivi, Irit, Ram, Ron
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 278
container_issue 2
container_start_page 271
container_title Annals of hematology
container_volume 96
creator Cohen, Yael C
Zuckerman, Tsila
Yeshurun, Moshe
Perez, Galit
Magen, Hila
Henig, Israel
Levi, Itai
Shargian, Liat
Trestman, Svetlana
Rouvio, Uri
Naparstek, Elizabeth
Ganon-Elazar, Eti
Avivi, Irit
Ram, Ron
description We aimed to test the efficacy and toxicity of autologous hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) in Multiple Myeloma (MM) patients aged ≥65 years compared to patients aged 60–64. Two hundred twenty consecutive patients (age ≥65, n  = 87) with MM aged 60 and above, who underwent HCT as part of an upfront MM treatment, at four Israeli centers between 2000 and 2014 were included. A melphalan dose of 200 mg/m 2 was more frequent in the 60–64 age group vs. the ≥65 age group (77 vs. 57%, p  = 0.002). There were no differences between groups in median day of neutrophil engraftment, incidence of infections, grades 3–4 mucositis, cardiovascular events, or non-relapse mortality at 100 days post HCT (4.7, vs. 5%, p  = 0.9). A similar rate of improvement in response level was observed (36, vs. 35%, p  = 0.87). At 3 years post HCT progression-free survival (PFS) was higher in the 60–64 age group (42 vs. 29%, p  = 0.04); however, it was no longer so after adjustment for disease status prior to HCT ( p  = 0.49). In a Multivariate analysis, melphalan doses and age did not predict PFS. There was no difference in overall survival (OS) between age groups ( p  = 0.2). We conclude that toxicity profile, response, PFS, and OS of HCT in aged ≥65 patients with myeloma is similar to patients aged 60–64.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00277-016-2882-9
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1857576897</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4298964991</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-96e2f99d9dc44753be49f4c716204500513a5567defeb4b928742be9d2042c5b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1u3SAQRlHUqLlJ-wDdVEhdkwIGY7qrovRHitRNukYYj3OJsHEBt_Lb5FFL4rTqpmxGYs58MDoIvWH0klGq3mdKuVKEspbwruNEn6ADEw0nVHbiBTpQ3Wgi6zlD5znfU8p4J_hLdMY72mjJ-AE9XI-jd9Zt2M4DznaEsuE4YruWGOJdXDM-wmRLXKKH4h12EAIuyc55CXYutvg4Yz9jCAOksOGl3sBcMv7lyxFPayh-CYCnDUKc7AdscYKSYl7AFf8T8PyUYMOOkuwLYBePMRWcyzpsr9DpaEOG18_1An3_dH179YXcfPv89erjDXGN4oXoFvio9aAHJ4SSTQ9Cj8Ip1nIqJKWSNVbKVg0wQi96zTsleA96qG3uZN9coHd77pLijxVyMfdxTfVj2bBOKqnaTqtKsZ1ydYWcYDRL8pNNm2HUPDoxuxNTnZhHJ0bXmbfPyWs_wfB34o-ECvAdyLU130H65-n_pv4GW9SbRA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1857576897</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Efficacy and safety of autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation in elderly patients with multiple myeloma: a retrospective national multi-site cohort study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Cohen, Yael C ; Zuckerman, Tsila ; Yeshurun, Moshe ; Perez, Galit ; Magen, Hila ; Henig, Israel ; Levi, Itai ; Shargian, Liat ; Trestman, Svetlana ; Rouvio, Uri ; Naparstek, Elizabeth ; Ganon-Elazar, Eti ; Avivi, Irit ; Ram, Ron</creator><creatorcontrib>Cohen, Yael C ; Zuckerman, Tsila ; Yeshurun, Moshe ; Perez, Galit ; Magen, Hila ; Henig, Israel ; Levi, Itai ; Shargian, Liat ; Trestman, Svetlana ; Rouvio, Uri ; Naparstek, Elizabeth ; Ganon-Elazar, Eti ; Avivi, Irit ; Ram, Ron</creatorcontrib><description>We aimed to test the efficacy and toxicity of autologous hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) in Multiple Myeloma (MM) patients aged ≥65 years compared to patients aged 60–64. Two hundred twenty consecutive patients (age ≥65, n  = 87) with MM aged 60 and above, who underwent HCT as part of an upfront MM treatment, at four Israeli centers between 2000 and 2014 were included. A melphalan dose of 200 mg/m 2 was more frequent in the 60–64 age group vs. the ≥65 age group (77 vs. 57%, p  = 0.002). There were no differences between groups in median day of neutrophil engraftment, incidence of infections, grades 3–4 mucositis, cardiovascular events, or non-relapse mortality at 100 days post HCT (4.7, vs. 5%, p  = 0.9). A similar rate of improvement in response level was observed (36, vs. 35%, p  = 0.87). At 3 years post HCT progression-free survival (PFS) was higher in the 60–64 age group (42 vs. 29%, p  = 0.04); however, it was no longer so after adjustment for disease status prior to HCT ( p  = 0.49). In a Multivariate analysis, melphalan doses and age did not predict PFS. There was no difference in overall survival (OS) between age groups ( p  = 0.2). We conclude that toxicity profile, response, PFS, and OS of HCT in aged ≥65 patients with myeloma is similar to patients aged 60–64.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0939-5555</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-0584</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00277-016-2882-9</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28039512</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Aged ; Cohort Studies ; Female ; Hematology ; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation - adverse effects ; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation - mortality ; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation - trends ; Humans ; Israel - epidemiology ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Multiple Myeloma - diagnosis ; Multiple Myeloma - mortality ; Multiple Myeloma - therapy ; Oncology ; Original Article ; Retrospective Studies ; Survival Rate - trends ; Transplantation Conditioning - adverse effects ; Transplantation Conditioning - mortality ; Transplantation Conditioning - trends ; Transplantation, Autologous - adverse effects ; Transplantation, Autologous - mortality ; Transplantation, Autologous - trends ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Annals of hematology, 2017-02, Vol.96 (2), p.271-278</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016</rights><rights>Annals of Hematology is a copyright of Springer, 2017.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-96e2f99d9dc44753be49f4c716204500513a5567defeb4b928742be9d2042c5b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-96e2f99d9dc44753be49f4c716204500513a5567defeb4b928742be9d2042c5b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00277-016-2882-9$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00277-016-2882-9$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28039512$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cohen, Yael C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zuckerman, Tsila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yeshurun, Moshe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perez, Galit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Magen, Hila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henig, Israel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levi, Itai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shargian, Liat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trestman, Svetlana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rouvio, Uri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naparstek, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ganon-Elazar, Eti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Avivi, Irit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ram, Ron</creatorcontrib><title>Efficacy and safety of autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation in elderly patients with multiple myeloma: a retrospective national multi-site cohort study</title><title>Annals of hematology</title><addtitle>Ann Hematol</addtitle><addtitle>Ann Hematol</addtitle><description>We aimed to test the efficacy and toxicity of autologous hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) in Multiple Myeloma (MM) patients aged ≥65 years compared to patients aged 60–64. Two hundred twenty consecutive patients (age ≥65, n  = 87) with MM aged 60 and above, who underwent HCT as part of an upfront MM treatment, at four Israeli centers between 2000 and 2014 were included. A melphalan dose of 200 mg/m 2 was more frequent in the 60–64 age group vs. the ≥65 age group (77 vs. 57%, p  = 0.002). There were no differences between groups in median day of neutrophil engraftment, incidence of infections, grades 3–4 mucositis, cardiovascular events, or non-relapse mortality at 100 days post HCT (4.7, vs. 5%, p  = 0.9). A similar rate of improvement in response level was observed (36, vs. 35%, p  = 0.87). At 3 years post HCT progression-free survival (PFS) was higher in the 60–64 age group (42 vs. 29%, p  = 0.04); however, it was no longer so after adjustment for disease status prior to HCT ( p  = 0.49). In a Multivariate analysis, melphalan doses and age did not predict PFS. There was no difference in overall survival (OS) between age groups ( p  = 0.2). We conclude that toxicity profile, response, PFS, and OS of HCT in aged ≥65 patients with myeloma is similar to patients aged 60–64.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hematology</subject><subject>Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation - adverse effects</subject><subject>Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation - mortality</subject><subject>Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation - trends</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Israel - epidemiology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Multiple Myeloma - diagnosis</subject><subject>Multiple Myeloma - mortality</subject><subject>Multiple Myeloma - therapy</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Survival Rate - trends</subject><subject>Transplantation Conditioning - adverse effects</subject><subject>Transplantation Conditioning - mortality</subject><subject>Transplantation Conditioning - trends</subject><subject>Transplantation, Autologous - adverse effects</subject><subject>Transplantation, Autologous - mortality</subject><subject>Transplantation, Autologous - trends</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0939-5555</issn><issn>1432-0584</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc1u3SAQRlHUqLlJ-wDdVEhdkwIGY7qrovRHitRNukYYj3OJsHEBt_Lb5FFL4rTqpmxGYs58MDoIvWH0klGq3mdKuVKEspbwruNEn6ADEw0nVHbiBTpQ3Wgi6zlD5znfU8p4J_hLdMY72mjJ-AE9XI-jd9Zt2M4DznaEsuE4YruWGOJdXDM-wmRLXKKH4h12EAIuyc55CXYutvg4Yz9jCAOksOGl3sBcMv7lyxFPayh-CYCnDUKc7AdscYKSYl7AFf8T8PyUYMOOkuwLYBePMRWcyzpsr9DpaEOG18_1An3_dH179YXcfPv89erjDXGN4oXoFvio9aAHJ4SSTQ9Cj8Ip1nIqJKWSNVbKVg0wQi96zTsleA96qG3uZN9coHd77pLijxVyMfdxTfVj2bBOKqnaTqtKsZ1ydYWcYDRL8pNNm2HUPDoxuxNTnZhHJ0bXmbfPyWs_wfB34o-ECvAdyLU130H65-n_pv4GW9SbRA</recordid><startdate>20170201</startdate><enddate>20170201</enddate><creator>Cohen, Yael C</creator><creator>Zuckerman, Tsila</creator><creator>Yeshurun, Moshe</creator><creator>Perez, Galit</creator><creator>Magen, Hila</creator><creator>Henig, Israel</creator><creator>Levi, Itai</creator><creator>Shargian, Liat</creator><creator>Trestman, Svetlana</creator><creator>Rouvio, Uri</creator><creator>Naparstek, Elizabeth</creator><creator>Ganon-Elazar, Eti</creator><creator>Avivi, Irit</creator><creator>Ram, Ron</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170201</creationdate><title>Efficacy and safety of autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation in elderly patients with multiple myeloma: a retrospective national multi-site cohort study</title><author>Cohen, Yael C ; Zuckerman, Tsila ; Yeshurun, Moshe ; Perez, Galit ; Magen, Hila ; Henig, Israel ; Levi, Itai ; Shargian, Liat ; Trestman, Svetlana ; Rouvio, Uri ; Naparstek, Elizabeth ; Ganon-Elazar, Eti ; Avivi, Irit ; Ram, Ron</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-96e2f99d9dc44753be49f4c716204500513a5567defeb4b928742be9d2042c5b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hematology</topic><topic>Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation - adverse effects</topic><topic>Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation - mortality</topic><topic>Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation - trends</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Israel - epidemiology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Multiple Myeloma - diagnosis</topic><topic>Multiple Myeloma - mortality</topic><topic>Multiple Myeloma - therapy</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Survival Rate - trends</topic><topic>Transplantation Conditioning - adverse effects</topic><topic>Transplantation Conditioning - mortality</topic><topic>Transplantation Conditioning - trends</topic><topic>Transplantation, Autologous - adverse effects</topic><topic>Transplantation, Autologous - mortality</topic><topic>Transplantation, Autologous - trends</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cohen, Yael C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zuckerman, Tsila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yeshurun, Moshe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perez, Galit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Magen, Hila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henig, Israel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levi, Itai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shargian, Liat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trestman, Svetlana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rouvio, Uri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naparstek, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ganon-Elazar, Eti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Avivi, Irit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ram, Ron</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Annals of hematology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cohen, Yael C</au><au>Zuckerman, Tsila</au><au>Yeshurun, Moshe</au><au>Perez, Galit</au><au>Magen, Hila</au><au>Henig, Israel</au><au>Levi, Itai</au><au>Shargian, Liat</au><au>Trestman, Svetlana</au><au>Rouvio, Uri</au><au>Naparstek, Elizabeth</au><au>Ganon-Elazar, Eti</au><au>Avivi, Irit</au><au>Ram, Ron</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Efficacy and safety of autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation in elderly patients with multiple myeloma: a retrospective national multi-site cohort study</atitle><jtitle>Annals of hematology</jtitle><stitle>Ann Hematol</stitle><addtitle>Ann Hematol</addtitle><date>2017-02-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>96</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>271</spage><epage>278</epage><pages>271-278</pages><issn>0939-5555</issn><eissn>1432-0584</eissn><abstract>We aimed to test the efficacy and toxicity of autologous hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) in Multiple Myeloma (MM) patients aged ≥65 years compared to patients aged 60–64. Two hundred twenty consecutive patients (age ≥65, n  = 87) with MM aged 60 and above, who underwent HCT as part of an upfront MM treatment, at four Israeli centers between 2000 and 2014 were included. A melphalan dose of 200 mg/m 2 was more frequent in the 60–64 age group vs. the ≥65 age group (77 vs. 57%, p  = 0.002). There were no differences between groups in median day of neutrophil engraftment, incidence of infections, grades 3–4 mucositis, cardiovascular events, or non-relapse mortality at 100 days post HCT (4.7, vs. 5%, p  = 0.9). A similar rate of improvement in response level was observed (36, vs. 35%, p  = 0.87). At 3 years post HCT progression-free survival (PFS) was higher in the 60–64 age group (42 vs. 29%, p  = 0.04); however, it was no longer so after adjustment for disease status prior to HCT ( p  = 0.49). In a Multivariate analysis, melphalan doses and age did not predict PFS. There was no difference in overall survival (OS) between age groups ( p  = 0.2). We conclude that toxicity profile, response, PFS, and OS of HCT in aged ≥65 patients with myeloma is similar to patients aged 60–64.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>28039512</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00277-016-2882-9</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0939-5555
ispartof Annals of hematology, 2017-02, Vol.96 (2), p.271-278
issn 0939-5555
1432-0584
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1857576897
source MEDLINE; SpringerNature Journals
subjects Aged
Cohort Studies
Female
Hematology
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation - adverse effects
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation - mortality
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation - trends
Humans
Israel - epidemiology
Male
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Middle Aged
Multiple Myeloma - diagnosis
Multiple Myeloma - mortality
Multiple Myeloma - therapy
Oncology
Original Article
Retrospective Studies
Survival Rate - trends
Transplantation Conditioning - adverse effects
Transplantation Conditioning - mortality
Transplantation Conditioning - trends
Transplantation, Autologous - adverse effects
Transplantation, Autologous - mortality
Transplantation, Autologous - trends
Treatment Outcome
title Efficacy and safety of autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation in elderly patients with multiple myeloma: a retrospective national multi-site cohort study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T21%3A45%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Efficacy%20and%20safety%20of%20autologous%20hematopoietic%20cell%20transplantation%20in%20elderly%20patients%20with%20multiple%20myeloma:%20a%20retrospective%20national%20multi-site%20cohort%20study&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20hematology&rft.au=Cohen,%20Yael%20C&rft.date=2017-02-01&rft.volume=96&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=271&rft.epage=278&rft.pages=271-278&rft.issn=0939-5555&rft.eissn=1432-0584&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00277-016-2882-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4298964991%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1857576897&rft_id=info:pmid/28039512&rfr_iscdi=true