Bond strength and micromorphology of resin-dentin interface of etch-and-rinse dentin bonding agents after 1-year of water storage
This study compared the microtensile bond strength (BS) and the micromorphology of resin-dentin interface (MI) of a conventional adhesive to two-steps etch-and-rinse bonding agents after 1 year of water storage. Twenty-eight human third molars were used (n = 7). Teeth were divided into four groups (...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Applied adhesion science 2016-08, Vol.4 (1), p.1, Article 16 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | Applied adhesion science |
container_volume | 4 |
creator | Carvalho, Adriana Oliveira Bacelar-Sá, Renata Wodevotzky, Osvaldo Ambrosano, Gláucia Maria Bovi Magne, Pascal Christophe Giannini, Marcelo |
description | This study compared the microtensile bond strength (BS) and the micromorphology of resin-dentin interface (MI) of a conventional adhesive to two-steps etch-and-rinse bonding agents after 1 year of water storage. Twenty-eight human third molars were used (n = 7). Teeth were divided into four groups (GCB: Gluma Comfort Bond; OPB: OptiBond FL; OCB: One Coat Bond SL; PUB: Peak Universal Bond). Specimens were tested in tension after 24 h or 1 year of water storage. Dentin BS strength data were analyzed by split-plot two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey–Kramer tests (α = 0.05). Water-storage for 1 year significantly decreased BS for OCB; however, no significant difference was noted between OCB and GCB and PUB adhesives after 1 year of water-storage. OPB showed the highest BS values at both storage times. All adhesives formed a hybrid layer with resin tags, and both interfacial structures were maintained after 1 year. However, degradation signals within interfacial structures were observed only for the adhesive with a bond strength reduction. BS test showed that only one adhesive declined after 1 year of water storage. The degradation of some structures of the interface collaborated this finding. The classic three-step etch-and-rinse (OPB) presented higher values of bond strength than GCB and OCB after 1 year, but it was not statistically different from PUB. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1186/s40563-016-0073-5 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1846965559</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4272985901</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3115-e47fe3d775cbaafbf84c866d0f255f252cb24f4c5c2efd78dcb6e5259681498d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kL1uwyAUhVHVSo3SPEA3pM60YAPGYxv1T4rUpZ0RxhfHUQIpOKoy9s2L5QxZOiA43POdKx2Ebhm9Z0zJh8SpkCWhTBJKq5KICzQrWC0JLwW7PHtfo0VKG0opy1-Uqhn6fQq-xWmI4LthjU0Wu97GsAtxvw7b0B1xcDhC6j1pwQ-9x70fIDpjYZzAYNckUyT2PgE-WZoc2vsOmy7rhI3LBGbkCCaO0I8ZdRpCzIYbdOXMNsHidM_R18vz5_KNrD5e35ePK2JLxgQBXjko26oStjHGNU5xq6RsqSuEyKewTcEdt8IW4NpKtbaRIApRS8V4rdpyju6m3H0M3wdIg96EQ_R5pWaKy1oKIersYpMrd5BSBKf3sd-ZeNSM6rFsPZWtc9l6LFuLzBQTk7LXdxDPkv-F_gDsaYPQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1846965559</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Bond strength and micromorphology of resin-dentin interface of etch-and-rinse dentin bonding agents after 1-year of water storage</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</source><creator>Carvalho, Adriana Oliveira ; Bacelar-Sá, Renata ; Wodevotzky, Osvaldo ; Ambrosano, Gláucia Maria Bovi ; Magne, Pascal Christophe ; Giannini, Marcelo</creator><creatorcontrib>Carvalho, Adriana Oliveira ; Bacelar-Sá, Renata ; Wodevotzky, Osvaldo ; Ambrosano, Gláucia Maria Bovi ; Magne, Pascal Christophe ; Giannini, Marcelo</creatorcontrib><description>This study compared the microtensile bond strength (BS) and the micromorphology of resin-dentin interface (MI) of a conventional adhesive to two-steps etch-and-rinse bonding agents after 1 year of water storage. Twenty-eight human third molars were used (n = 7). Teeth were divided into four groups (GCB: Gluma Comfort Bond; OPB: OptiBond FL; OCB: One Coat Bond SL; PUB: Peak Universal Bond). Specimens were tested in tension after 24 h or 1 year of water storage. Dentin BS strength data were analyzed by split-plot two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey–Kramer tests (α = 0.05). Water-storage for 1 year significantly decreased BS for OCB; however, no significant difference was noted between OCB and GCB and PUB adhesives after 1 year of water-storage. OPB showed the highest BS values at both storage times. All adhesives formed a hybrid layer with resin tags, and both interfacial structures were maintained after 1 year. However, degradation signals within interfacial structures were observed only for the adhesive with a bond strength reduction. BS test showed that only one adhesive declined after 1 year of water storage. The degradation of some structures of the interface collaborated this finding. The classic three-step etch-and-rinse (OPB) presented higher values of bond strength than GCB and OCB after 1 year, but it was not statistically different from PUB.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2196-4351</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2196-4351</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s40563-016-0073-5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Biomaterials ; Chemistry and Materials Science ; Materials Science ; Mechanical Engineering ; Surfaces and Interfaces ; Thin Films</subject><ispartof>Applied adhesion science, 2016-08, Vol.4 (1), p.1, Article 16</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2016</rights><rights>Applied Adhesion Science is a copyright of Springer, 2016.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3115-e47fe3d775cbaafbf84c866d0f255f252cb24f4c5c2efd78dcb6e5259681498d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3115-e47fe3d775cbaafbf84c866d0f255f252cb24f4c5c2efd78dcb6e5259681498d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1186/s40563-016-0073-5$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s40563-016-0073-5$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41096,42165,51551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Carvalho, Adriana Oliveira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bacelar-Sá, Renata</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wodevotzky, Osvaldo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ambrosano, Gláucia Maria Bovi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Magne, Pascal Christophe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giannini, Marcelo</creatorcontrib><title>Bond strength and micromorphology of resin-dentin interface of etch-and-rinse dentin bonding agents after 1-year of water storage</title><title>Applied adhesion science</title><addtitle>Appl Adhes Sci</addtitle><description>This study compared the microtensile bond strength (BS) and the micromorphology of resin-dentin interface (MI) of a conventional adhesive to two-steps etch-and-rinse bonding agents after 1 year of water storage. Twenty-eight human third molars were used (n = 7). Teeth were divided into four groups (GCB: Gluma Comfort Bond; OPB: OptiBond FL; OCB: One Coat Bond SL; PUB: Peak Universal Bond). Specimens were tested in tension after 24 h or 1 year of water storage. Dentin BS strength data were analyzed by split-plot two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey–Kramer tests (α = 0.05). Water-storage for 1 year significantly decreased BS for OCB; however, no significant difference was noted between OCB and GCB and PUB adhesives after 1 year of water-storage. OPB showed the highest BS values at both storage times. All adhesives formed a hybrid layer with resin tags, and both interfacial structures were maintained after 1 year. However, degradation signals within interfacial structures were observed only for the adhesive with a bond strength reduction. BS test showed that only one adhesive declined after 1 year of water storage. The degradation of some structures of the interface collaborated this finding. The classic three-step etch-and-rinse (OPB) presented higher values of bond strength than GCB and OCB after 1 year, but it was not statistically different from PUB.</description><subject>Biomaterials</subject><subject>Chemistry and Materials Science</subject><subject>Materials Science</subject><subject>Mechanical Engineering</subject><subject>Surfaces and Interfaces</subject><subject>Thin Films</subject><issn>2196-4351</issn><issn>2196-4351</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kL1uwyAUhVHVSo3SPEA3pM60YAPGYxv1T4rUpZ0RxhfHUQIpOKoy9s2L5QxZOiA43POdKx2Ebhm9Z0zJh8SpkCWhTBJKq5KICzQrWC0JLwW7PHtfo0VKG0opy1-Uqhn6fQq-xWmI4LthjU0Wu97GsAtxvw7b0B1xcDhC6j1pwQ-9x70fIDpjYZzAYNckUyT2PgE-WZoc2vsOmy7rhI3LBGbkCCaO0I8ZdRpCzIYbdOXMNsHidM_R18vz5_KNrD5e35ePK2JLxgQBXjko26oStjHGNU5xq6RsqSuEyKewTcEdt8IW4NpKtbaRIApRS8V4rdpyju6m3H0M3wdIg96EQ_R5pWaKy1oKIersYpMrd5BSBKf3sd-ZeNSM6rFsPZWtc9l6LFuLzBQTk7LXdxDPkv-F_gDsaYPQ</recordid><startdate>20160815</startdate><enddate>20160815</enddate><creator>Carvalho, Adriana Oliveira</creator><creator>Bacelar-Sá, Renata</creator><creator>Wodevotzky, Osvaldo</creator><creator>Ambrosano, Gláucia Maria Bovi</creator><creator>Magne, Pascal Christophe</creator><creator>Giannini, Marcelo</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160815</creationdate><title>Bond strength and micromorphology of resin-dentin interface of etch-and-rinse dentin bonding agents after 1-year of water storage</title><author>Carvalho, Adriana Oliveira ; Bacelar-Sá, Renata ; Wodevotzky, Osvaldo ; Ambrosano, Gláucia Maria Bovi ; Magne, Pascal Christophe ; Giannini, Marcelo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3115-e47fe3d775cbaafbf84c866d0f255f252cb24f4c5c2efd78dcb6e5259681498d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Biomaterials</topic><topic>Chemistry and Materials Science</topic><topic>Materials Science</topic><topic>Mechanical Engineering</topic><topic>Surfaces and Interfaces</topic><topic>Thin Films</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Carvalho, Adriana Oliveira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bacelar-Sá, Renata</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wodevotzky, Osvaldo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ambrosano, Gláucia Maria Bovi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Magne, Pascal Christophe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giannini, Marcelo</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><jtitle>Applied adhesion science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Carvalho, Adriana Oliveira</au><au>Bacelar-Sá, Renata</au><au>Wodevotzky, Osvaldo</au><au>Ambrosano, Gláucia Maria Bovi</au><au>Magne, Pascal Christophe</au><au>Giannini, Marcelo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Bond strength and micromorphology of resin-dentin interface of etch-and-rinse dentin bonding agents after 1-year of water storage</atitle><jtitle>Applied adhesion science</jtitle><stitle>Appl Adhes Sci</stitle><date>2016-08-15</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><pages>1-</pages><artnum>16</artnum><issn>2196-4351</issn><eissn>2196-4351</eissn><abstract>This study compared the microtensile bond strength (BS) and the micromorphology of resin-dentin interface (MI) of a conventional adhesive to two-steps etch-and-rinse bonding agents after 1 year of water storage. Twenty-eight human third molars were used (n = 7). Teeth were divided into four groups (GCB: Gluma Comfort Bond; OPB: OptiBond FL; OCB: One Coat Bond SL; PUB: Peak Universal Bond). Specimens were tested in tension after 24 h or 1 year of water storage. Dentin BS strength data were analyzed by split-plot two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey–Kramer tests (α = 0.05). Water-storage for 1 year significantly decreased BS for OCB; however, no significant difference was noted between OCB and GCB and PUB adhesives after 1 year of water-storage. OPB showed the highest BS values at both storage times. All adhesives formed a hybrid layer with resin tags, and both interfacial structures were maintained after 1 year. However, degradation signals within interfacial structures were observed only for the adhesive with a bond strength reduction. BS test showed that only one adhesive declined after 1 year of water storage. The degradation of some structures of the interface collaborated this finding. The classic three-step etch-and-rinse (OPB) presented higher values of bond strength than GCB and OCB after 1 year, but it was not statistically different from PUB.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><doi>10.1186/s40563-016-0073-5</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2196-4351 |
ispartof | Applied adhesion science, 2016-08, Vol.4 (1), p.1, Article 16 |
issn | 2196-4351 2196-4351 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1846965559 |
source | Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Springer Nature OA Free Journals |
subjects | Biomaterials Chemistry and Materials Science Materials Science Mechanical Engineering Surfaces and Interfaces Thin Films |
title | Bond strength and micromorphology of resin-dentin interface of etch-and-rinse dentin bonding agents after 1-year of water storage |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T08%3A05%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Bond%20strength%20and%20micromorphology%20of%20resin-dentin%20interface%20of%20etch-and-rinse%20dentin%20bonding%20agents%20after%201-year%20of%20water%20storage&rft.jtitle=Applied%20adhesion%20science&rft.au=Carvalho,%20Adriana%20Oliveira&rft.date=2016-08-15&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.pages=1-&rft.artnum=16&rft.issn=2196-4351&rft.eissn=2196-4351&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s40563-016-0073-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4272985901%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1846965559&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |