Sharing the Risk? Households, Labor Market Vulnerability, and Social Policy Preferences in Western Europe

Explaining social policy preferences has become a major topic in comparative politics with labor market risk as a key determinant of these preferences. However, one question continues to loom large: are preference divides blurred by mixed households, that is, secure labor market participants living...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of politics 2016-10, Vol.78 (4), p.1045-1060
Hauptverfasser: Häusermann, Silja, Kurer, Thomas, Schwander, Hanna
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1060
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1045
container_title The Journal of politics
container_volume 78
creator Häusermann, Silja
Kurer, Thomas
Schwander, Hanna
description Explaining social policy preferences has become a major topic in comparative politics with labor market risk as a key determinant of these preferences. However, one question continues to loom large: are preference divides blurred by mixed households, that is, secure labor market participants living with vulnerable partners? In this article, we build on the insider-outsider literature and show that while the household does matter, its mitigating effect is limited in scope and strongly conditional on gender. Women’s preferences depend on their partner’s labor market situation, while men’s preferences are unaffected by it. Overall, only a small minority of the population across Western Europe benefits from a “household safety net.” Our findings have important implications for understanding the politicization of insider-outsider divides.
doi_str_mv 10.1086/686972
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1842817464</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26550789</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26550789</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c305t-1d426f24c6ee7762e39354f93a802489576aaa4eaac03d3f6b52455483588da3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo90E1Lw0AQBuBFFKxV_4GwIHhqdL-zOYmUaoWKxRY9hmkysdvGbN1NDv33RirOZS4PMy8vIZec3XJmzZ2xJkvFERlwZWwiNLPHZMCYEIm03JySsxg3rB-TqQFxizUE13zSdo30zcXtPZ36LuLa12Uc0RmsfKAvELbY0veubjDAytWu3Y8oNCVd-MJBTee-dsWezgNWGLApMFLX0A-MLYaGTrrgd3hOTiqoI1787SFZPk6W42kye316Hj_MkkIy3Sa8VMJUQhUGMU2NQJlJrapMgmVC2UynBgAUAhRMlrIyKy2U1spKbW0JckiuD2d3wX93fYJ847vQ9B9zbpWwPFVG9ermoIrgY-xj57vgviDsc87y3xbzQ4s9vDrATWx9-FfCaM1Sm8kfhlxsew</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1842817464</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sharing the Risk? Households, Labor Market Vulnerability, and Social Policy Preferences in Western Europe</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Political Science Complete</source><creator>Häusermann, Silja ; Kurer, Thomas ; Schwander, Hanna</creator><creatorcontrib>Häusermann, Silja ; Kurer, Thomas ; Schwander, Hanna</creatorcontrib><description>Explaining social policy preferences has become a major topic in comparative politics with labor market risk as a key determinant of these preferences. However, one question continues to loom large: are preference divides blurred by mixed households, that is, secure labor market participants living with vulnerable partners? In this article, we build on the insider-outsider literature and show that while the household does matter, its mitigating effect is limited in scope and strongly conditional on gender. Women’s preferences depend on their partner’s labor market situation, while men’s preferences are unaffected by it. Overall, only a small minority of the population across Western Europe benefits from a “household safety net.” Our findings have important implications for understanding the politicization of insider-outsider divides.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3816</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-2508</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1086/686972</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JPOLA3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chicago: University of Chicago on behalf of the Southern Political Science Association</publisher><subject>Comparative politics ; Females ; Households ; Housework ; Labor market ; Preferences ; Risk ; Risk assessment ; Safety ; Social policy</subject><ispartof>The Journal of politics, 2016-10, Vol.78 (4), p.1045-1060</ispartof><rights>2016 by the Southern Political Science Association</rights><rights>Copyright University of Chicago Press Oct 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c305t-1d426f24c6ee7762e39354f93a802489576aaa4eaac03d3f6b52455483588da3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c305t-1d426f24c6ee7762e39354f93a802489576aaa4eaac03d3f6b52455483588da3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26550789$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26550789$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27924,27925,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Häusermann, Silja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kurer, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwander, Hanna</creatorcontrib><title>Sharing the Risk? Households, Labor Market Vulnerability, and Social Policy Preferences in Western Europe</title><title>The Journal of politics</title><description>Explaining social policy preferences has become a major topic in comparative politics with labor market risk as a key determinant of these preferences. However, one question continues to loom large: are preference divides blurred by mixed households, that is, secure labor market participants living with vulnerable partners? In this article, we build on the insider-outsider literature and show that while the household does matter, its mitigating effect is limited in scope and strongly conditional on gender. Women’s preferences depend on their partner’s labor market situation, while men’s preferences are unaffected by it. Overall, only a small minority of the population across Western Europe benefits from a “household safety net.” Our findings have important implications for understanding the politicization of insider-outsider divides.</description><subject>Comparative politics</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Households</subject><subject>Housework</subject><subject>Labor market</subject><subject>Preferences</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Risk assessment</subject><subject>Safety</subject><subject>Social policy</subject><issn>0022-3816</issn><issn>1468-2508</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNo90E1Lw0AQBuBFFKxV_4GwIHhqdL-zOYmUaoWKxRY9hmkysdvGbN1NDv33RirOZS4PMy8vIZec3XJmzZ2xJkvFERlwZWwiNLPHZMCYEIm03JySsxg3rB-TqQFxizUE13zSdo30zcXtPZ36LuLa12Uc0RmsfKAvELbY0veubjDAytWu3Y8oNCVd-MJBTee-dsWezgNWGLApMFLX0A-MLYaGTrrgd3hOTiqoI1787SFZPk6W42kye316Hj_MkkIy3Sa8VMJUQhUGMU2NQJlJrapMgmVC2UynBgAUAhRMlrIyKy2U1spKbW0JckiuD2d3wX93fYJ847vQ9B9zbpWwPFVG9ermoIrgY-xj57vgviDsc87y3xbzQ4s9vDrATWx9-FfCaM1Sm8kfhlxsew</recordid><startdate>20161001</startdate><enddate>20161001</enddate><creator>Häusermann, Silja</creator><creator>Kurer, Thomas</creator><creator>Schwander, Hanna</creator><general>University of Chicago on behalf of the Southern Political Science Association</general><general>University of Chicago Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20161001</creationdate><title>Sharing the Risk? Households, Labor Market Vulnerability, and Social Policy Preferences in Western Europe</title><author>Häusermann, Silja ; Kurer, Thomas ; Schwander, Hanna</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c305t-1d426f24c6ee7762e39354f93a802489576aaa4eaac03d3f6b52455483588da3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Comparative politics</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Households</topic><topic>Housework</topic><topic>Labor market</topic><topic>Preferences</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Risk assessment</topic><topic>Safety</topic><topic>Social policy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Häusermann, Silja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kurer, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwander, Hanna</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>The Journal of politics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Häusermann, Silja</au><au>Kurer, Thomas</au><au>Schwander, Hanna</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sharing the Risk? Households, Labor Market Vulnerability, and Social Policy Preferences in Western Europe</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of politics</jtitle><date>2016-10-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>78</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1045</spage><epage>1060</epage><pages>1045-1060</pages><issn>0022-3816</issn><eissn>1468-2508</eissn><coden>JPOLA3</coden><abstract>Explaining social policy preferences has become a major topic in comparative politics with labor market risk as a key determinant of these preferences. However, one question continues to loom large: are preference divides blurred by mixed households, that is, secure labor market participants living with vulnerable partners? In this article, we build on the insider-outsider literature and show that while the household does matter, its mitigating effect is limited in scope and strongly conditional on gender. Women’s preferences depend on their partner’s labor market situation, while men’s preferences are unaffected by it. Overall, only a small minority of the population across Western Europe benefits from a “household safety net.” Our findings have important implications for understanding the politicization of insider-outsider divides.</abstract><cop>Chicago</cop><pub>University of Chicago on behalf of the Southern Political Science Association</pub><doi>10.1086/686972</doi><tpages>16</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-3816
ispartof The Journal of politics, 2016-10, Vol.78 (4), p.1045-1060
issn 0022-3816
1468-2508
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1842817464
source Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Business Source Complete; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Political Science Complete
subjects Comparative politics
Females
Households
Housework
Labor market
Preferences
Risk
Risk assessment
Safety
Social policy
title Sharing the Risk? Households, Labor Market Vulnerability, and Social Policy Preferences in Western Europe
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T04%3A03%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sharing%20the%20Risk?%20Households,%20Labor%20Market%20Vulnerability,%20and%20Social%20Policy%20Preferences%20in%20Western%20Europe&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20politics&rft.au=H%C3%A4usermann,%20Silja&rft.date=2016-10-01&rft.volume=78&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1045&rft.epage=1060&rft.pages=1045-1060&rft.issn=0022-3816&rft.eissn=1468-2508&rft.coden=JPOLA3&rft_id=info:doi/10.1086/686972&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26550789%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1842817464&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=26550789&rfr_iscdi=true