Full Lactation Response on Restricted vs. ad Libitum Roughage Diets with Liberal Concentrate Feeding

Full Lactation Response on Restricted vs. ad Libitum Roughage Diets with Liberal Concentrate Feeding

The effect of replacing one-half of the expected roughage consumption with equivalent TDN from concentrates was determined in full lactations with 20 pairs of high producing cows. Control cows (Group I) were fed alfalfa hay and corn silage ad libitum plus concentrates at an average ratio to FCM of 1...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of dairy science 1967-07, Vol.50 (7), p.1147-1152
Hauptverfasser: Swanson, E.W., Hinton, S.A., Miles, J.T.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1152
container_issue 7
container_start_page 1147
container_title Journal of dairy science
container_volume 50
creator Swanson, E.W.
Hinton, S.A.
Miles, J.T.
description The effect of replacing one-half of the expected roughage consumption with equivalent TDN from concentrates was determined in full lactations with 20 pairs of high producing cows. Control cows (Group I) were fed alfalfa hay and corn silage ad libitum plus concentrates at an average ratio to FCM of 1:2.4. Paired cows restricted on roughage (Group II) were allowed roughage at the rate of 3.0kg hay and 7.5kg silage per 500kg body weight plus 3.8kg concentrates, in addition to the concentrate allowance for FCM at 1:2.4. In 294-day lactations Group I averaged 6,349kg FCM and Group II, 6,137kg, a nonsignificant difference (P>.10). Fat tests averaged 4.01 (I) and 3.89% (II), with the difference between groups from the 12th to the 22nd wk statistically significant (P
doi_str_mv 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(67)87581-7
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1839844727</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0022030267875817</els_id><sourcerecordid>1839844727</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-cea9efd93055491579e91da927b17436d0a1cb9e50ca98256ffc5d2862a00b4f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkF1LwzAUhoMoOD_-Q0QQvehM0qZpLmU6FQaCH9chTU63jK6dSbrhv7e14rVXSTjPm3POg9AFJdOU5sXt2obpGyGMJSQl7DoXN4XgBU3EAZpQzniSUlkcoskfcoxOQlj3T8oInyA77-oaL7SJOrq2wa8Qtm0TAI_36J2JYPEuTLG2eOFKF7sNfm275UovAd87iAHvXVwNNfC6xrO2MdBEryPgOYB1zfIMHVW6DnD-e56ij_nD--wpWbw8Ps_uFonJmIyJAS2hsjIlnGeSciFBUqslEyUVWZpboqkpJXBitCwYz6vKcMuKnGlCyqxKT9Hl-O_Wt59dP71at51v-paKFqksskww0VNypIxvQ_BQqa13G-2_FCVqkKp6qepHqhqMqVyoH6lqyF6N2ZVbrvbOgwobXdfbrqRDihMlFKXZAM5GEPp9dw68CsZBb8b2IROVbd0_2n0DmSKOww</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1839844727</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Full Lactation Response on Restricted vs. ad Libitum Roughage Diets with Liberal Concentrate Feeding</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>Swanson, E.W. ; Hinton, S.A. ; Miles, J.T.</creator><creatorcontrib>Swanson, E.W. ; Hinton, S.A. ; Miles, J.T.</creatorcontrib><description>The effect of replacing one-half of the expected roughage consumption with equivalent TDN from concentrates was determined in full lactations with 20 pairs of high producing cows. Control cows (Group I) were fed alfalfa hay and corn silage ad libitum plus concentrates at an average ratio to FCM of 1:2.4. Paired cows restricted on roughage (Group II) were allowed roughage at the rate of 3.0kg hay and 7.5kg silage per 500kg body weight plus 3.8kg concentrates, in addition to the concentrate allowance for FCM at 1:2.4. In 294-day lactations Group I averaged 6,349kg FCM and Group II, 6,137kg, a nonsignificant difference (P&gt;.10). Fat tests averaged 4.01 (I) and 3.89% (II), with the difference between groups from the 12th to the 22nd wk statistically significant (P&lt;.01). Differences in body weight gain, total dry matter consumption, estimated TDN consumption, solids-not-fat tests, and milk fat yield were not significant. The average TDN/FCM ratio was significantly (P&lt;.05) higher for Group II, 0.33, than for Group I, 0.31. Indications were that the Group II diet, which averaged 67.6% concentrate, was used less efficiently than the Group I diet, which averaged 51.1% concentrate. Restricting roughage and substituting concentrate for roughage TDN for cows fed concentrates liberally gave no benefits and resulted in lower milk fat tests and efficiency.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-0302</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3198</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(67)87581-7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Champaign: Elsevier Inc</publisher><ispartof>Journal of dairy science, 1967-07, Vol.50 (7), p.1147-1152</ispartof><rights>1967 American Dairy Science Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-cea9efd93055491579e91da927b17436d0a1cb9e50ca98256ffc5d2862a00b4f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-cea9efd93055491579e91da927b17436d0a1cb9e50ca98256ffc5d2862a00b4f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022030267875817$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27846,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Swanson, E.W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hinton, S.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miles, J.T.</creatorcontrib><title>Full Lactation Response on Restricted vs. ad Libitum Roughage Diets with Liberal Concentrate Feeding</title><title>Journal of dairy science</title><description>The effect of replacing one-half of the expected roughage consumption with equivalent TDN from concentrates was determined in full lactations with 20 pairs of high producing cows. Control cows (Group I) were fed alfalfa hay and corn silage ad libitum plus concentrates at an average ratio to FCM of 1:2.4. Paired cows restricted on roughage (Group II) were allowed roughage at the rate of 3.0kg hay and 7.5kg silage per 500kg body weight plus 3.8kg concentrates, in addition to the concentrate allowance for FCM at 1:2.4. In 294-day lactations Group I averaged 6,349kg FCM and Group II, 6,137kg, a nonsignificant difference (P&gt;.10). Fat tests averaged 4.01 (I) and 3.89% (II), with the difference between groups from the 12th to the 22nd wk statistically significant (P&lt;.01). Differences in body weight gain, total dry matter consumption, estimated TDN consumption, solids-not-fat tests, and milk fat yield were not significant. The average TDN/FCM ratio was significantly (P&lt;.05) higher for Group II, 0.33, than for Group I, 0.31. Indications were that the Group II diet, which averaged 67.6% concentrate, was used less efficiently than the Group I diet, which averaged 51.1% concentrate. Restricting roughage and substituting concentrate for roughage TDN for cows fed concentrates liberally gave no benefits and resulted in lower milk fat tests and efficiency.</description><issn>0022-0302</issn><issn>1525-3198</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1967</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkF1LwzAUhoMoOD_-Q0QQvehM0qZpLmU6FQaCH9chTU63jK6dSbrhv7e14rVXSTjPm3POg9AFJdOU5sXt2obpGyGMJSQl7DoXN4XgBU3EAZpQzniSUlkcoskfcoxOQlj3T8oInyA77-oaL7SJOrq2wa8Qtm0TAI_36J2JYPEuTLG2eOFKF7sNfm275UovAd87iAHvXVwNNfC6xrO2MdBEryPgOYB1zfIMHVW6DnD-e56ij_nD--wpWbw8Ps_uFonJmIyJAS2hsjIlnGeSciFBUqslEyUVWZpboqkpJXBitCwYz6vKcMuKnGlCyqxKT9Hl-O_Wt59dP71at51v-paKFqksskww0VNypIxvQ_BQqa13G-2_FCVqkKp6qepHqhqMqVyoH6lqyF6N2ZVbrvbOgwobXdfbrqRDihMlFKXZAM5GEPp9dw68CsZBb8b2IROVbd0_2n0DmSKOww</recordid><startdate>19670701</startdate><enddate>19670701</enddate><creator>Swanson, E.W.</creator><creator>Hinton, S.A.</creator><creator>Miles, J.T.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Am Dairy Sci Assoc</general><general>American Dairy Science Association</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7WH</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19670701</creationdate><title>Full Lactation Response on Restricted vs. ad Libitum Roughage Diets with Liberal Concentrate Feeding</title><author>Swanson, E.W. ; Hinton, S.A. ; Miles, J.T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-cea9efd93055491579e91da927b17436d0a1cb9e50ca98256ffc5d2862a00b4f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1967</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Swanson, E.W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hinton, S.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miles, J.T.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 50</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><jtitle>Journal of dairy science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Swanson, E.W.</au><au>Hinton, S.A.</au><au>Miles, J.T.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Full Lactation Response on Restricted vs. ad Libitum Roughage Diets with Liberal Concentrate Feeding</atitle><jtitle>Journal of dairy science</jtitle><date>1967-07-01</date><risdate>1967</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1147</spage><epage>1152</epage><pages>1147-1152</pages><issn>0022-0302</issn><eissn>1525-3198</eissn><abstract>The effect of replacing one-half of the expected roughage consumption with equivalent TDN from concentrates was determined in full lactations with 20 pairs of high producing cows. Control cows (Group I) were fed alfalfa hay and corn silage ad libitum plus concentrates at an average ratio to FCM of 1:2.4. Paired cows restricted on roughage (Group II) were allowed roughage at the rate of 3.0kg hay and 7.5kg silage per 500kg body weight plus 3.8kg concentrates, in addition to the concentrate allowance for FCM at 1:2.4. In 294-day lactations Group I averaged 6,349kg FCM and Group II, 6,137kg, a nonsignificant difference (P&gt;.10). Fat tests averaged 4.01 (I) and 3.89% (II), with the difference between groups from the 12th to the 22nd wk statistically significant (P&lt;.01). Differences in body weight gain, total dry matter consumption, estimated TDN consumption, solids-not-fat tests, and milk fat yield were not significant. The average TDN/FCM ratio was significantly (P&lt;.05) higher for Group II, 0.33, than for Group I, 0.31. Indications were that the Group II diet, which averaged 67.6% concentrate, was used less efficiently than the Group I diet, which averaged 51.1% concentrate. Restricting roughage and substituting concentrate for roughage TDN for cows fed concentrates liberally gave no benefits and resulted in lower milk fat tests and efficiency.</abstract><cop>Champaign</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(67)87581-7</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-0302
ispartof Journal of dairy science, 1967-07, Vol.50 (7), p.1147-1152
issn 0022-0302
1525-3198
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1839844727
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Periodicals Index Online
title Full Lactation Response on Restricted vs. ad Libitum Roughage Diets with Liberal Concentrate Feeding
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T01%3A36%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Full%20Lactation%20Response%20on%20Restricted%20vs.%20ad%20Libitum%20Roughage%20Diets%20with%20Liberal%20Concentrate%20Feeding&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20dairy%20science&rft.au=Swanson,%20E.W.&rft.date=1967-07-01&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1147&rft.epage=1152&rft.pages=1147-1152&rft.issn=0022-0302&rft.eissn=1525-3198&rft_id=info:doi/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(67)87581-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1839844727%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1839844727&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0022030267875817&rfr_iscdi=true