When should contact precautions be discontinued for patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus ?
Highlights • The proportion of patients with MRSA who remained positive by ASC was low (19.9%). • This proportion decreased over time, with the lowest at 5 years (12.5%). • Only 3.9% of patients with a negative ASC later had a positive MRSA culture. • The presence of a foreign body increased the ris...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | American journal of infection control 2017-01, Vol.45 (1), p.75-76 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 76 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 75 |
| container_title | American journal of infection control |
| container_volume | 45 |
| creator | Richey, Lauren E., MD, MPH Oh, Yumi, MD Tchamba, Djeunou M., MD Engle, Michelle Formby, Linda S Salgado, Cassandra D., MD, MS |
| description | Highlights • The proportion of patients with MRSA who remained positive by ASC was low (19.9%). • This proportion decreased over time, with the lowest at 5 years (12.5%). • Only 3.9% of patients with a negative ASC later had a positive MRSA culture. • The presence of a foreign body increased the risk of having a MRSA positive culture. • Patients with known MRSA and a negative ASC may not need contact precautions. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ajic.2016.05.030 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1856858063</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0196655316306861</els_id><sourcerecordid>4297348851</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-f6235dae36ca66c97a6ece6f9b919583bd89a9ebe6a95673393f5f64efa930d43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkU1r3DAQhkVpaLZp_kAOQdCzXclazVqXhBLSDwjkkJYehSyPsRyv5Uhywv77yGzanmZg3nc-niHkgrOSMw5fhtIMzpZVzksmSybYO7LhstoVolLwnmwYV1CAlOKUfIxxYIwpAfIDOa12UjHO-Yb4Pz1ONPZ-GVtq_ZSMTXQOaM2SnJ8ibZC2Lq4VNy3Y0s4HOpvkcEqRvrjU0z2m3lk3jm4qAkYXk5kSfUhm7g-jt97aJVKzBMzh-hM56cwY8fwtnpHf325_3fwo7u6__7z5elfYbSVS0UElZGtQgDUAVu0MoEXoVKO4krVo2loZhQ2CURJ2QijRyQ622BklWLsVZ-Tzse8c_NOCMenBL2HKIzWvJdSyZiCyqjqqbPAxBuz0HNzehIPmTK-M9aBXxnplrJnUmXE2Xb61Xpo9tv8sf6FmwdVRgPnAZ4dB28zGWTM-4gHj_0V0rDTTD-ub1i9xEAxq4OIVNqSQRA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1856858063</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>When should contact precautions be discontinued for patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus ?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Richey, Lauren E., MD, MPH ; Oh, Yumi, MD ; Tchamba, Djeunou M., MD ; Engle, Michelle ; Formby, Linda S ; Salgado, Cassandra D., MD, MS</creator><creatorcontrib>Richey, Lauren E., MD, MPH ; Oh, Yumi, MD ; Tchamba, Djeunou M., MD ; Engle, Michelle ; Formby, Linda S ; Salgado, Cassandra D., MD, MS</creatorcontrib><description>Highlights • The proportion of patients with MRSA who remained positive by ASC was low (19.9%). • This proportion decreased over time, with the lowest at 5 years (12.5%). • Only 3.9% of patients with a negative ASC later had a positive MRSA culture. • The presence of a foreign body increased the risk of having a MRSA positive culture. • Patients with known MRSA and a negative ASC may not need contact precautions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0196-6553</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1527-3296</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2016.05.030</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27590111</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Mosby-Year Book, Inc</publisher><subject>Carrier State - drug therapy ; Carrier State - microbiology ; Female ; Humans ; Infection Control ; Infectious Disease ; Male ; Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus - isolation & purification ; Middle Aged ; Patients ; Prospective Studies ; Staphylococcal Infections - drug therapy ; Staphylococcal Infections - microbiology ; Staphylococcus infections ; Surveillance ; Time Factors</subject><ispartof>American journal of infection control, 2017-01, Vol.45 (1), p.75-76</ispartof><rights>Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Mosby-Year Book, Inc. Jan 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-f6235dae36ca66c97a6ece6f9b919583bd89a9ebe6a95673393f5f64efa930d43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-f6235dae36ca66c97a6ece6f9b919583bd89a9ebe6a95673393f5f64efa930d43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27929,27930</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27590111$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Richey, Lauren E., MD, MPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oh, Yumi, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tchamba, Djeunou M., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Engle, Michelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Formby, Linda S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salgado, Cassandra D., MD, MS</creatorcontrib><title>When should contact precautions be discontinued for patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus ?</title><title>American journal of infection control</title><addtitle>Am J Infect Control</addtitle><description>Highlights • The proportion of patients with MRSA who remained positive by ASC was low (19.9%). • This proportion decreased over time, with the lowest at 5 years (12.5%). • Only 3.9% of patients with a negative ASC later had a positive MRSA culture. • The presence of a foreign body increased the risk of having a MRSA positive culture. • Patients with known MRSA and a negative ASC may not need contact precautions.</description><subject>Carrier State - drug therapy</subject><subject>Carrier State - microbiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infection Control</subject><subject>Infectious Disease</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus - isolation & purification</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Staphylococcal Infections - drug therapy</subject><subject>Staphylococcal Infections - microbiology</subject><subject>Staphylococcus infections</subject><subject>Surveillance</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><issn>0196-6553</issn><issn>1527-3296</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkU1r3DAQhkVpaLZp_kAOQdCzXclazVqXhBLSDwjkkJYehSyPsRyv5Uhywv77yGzanmZg3nc-niHkgrOSMw5fhtIMzpZVzksmSybYO7LhstoVolLwnmwYV1CAlOKUfIxxYIwpAfIDOa12UjHO-Yb4Pz1ONPZ-GVtq_ZSMTXQOaM2SnJ8ibZC2Lq4VNy3Y0s4HOpvkcEqRvrjU0z2m3lk3jm4qAkYXk5kSfUhm7g-jt97aJVKzBMzh-hM56cwY8fwtnpHf325_3fwo7u6__7z5elfYbSVS0UElZGtQgDUAVu0MoEXoVKO4krVo2loZhQ2CURJ2QijRyQ622BklWLsVZ-Tzse8c_NOCMenBL2HKIzWvJdSyZiCyqjqqbPAxBuz0HNzehIPmTK-M9aBXxnplrJnUmXE2Xb61Xpo9tv8sf6FmwdVRgPnAZ4dB28zGWTM-4gHj_0V0rDTTD-ub1i9xEAxq4OIVNqSQRA</recordid><startdate>20170101</startdate><enddate>20170101</enddate><creator>Richey, Lauren E., MD, MPH</creator><creator>Oh, Yumi, MD</creator><creator>Tchamba, Djeunou M., MD</creator><creator>Engle, Michelle</creator><creator>Formby, Linda S</creator><creator>Salgado, Cassandra D., MD, MS</creator><general>Mosby-Year Book, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170101</creationdate><title>When should contact precautions be discontinued for patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus ?</title><author>Richey, Lauren E., MD, MPH ; Oh, Yumi, MD ; Tchamba, Djeunou M., MD ; Engle, Michelle ; Formby, Linda S ; Salgado, Cassandra D., MD, MS</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-f6235dae36ca66c97a6ece6f9b919583bd89a9ebe6a95673393f5f64efa930d43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Carrier State - drug therapy</topic><topic>Carrier State - microbiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infection Control</topic><topic>Infectious Disease</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus - isolation & purification</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Staphylococcal Infections - drug therapy</topic><topic>Staphylococcal Infections - microbiology</topic><topic>Staphylococcus infections</topic><topic>Surveillance</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Richey, Lauren E., MD, MPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oh, Yumi, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tchamba, Djeunou M., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Engle, Michelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Formby, Linda S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salgado, Cassandra D., MD, MS</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>American journal of infection control</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Richey, Lauren E., MD, MPH</au><au>Oh, Yumi, MD</au><au>Tchamba, Djeunou M., MD</au><au>Engle, Michelle</au><au>Formby, Linda S</au><au>Salgado, Cassandra D., MD, MS</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>When should contact precautions be discontinued for patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus ?</atitle><jtitle>American journal of infection control</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Infect Control</addtitle><date>2017-01-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>75</spage><epage>76</epage><pages>75-76</pages><issn>0196-6553</issn><eissn>1527-3296</eissn><abstract>Highlights • The proportion of patients with MRSA who remained positive by ASC was low (19.9%). • This proportion decreased over time, with the lowest at 5 years (12.5%). • Only 3.9% of patients with a negative ASC later had a positive MRSA culture. • The presence of a foreign body increased the risk of having a MRSA positive culture. • Patients with known MRSA and a negative ASC may not need contact precautions.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Mosby-Year Book, Inc</pub><pmid>27590111</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ajic.2016.05.030</doi><tpages>2</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0196-6553 |
| ispartof | American journal of infection control, 2017-01, Vol.45 (1), p.75-76 |
| issn | 0196-6553 1527-3296 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1856858063 |
| source | MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
| subjects | Carrier State - drug therapy Carrier State - microbiology Female Humans Infection Control Infectious Disease Male Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus - isolation & purification Middle Aged Patients Prospective Studies Staphylococcal Infections - drug therapy Staphylococcal Infections - microbiology Staphylococcus infections Surveillance Time Factors |
| title | When should contact precautions be discontinued for patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus ? |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-15T05%3A24%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=When%20should%20contact%20precautions%20be%20discontinued%20for%20patients%20with%20methicillin-resistant%20Staphylococcus%20aureus%20?&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20infection%20control&rft.au=Richey,%20Lauren%20E.,%20MD,%20MPH&rft.date=2017-01-01&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=75&rft.epage=76&rft.pages=75-76&rft.issn=0196-6553&rft.eissn=1527-3296&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ajic.2016.05.030&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4297348851%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1856858063&rft_id=info:pmid/27590111&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0196655316306861&rfr_iscdi=true |