Person Reidentification via Ranking Aggregation of Similarity Pulling and Dissimilarity Pushing
Person reidentification is a key technique to match different persons observed in nonoverlapping camera views. Many researchers treat it as a special object-retrieval problem, where ranking optimization plays an important role. Existing ranking optimization methods mainly utilize the similarity rela...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | IEEE transactions on multimedia 2016-12, Vol.18 (12), p.2553-2566 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Person reidentification is a key technique to match different persons observed in nonoverlapping camera views. Many researchers treat it as a special object-retrieval problem, where ranking optimization plays an important role. Existing ranking optimization methods mainly utilize the similarity relationship between the probe and gallery images to optimize the original ranking list, but seldom consider the important dissimilarity relationship. In this paper, we propose to use both similarity and dissimilarity cues in a ranking optimization framework for person reidentification. Its core idea is that the true match should not only be similar to those strongly similar galleries of the probe, but also be dissimilar to those strongly dissimilar galleries of the probe. Furthermore, motivated by the philosophy of multiview verification, a ranking aggregation algorithm is proposed to enhance the detection of similarity and dissimilarity based on the following assumption: the true match should be similar to the probe in different baseline methods. In other words, if a gallery blue image is strongly similar to the probe in one method, while simultaneously strongly dissimilar to the probe in another method, it will probably be a wrong match of the probe. Extensive experiments conducted on public benchmark datasets and comparisons with different baseline methods have shown the great superiority of the proposed ranking optimization method. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1520-9210 1941-0077 |
DOI: | 10.1109/TMM.2016.2605058 |