An Intellectual Entertainment: Thought and Thinking

This dialogue is on the nature of thought and thinking. The five disputants are Socrates, an imaginary neuroscientist from California (whose opinions reflect those of contemporary cognitive neuroscientists), an Oxford don from the 1950s (who employs the linguistic analytic techniques of his times),...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Philosophy (London) 2017-01, Vol.92 (1), p.97-128
1. Verfasser: Hacker, P. M. S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 128
container_issue 1
container_start_page 97
container_title Philosophy (London)
container_volume 92
creator Hacker, P. M. S.
description This dialogue is on the nature of thought and thinking. The five disputants are Socrates, an imaginary neuroscientist from California (whose opinions reflect those of contemporary cognitive neuroscientists), an Oxford don from the 1950s (who employs the linguistic analytic techniques of his times), a Scottish post-doctoral student, and John Locke (who speaks for himself). The discussion takes place in Elysium in the late afternoon. They examine the idea that thinking is an activity of the mind or the brain, whether the medium of thought consists of words or ideas, whether thoughtful speech is speech accompanied by thought, whether thinking, i.e. reasoning and inferring, is a process, and what is meant by the claim that ‘thinking is the last interpretation’. The dialogue ends when the protagonists go to dinner, but will be resumed after the meal.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S0031819116000449
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1848675601</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0031819116000449</cupid><sourcerecordid>4277846081</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-be86958a689dd4e867094d981235942cc3fc0847326ae1e487cb1e94195020343</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UMtKw0AUHUTBWv0AdwHX0Xszk3m4K6VqoeDCCu7CZDJpU9NJnUwW_r0T2oUgru49nBccQm4R7hFQPLwBUJSoEDkAMKbOyAQZV6lE8XFOJiOdjvwluer7XdRwFGJC6MwlSxds21oTBt0miwh80I3bWxcek_W2GzbbkGhXxb9xn43bXJOLWre9vTndKXl_WqznL-nq9Xk5n61SQ6kKaWklV7nUXKqqYhEIUKxSEjOaK5YZQ2sDkgmacW3RMilMiVYxVDlkQBmdkrtj7sF3X4PtQ7HrBu9iZYGSxbycA0YVHlXGd33vbV0cfLPX_rtAKMZtij_bRA89efS-9E21sb-i_3X9AKBFYyY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1848675601</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>An Intellectual Entertainment: Thought and Thinking</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Hacker, P. M. S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hacker, P. M. S.</creatorcontrib><description>This dialogue is on the nature of thought and thinking. The five disputants are Socrates, an imaginary neuroscientist from California (whose opinions reflect those of contemporary cognitive neuroscientists), an Oxford don from the 1950s (who employs the linguistic analytic techniques of his times), a Scottish post-doctoral student, and John Locke (who speaks for himself). The discussion takes place in Elysium in the late afternoon. They examine the idea that thinking is an activity of the mind or the brain, whether the medium of thought consists of words or ideas, whether thoughtful speech is speech accompanied by thought, whether thinking, i.e. reasoning and inferring, is a process, and what is meant by the claim that ‘thinking is the last interpretation’. The dialogue ends when the protagonists go to dinner, but will be resumed after the meal.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0031-8191</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-817X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0031819116000449</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Attitudes ; Brain ; Cognition ; Cognition &amp; reasoning ; Philosophy ; Reasoning ; Sophocles (496?-406 BC)</subject><ispartof>Philosophy (London), 2017-01, Vol.92 (1), p.97-128</ispartof><rights>Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-be86958a689dd4e867094d981235942cc3fc0847326ae1e487cb1e94195020343</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0031819116000449/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,780,784,27924,27925,55628</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hacker, P. M. S.</creatorcontrib><title>An Intellectual Entertainment: Thought and Thinking</title><title>Philosophy (London)</title><addtitle>Philosophy</addtitle><description>This dialogue is on the nature of thought and thinking. The five disputants are Socrates, an imaginary neuroscientist from California (whose opinions reflect those of contemporary cognitive neuroscientists), an Oxford don from the 1950s (who employs the linguistic analytic techniques of his times), a Scottish post-doctoral student, and John Locke (who speaks for himself). The discussion takes place in Elysium in the late afternoon. They examine the idea that thinking is an activity of the mind or the brain, whether the medium of thought consists of words or ideas, whether thoughtful speech is speech accompanied by thought, whether thinking, i.e. reasoning and inferring, is a process, and what is meant by the claim that ‘thinking is the last interpretation’. The dialogue ends when the protagonists go to dinner, but will be resumed after the meal.</description><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>Brain</subject><subject>Cognition</subject><subject>Cognition &amp; reasoning</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Reasoning</subject><subject>Sophocles (496?-406 BC)</subject><issn>0031-8191</issn><issn>1469-817X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>88H</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AIMQZ</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2N</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UMtKw0AUHUTBWv0AdwHX0Xszk3m4K6VqoeDCCu7CZDJpU9NJnUwW_r0T2oUgru49nBccQm4R7hFQPLwBUJSoEDkAMKbOyAQZV6lE8XFOJiOdjvwluer7XdRwFGJC6MwlSxds21oTBt0miwh80I3bWxcek_W2GzbbkGhXxb9xn43bXJOLWre9vTndKXl_WqznL-nq9Xk5n61SQ6kKaWklV7nUXKqqYhEIUKxSEjOaK5YZQ2sDkgmacW3RMilMiVYxVDlkQBmdkrtj7sF3X4PtQ7HrBu9iZYGSxbycA0YVHlXGd33vbV0cfLPX_rtAKMZtij_bRA89efS-9E21sb-i_3X9AKBFYyY</recordid><startdate>20170101</startdate><enddate>20170101</enddate><creator>Hacker, P. M. S.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88H</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>AABKS</scope><scope>ABSDQ</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GB0</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M2N</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170101</creationdate><title>An Intellectual Entertainment: Thought and Thinking</title><author>Hacker, P. M. S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-be86958a689dd4e867094d981235942cc3fc0847326ae1e487cb1e94195020343</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>Brain</topic><topic>Cognition</topic><topic>Cognition &amp; reasoning</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Reasoning</topic><topic>Sophocles (496?-406 BC)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hacker, P. M. S.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Religion Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Philosophy Collection</collection><collection>Philosophy Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>DELNET Social Sciences &amp; Humanities Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature - U.S. Customers Only</collection><collection>Religion Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Philosophy (London)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hacker, P. M. S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An Intellectual Entertainment: Thought and Thinking</atitle><jtitle>Philosophy (London)</jtitle><addtitle>Philosophy</addtitle><date>2017-01-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>92</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>97</spage><epage>128</epage><pages>97-128</pages><issn>0031-8191</issn><eissn>1469-817X</eissn><abstract>This dialogue is on the nature of thought and thinking. The five disputants are Socrates, an imaginary neuroscientist from California (whose opinions reflect those of contemporary cognitive neuroscientists), an Oxford don from the 1950s (who employs the linguistic analytic techniques of his times), a Scottish post-doctoral student, and John Locke (who speaks for himself). The discussion takes place in Elysium in the late afternoon. They examine the idea that thinking is an activity of the mind or the brain, whether the medium of thought consists of words or ideas, whether thoughtful speech is speech accompanied by thought, whether thinking, i.e. reasoning and inferring, is a process, and what is meant by the claim that ‘thinking is the last interpretation’. The dialogue ends when the protagonists go to dinner, but will be resumed after the meal.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0031819116000449</doi><tpages>32</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0031-8191
ispartof Philosophy (London), 2017-01, Vol.92 (1), p.97-128
issn 0031-8191
1469-817X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1848675601
source JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Cambridge University Press Journals Complete
subjects Attitudes
Brain
Cognition
Cognition & reasoning
Philosophy
Reasoning
Sophocles (496?-406 BC)
title An Intellectual Entertainment: Thought and Thinking
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T09%3A17%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20Intellectual%20Entertainment:%20Thought%20and%20Thinking&rft.jtitle=Philosophy%20(London)&rft.au=Hacker,%20P.%20M.%20S.&rft.date=2017-01-01&rft.volume=92&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=97&rft.epage=128&rft.pages=97-128&rft.issn=0031-8191&rft.eissn=1469-817X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0031819116000449&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4277846081%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1848675601&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0031819116000449&rfr_iscdi=true