Music Theory as Productivity
The author here proposes Julia Kristeva's notion of "productivity" as a way of conceiving of the relations between different theories of music. By such a notion, rather than confirming, disconfirming, or exemplifying a theory, a particular musical work (or works) may redistribute the...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Canadian university music review 2000, Vol.20 (2), p.16-30 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 30 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 16 |
container_title | Canadian university music review |
container_volume | 20 |
creator | Krims, Adam |
description | The author here proposes Julia Kristeva's notion of "productivity" as a way of conceiving of the relations between different theories of music. By such a notion, rather than confirming, disconfirming, or exemplifying a theory, a particular musical work (or works) may redistribute the theory. The redistribution, in fact, might not only modify the initial theory—something certainly not original to productivity—but may also bring it into articulation with fundamentally opposed models of musical function, without which, nevertheless, the original theory remains incomplete. An extended example is adduced from Schubert's Schubert's Impromptu in G-flat Major, D. 899, in connection with, first, Schenker's Free Composition (Der freie Satz), and second, Schoenberg's Theory of Harmony (Harmonielehre); Schenker's inconsistent practice with respect to first-order neighbours, along with certain issues in the Impromptu, become the occasion for examining a case of productivity. |
doi_str_mv | 10.7202/1014455ar |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>erudit_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1840050777</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><eruid>1014455ar</eruid><sourcerecordid>1014455ar</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c121r-c0ffeb0270455d307c53a3a764eb7900827936eeab09ed856bca4f4d1516d2ca3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNz0tLxDAUBeAgCtbRhXvBgisX1XvzaJqlDL5gRBfjOqRJih3Ujjet0H9vpSquzubjHA5jxwgXmgO_REAplXK0wzLODRZcinKXZaARChBK7LODlDYAkzMiYycPQ2p9vn6JHY25S_kTdWHwffvZ9uMh22vca4pHP7lgzzfX6-VdsXq8vV9erQqPHKnw0DSxBq5hWg4CtFfCCadLGWttACqujShjdDWYGCpV1t7JRgZUWAbunViws7l3S93HEFNvN91A79OkxUoCKNBaT-p8Vp66lCg2dkvtm6PRItjv8_bv_GRPZxtpCG3_T_6KL1WpVFo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1840050777</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Music Theory as Productivity</title><source>Érudit (Freely Accessible)</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>Krims, Adam</creator><creatorcontrib>Krims, Adam</creatorcontrib><description>The author here proposes Julia Kristeva's notion of "productivity" as a way of conceiving of the relations between different theories of music. By such a notion, rather than confirming, disconfirming, or exemplifying a theory, a particular musical work (or works) may redistribute the theory. The redistribution, in fact, might not only modify the initial theory—something certainly not original to productivity—but may also bring it into articulation with fundamentally opposed models of musical function, without which, nevertheless, the original theory remains incomplete. An extended example is adduced from Schubert's Schubert's Impromptu in G-flat Major, D. 899, in connection with, first, Schenker's Free Composition (Der freie Satz), and second, Schoenberg's Theory of Harmony (Harmonielehre); Schenker's inconsistent practice with respect to first-order neighbours, along with certain issues in the Impromptu, become the occasion for examining a case of productivity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0710-0353</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2291-2436</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.7202/1014455ar</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ottawa: Canadian University Music Society / Société de musique des universités canadiennes</publisher><ispartof>Canadian university music review, 2000, Vol.20 (2), p.16-30</ispartof><rights>All Rights Reserved © Canadian University Music Society / Société de musique des universités canadiennes, 2000</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.erudit.org/en/journals/cumr/2000-cumr0469/1014455ar.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gerudit$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1014455ar$$EHTML$$P50$$Gerudit$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,4010,27850,27904,27905,27906,79318,79325</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Krims, Adam</creatorcontrib><title>Music Theory as Productivity</title><title>Canadian university music review</title><description>The author here proposes Julia Kristeva's notion of "productivity" as a way of conceiving of the relations between different theories of music. By such a notion, rather than confirming, disconfirming, or exemplifying a theory, a particular musical work (or works) may redistribute the theory. The redistribution, in fact, might not only modify the initial theory—something certainly not original to productivity—but may also bring it into articulation with fundamentally opposed models of musical function, without which, nevertheless, the original theory remains incomplete. An extended example is adduced from Schubert's Schubert's Impromptu in G-flat Major, D. 899, in connection with, first, Schenker's Free Composition (Der freie Satz), and second, Schoenberg's Theory of Harmony (Harmonielehre); Schenker's inconsistent practice with respect to first-order neighbours, along with certain issues in the Impromptu, become the occasion for examining a case of productivity.</description><issn>0710-0353</issn><issn>2291-2436</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNpNz0tLxDAUBeAgCtbRhXvBgisX1XvzaJqlDL5gRBfjOqRJih3Ujjet0H9vpSquzubjHA5jxwgXmgO_REAplXK0wzLODRZcinKXZaARChBK7LODlDYAkzMiYycPQ2p9vn6JHY25S_kTdWHwffvZ9uMh22vca4pHP7lgzzfX6-VdsXq8vV9erQqPHKnw0DSxBq5hWg4CtFfCCadLGWttACqujShjdDWYGCpV1t7JRgZUWAbunViws7l3S93HEFNvN91A79OkxUoCKNBaT-p8Vp66lCg2dkvtm6PRItjv8_bv_GRPZxtpCG3_T_6KL1WpVFo</recordid><startdate>2000</startdate><enddate>2000</enddate><creator>Krims, Adam</creator><general>Canadian University Music Society / Société de musique des universités canadiennes</general><general>Ottawa, Ont. :Canadian University Music Society = Société de musique des universités canadiennes</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7WH</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2000</creationdate><title>Music Theory as Productivity</title><author>Krims, Adam</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c121r-c0ffeb0270455d307c53a3a764eb7900827936eeab09ed856bca4f4d1516d2ca3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Krims, Adam</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 50</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><jtitle>Canadian university music review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Krims, Adam</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Music Theory as Productivity</atitle><jtitle>Canadian university music review</jtitle><date>2000</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>16</spage><epage>30</epage><pages>16-30</pages><issn>0710-0353</issn><eissn>2291-2436</eissn><abstract>The author here proposes Julia Kristeva's notion of "productivity" as a way of conceiving of the relations between different theories of music. By such a notion, rather than confirming, disconfirming, or exemplifying a theory, a particular musical work (or works) may redistribute the theory. The redistribution, in fact, might not only modify the initial theory—something certainly not original to productivity—but may also bring it into articulation with fundamentally opposed models of musical function, without which, nevertheless, the original theory remains incomplete. An extended example is adduced from Schubert's Schubert's Impromptu in G-flat Major, D. 899, in connection with, first, Schenker's Free Composition (Der freie Satz), and second, Schoenberg's Theory of Harmony (Harmonielehre); Schenker's inconsistent practice with respect to first-order neighbours, along with certain issues in the Impromptu, become the occasion for examining a case of productivity.</abstract><cop>Ottawa</cop><pub>Canadian University Music Society / Société de musique des universités canadiennes</pub><doi>10.7202/1014455ar</doi><tpages>15</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0710-0353 |
ispartof | Canadian university music review, 2000, Vol.20 (2), p.16-30 |
issn | 0710-0353 2291-2436 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1840050777 |
source | Érudit (Freely Accessible); Periodicals Index Online |
title | Music Theory as Productivity |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T13%3A13%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-erudit_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Music%20Theory%20as%20Productivity&rft.jtitle=Canadian%20university%20music%20review&rft.au=Krims,%20Adam&rft.date=2000&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=16&rft.epage=30&rft.pages=16-30&rft.issn=0710-0353&rft.eissn=2291-2436&rft_id=info:doi/10.7202/1014455ar&rft_dat=%3Cerudit_proqu%3E1014455ar%3C/erudit_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1840050777&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_eruid=1014455ar&rfr_iscdi=true |