Is Event-Based Prospective Memory Resistant to Proactive Interference?

Proactive interference builds up rapidly in recall with the presentation of successive lists comprising items from a single category (e.g., animals). In two experiments, we used a similar build-up paradigm in prospective memory. Interestingly, in Experiment 1, there was no evidence of proactive inte...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Current psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.) N.J.), 2016-12, Vol.35 (4), p.632-637
Hauptverfasser: Oates, Joyce M., Peynircioğlu, Zehra F., Bates, Kathryn B.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 637
container_issue 4
container_start_page 632
container_title Current psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.)
container_volume 35
creator Oates, Joyce M.
Peynircioğlu, Zehra F.
Bates, Kathryn B.
description Proactive interference builds up rapidly in recall with the presentation of successive lists comprising items from a single category (e.g., animals). In two experiments, we used a similar build-up paradigm in prospective memory. Interestingly, in Experiment 1, there was no evidence of proactive interference in prospective memory, although build-up emerged in a similar recall task. In Experiment 2, by also showing proactive interference build-up in a recognition task analogous to our prospective memory task, we ruled out the possibility that it was the recognition processes inherent in the prospective memory task that might make the task easier and prevent proactive interference. We suggest that, under normal conditions, prospective memory is resistant to build-up of proactive interference and propose that this resistance is a function of the strengthening afforded by a cue-to-intention association that is a part of prospective memory tasks. We discuss the finding using the classical paired-associate learning framework.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s12144-015-9330-1
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1838207784</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A470325904</galeid><sourcerecordid>A470325904</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-ffffd5116eda8fecdfda5f0d6027b5599002642fa2eff30d42f0876c91142f583</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNklFLHDEUhQexoLX-AN8GBKEPsfcmM5OZJ1FRu2BpsfY5xMzNOjKbrElW6r9vlinUhS2YPORw73cSuDlFcYRwigDyS0SOVcUAa9YJAQx3in3sRMMqKcRu1lA1DAXCXvExxicAlE3X7RfXs1hevZBL7EJH6ssfwcclmTS8UPmNFj68lncUh5i0S2Xy676eujOXKFgK5AydfSo-WD1GOvx7HhS_rq_uL7-y2-83s8vzW2YqyROzefU1YkO9bi2Z3va6ttA3wOVDXXcdAG8qbjUnawX0WUIrG9MhZlm34qA4nu5dBv-8opjUk18Fl59U2IqWg5Rt9Y-a65HU4KxPQZvFEI06ryQIXnewptgWak6Ogh69Izvk8gZ_uoXPu6fFYLYaPm8YMpPod5rrVYxq9vPu_ezFzSZ78oZ9JD2mx-jHVRq8i5sgTqDJvxoDWbUMw0KHV4Wg1rFRU2xUjo1ax0Zh9vDJEzPr5hTeTPi_pj9mEL-1</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1838207784</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Is Event-Based Prospective Memory Resistant to Proactive Interference?</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Oates, Joyce M. ; Peynircioğlu, Zehra F. ; Bates, Kathryn B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Oates, Joyce M. ; Peynircioğlu, Zehra F. ; Bates, Kathryn B.</creatorcontrib><description>Proactive interference builds up rapidly in recall with the presentation of successive lists comprising items from a single category (e.g., animals). In two experiments, we used a similar build-up paradigm in prospective memory. Interestingly, in Experiment 1, there was no evidence of proactive interference in prospective memory, although build-up emerged in a similar recall task. In Experiment 2, by also showing proactive interference build-up in a recognition task analogous to our prospective memory task, we ruled out the possibility that it was the recognition processes inherent in the prospective memory task that might make the task easier and prevent proactive interference. We suggest that, under normal conditions, prospective memory is resistant to build-up of proactive interference and propose that this resistance is a function of the strengthening afforded by a cue-to-intention association that is a part of prospective memory tasks. We discuss the finding using the classical paired-associate learning framework.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1046-1310</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1936-4733</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12144-015-9330-1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology ; Experiments ; Memory ; Proactive interference ; Prospective memory ; Psychological research ; Psychology ; Social Sciences</subject><ispartof>Current psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.), 2016-12, Vol.35 (4), p.632-637</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2016 Springer</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-ffffd5116eda8fecdfda5f0d6027b5599002642fa2eff30d42f0876c91142f583</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12144-015-9330-1$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12144-015-9330-1$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Oates, Joyce M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peynircioğlu, Zehra F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bates, Kathryn B.</creatorcontrib><title>Is Event-Based Prospective Memory Resistant to Proactive Interference?</title><title>Current psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.)</title><addtitle>Curr Psychol</addtitle><description>Proactive interference builds up rapidly in recall with the presentation of successive lists comprising items from a single category (e.g., animals). In two experiments, we used a similar build-up paradigm in prospective memory. Interestingly, in Experiment 1, there was no evidence of proactive interference in prospective memory, although build-up emerged in a similar recall task. In Experiment 2, by also showing proactive interference build-up in a recognition task analogous to our prospective memory task, we ruled out the possibility that it was the recognition processes inherent in the prospective memory task that might make the task easier and prevent proactive interference. We suggest that, under normal conditions, prospective memory is resistant to build-up of proactive interference and propose that this resistance is a function of the strengthening afforded by a cue-to-intention association that is a part of prospective memory tasks. We discuss the finding using the classical paired-associate learning framework.</description><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Proactive interference</subject><subject>Prospective memory</subject><subject>Psychological research</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><issn>1046-1310</issn><issn>1936-4733</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqNklFLHDEUhQexoLX-AN8GBKEPsfcmM5OZJ1FRu2BpsfY5xMzNOjKbrElW6r9vlinUhS2YPORw73cSuDlFcYRwigDyS0SOVcUAa9YJAQx3in3sRMMqKcRu1lA1DAXCXvExxicAlE3X7RfXs1hevZBL7EJH6ssfwcclmTS8UPmNFj68lncUh5i0S2Xy676eujOXKFgK5AydfSo-WD1GOvx7HhS_rq_uL7-y2-83s8vzW2YqyROzefU1YkO9bi2Z3va6ttA3wOVDXXcdAG8qbjUnawX0WUIrG9MhZlm34qA4nu5dBv-8opjUk18Fl59U2IqWg5Rt9Y-a65HU4KxPQZvFEI06ryQIXnewptgWak6Ogh69Izvk8gZ_uoXPu6fFYLYaPm8YMpPod5rrVYxq9vPu_ezFzSZ78oZ9JD2mx-jHVRq8i5sgTqDJvxoDWbUMw0KHV4Wg1rFRU2xUjo1ax0Zh9vDJEzPr5hTeTPi_pj9mEL-1</recordid><startdate>20161201</startdate><enddate>20161201</enddate><creator>Oates, Joyce M.</creator><creator>Peynircioğlu, Zehra F.</creator><creator>Bates, Kathryn B.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IBG</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20161201</creationdate><title>Is Event-Based Prospective Memory Resistant to Proactive Interference?</title><author>Oates, Joyce M. ; Peynircioğlu, Zehra F. ; Bates, Kathryn B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-ffffd5116eda8fecdfda5f0d6027b5599002642fa2eff30d42f0876c91142f583</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Behavioral Science and Psychology</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Proactive interference</topic><topic>Prospective memory</topic><topic>Psychological research</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Oates, Joyce M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peynircioğlu, Zehra F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bates, Kathryn B.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Biography</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Current psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Oates, Joyce M.</au><au>Peynircioğlu, Zehra F.</au><au>Bates, Kathryn B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Is Event-Based Prospective Memory Resistant to Proactive Interference?</atitle><jtitle>Current psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.)</jtitle><stitle>Curr Psychol</stitle><date>2016-12-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>632</spage><epage>637</epage><pages>632-637</pages><issn>1046-1310</issn><eissn>1936-4733</eissn><abstract>Proactive interference builds up rapidly in recall with the presentation of successive lists comprising items from a single category (e.g., animals). In two experiments, we used a similar build-up paradigm in prospective memory. Interestingly, in Experiment 1, there was no evidence of proactive interference in prospective memory, although build-up emerged in a similar recall task. In Experiment 2, by also showing proactive interference build-up in a recognition task analogous to our prospective memory task, we ruled out the possibility that it was the recognition processes inherent in the prospective memory task that might make the task easier and prevent proactive interference. We suggest that, under normal conditions, prospective memory is resistant to build-up of proactive interference and propose that this resistance is a function of the strengthening afforded by a cue-to-intention association that is a part of prospective memory tasks. We discuss the finding using the classical paired-associate learning framework.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s12144-015-9330-1</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1046-1310
ispartof Current psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.), 2016-12, Vol.35 (4), p.632-637
issn 1046-1310
1936-4733
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1838207784
source Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
subjects Behavioral Science and Psychology
Experiments
Memory
Proactive interference
Prospective memory
Psychological research
Psychology
Social Sciences
title Is Event-Based Prospective Memory Resistant to Proactive Interference?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T16%3A47%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is%20Event-Based%20Prospective%20Memory%20Resistant%20to%20Proactive%20Interference?&rft.jtitle=Current%20psychology%20(New%20Brunswick,%20N.J.)&rft.au=Oates,%20Joyce%20M.&rft.date=2016-12-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=632&rft.epage=637&rft.pages=632-637&rft.issn=1046-1310&rft.eissn=1936-4733&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12144-015-9330-1&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA470325904%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1838207784&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A470325904&rfr_iscdi=true