Relationships Among Whole-and Part-Lactation Gross Feed Efficiency, Feed Consumption, and Milk Yield
Milk production, feed consumption, and feed efficiency data were collected on 425 first lactation cows by 31 sires to determine if a part-lactation measure of feed efficiency would effectively predict total lactation efficiency. The data were summarized by ten 30 day periods (1 to 30, 31 to 60…, 271...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of dairy science 1972-08, Vol.55 (8), p.1113-1122 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1122 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 1113 |
container_title | Journal of dairy science |
container_volume | 55 |
creator | Hooven, N.W. Miller, R.H. Smith, J.W. |
description | Milk production, feed consumption, and feed efficiency data were collected on 425 first lactation cows by 31 sires to determine if a part-lactation measure of feed efficiency would effectively predict total lactation efficiency. The data were summarized by ten 30 day periods (1 to 30, 31 to 60…, 271 to 300), and a 300-day lactation total basis. Three periods (two, five, and seven) were examined to estimate heritabilities and genetic correlations. Phenotypic correlations among measures of feed efficiency in adjacent periods ranged from .82 to .88. Correlations between the 10 part-lactation measures and total ranged from .64 to .87 with the highest occurring in Periods 4 and 5. The highest phenotypic correlation between part-lactation efficiency and total fat-corrected milk yield occurred during Period 5 (.72). Correlations between feed consumed in each of the 10 periods and total fat-corrected milk and total efficiency ranged from .10 to .69 and −.29 to .32. The highest genetic correlation of the three part-lactation efficiency measures with total occurred during the fifth period (1.00). The genetic correlation between fifth period efficiency and total fat-corrected milk yield was higher (.91) than the other two part-lactation measures but similar to that for total (.93). Heritabilities of the three part-lactation measures of feed efficiency were .44, .44, and .34 as compared to .56 for total lactation efficiency. Selection for efficiency during Period 5 would be 89% as effective as direct selection for total efficiency. Selection for yield during Period 5 would improve efficiency in the same period more rapidly than direct selection |
doi_str_mv | 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(72)85633-9 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1839852416</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0022030272856339</els_id><sourcerecordid>1839852416</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3449-b87c7cc675797d2f8f5502fa473e9d1cee10168880be38743db42f4ce1ee76fa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkF1L5DAUhoMoOOr-h4ogClbz0TTppQzjB4zs4q6IVyGTnDgZO21NOrv47zeditdehROe9xzeB6Fjgi8ZKeXVysbL3xhTmmOG6Zmg55KXjOXVDpoQTnnOSCV30eQL2UcHMa7SSCjmE2Qfoda9b5u49F3Mrtdt85o9L9sact3Y7JcOfT7Xpt8y2W1oY8xuAGw2c84bD435uBg_pmnHZt0N3EU2ZB98_Za9eKjtEdpzuo7w4_M9RE83sz_Tu3z-8_Z-ej3PDSuKKl9IYYQxpeCiEpY66TjH1OlCMKgsMQAEp85S4gUwKQpmFwV1hQECIEqn2SE6Gfd2oX3fQOzVqt2EJp1URLJKclqQMlHVSJmhTQCnuuDXOnwogtUgVSWpaitVDcaUoGorVVUpezpml_51-c8HUHGt67rbLMiQ4lxJRQhhCZyOIKS-fz0EFbe2wKaQ6ZVt_TfO_Qfe1o4u</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1839852416</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Relationships Among Whole-and Part-Lactation Gross Feed Efficiency, Feed Consumption, and Milk Yield</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>Hooven, N.W. ; Miller, R.H. ; Smith, J.W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hooven, N.W. ; Miller, R.H. ; Smith, J.W.</creatorcontrib><description>Milk production, feed consumption, and feed efficiency data were collected on 425 first lactation cows by 31 sires to determine if a part-lactation measure of feed efficiency would effectively predict total lactation efficiency. The data were summarized by ten 30 day periods (1 to 30, 31 to 60…, 271 to 300), and a 300-day lactation total basis. Three periods (two, five, and seven) were examined to estimate heritabilities and genetic correlations. Phenotypic correlations among measures of feed efficiency in adjacent periods ranged from .82 to .88. Correlations between the 10 part-lactation measures and total ranged from .64 to .87 with the highest occurring in Periods 4 and 5. The highest phenotypic correlation between part-lactation efficiency and total fat-corrected milk yield occurred during Period 5 (.72). Correlations between feed consumed in each of the 10 periods and total fat-corrected milk and total efficiency ranged from .10 to .69 and −.29 to .32. The highest genetic correlation of the three part-lactation efficiency measures with total occurred during the fifth period (1.00). The genetic correlation between fifth period efficiency and total fat-corrected milk yield was higher (.91) than the other two part-lactation measures but similar to that for total (.93). Heritabilities of the three part-lactation measures of feed efficiency were .44, .44, and .34 as compared to .56 for total lactation efficiency. Selection for efficiency during Period 5 would be 89% as effective as direct selection for total efficiency. Selection for yield during Period 5 would improve efficiency in the same period more rapidly than direct selection</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-0302</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3198</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(72)85633-9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Champaign: Elsevier Inc</publisher><ispartof>Journal of dairy science, 1972-08, Vol.55 (8), p.1113-1122</ispartof><rights>1972 American Dairy Science Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3449-b87c7cc675797d2f8f5502fa473e9d1cee10168880be38743db42f4ce1ee76fa3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3449-b87c7cc675797d2f8f5502fa473e9d1cee10168880be38743db42f4ce1ee76fa3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(72)85633-9$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27869,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hooven, N.W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, R.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, J.W.</creatorcontrib><title>Relationships Among Whole-and Part-Lactation Gross Feed Efficiency, Feed Consumption, and Milk Yield</title><title>Journal of dairy science</title><description>Milk production, feed consumption, and feed efficiency data were collected on 425 first lactation cows by 31 sires to determine if a part-lactation measure of feed efficiency would effectively predict total lactation efficiency. The data were summarized by ten 30 day periods (1 to 30, 31 to 60…, 271 to 300), and a 300-day lactation total basis. Three periods (two, five, and seven) were examined to estimate heritabilities and genetic correlations. Phenotypic correlations among measures of feed efficiency in adjacent periods ranged from .82 to .88. Correlations between the 10 part-lactation measures and total ranged from .64 to .87 with the highest occurring in Periods 4 and 5. The highest phenotypic correlation between part-lactation efficiency and total fat-corrected milk yield occurred during Period 5 (.72). Correlations between feed consumed in each of the 10 periods and total fat-corrected milk and total efficiency ranged from .10 to .69 and −.29 to .32. The highest genetic correlation of the three part-lactation efficiency measures with total occurred during the fifth period (1.00). The genetic correlation between fifth period efficiency and total fat-corrected milk yield was higher (.91) than the other two part-lactation measures but similar to that for total (.93). Heritabilities of the three part-lactation measures of feed efficiency were .44, .44, and .34 as compared to .56 for total lactation efficiency. Selection for efficiency during Period 5 would be 89% as effective as direct selection for total efficiency. Selection for yield during Period 5 would improve efficiency in the same period more rapidly than direct selection</description><issn>0022-0302</issn><issn>1525-3198</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1972</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkF1L5DAUhoMoOOr-h4ogClbz0TTppQzjB4zs4q6IVyGTnDgZO21NOrv47zeditdehROe9xzeB6Fjgi8ZKeXVysbL3xhTmmOG6Zmg55KXjOXVDpoQTnnOSCV30eQL2UcHMa7SSCjmE2Qfoda9b5u49F3Mrtdt85o9L9sact3Y7JcOfT7Xpt8y2W1oY8xuAGw2c84bD435uBg_pmnHZt0N3EU2ZB98_Za9eKjtEdpzuo7w4_M9RE83sz_Tu3z-8_Z-ej3PDSuKKl9IYYQxpeCiEpY66TjH1OlCMKgsMQAEp85S4gUwKQpmFwV1hQECIEqn2SE6Gfd2oX3fQOzVqt2EJp1URLJKclqQMlHVSJmhTQCnuuDXOnwogtUgVSWpaitVDcaUoGorVVUpezpml_51-c8HUHGt67rbLMiQ4lxJRQhhCZyOIKS-fz0EFbe2wKaQ6ZVt_TfO_Qfe1o4u</recordid><startdate>19720801</startdate><enddate>19720801</enddate><creator>Hooven, N.W.</creator><creator>Miller, R.H.</creator><creator>Smith, J.W.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Am Dairy Sci Assoc</general><general>American Dairy Science Association</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7WH</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19720801</creationdate><title>Relationships Among Whole-and Part-Lactation Gross Feed Efficiency, Feed Consumption, and Milk Yield</title><author>Hooven, N.W. ; Miller, R.H. ; Smith, J.W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3449-b87c7cc675797d2f8f5502fa473e9d1cee10168880be38743db42f4ce1ee76fa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1972</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hooven, N.W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, R.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, J.W.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 50</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><jtitle>Journal of dairy science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hooven, N.W.</au><au>Miller, R.H.</au><au>Smith, J.W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Relationships Among Whole-and Part-Lactation Gross Feed Efficiency, Feed Consumption, and Milk Yield</atitle><jtitle>Journal of dairy science</jtitle><date>1972-08-01</date><risdate>1972</risdate><volume>55</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1113</spage><epage>1122</epage><pages>1113-1122</pages><issn>0022-0302</issn><eissn>1525-3198</eissn><abstract>Milk production, feed consumption, and feed efficiency data were collected on 425 first lactation cows by 31 sires to determine if a part-lactation measure of feed efficiency would effectively predict total lactation efficiency. The data were summarized by ten 30 day periods (1 to 30, 31 to 60…, 271 to 300), and a 300-day lactation total basis. Three periods (two, five, and seven) were examined to estimate heritabilities and genetic correlations. Phenotypic correlations among measures of feed efficiency in adjacent periods ranged from .82 to .88. Correlations between the 10 part-lactation measures and total ranged from .64 to .87 with the highest occurring in Periods 4 and 5. The highest phenotypic correlation between part-lactation efficiency and total fat-corrected milk yield occurred during Period 5 (.72). Correlations between feed consumed in each of the 10 periods and total fat-corrected milk and total efficiency ranged from .10 to .69 and −.29 to .32. The highest genetic correlation of the three part-lactation efficiency measures with total occurred during the fifth period (1.00). The genetic correlation between fifth period efficiency and total fat-corrected milk yield was higher (.91) than the other two part-lactation measures but similar to that for total (.93). Heritabilities of the three part-lactation measures of feed efficiency were .44, .44, and .34 as compared to .56 for total lactation efficiency. Selection for efficiency during Period 5 would be 89% as effective as direct selection for total efficiency. Selection for yield during Period 5 would improve efficiency in the same period more rapidly than direct selection</abstract><cop>Champaign</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(72)85633-9</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-0302 |
ispartof | Journal of dairy science, 1972-08, Vol.55 (8), p.1113-1122 |
issn | 0022-0302 1525-3198 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1839852416 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Periodicals Index Online |
title | Relationships Among Whole-and Part-Lactation Gross Feed Efficiency, Feed Consumption, and Milk Yield |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T07%3A21%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Relationships%20Among%20Whole-and%20Part-Lactation%20Gross%20Feed%20Efficiency,%20Feed%20Consumption,%20and%20Milk%20Yield&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20dairy%20science&rft.au=Hooven,%20N.W.&rft.date=1972-08-01&rft.volume=55&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1113&rft.epage=1122&rft.pages=1113-1122&rft.issn=0022-0302&rft.eissn=1525-3198&rft_id=info:doi/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(72)85633-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1839852416%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1839852416&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0022030272856339&rfr_iscdi=true |