A model of adoption determinants of ERP within T-O-E framework

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to attempts to provide further insight into IS adoption by investigating how 12 factors within the technology-organization-environment framework explain small- and medium-sized enterprises’ (SMEs) adoption of enterprise resource planning (ERP) software. Design/me...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Information technology & people (West Linn, Or.) Or.), 2016-01, Vol.29 (4), p.901-930
Hauptverfasser: Awa, Hart O., Ojiabo, Ojiabo Ukoha
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 930
container_issue 4
container_start_page 901
container_title Information technology & people (West Linn, Or.)
container_volume 29
creator Awa, Hart O.
Ojiabo, Ojiabo Ukoha
description Purpose The purpose of this paper is to attempts to provide further insight into IS adoption by investigating how 12 factors within the technology-organization-environment framework explain small- and medium-sized enterprises’ (SMEs) adoption of enterprise resource planning (ERP) software. Design/methodology/approach The approach for data collection was questionnaire survey involving executives of SMEs drawn from six fast service enterprises with strong operations in Port Harcourt. The mode of sampling was purposive and snow ball and analysis involves logistic regression test; the likelihood ratios, Hosmer and Lemeshow’s goodness of fit, and Nagelkerke’s R2 provided the necessary lenses. Findings The 12 hypothesized relationships were supported with each factor differing in its statistical coefficient and some bearing negative values. ICT infrastructures, technical know-how, perceived compatibility, perceived values, security, and firm’s size were found statistically significant adoption determinants. Although, scope of business operations, trading partners’ readiness, demographic composition, subjective norms, external supports, and competitive pressures were equally critical but their negative coefficients suggest they pose less of an obstacle to adopters than to non-adopters. Thus, adoption of ERP by SMEs is more driven by technological factors than by organizational and environmental factors. Research limitations/implications The study is limited by its scope of data collection and phases, therefore extended data are needed to apply the findings to other sectors/industries and to factor in the implementation and post-adoption phases in order to forge a more integrated and holistic adoption framework. Practical implications The model may be used by IS vendors to make investment decisions, to meet customers’ needs, and to craft informed marketing programs that would appeal to actual and potential adopters and cause them to progress in the customer loyalty ladder. Originality/value The paper contributes to the growing research on IS innovations’ adoption by using factors within the T-O-E framework to explains SMEs’ adoption of ERP.
doi_str_mv 10.1108/ITP-03-2015-0068
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1837159621</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4243039961</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-bbfdf6d19f21b45302ea786ad8c95524ea451f1008588cd5c62e6906590c04123</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkU1Lw0AQhhdRsFbvHgNevKydyX5kcxFKqVootEg9L9vsBlOTbN1NKf57E-pF8TSHed5heF5CbhEeEEFNFps1BUZTQEEBpDojI8yEokIhOycjyEVOmeLiklzFuANAKQBH5HGaNN66OvFlYqzfd5VvE-s6F5qqNW0Xh8X8dZ0cq-69apMNXdF5UgbTuKMPH9fkojR1dDc_c0zenuab2Qtdrp4Xs-mSFizHjm63pS2lxbxMccsFg9SZTEljVZELkXJnuMASAZRQqrCikKmTOUiRQwEcUzYm96e7--A_Dy52uqli4eratM4fokbFM64kTwf07g-684fQ9t_1FMtQ5DLFnoITVQQfY3Cl3oeqMeFLI-hBqO6FamB6EKoHoX1kcoq4xgVT2_8Svypg3yKkc4k</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1837159621</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A model of adoption determinants of ERP within T-O-E framework</title><source>Emerald A-Z Current Journals</source><creator>Awa, Hart O. ; Ojiabo, Ojiabo Ukoha</creator><creatorcontrib>Awa, Hart O. ; Ojiabo, Ojiabo Ukoha</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose The purpose of this paper is to attempts to provide further insight into IS adoption by investigating how 12 factors within the technology-organization-environment framework explain small- and medium-sized enterprises’ (SMEs) adoption of enterprise resource planning (ERP) software. Design/methodology/approach The approach for data collection was questionnaire survey involving executives of SMEs drawn from six fast service enterprises with strong operations in Port Harcourt. The mode of sampling was purposive and snow ball and analysis involves logistic regression test; the likelihood ratios, Hosmer and Lemeshow’s goodness of fit, and Nagelkerke’s R2 provided the necessary lenses. Findings The 12 hypothesized relationships were supported with each factor differing in its statistical coefficient and some bearing negative values. ICT infrastructures, technical know-how, perceived compatibility, perceived values, security, and firm’s size were found statistically significant adoption determinants. Although, scope of business operations, trading partners’ readiness, demographic composition, subjective norms, external supports, and competitive pressures were equally critical but their negative coefficients suggest they pose less of an obstacle to adopters than to non-adopters. Thus, adoption of ERP by SMEs is more driven by technological factors than by organizational and environmental factors. Research limitations/implications The study is limited by its scope of data collection and phases, therefore extended data are needed to apply the findings to other sectors/industries and to factor in the implementation and post-adoption phases in order to forge a more integrated and holistic adoption framework. Practical implications The model may be used by IS vendors to make investment decisions, to meet customers’ needs, and to craft informed marketing programs that would appeal to actual and potential adopters and cause them to progress in the customer loyalty ladder. Originality/value The paper contributes to the growing research on IS innovations’ adoption by using factors within the T-O-E framework to explains SMEs’ adoption of ERP.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0959-3845</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-5813</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/ITP-03-2015-0068</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>West Linn: Emerald Group Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Communications technology ; Companies ; Competition ; Competitive advantage ; Customers ; Data acquisition ; Data collection ; Demographics ; Determinants ; Economic growth ; Employment ; Enterprise resource planning ; Environmental aspects ; External pressure ; Goodness of fit ; Informal economy ; Information technology ; Innovation ; Innovations ; Internet resources ; Loyalty ; Market positioning ; Marketing ; Norms ; Product quality ; Questionnaires ; Regression analysis ; Sampling ; Software ; Statistical analysis ; Studies ; Technology ; Technology Acceptance Model ; Technology adoption ; Theory ; Trading ; Vendors</subject><ispartof>Information technology &amp; people (West Linn, Or.), 2016-01, Vol.29 (4), p.901-930</ispartof><rights>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</rights><rights>Emerald Group Publishing Limited 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-bbfdf6d19f21b45302ea786ad8c95524ea451f1008588cd5c62e6906590c04123</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-bbfdf6d19f21b45302ea786ad8c95524ea451f1008588cd5c62e6906590c04123</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/ITP-03-2015-0068/full/html$$EHTML$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,964,11618,27907,27908,52672</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Awa, Hart O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ojiabo, Ojiabo Ukoha</creatorcontrib><title>A model of adoption determinants of ERP within T-O-E framework</title><title>Information technology &amp; people (West Linn, Or.)</title><description>Purpose The purpose of this paper is to attempts to provide further insight into IS adoption by investigating how 12 factors within the technology-organization-environment framework explain small- and medium-sized enterprises’ (SMEs) adoption of enterprise resource planning (ERP) software. Design/methodology/approach The approach for data collection was questionnaire survey involving executives of SMEs drawn from six fast service enterprises with strong operations in Port Harcourt. The mode of sampling was purposive and snow ball and analysis involves logistic regression test; the likelihood ratios, Hosmer and Lemeshow’s goodness of fit, and Nagelkerke’s R2 provided the necessary lenses. Findings The 12 hypothesized relationships were supported with each factor differing in its statistical coefficient and some bearing negative values. ICT infrastructures, technical know-how, perceived compatibility, perceived values, security, and firm’s size were found statistically significant adoption determinants. Although, scope of business operations, trading partners’ readiness, demographic composition, subjective norms, external supports, and competitive pressures were equally critical but their negative coefficients suggest they pose less of an obstacle to adopters than to non-adopters. Thus, adoption of ERP by SMEs is more driven by technological factors than by organizational and environmental factors. Research limitations/implications The study is limited by its scope of data collection and phases, therefore extended data are needed to apply the findings to other sectors/industries and to factor in the implementation and post-adoption phases in order to forge a more integrated and holistic adoption framework. Practical implications The model may be used by IS vendors to make investment decisions, to meet customers’ needs, and to craft informed marketing programs that would appeal to actual and potential adopters and cause them to progress in the customer loyalty ladder. Originality/value The paper contributes to the growing research on IS innovations’ adoption by using factors within the T-O-E framework to explains SMEs’ adoption of ERP.</description><subject>Communications technology</subject><subject>Companies</subject><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Competitive advantage</subject><subject>Customers</subject><subject>Data acquisition</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Demographics</subject><subject>Determinants</subject><subject>Economic growth</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>Enterprise resource planning</subject><subject>Environmental aspects</subject><subject>External pressure</subject><subject>Goodness of fit</subject><subject>Informal economy</subject><subject>Information technology</subject><subject>Innovation</subject><subject>Innovations</subject><subject>Internet resources</subject><subject>Loyalty</subject><subject>Market positioning</subject><subject>Marketing</subject><subject>Norms</subject><subject>Product quality</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Sampling</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Technology</subject><subject>Technology Acceptance Model</subject><subject>Technology adoption</subject><subject>Theory</subject><subject>Trading</subject><subject>Vendors</subject><issn>0959-3845</issn><issn>1758-5813</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNptkU1Lw0AQhhdRsFbvHgNevKydyX5kcxFKqVootEg9L9vsBlOTbN1NKf57E-pF8TSHed5heF5CbhEeEEFNFps1BUZTQEEBpDojI8yEokIhOycjyEVOmeLiklzFuANAKQBH5HGaNN66OvFlYqzfd5VvE-s6F5qqNW0Xh8X8dZ0cq-69apMNXdF5UgbTuKMPH9fkojR1dDc_c0zenuab2Qtdrp4Xs-mSFizHjm63pS2lxbxMccsFg9SZTEljVZELkXJnuMASAZRQqrCikKmTOUiRQwEcUzYm96e7--A_Dy52uqli4eratM4fokbFM64kTwf07g-684fQ9t_1FMtQ5DLFnoITVQQfY3Cl3oeqMeFLI-hBqO6FamB6EKoHoX1kcoq4xgVT2_8Svypg3yKkc4k</recordid><startdate>20160101</startdate><enddate>20160101</enddate><creator>Awa, Hart O.</creator><creator>Ojiabo, Ojiabo Ukoha</creator><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CNYFK</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>E3H</scope><scope>F2A</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M1O</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160101</creationdate><title>A model of adoption determinants of ERP within T-O-E framework</title><author>Awa, Hart O. ; Ojiabo, Ojiabo Ukoha</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-bbfdf6d19f21b45302ea786ad8c95524ea451f1008588cd5c62e6906590c04123</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Communications technology</topic><topic>Companies</topic><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Competitive advantage</topic><topic>Customers</topic><topic>Data acquisition</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Demographics</topic><topic>Determinants</topic><topic>Economic growth</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>Enterprise resource planning</topic><topic>Environmental aspects</topic><topic>External pressure</topic><topic>Goodness of fit</topic><topic>Informal economy</topic><topic>Information technology</topic><topic>Innovation</topic><topic>Innovations</topic><topic>Internet resources</topic><topic>Loyalty</topic><topic>Market positioning</topic><topic>Marketing</topic><topic>Norms</topic><topic>Product quality</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Sampling</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Technology</topic><topic>Technology Acceptance Model</topic><topic>Technology adoption</topic><topic>Theory</topic><topic>Trading</topic><topic>Vendors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Awa, Hart O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ojiabo, Ojiabo Ukoha</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>Career &amp; Technical Education Database</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Library &amp; Information Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Library &amp; Information Sciences Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>Library &amp; Information Science Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Library Science Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Information technology &amp; people (West Linn, Or.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Awa, Hart O.</au><au>Ojiabo, Ojiabo Ukoha</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A model of adoption determinants of ERP within T-O-E framework</atitle><jtitle>Information technology &amp; people (West Linn, Or.)</jtitle><date>2016-01-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>901</spage><epage>930</epage><pages>901-930</pages><issn>0959-3845</issn><eissn>1758-5813</eissn><abstract>Purpose The purpose of this paper is to attempts to provide further insight into IS adoption by investigating how 12 factors within the technology-organization-environment framework explain small- and medium-sized enterprises’ (SMEs) adoption of enterprise resource planning (ERP) software. Design/methodology/approach The approach for data collection was questionnaire survey involving executives of SMEs drawn from six fast service enterprises with strong operations in Port Harcourt. The mode of sampling was purposive and snow ball and analysis involves logistic regression test; the likelihood ratios, Hosmer and Lemeshow’s goodness of fit, and Nagelkerke’s R2 provided the necessary lenses. Findings The 12 hypothesized relationships were supported with each factor differing in its statistical coefficient and some bearing negative values. ICT infrastructures, technical know-how, perceived compatibility, perceived values, security, and firm’s size were found statistically significant adoption determinants. Although, scope of business operations, trading partners’ readiness, demographic composition, subjective norms, external supports, and competitive pressures were equally critical but their negative coefficients suggest they pose less of an obstacle to adopters than to non-adopters. Thus, adoption of ERP by SMEs is more driven by technological factors than by organizational and environmental factors. Research limitations/implications The study is limited by its scope of data collection and phases, therefore extended data are needed to apply the findings to other sectors/industries and to factor in the implementation and post-adoption phases in order to forge a more integrated and holistic adoption framework. Practical implications The model may be used by IS vendors to make investment decisions, to meet customers’ needs, and to craft informed marketing programs that would appeal to actual and potential adopters and cause them to progress in the customer loyalty ladder. Originality/value The paper contributes to the growing research on IS innovations’ adoption by using factors within the T-O-E framework to explains SMEs’ adoption of ERP.</abstract><cop>West Linn</cop><pub>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/ITP-03-2015-0068</doi><tpages>30</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0959-3845
ispartof Information technology & people (West Linn, Or.), 2016-01, Vol.29 (4), p.901-930
issn 0959-3845
1758-5813
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1837159621
source Emerald A-Z Current Journals
subjects Communications technology
Companies
Competition
Competitive advantage
Customers
Data acquisition
Data collection
Demographics
Determinants
Economic growth
Employment
Enterprise resource planning
Environmental aspects
External pressure
Goodness of fit
Informal economy
Information technology
Innovation
Innovations
Internet resources
Loyalty
Market positioning
Marketing
Norms
Product quality
Questionnaires
Regression analysis
Sampling
Software
Statistical analysis
Studies
Technology
Technology Acceptance Model
Technology adoption
Theory
Trading
Vendors
title A model of adoption determinants of ERP within T-O-E framework
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T06%3A29%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20model%20of%20adoption%20determinants%20of%20ERP%20within%20T-O-E%20framework&rft.jtitle=Information%20technology%20&%20people%20(West%20Linn,%20Or.)&rft.au=Awa,%20Hart%20O.&rft.date=2016-01-01&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=901&rft.epage=930&rft.pages=901-930&rft.issn=0959-3845&rft.eissn=1758-5813&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/ITP-03-2015-0068&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4243039961%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1837159621&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true