Outdoor Individual Portable Pens Compared with Conventional Housing for Raising Dairy Calves

Thirty-two new-born calves were divided equally and placed in individual outdoor portable pens or in a barn and exercise lot during a test covering 2 years. During the second year, half of the calves in each system of management were given inoculations with rumen fluid. The pen calves were placed on...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of dairy science 1954-05, Vol.37 (5), p.562-570
Hauptverfasser: Davis, L.R., Autrey, K.M., Herlich, H., Hawkins, G.E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 570
container_issue 5
container_start_page 562
container_title Journal of dairy science
container_volume 37
creator Davis, L.R.
Autrey, K.M.
Herlich, H.
Hawkins, G.E.
description Thirty-two new-born calves were divided equally and placed in individual outdoor portable pens or in a barn and exercise lot during a test covering 2 years. During the second year, half of the calves in each system of management were given inoculations with rumen fluid. The pen calves were placed on a site which was clean the first year and slightly contaminated by older animals the second year. Despite temperatures as low as 9° F., the calves in the portable pens made significantly greater weight gains both years and had fewer coccidia and worm parasites and less diarrhea than the barn calves. All calves in the barn had respiratory troubles, but only one calf in the pens had this trouble. One barn calf died from pneumonia following an attack by E. zurnii, a pathogenic coccidian. The growth response of calves that were fed rumen fluid did not differ significantly from that of uninoculated calves. When placed together on pasture at the age of 5 or 6 months, the portable pen calves showed no more susceptibility to coccidia and worm parasites than the calves from the barn and continued to maintain their superior weights.
doi_str_mv 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(54)91299-0
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1839948624</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0022030254912990</els_id><sourcerecordid>1839948624</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-bc2fcecd41359da438192915bd14a2662505e84a8ca6c0dbac6d596d323209423</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkFtLwzAYhoMoOKf_oSKCXnTmWJtLqYcJgw0Pd0JIk2zL6JqZtBv796areO1V8sLzJt_3AHCJ4IigLL9b6TB6hxDjFBKIbxi95QhznsIjMEAMs5Qgnh-DwR9yCs5CWMWIMGQD8DVtG-2cT15rbbdWt7JKZs43sqxMMjN1SAq33khvdLKzzTKmemvqxro6gmPXBlsvknnsv0l7uD9K6_dJIautCefgZC6rYC5-zyH4fH76KMbpZPryWjxMUkUJbNJS4bkySlNEGNeSkhxxzBErNaISZxlmkJmcylzJTEFdSpVpxjNNMMGQU0yG4Kp_d-Pdd2tCI1au9XHCIFBOOKd5hmmkeE8p70LwZi423q6l3wsERSdTRJniIFN0pgSj4iAzpiG47rtLu1jurDcirGVVbdoSdS1yL5hgWTdJ0XMmrru1xougrKmV0bGjGqGd_cdvP3-7i80</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1839948624</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Outdoor Individual Portable Pens Compared with Conventional Housing for Raising Dairy Calves</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>Davis, L.R. ; Autrey, K.M. ; Herlich, H. ; Hawkins, G.E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Davis, L.R. ; Autrey, K.M. ; Herlich, H. ; Hawkins, G.E.</creatorcontrib><description>Thirty-two new-born calves were divided equally and placed in individual outdoor portable pens or in a barn and exercise lot during a test covering 2 years. During the second year, half of the calves in each system of management were given inoculations with rumen fluid. The pen calves were placed on a site which was clean the first year and slightly contaminated by older animals the second year. Despite temperatures as low as 9° F., the calves in the portable pens made significantly greater weight gains both years and had fewer coccidia and worm parasites and less diarrhea than the barn calves. All calves in the barn had respiratory troubles, but only one calf in the pens had this trouble. One barn calf died from pneumonia following an attack by E. zurnii, a pathogenic coccidian. The growth response of calves that were fed rumen fluid did not differ significantly from that of uninoculated calves. When placed together on pasture at the age of 5 or 6 months, the portable pen calves showed no more susceptibility to coccidia and worm parasites than the calves from the barn and continued to maintain their superior weights.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-0302</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3198</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(54)91299-0</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Champaign: Elsevier Inc</publisher><ispartof>Journal of dairy science, 1954-05, Vol.37 (5), p.562-570</ispartof><rights>1954 American Dairy Science Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-bc2fcecd41359da438192915bd14a2662505e84a8ca6c0dbac6d596d323209423</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022030254912990$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27846,27901,27902,65534</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Davis, L.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Autrey, K.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herlich, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hawkins, G.E.</creatorcontrib><title>Outdoor Individual Portable Pens Compared with Conventional Housing for Raising Dairy Calves</title><title>Journal of dairy science</title><description>Thirty-two new-born calves were divided equally and placed in individual outdoor portable pens or in a barn and exercise lot during a test covering 2 years. During the second year, half of the calves in each system of management were given inoculations with rumen fluid. The pen calves were placed on a site which was clean the first year and slightly contaminated by older animals the second year. Despite temperatures as low as 9° F., the calves in the portable pens made significantly greater weight gains both years and had fewer coccidia and worm parasites and less diarrhea than the barn calves. All calves in the barn had respiratory troubles, but only one calf in the pens had this trouble. One barn calf died from pneumonia following an attack by E. zurnii, a pathogenic coccidian. The growth response of calves that were fed rumen fluid did not differ significantly from that of uninoculated calves. When placed together on pasture at the age of 5 or 6 months, the portable pen calves showed no more susceptibility to coccidia and worm parasites than the calves from the barn and continued to maintain their superior weights.</description><issn>0022-0302</issn><issn>1525-3198</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1954</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkFtLwzAYhoMoOKf_oSKCXnTmWJtLqYcJgw0Pd0JIk2zL6JqZtBv796areO1V8sLzJt_3AHCJ4IigLL9b6TB6hxDjFBKIbxi95QhznsIjMEAMs5Qgnh-DwR9yCs5CWMWIMGQD8DVtG-2cT15rbbdWt7JKZs43sqxMMjN1SAq33khvdLKzzTKmemvqxro6gmPXBlsvknnsv0l7uD9K6_dJIautCefgZC6rYC5-zyH4fH76KMbpZPryWjxMUkUJbNJS4bkySlNEGNeSkhxxzBErNaISZxlmkJmcylzJTEFdSpVpxjNNMMGQU0yG4Kp_d-Pdd2tCI1au9XHCIFBOOKd5hmmkeE8p70LwZi423q6l3wsERSdTRJniIFN0pgSj4iAzpiG47rtLu1jurDcirGVVbdoSdS1yL5hgWTdJ0XMmrru1xougrKmV0bGjGqGd_cdvP3-7i80</recordid><startdate>19540501</startdate><enddate>19540501</enddate><creator>Davis, L.R.</creator><creator>Autrey, K.M.</creator><creator>Herlich, H.</creator><creator>Hawkins, G.E.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Am Dairy Sci Assoc</general><general>American Dairy Science Association</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7WH</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19540501</creationdate><title>Outdoor Individual Portable Pens Compared with Conventional Housing for Raising Dairy Calves</title><author>Davis, L.R. ; Autrey, K.M. ; Herlich, H. ; Hawkins, G.E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-bc2fcecd41359da438192915bd14a2662505e84a8ca6c0dbac6d596d323209423</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1954</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Davis, L.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Autrey, K.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herlich, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hawkins, G.E.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 50</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><jtitle>Journal of dairy science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Davis, L.R.</au><au>Autrey, K.M.</au><au>Herlich, H.</au><au>Hawkins, G.E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Outdoor Individual Portable Pens Compared with Conventional Housing for Raising Dairy Calves</atitle><jtitle>Journal of dairy science</jtitle><date>1954-05-01</date><risdate>1954</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>562</spage><epage>570</epage><pages>562-570</pages><issn>0022-0302</issn><eissn>1525-3198</eissn><abstract>Thirty-two new-born calves were divided equally and placed in individual outdoor portable pens or in a barn and exercise lot during a test covering 2 years. During the second year, half of the calves in each system of management were given inoculations with rumen fluid. The pen calves were placed on a site which was clean the first year and slightly contaminated by older animals the second year. Despite temperatures as low as 9° F., the calves in the portable pens made significantly greater weight gains both years and had fewer coccidia and worm parasites and less diarrhea than the barn calves. All calves in the barn had respiratory troubles, but only one calf in the pens had this trouble. One barn calf died from pneumonia following an attack by E. zurnii, a pathogenic coccidian. The growth response of calves that were fed rumen fluid did not differ significantly from that of uninoculated calves. When placed together on pasture at the age of 5 or 6 months, the portable pen calves showed no more susceptibility to coccidia and worm parasites than the calves from the barn and continued to maintain their superior weights.</abstract><cop>Champaign</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(54)91299-0</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-0302
ispartof Journal of dairy science, 1954-05, Vol.37 (5), p.562-570
issn 0022-0302
1525-3198
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1839948624
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Periodicals Index Online
title Outdoor Individual Portable Pens Compared with Conventional Housing for Raising Dairy Calves
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-15T23%3A20%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Outdoor%20Individual%20Portable%20Pens%20Compared%20with%20Conventional%20Housing%20for%20Raising%20Dairy%20Calves&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20dairy%20science&rft.au=Davis,%20L.R.&rft.date=1954-05-01&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=562&rft.epage=570&rft.pages=562-570&rft.issn=0022-0302&rft.eissn=1525-3198&rft_id=info:doi/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(54)91299-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1839948624%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1839948624&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0022030254912990&rfr_iscdi=true