Why the New Benefit Corporations May Not Prove to Be Truly Socially Beneficial

Social enterprises may take a variety of legal forms (limited liability companies, nonprofit entities, etc.). This paper focuses primarily upon one particular new form increasingly popular within the United States—the "Benefit Corporation." I evaluate whether US Benefit Corporations are li...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Business & professional ethics journal 2016, Vol.35 (1), p.17-50
1. Verfasser: Koehn, Daryl
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 50
container_issue 1
container_start_page 17
container_title Business & professional ethics journal
container_volume 35
creator Koehn, Daryl
description Social enterprises may take a variety of legal forms (limited liability companies, nonprofit entities, etc.). This paper focuses primarily upon one particular new form increasingly popular within the United States—the "Benefit Corporation." I evaluate whether US Benefit Corporations are likely to realize as much social benefit as is frequently claimed. Part One of the paper describes the features of Benefit Corporations as they are constituted in many states. Part Two lays out the benefits extolled by supporters of this US legal corporate form. Part Three challenges these claims and adduces some reasons for doubting whether Benefit Corporations will prove to be as socially useful as they claim to be. Part Four concludes with some suggestions for future lines of research into the nature of the firm and Benefit Corporations in particular.
doi_str_mv 10.5840/bpej201672641
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1841966876</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>44074868</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>44074868</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c321t-8f54f984a6e00d141ad593e37d89ccd7279ce26dd7aa87b8870a88b9038829d33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkF1LwzAUhoMoOKeXXgoBr6snH21OL3X4BXMOnHgZsjZlHXOpSaf035u6MfTmPSfwnifwEHLO4CpFCdfzxi45sEzxTLIDMuAsFYlCjodkAFyphMc8JichLAFA5SAHZPK-6Gi7sHRiv-mtXduqbunI-cZ509ZuHeiz6ejEtXTq3ZelrYstOvObVUdfXVGbVVy2d_3jlBxVZhXs2W4Oydv93Wz0mIxfHp5GN-OkEJy1CVaprHKUJrMAJZPMlGkurFAl5kVRKq7ywvKsLJUxqOaICgziPAeByPNSiCG53HIb7z43NrR66TZ-Hb_UDCXLswxVFlvJtlV4F4K3lW58_WF8pxnoXpn-pyz2pzvqol654JpFt7_4NaP_mtHRjJ64HqF7hgYQaQxgMZiKkUJEXmyRy9A6v6dJCUpihuIHa8CC6g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1841966876</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Why the New Benefit Corporations May Not Prove to Be Truly Socially Beneficial</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Koehn, Daryl</creator><creatorcontrib>Koehn, Daryl ; Philosophy Documentation Center</creatorcontrib><description>Social enterprises may take a variety of legal forms (limited liability companies, nonprofit entities, etc.). This paper focuses primarily upon one particular new form increasingly popular within the United States—the "Benefit Corporation." I evaluate whether US Benefit Corporations are likely to realize as much social benefit as is frequently claimed. Part One of the paper describes the features of Benefit Corporations as they are constituted in many states. Part Two lays out the benefits extolled by supporters of this US legal corporate form. Part Three challenges these claims and adduces some reasons for doubting whether Benefit Corporations will prove to be as socially useful as they claim to be. Part Four concludes with some suggestions for future lines of research into the nature of the firm and Benefit Corporations in particular.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0277-2027</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2153-7828</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5840/bpej201672641</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Troy: Philosophy Documentation Center</publisher><subject>Applied Philosophy ; Business and Professional Ethics ; Business entities ; Corporate regulation ; Corporations ; Fiduciary responsibility ; Investors ; Limited liability companies ; Low profit limited liability companies ; Nonprofit organizations ; Professional ethics ; Public benefit corporations ; Shareholders ; Stakeholders</subject><ispartof>Business &amp; professional ethics journal, 2016, Vol.35 (1), p.17-50</ispartof><rights>Business and Professional Ethics Journal</rights><rights>Copyright University of Florida, Center for Applied Philosophy Spring 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c321t-8f54f984a6e00d141ad593e37d89ccd7279ce26dd7aa87b8870a88b9038829d33</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/44074868$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/44074868$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,804,4025,27928,27929,27930,58022,58255</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Koehn, Daryl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Philosophy Documentation Center</creatorcontrib><title>Why the New Benefit Corporations May Not Prove to Be Truly Socially Beneficial</title><title>Business &amp; professional ethics journal</title><description>Social enterprises may take a variety of legal forms (limited liability companies, nonprofit entities, etc.). This paper focuses primarily upon one particular new form increasingly popular within the United States—the "Benefit Corporation." I evaluate whether US Benefit Corporations are likely to realize as much social benefit as is frequently claimed. Part One of the paper describes the features of Benefit Corporations as they are constituted in many states. Part Two lays out the benefits extolled by supporters of this US legal corporate form. Part Three challenges these claims and adduces some reasons for doubting whether Benefit Corporations will prove to be as socially useful as they claim to be. Part Four concludes with some suggestions for future lines of research into the nature of the firm and Benefit Corporations in particular.</description><subject>Applied Philosophy</subject><subject>Business and Professional Ethics</subject><subject>Business entities</subject><subject>Corporate regulation</subject><subject>Corporations</subject><subject>Fiduciary responsibility</subject><subject>Investors</subject><subject>Limited liability companies</subject><subject>Low profit limited liability companies</subject><subject>Nonprofit organizations</subject><subject>Professional ethics</subject><subject>Public benefit corporations</subject><subject>Shareholders</subject><subject>Stakeholders</subject><issn>0277-2027</issn><issn>2153-7828</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkF1LwzAUhoMoOKeXXgoBr6snH21OL3X4BXMOnHgZsjZlHXOpSaf035u6MfTmPSfwnifwEHLO4CpFCdfzxi45sEzxTLIDMuAsFYlCjodkAFyphMc8JichLAFA5SAHZPK-6Gi7sHRiv-mtXduqbunI-cZ509ZuHeiz6ejEtXTq3ZelrYstOvObVUdfXVGbVVy2d_3jlBxVZhXs2W4Oydv93Wz0mIxfHp5GN-OkEJy1CVaprHKUJrMAJZPMlGkurFAl5kVRKq7ywvKsLJUxqOaICgziPAeByPNSiCG53HIb7z43NrR66TZ-Hb_UDCXLswxVFlvJtlV4F4K3lW58_WF8pxnoXpn-pyz2pzvqol654JpFt7_4NaP_mtHRjJ64HqF7hgYQaQxgMZiKkUJEXmyRy9A6v6dJCUpihuIHa8CC6g</recordid><startdate>2016</startdate><enddate>2016</enddate><creator>Koehn, Daryl</creator><general>Philosophy Documentation Center</general><general>University of Florida, Center for Applied Philosophy</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2016</creationdate><title>Why the New Benefit Corporations May Not Prove to Be Truly Socially Beneficial</title><author>Koehn, Daryl</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c321t-8f54f984a6e00d141ad593e37d89ccd7279ce26dd7aa87b8870a88b9038829d33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Applied Philosophy</topic><topic>Business and Professional Ethics</topic><topic>Business entities</topic><topic>Corporate regulation</topic><topic>Corporations</topic><topic>Fiduciary responsibility</topic><topic>Investors</topic><topic>Limited liability companies</topic><topic>Low profit limited liability companies</topic><topic>Nonprofit organizations</topic><topic>Professional ethics</topic><topic>Public benefit corporations</topic><topic>Shareholders</topic><topic>Stakeholders</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Koehn, Daryl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Philosophy Documentation Center</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Business &amp; professional ethics journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Koehn, Daryl</au><aucorp>Philosophy Documentation Center</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Why the New Benefit Corporations May Not Prove to Be Truly Socially Beneficial</atitle><jtitle>Business &amp; professional ethics journal</jtitle><date>2016</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>17</spage><epage>50</epage><pages>17-50</pages><issn>0277-2027</issn><eissn>2153-7828</eissn><abstract>Social enterprises may take a variety of legal forms (limited liability companies, nonprofit entities, etc.). This paper focuses primarily upon one particular new form increasingly popular within the United States—the "Benefit Corporation." I evaluate whether US Benefit Corporations are likely to realize as much social benefit as is frequently claimed. Part One of the paper describes the features of Benefit Corporations as they are constituted in many states. Part Two lays out the benefits extolled by supporters of this US legal corporate form. Part Three challenges these claims and adduces some reasons for doubting whether Benefit Corporations will prove to be as socially useful as they claim to be. Part Four concludes with some suggestions for future lines of research into the nature of the firm and Benefit Corporations in particular.</abstract><cop>Troy</cop><pub>Philosophy Documentation Center</pub><doi>10.5840/bpej201672641</doi><tpages>34</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0277-2027
ispartof Business & professional ethics journal, 2016, Vol.35 (1), p.17-50
issn 0277-2027
2153-7828
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1841966876
source JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing
subjects Applied Philosophy
Business and Professional Ethics
Business entities
Corporate regulation
Corporations
Fiduciary responsibility
Investors
Limited liability companies
Low profit limited liability companies
Nonprofit organizations
Professional ethics
Public benefit corporations
Shareholders
Stakeholders
title Why the New Benefit Corporations May Not Prove to Be Truly Socially Beneficial
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-14T00%3A54%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Why%20the%20New%20Benefit%20Corporations%20May%20Not%20Prove%20to%20Be%20Truly%20Socially%20Beneficial&rft.jtitle=Business%20&%20professional%20ethics%20journal&rft.au=Koehn,%20Daryl&rft.aucorp=Philosophy%20Documentation%20Center&rft.date=2016&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=17&rft.epage=50&rft.pages=17-50&rft.issn=0277-2027&rft.eissn=2153-7828&rft_id=info:doi/10.5840/bpej201672641&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E44074868%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1841966876&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=44074868&rfr_iscdi=true