Approaches to strategic alignment of software process improvement: A systematic literature review

•A systematic literature review that combines database search and snowballing.•A list of existing approaches for strategic alignment of SPI.•An assessment of rigor and relevance of empirical studies.•A discussion about the lack of validation of the existing approaches.•A proposal of a research agend...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of systems and software 2017-01, Vol.123, p.45-63
Hauptverfasser: Vasconcellos, Francisco J.S., Landre, Geraldo B., Cunha, José Adson O.G., Oliveira, Juliano L., Ferreira, Ronaldo A., Vincenzi, Auri M.R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 63
container_issue
container_start_page 45
container_title The Journal of systems and software
container_volume 123
creator Vasconcellos, Francisco J.S.
Landre, Geraldo B.
Cunha, José Adson O.G.
Oliveira, Juliano L.
Ferreira, Ronaldo A.
Vincenzi, Auri M.R.
description •A systematic literature review that combines database search and snowballing.•A list of existing approaches for strategic alignment of SPI.•An assessment of rigor and relevance of empirical studies.•A discussion about the lack of validation of the existing approaches.•A proposal of a research agenda to support the strategic alignment of SPI. Context: Software process improvement (SPI) aims to increase the effectiveness of a software organization. Many studies indicate that the strategic alignment is a critical factor for the SPI success. However, little is known about practical approaches to achieving and maintaining such alignment. Objective: The goal of this study is to evaluate the validation evidence of the existing approaches to the strategic alignment of SPI. Method: We develop a search protocol that combines database search and snowballing to perform the systematic literature review and evaluate empirical studies by applying rigor and relevance criteria. To evaluate the efficiency of our protocol, we use a “quasi-gold standard” to compute the sensitivity and precision of the search. Result: We identified 30 studies (18 empirical) and 19 approaches to strategic alignment of SPI from 495 retrieved studies. Only three out of the 18 empirical studies were rated as high in the categories rigor and relevance, suggesting the need for a stronger validation of the approaches. Conclusion: We conclude that the lack of empirical validation indicates that the results of the existing approaches have not been adequately transferred to practitioners yet, calling for more rigorous studies on the subject.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jss.2016.09.030
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1843009701</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0164121216301893</els_id><sourcerecordid>4261012771</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c325t-60f58b91e76dc9eaaa09e8cf42ddcdcf998c1c75f8f027a1f0a48e5013bbdb033</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UMtOwzAQtBBIlMIHcLPEuWHtJI0Dp6riJVXiAmfLcdbFUZMUr9uKv8dVOXPakXZmdnYYuxWQCRDz-y7riDKZYAZ1BjmcsYlQVT4TUqpzNkmLImEhL9kVUQcAlQQ5YWax3YbR2C8kHkdOMZiIa2-52fj10OMQ-eg4jS4eTECeuBaJuO8T2uNx_8AXnH4oYm9i0m18xOSxS-SAe4-Ha3bhzIbw5m9O2efz08fydbZ6f3lbLlYzm8syzubgStXUAqt5a2s0xkCNyrpCtq1tratrZYWtSqccyMoIB6ZQWILIm6ZtIM-n7O7km5J975Ci7sZdGNJJLVSRA9RVIk-ZOLFsGIkCOr0NvjfhRwvQxyZ1p1OT-tikhlqnJpPm8aTBFD-9FDRZj4PF1ge0Ubej_0f9C6h_fn8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1843009701</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Approaches to strategic alignment of software process improvement: A systematic literature review</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Vasconcellos, Francisco J.S. ; Landre, Geraldo B. ; Cunha, José Adson O.G. ; Oliveira, Juliano L. ; Ferreira, Ronaldo A. ; Vincenzi, Auri M.R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Vasconcellos, Francisco J.S. ; Landre, Geraldo B. ; Cunha, José Adson O.G. ; Oliveira, Juliano L. ; Ferreira, Ronaldo A. ; Vincenzi, Auri M.R.</creatorcontrib><description>•A systematic literature review that combines database search and snowballing.•A list of existing approaches for strategic alignment of SPI.•An assessment of rigor and relevance of empirical studies.•A discussion about the lack of validation of the existing approaches.•A proposal of a research agenda to support the strategic alignment of SPI. Context: Software process improvement (SPI) aims to increase the effectiveness of a software organization. Many studies indicate that the strategic alignment is a critical factor for the SPI success. However, little is known about practical approaches to achieving and maintaining such alignment. Objective: The goal of this study is to evaluate the validation evidence of the existing approaches to the strategic alignment of SPI. Method: We develop a search protocol that combines database search and snowballing to perform the systematic literature review and evaluate empirical studies by applying rigor and relevance criteria. To evaluate the efficiency of our protocol, we use a “quasi-gold standard” to compute the sensitivity and precision of the search. Result: We identified 30 studies (18 empirical) and 19 approaches to strategic alignment of SPI from 495 retrieved studies. Only three out of the 18 empirical studies were rated as high in the categories rigor and relevance, suggesting the need for a stronger validation of the approaches. Conclusion: We conclude that the lack of empirical validation indicates that the results of the existing approaches have not been adequately transferred to practitioners yet, calling for more rigorous studies on the subject.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0164-1212</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-1228</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2016.09.030</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JSSODM</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Business alignment ; Effectiveness ; Literature reviews ; Searches ; Software engineering ; Software process improvement ; Strategic alignment ; Studies ; Systematic literature review ; Systematic review</subject><ispartof>The Journal of systems and software, 2017-01, Vol.123, p.45-63</ispartof><rights>2016 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Sequoia S.A. Jan 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c325t-60f58b91e76dc9eaaa09e8cf42ddcdcf998c1c75f8f027a1f0a48e5013bbdb033</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c325t-60f58b91e76dc9eaaa09e8cf42ddcdcf998c1c75f8f027a1f0a48e5013bbdb033</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5902-1672</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0164121216301893$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vasconcellos, Francisco J.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Landre, Geraldo B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cunha, José Adson O.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oliveira, Juliano L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferreira, Ronaldo A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vincenzi, Auri M.R.</creatorcontrib><title>Approaches to strategic alignment of software process improvement: A systematic literature review</title><title>The Journal of systems and software</title><description>•A systematic literature review that combines database search and snowballing.•A list of existing approaches for strategic alignment of SPI.•An assessment of rigor and relevance of empirical studies.•A discussion about the lack of validation of the existing approaches.•A proposal of a research agenda to support the strategic alignment of SPI. Context: Software process improvement (SPI) aims to increase the effectiveness of a software organization. Many studies indicate that the strategic alignment is a critical factor for the SPI success. However, little is known about practical approaches to achieving and maintaining such alignment. Objective: The goal of this study is to evaluate the validation evidence of the existing approaches to the strategic alignment of SPI. Method: We develop a search protocol that combines database search and snowballing to perform the systematic literature review and evaluate empirical studies by applying rigor and relevance criteria. To evaluate the efficiency of our protocol, we use a “quasi-gold standard” to compute the sensitivity and precision of the search. Result: We identified 30 studies (18 empirical) and 19 approaches to strategic alignment of SPI from 495 retrieved studies. Only three out of the 18 empirical studies were rated as high in the categories rigor and relevance, suggesting the need for a stronger validation of the approaches. Conclusion: We conclude that the lack of empirical validation indicates that the results of the existing approaches have not been adequately transferred to practitioners yet, calling for more rigorous studies on the subject.</description><subject>Business alignment</subject><subject>Effectiveness</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Searches</subject><subject>Software engineering</subject><subject>Software process improvement</subject><subject>Strategic alignment</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Systematic literature review</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><issn>0164-1212</issn><issn>1873-1228</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UMtOwzAQtBBIlMIHcLPEuWHtJI0Dp6riJVXiAmfLcdbFUZMUr9uKv8dVOXPakXZmdnYYuxWQCRDz-y7riDKZYAZ1BjmcsYlQVT4TUqpzNkmLImEhL9kVUQcAlQQ5YWax3YbR2C8kHkdOMZiIa2-52fj10OMQ-eg4jS4eTECeuBaJuO8T2uNx_8AXnH4oYm9i0m18xOSxS-SAe4-Ha3bhzIbw5m9O2efz08fydbZ6f3lbLlYzm8syzubgStXUAqt5a2s0xkCNyrpCtq1tratrZYWtSqccyMoIB6ZQWILIm6ZtIM-n7O7km5J975Ci7sZdGNJJLVSRA9RVIk-ZOLFsGIkCOr0NvjfhRwvQxyZ1p1OT-tikhlqnJpPm8aTBFD-9FDRZj4PF1ge0Ubej_0f9C6h_fn8</recordid><startdate>201701</startdate><enddate>201701</enddate><creator>Vasconcellos, Francisco J.S.</creator><creator>Landre, Geraldo B.</creator><creator>Cunha, José Adson O.G.</creator><creator>Oliveira, Juliano L.</creator><creator>Ferreira, Ronaldo A.</creator><creator>Vincenzi, Auri M.R.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Sequoia S.A</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5902-1672</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201701</creationdate><title>Approaches to strategic alignment of software process improvement: A systematic literature review</title><author>Vasconcellos, Francisco J.S. ; Landre, Geraldo B. ; Cunha, José Adson O.G. ; Oliveira, Juliano L. ; Ferreira, Ronaldo A. ; Vincenzi, Auri M.R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c325t-60f58b91e76dc9eaaa09e8cf42ddcdcf998c1c75f8f027a1f0a48e5013bbdb033</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Business alignment</topic><topic>Effectiveness</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Searches</topic><topic>Software engineering</topic><topic>Software process improvement</topic><topic>Strategic alignment</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Systematic literature review</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vasconcellos, Francisco J.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Landre, Geraldo B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cunha, José Adson O.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oliveira, Juliano L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferreira, Ronaldo A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vincenzi, Auri M.R.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>The Journal of systems and software</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vasconcellos, Francisco J.S.</au><au>Landre, Geraldo B.</au><au>Cunha, José Adson O.G.</au><au>Oliveira, Juliano L.</au><au>Ferreira, Ronaldo A.</au><au>Vincenzi, Auri M.R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Approaches to strategic alignment of software process improvement: A systematic literature review</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of systems and software</jtitle><date>2017-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>123</volume><spage>45</spage><epage>63</epage><pages>45-63</pages><issn>0164-1212</issn><eissn>1873-1228</eissn><coden>JSSODM</coden><abstract>•A systematic literature review that combines database search and snowballing.•A list of existing approaches for strategic alignment of SPI.•An assessment of rigor and relevance of empirical studies.•A discussion about the lack of validation of the existing approaches.•A proposal of a research agenda to support the strategic alignment of SPI. Context: Software process improvement (SPI) aims to increase the effectiveness of a software organization. Many studies indicate that the strategic alignment is a critical factor for the SPI success. However, little is known about practical approaches to achieving and maintaining such alignment. Objective: The goal of this study is to evaluate the validation evidence of the existing approaches to the strategic alignment of SPI. Method: We develop a search protocol that combines database search and snowballing to perform the systematic literature review and evaluate empirical studies by applying rigor and relevance criteria. To evaluate the efficiency of our protocol, we use a “quasi-gold standard” to compute the sensitivity and precision of the search. Result: We identified 30 studies (18 empirical) and 19 approaches to strategic alignment of SPI from 495 retrieved studies. Only three out of the 18 empirical studies were rated as high in the categories rigor and relevance, suggesting the need for a stronger validation of the approaches. Conclusion: We conclude that the lack of empirical validation indicates that the results of the existing approaches have not been adequately transferred to practitioners yet, calling for more rigorous studies on the subject.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jss.2016.09.030</doi><tpages>19</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5902-1672</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0164-1212
ispartof The Journal of systems and software, 2017-01, Vol.123, p.45-63
issn 0164-1212
1873-1228
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1843009701
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Business alignment
Effectiveness
Literature reviews
Searches
Software engineering
Software process improvement
Strategic alignment
Studies
Systematic literature review
Systematic review
title Approaches to strategic alignment of software process improvement: A systematic literature review
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T14%3A37%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Approaches%20to%20strategic%20alignment%20of%20software%20process%20improvement:%20A%20systematic%20literature%20review&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20systems%20and%20software&rft.au=Vasconcellos,%20Francisco%20J.S.&rft.date=2017-01&rft.volume=123&rft.spage=45&rft.epage=63&rft.pages=45-63&rft.issn=0164-1212&rft.eissn=1873-1228&rft.coden=JSSODM&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jss.2016.09.030&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4261012771%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1843009701&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0164121216301893&rfr_iscdi=true