Is Event-Based Prospective Memory Resistant to Proactive Interference?
Proactive interference builds up rapidly in recall with the presentation of successive lists comprising items from a single category (e.g., animals). In two experiments, we used a similar build-up paradigm in prospective memory. Interestingly, in Experiment 1, there was no evidence of proactive inte...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Current psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.) N.J.), 2016-12, Vol.35 (4), p.632-637 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 637 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 632 |
container_title | Current psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.) |
container_volume | 35 |
creator | Oates, Joyce M. Peynircioğlu, Zehra F. Bates, Kathryn B. |
description | Proactive interference builds up rapidly in recall with the presentation of successive lists comprising items from a single category (e.g., animals). In two experiments, we used a similar build-up paradigm in prospective memory. Interestingly, in Experiment 1, there was no evidence of proactive interference in prospective memory, although build-up emerged in a similar recall task. In Experiment 2, by also showing proactive interference build-up in a recognition task analogous to our prospective memory task, we ruled out the possibility that it was the recognition processes inherent in the prospective memory task that might make the task easier and prevent proactive interference. We suggest that, under normal conditions, prospective memory is resistant to build-up of proactive interference and propose that this resistance is a function of the strengthening afforded by a cue-to-intention association that is a part of prospective memory tasks. We discuss the finding using the classical paired-associate learning framework. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s12144-015-9330-1 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1838207784</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A470325904</galeid><sourcerecordid>A470325904</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-ffffd5116eda8fecdfda5f0d6027b5599002642fa2eff30d42f0876c91142f583</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNklFLHDEUhQexoLX-AN8GBKEPsfcmM5OZJ1FRu2BpsfY5xMzNOjKbrElW6r9vlinUhS2YPORw73cSuDlFcYRwigDyS0SOVcUAa9YJAQx3in3sRMMqKcRu1lA1DAXCXvExxicAlE3X7RfXs1hevZBL7EJH6ssfwcclmTS8UPmNFj68lncUh5i0S2Xy676eujOXKFgK5AydfSo-WD1GOvx7HhS_rq_uL7-y2-83s8vzW2YqyROzefU1YkO9bi2Z3va6ttA3wOVDXXcdAG8qbjUnawX0WUIrG9MhZlm34qA4nu5dBv-8opjUk18Fl59U2IqWg5Rt9Y-a65HU4KxPQZvFEI06ryQIXnewptgWak6Ogh69Izvk8gZ_uoXPu6fFYLYaPm8YMpPod5rrVYxq9vPu_ezFzSZ78oZ9JD2mx-jHVRq8i5sgTqDJvxoDWbUMw0KHV4Wg1rFRU2xUjo1ax0Zh9vDJEzPr5hTeTPi_pj9mEL-1</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1838207784</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Is Event-Based Prospective Memory Resistant to Proactive Interference?</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Oates, Joyce M. ; Peynircioğlu, Zehra F. ; Bates, Kathryn B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Oates, Joyce M. ; Peynircioğlu, Zehra F. ; Bates, Kathryn B.</creatorcontrib><description>Proactive interference builds up rapidly in recall with the presentation of successive lists comprising items from a single category (e.g., animals). In two experiments, we used a similar build-up paradigm in prospective memory. Interestingly, in Experiment 1, there was no evidence of proactive interference in prospective memory, although build-up emerged in a similar recall task. In Experiment 2, by also showing proactive interference build-up in a recognition task analogous to our prospective memory task, we ruled out the possibility that it was the recognition processes inherent in the prospective memory task that might make the task easier and prevent proactive interference. We suggest that, under normal conditions, prospective memory is resistant to build-up of proactive interference and propose that this resistance is a function of the strengthening afforded by a cue-to-intention association that is a part of prospective memory tasks. We discuss the finding using the classical paired-associate learning framework.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1046-1310</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1936-4733</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12144-015-9330-1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology ; Experiments ; Memory ; Proactive interference ; Prospective memory ; Psychological research ; Psychology ; Social Sciences</subject><ispartof>Current psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.), 2016-12, Vol.35 (4), p.632-637</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2016 Springer</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-ffffd5116eda8fecdfda5f0d6027b5599002642fa2eff30d42f0876c91142f583</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12144-015-9330-1$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12144-015-9330-1$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Oates, Joyce M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peynircioğlu, Zehra F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bates, Kathryn B.</creatorcontrib><title>Is Event-Based Prospective Memory Resistant to Proactive Interference?</title><title>Current psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.)</title><addtitle>Curr Psychol</addtitle><description>Proactive interference builds up rapidly in recall with the presentation of successive lists comprising items from a single category (e.g., animals). In two experiments, we used a similar build-up paradigm in prospective memory. Interestingly, in Experiment 1, there was no evidence of proactive interference in prospective memory, although build-up emerged in a similar recall task. In Experiment 2, by also showing proactive interference build-up in a recognition task analogous to our prospective memory task, we ruled out the possibility that it was the recognition processes inherent in the prospective memory task that might make the task easier and prevent proactive interference. We suggest that, under normal conditions, prospective memory is resistant to build-up of proactive interference and propose that this resistance is a function of the strengthening afforded by a cue-to-intention association that is a part of prospective memory tasks. We discuss the finding using the classical paired-associate learning framework.</description><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Proactive interference</subject><subject>Prospective memory</subject><subject>Psychological research</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><issn>1046-1310</issn><issn>1936-4733</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqNklFLHDEUhQexoLX-AN8GBKEPsfcmM5OZJ1FRu2BpsfY5xMzNOjKbrElW6r9vlinUhS2YPORw73cSuDlFcYRwigDyS0SOVcUAa9YJAQx3in3sRMMqKcRu1lA1DAXCXvExxicAlE3X7RfXs1hevZBL7EJH6ssfwcclmTS8UPmNFj68lncUh5i0S2Xy676eujOXKFgK5AydfSo-WD1GOvx7HhS_rq_uL7-y2-83s8vzW2YqyROzefU1YkO9bi2Z3va6ttA3wOVDXXcdAG8qbjUnawX0WUIrG9MhZlm34qA4nu5dBv-8opjUk18Fl59U2IqWg5Rt9Y-a65HU4KxPQZvFEI06ryQIXnewptgWak6Ogh69Izvk8gZ_uoXPu6fFYLYaPm8YMpPod5rrVYxq9vPu_ezFzSZ78oZ9JD2mx-jHVRq8i5sgTqDJvxoDWbUMw0KHV4Wg1rFRU2xUjo1ax0Zh9vDJEzPr5hTeTPi_pj9mEL-1</recordid><startdate>20161201</startdate><enddate>20161201</enddate><creator>Oates, Joyce M.</creator><creator>Peynircioğlu, Zehra F.</creator><creator>Bates, Kathryn B.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IBG</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20161201</creationdate><title>Is Event-Based Prospective Memory Resistant to Proactive Interference?</title><author>Oates, Joyce M. ; Peynircioğlu, Zehra F. ; Bates, Kathryn B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-ffffd5116eda8fecdfda5f0d6027b5599002642fa2eff30d42f0876c91142f583</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Behavioral Science and Psychology</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Proactive interference</topic><topic>Prospective memory</topic><topic>Psychological research</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Oates, Joyce M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peynircioğlu, Zehra F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bates, Kathryn B.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Biography</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Current psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Oates, Joyce M.</au><au>Peynircioğlu, Zehra F.</au><au>Bates, Kathryn B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Is Event-Based Prospective Memory Resistant to Proactive Interference?</atitle><jtitle>Current psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.)</jtitle><stitle>Curr Psychol</stitle><date>2016-12-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>632</spage><epage>637</epage><pages>632-637</pages><issn>1046-1310</issn><eissn>1936-4733</eissn><abstract>Proactive interference builds up rapidly in recall with the presentation of successive lists comprising items from a single category (e.g., animals). In two experiments, we used a similar build-up paradigm in prospective memory. Interestingly, in Experiment 1, there was no evidence of proactive interference in prospective memory, although build-up emerged in a similar recall task. In Experiment 2, by also showing proactive interference build-up in a recognition task analogous to our prospective memory task, we ruled out the possibility that it was the recognition processes inherent in the prospective memory task that might make the task easier and prevent proactive interference. We suggest that, under normal conditions, prospective memory is resistant to build-up of proactive interference and propose that this resistance is a function of the strengthening afforded by a cue-to-intention association that is a part of prospective memory tasks. We discuss the finding using the classical paired-associate learning framework.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s12144-015-9330-1</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1046-1310 |
ispartof | Current psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.), 2016-12, Vol.35 (4), p.632-637 |
issn | 1046-1310 1936-4733 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1838207784 |
source | Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
subjects | Behavioral Science and Psychology Experiments Memory Proactive interference Prospective memory Psychological research Psychology Social Sciences |
title | Is Event-Based Prospective Memory Resistant to Proactive Interference? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T16%3A47%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is%20Event-Based%20Prospective%20Memory%20Resistant%20to%20Proactive%20Interference?&rft.jtitle=Current%20psychology%20(New%20Brunswick,%20N.J.)&rft.au=Oates,%20Joyce%20M.&rft.date=2016-12-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=632&rft.epage=637&rft.pages=632-637&rft.issn=1046-1310&rft.eissn=1936-4733&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12144-015-9330-1&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA470325904%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1838207784&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A470325904&rfr_iscdi=true |