Sharing the Risk? Households, Labor Market Vulnerability, and Social Policy Preferences in Western Europe
Explaining social policy preferences has become a major topic in comparative politics with labor market risk as a key determinant of these preferences. However, one question continues to loom large: are preference divides blurred by mixed households, that is, secure labor market participants living...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of politics 2016-10, Vol.78 (4), p.1045-1060 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1060 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 1045 |
container_title | The Journal of politics |
container_volume | 78 |
creator | Häusermann, Silja Kurer, Thomas Schwander, Hanna |
description | Explaining social policy preferences has become a major topic in comparative politics with labor market risk as a key determinant of these preferences. However, one question continues to loom large: are preference divides blurred by mixed households, that is, secure labor market participants living with vulnerable partners? In this article, we build on the insider-outsider literature and show that while the household does matter, its mitigating effect is limited in scope and strongly conditional on gender. Women’s preferences depend on their partner’s labor market situation, while men’s preferences are unaffected by it. Overall, only a small minority of the population across Western Europe benefits from a “household safety net.” Our findings have important implications for understanding the politicization of insider-outsider divides. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1086/686972 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1842817464</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26550789</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26550789</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c305t-1d426f24c6ee7762e39354f93a802489576aaa4eaac03d3f6b52455483588da3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo90E1Lw0AQBuBFFKxV_4GwIHhqdL-zOYmUaoWKxRY9hmkysdvGbN1NDv33RirOZS4PMy8vIZec3XJmzZ2xJkvFERlwZWwiNLPHZMCYEIm03JySsxg3rB-TqQFxizUE13zSdo30zcXtPZ36LuLa12Uc0RmsfKAvELbY0veubjDAytWu3Y8oNCVd-MJBTee-dsWezgNWGLApMFLX0A-MLYaGTrrgd3hOTiqoI1787SFZPk6W42kye316Hj_MkkIy3Sa8VMJUQhUGMU2NQJlJrapMgmVC2UynBgAUAhRMlrIyKy2U1spKbW0JckiuD2d3wX93fYJ847vQ9B9zbpWwPFVG9ermoIrgY-xj57vgviDsc87y3xbzQ4s9vDrATWx9-FfCaM1Sm8kfhlxsew</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1842817464</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sharing the Risk? Households, Labor Market Vulnerability, and Social Policy Preferences in Western Europe</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Political Science Complete</source><creator>Häusermann, Silja ; Kurer, Thomas ; Schwander, Hanna</creator><creatorcontrib>Häusermann, Silja ; Kurer, Thomas ; Schwander, Hanna</creatorcontrib><description>Explaining social policy preferences has become a major topic in comparative politics with labor market risk as a key determinant of these preferences. However, one question continues to loom large: are preference divides blurred by mixed households, that is, secure labor market participants living with vulnerable partners? In this article, we build on the insider-outsider literature and show that while the household does matter, its mitigating effect is limited in scope and strongly conditional on gender. Women’s preferences depend on their partner’s labor market situation, while men’s preferences are unaffected by it. Overall, only a small minority of the population across Western Europe benefits from a “household safety net.” Our findings have important implications for understanding the politicization of insider-outsider divides.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3816</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-2508</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1086/686972</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JPOLA3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chicago: University of Chicago on behalf of the Southern Political Science Association</publisher><subject>Comparative politics ; Females ; Households ; Housework ; Labor market ; Preferences ; Risk ; Risk assessment ; Safety ; Social policy</subject><ispartof>The Journal of politics, 2016-10, Vol.78 (4), p.1045-1060</ispartof><rights>2016 by the Southern Political Science Association</rights><rights>Copyright University of Chicago Press Oct 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c305t-1d426f24c6ee7762e39354f93a802489576aaa4eaac03d3f6b52455483588da3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c305t-1d426f24c6ee7762e39354f93a802489576aaa4eaac03d3f6b52455483588da3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26550789$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26550789$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27924,27925,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Häusermann, Silja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kurer, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwander, Hanna</creatorcontrib><title>Sharing the Risk? Households, Labor Market Vulnerability, and Social Policy Preferences in Western Europe</title><title>The Journal of politics</title><description>Explaining social policy preferences has become a major topic in comparative politics with labor market risk as a key determinant of these preferences. However, one question continues to loom large: are preference divides blurred by mixed households, that is, secure labor market participants living with vulnerable partners? In this article, we build on the insider-outsider literature and show that while the household does matter, its mitigating effect is limited in scope and strongly conditional on gender. Women’s preferences depend on their partner’s labor market situation, while men’s preferences are unaffected by it. Overall, only a small minority of the population across Western Europe benefits from a “household safety net.” Our findings have important implications for understanding the politicization of insider-outsider divides.</description><subject>Comparative politics</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Households</subject><subject>Housework</subject><subject>Labor market</subject><subject>Preferences</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Risk assessment</subject><subject>Safety</subject><subject>Social policy</subject><issn>0022-3816</issn><issn>1468-2508</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNo90E1Lw0AQBuBFFKxV_4GwIHhqdL-zOYmUaoWKxRY9hmkysdvGbN1NDv33RirOZS4PMy8vIZec3XJmzZ2xJkvFERlwZWwiNLPHZMCYEIm03JySsxg3rB-TqQFxizUE13zSdo30zcXtPZ36LuLa12Uc0RmsfKAvELbY0veubjDAytWu3Y8oNCVd-MJBTee-dsWezgNWGLApMFLX0A-MLYaGTrrgd3hOTiqoI1787SFZPk6W42kye316Hj_MkkIy3Sa8VMJUQhUGMU2NQJlJrapMgmVC2UynBgAUAhRMlrIyKy2U1spKbW0JckiuD2d3wX93fYJ847vQ9B9zbpWwPFVG9ermoIrgY-xj57vgviDsc87y3xbzQ4s9vDrATWx9-FfCaM1Sm8kfhlxsew</recordid><startdate>20161001</startdate><enddate>20161001</enddate><creator>Häusermann, Silja</creator><creator>Kurer, Thomas</creator><creator>Schwander, Hanna</creator><general>University of Chicago on behalf of the Southern Political Science Association</general><general>University of Chicago Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20161001</creationdate><title>Sharing the Risk? Households, Labor Market Vulnerability, and Social Policy Preferences in Western Europe</title><author>Häusermann, Silja ; Kurer, Thomas ; Schwander, Hanna</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c305t-1d426f24c6ee7762e39354f93a802489576aaa4eaac03d3f6b52455483588da3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Comparative politics</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Households</topic><topic>Housework</topic><topic>Labor market</topic><topic>Preferences</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Risk assessment</topic><topic>Safety</topic><topic>Social policy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Häusermann, Silja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kurer, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwander, Hanna</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>The Journal of politics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Häusermann, Silja</au><au>Kurer, Thomas</au><au>Schwander, Hanna</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sharing the Risk? Households, Labor Market Vulnerability, and Social Policy Preferences in Western Europe</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of politics</jtitle><date>2016-10-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>78</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1045</spage><epage>1060</epage><pages>1045-1060</pages><issn>0022-3816</issn><eissn>1468-2508</eissn><coden>JPOLA3</coden><abstract>Explaining social policy preferences has become a major topic in comparative politics with labor market risk as a key determinant of these preferences. However, one question continues to loom large: are preference divides blurred by mixed households, that is, secure labor market participants living with vulnerable partners? In this article, we build on the insider-outsider literature and show that while the household does matter, its mitigating effect is limited in scope and strongly conditional on gender. Women’s preferences depend on their partner’s labor market situation, while men’s preferences are unaffected by it. Overall, only a small minority of the population across Western Europe benefits from a “household safety net.” Our findings have important implications for understanding the politicization of insider-outsider divides.</abstract><cop>Chicago</cop><pub>University of Chicago on behalf of the Southern Political Science Association</pub><doi>10.1086/686972</doi><tpages>16</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-3816 |
ispartof | The Journal of politics, 2016-10, Vol.78 (4), p.1045-1060 |
issn | 0022-3816 1468-2508 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1842817464 |
source | Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Business Source Complete; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Political Science Complete |
subjects | Comparative politics Females Households Housework Labor market Preferences Risk Risk assessment Safety Social policy |
title | Sharing the Risk? Households, Labor Market Vulnerability, and Social Policy Preferences in Western Europe |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T04%3A03%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sharing%20the%20Risk?%20Households,%20Labor%20Market%20Vulnerability,%20and%20Social%20Policy%20Preferences%20in%20Western%20Europe&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20politics&rft.au=H%C3%A4usermann,%20Silja&rft.date=2016-10-01&rft.volume=78&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1045&rft.epage=1060&rft.pages=1045-1060&rft.issn=0022-3816&rft.eissn=1468-2508&rft.coden=JPOLA3&rft_id=info:doi/10.1086/686972&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26550789%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1842817464&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=26550789&rfr_iscdi=true |