Spacing judgments as an index of study-phase retrieval
Investigated the hypothesis that the ability of Ss to judge the distance between 2 presentations of a word in a list reflects study-phase retrieval of the trace of the 1st presentation of the word by its 2nd presentation. 2 experiments were conducted using a total of 153 Ss recruited through a unive...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of Experimental Psychology : Human Learning and Memory 1975-01, Vol.1 (1), p.31-40 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 40 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 31 |
| container_title | Journal of Experimental Psychology : Human Learning and Memory |
| container_volume | 1 |
| creator | Hintzman, Douglas L Summers, Jeffrey J Block, Richard A |
| description | Investigated the hypothesis that the ability of Ss to judge the distance between 2 presentations of a word in a list reflects study-phase retrieval of the trace of the 1st presentation of the word by its 2nd presentation. 2 experiments were conducted using a total of 153 Ss recruited through a university newspaper. Exp I supported the hypothesis by demonstrating that the accuracy of spacing judgments for associatively related pairs of words, like that for repeated words, was high compared to that for unrelated words. Exp II used spacing judgments to measure retrieval upon repetition of a homograph. In 3 conditions, context words accompanying a homograph on its 2 presentations were either the same, biased the same meaning, or biased different meanings. In all 3 conditions, later spacing judgments were more accurate than in an unrelated-word control. Accuracy did not depend on whether the 2 context words biased the same meaning or different meanings of the homograph. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1037/0278-7393.1.1.31 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1839872750</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>614280009</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a323t-bfe57ee2b65298c6d97fbcd90209b80d175e3ef659ebd69d1b5d201728a4c9143</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1LxDAQhoMouK7ePRY9d51JmqQ5yuIXLHhQzyFtpmuXbluTVtx_b5dVPMk7MJeHeZmHsUuEBYLQN8B1nmphxAKnCDxiMy64To3O5DGbARiVokR5ys5i3ACAyiTOmHrpXVm362Qz-vWW2iEmbpo2qVtPX0lXJXEY_S7t312kJNAQavp0zTk7qVwT6eJnz9nb_d3r8jFdPT88LW9XqRNcDGlRkdREvFCSm7xU3uiqKL0BDqbIwaOWJKhS0lDhlfFYSM8BNc9dVhrMxJxdHe72ofsYKQ52042hnSqtwozn0x9mgq7_gzAXJtdcS5goOFBl6GIMVNk-1FsXdhbB7hXavUK7V2hxisC_dtc728dd6cJQlw1F-9Vsf6FvtfJuFQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>614280009</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Spacing judgments as an index of study-phase retrieval</title><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>Hintzman, Douglas L ; Summers, Jeffrey J ; Block, Richard A</creator><creatorcontrib>Hintzman, Douglas L ; Summers, Jeffrey J ; Block, Richard A</creatorcontrib><description>Investigated the hypothesis that the ability of Ss to judge the distance between 2 presentations of a word in a list reflects study-phase retrieval of the trace of the 1st presentation of the word by its 2nd presentation. 2 experiments were conducted using a total of 153 Ss recruited through a university newspaper. Exp I supported the hypothesis by demonstrating that the accuracy of spacing judgments for associatively related pairs of words, like that for repeated words, was high compared to that for unrelated words. Exp II used spacing judgments to measure retrieval upon repetition of a homograph. In 3 conditions, context words accompanying a homograph on its 2 presentations were either the same, biased the same meaning, or biased different meanings. In all 3 conditions, later spacing judgments were more accurate than in an unrelated-word control. Accuracy did not depend on whether the 2 context words biased the same meaning or different meanings of the homograph.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0096-1515</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0278-7393</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2327-9745</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1285</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.1.1.31</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Human ; Memory ; Memory Trace ; Word Associations ; Word Meaning</subject><ispartof>Journal of Experimental Psychology : Human Learning and Memory, 1975-01, Vol.1 (1), p.31-40</ispartof><rights>1975 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>1975, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a323t-bfe57ee2b65298c6d97fbcd90209b80d175e3ef659ebd69d1b5d201728a4c9143</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27846,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hintzman, Douglas L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Summers, Jeffrey J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Block, Richard A</creatorcontrib><title>Spacing judgments as an index of study-phase retrieval</title><title>Journal of Experimental Psychology : Human Learning and Memory</title><description>Investigated the hypothesis that the ability of Ss to judge the distance between 2 presentations of a word in a list reflects study-phase retrieval of the trace of the 1st presentation of the word by its 2nd presentation. 2 experiments were conducted using a total of 153 Ss recruited through a university newspaper. Exp I supported the hypothesis by demonstrating that the accuracy of spacing judgments for associatively related pairs of words, like that for repeated words, was high compared to that for unrelated words. Exp II used spacing judgments to measure retrieval upon repetition of a homograph. In 3 conditions, context words accompanying a homograph on its 2 presentations were either the same, biased the same meaning, or biased different meanings. In all 3 conditions, later spacing judgments were more accurate than in an unrelated-word control. Accuracy did not depend on whether the 2 context words biased the same meaning or different meanings of the homograph.</description><subject>Human</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Memory Trace</subject><subject>Word Associations</subject><subject>Word Meaning</subject><issn>0096-1515</issn><issn>0278-7393</issn><issn>2327-9745</issn><issn>1939-1285</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1975</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1LxDAQhoMouK7ePRY9d51JmqQ5yuIXLHhQzyFtpmuXbluTVtx_b5dVPMk7MJeHeZmHsUuEBYLQN8B1nmphxAKnCDxiMy64To3O5DGbARiVokR5ys5i3ACAyiTOmHrpXVm362Qz-vWW2iEmbpo2qVtPX0lXJXEY_S7t312kJNAQavp0zTk7qVwT6eJnz9nb_d3r8jFdPT88LW9XqRNcDGlRkdREvFCSm7xU3uiqKL0BDqbIwaOWJKhS0lDhlfFYSM8BNc9dVhrMxJxdHe72ofsYKQ52042hnSqtwozn0x9mgq7_gzAXJtdcS5goOFBl6GIMVNk-1FsXdhbB7hXavUK7V2hxisC_dtc728dd6cJQlw1F-9Vsf6FvtfJuFQ</recordid><startdate>197501</startdate><enddate>197501</enddate><creator>Hintzman, Douglas L</creator><creator>Summers, Jeffrey J</creator><creator>Block, Richard A</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7WH</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>197501</creationdate><title>Spacing judgments as an index of study-phase retrieval</title><author>Hintzman, Douglas L ; Summers, Jeffrey J ; Block, Richard A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a323t-bfe57ee2b65298c6d97fbcd90209b80d175e3ef659ebd69d1b5d201728a4c9143</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1975</creationdate><topic>Human</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Memory Trace</topic><topic>Word Associations</topic><topic>Word Meaning</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hintzman, Douglas L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Summers, Jeffrey J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Block, Richard A</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 50</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><jtitle>Journal of Experimental Psychology : Human Learning and Memory</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hintzman, Douglas L</au><au>Summers, Jeffrey J</au><au>Block, Richard A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Spacing judgments as an index of study-phase retrieval</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Experimental Psychology : Human Learning and Memory</jtitle><date>1975-01</date><risdate>1975</risdate><volume>1</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>31</spage><epage>40</epage><pages>31-40</pages><issn>0096-1515</issn><issn>0278-7393</issn><eissn>2327-9745</eissn><eissn>1939-1285</eissn><abstract>Investigated the hypothesis that the ability of Ss to judge the distance between 2 presentations of a word in a list reflects study-phase retrieval of the trace of the 1st presentation of the word by its 2nd presentation. 2 experiments were conducted using a total of 153 Ss recruited through a university newspaper. Exp I supported the hypothesis by demonstrating that the accuracy of spacing judgments for associatively related pairs of words, like that for repeated words, was high compared to that for unrelated words. Exp II used spacing judgments to measure retrieval upon repetition of a homograph. In 3 conditions, context words accompanying a homograph on its 2 presentations were either the same, biased the same meaning, or biased different meanings. In all 3 conditions, later spacing judgments were more accurate than in an unrelated-word control. Accuracy did not depend on whether the 2 context words biased the same meaning or different meanings of the homograph.</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><doi>10.1037/0278-7393.1.1.31</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0096-1515 |
| ispartof | Journal of Experimental Psychology : Human Learning and Memory, 1975-01, Vol.1 (1), p.31-40 |
| issn | 0096-1515 0278-7393 2327-9745 1939-1285 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1839872750 |
| source | EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES; Periodicals Index Online |
| subjects | Human Memory Memory Trace Word Associations Word Meaning |
| title | Spacing judgments as an index of study-phase retrieval |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T16%3A18%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Spacing%20judgments%20as%20an%20index%20of%20study-phase%20retrieval&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Experimental%20Psychology%20:%20Human%20Learning%20and%20Memory&rft.au=Hintzman,%20Douglas%20L&rft.date=1975-01&rft.volume=1&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=31&rft.epage=40&rft.pages=31-40&rft.issn=0096-1515&rft.eissn=2327-9745&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/0278-7393.1.1.31&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E614280009%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=614280009&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |