TCT-31 Impact of Strut Thickness on Short-Term Healing Response after Bioresorbable Scaffold Implantation: Serial OCT Evaluation of Novel Thin Strut Sirolimus Eluting BRS Versus Thick Strut Everolimus Eluting BRS in Porcine Coronary Arteries
Background The most widely commercially available bioresorbable scaffold (BRS) Absorb has strut thickness of 165 microns. [...]it has potential for higher thrombogenicity, especially in the early phase of vessel healing.
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2016-11, Vol.68 (18), p.B13-B13 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | B13 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 18 |
| container_start_page | B13 |
| container_title | Journal of the American College of Cardiology |
| container_volume | 68 |
| creator | Gasior, Pawel Cheng, Yanping Xia, Jinggang Valencia, Andres Estrada, Alex McGregor, Jenn Ramzipoor, Kamal Lee, Chang Conditt, Gerard Kaluza, Greg Granada, Juan |
| description | Background The most widely commercially available bioresorbable scaffold (BRS) Absorb has strut thickness of 165 microns. [...]it has potential for higher thrombogenicity, especially in the early phase of vessel healing. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.09.052 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1834396643</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0735109716353748</els_id><sourcerecordid>4234665401</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2232-424049fcb9e798de8c0b07fc25200179630d85f3c17a662a42cc701ac26ea90f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UltrFDEUHkTBtfoHfAr4PGsuc4uI0A6rLRQrndHXkM2csZlmk22SWejP9h-Y6S4IIj6dw-G7wXey7C3Ba4JJ9X5aT1KpNU37GvM1LumzbEXKsslZyevn2QrXrMwJ5vXL7FUIE8a4aghfZb_6ts8ZQVe7vVQRuRF10c8R9Xda3VsIATmLujvnY96D36FLkEbbn-gWwt7ZAEiOETy60M5DcH4rtwZQp-Q4OjMsqkbaKKN29gPqwGtp0E3bo81BmvnpvFh-dQcwi6U9uXfaO6N3c0AbM8fF7-K2Qz_Ah3R6inYCbg7wL2QS-ua80hZQ67yz0j-ic5-CagivsxejNAHenOZZ9v3zpm8v8-ubL1ft-XWuKGU0L2iBCz6qLYeaNwM0Cm9xPSpaUoxJzSuGh6YcmSK1rCoqC6pUjYlUtALJ8cjOsndH3b13DzOEKCY3e5ssBWlYwXhVFSyh6BGlvAvBwyj2Xu9SXkGwWKoVk1iqFUu1AnORqk2kj0cSpPwHDV4EpcEqGLQHFcXg9P_pn_6iq9SpVtLcwyOEPzFFoAKLbvmd5XVIxUpWFw37DX-rxKM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1834396643</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>TCT-31 Impact of Strut Thickness on Short-Term Healing Response after Bioresorbable Scaffold Implantation: Serial OCT Evaluation of Novel Thin Strut Sirolimus Eluting BRS Versus Thick Strut Everolimus Eluting BRS in Porcine Coronary Arteries</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Gasior, Pawel ; Cheng, Yanping ; Xia, Jinggang ; Valencia, Andres ; Estrada, Alex ; McGregor, Jenn ; Ramzipoor, Kamal ; Lee, Chang ; Conditt, Gerard ; Kaluza, Greg ; Granada, Juan</creator><creatorcontrib>Gasior, Pawel ; Cheng, Yanping ; Xia, Jinggang ; Valencia, Andres ; Estrada, Alex ; McGregor, Jenn ; Ramzipoor, Kamal ; Lee, Chang ; Conditt, Gerard ; Kaluza, Greg ; Granada, Juan</creatorcontrib><description>Background The most widely commercially available bioresorbable scaffold (BRS) Absorb has strut thickness of 165 microns. [...]it has potential for higher thrombogenicity, especially in the early phase of vessel healing.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0735-1097</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-3597</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.09.052</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Acquisitions & mergers ; Cardiology ; Cardiovascular ; Coronary vessels ; Internal Medicine ; Stents ; Veins & arteries</subject><ispartof>Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2016-11, Vol.68 (18), p.B13-B13</ispartof><rights>2016</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Nov 1, 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2016.09.052$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,3551,27929,27930,46000</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gasior, Pawel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Yanping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xia, Jinggang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valencia, Andres</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Estrada, Alex</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGregor, Jenn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramzipoor, Kamal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Chang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conditt, Gerard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaluza, Greg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Granada, Juan</creatorcontrib><title>TCT-31 Impact of Strut Thickness on Short-Term Healing Response after Bioresorbable Scaffold Implantation: Serial OCT Evaluation of Novel Thin Strut Sirolimus Eluting BRS Versus Thick Strut Everolimus Eluting BRS in Porcine Coronary Arteries</title><title>Journal of the American College of Cardiology</title><description>Background The most widely commercially available bioresorbable scaffold (BRS) Absorb has strut thickness of 165 microns. [...]it has potential for higher thrombogenicity, especially in the early phase of vessel healing.</description><subject>Acquisitions & mergers</subject><subject>Cardiology</subject><subject>Cardiovascular</subject><subject>Coronary vessels</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Stents</subject><subject>Veins & arteries</subject><issn>0735-1097</issn><issn>1558-3597</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UltrFDEUHkTBtfoHfAr4PGsuc4uI0A6rLRQrndHXkM2csZlmk22SWejP9h-Y6S4IIj6dw-G7wXey7C3Ba4JJ9X5aT1KpNU37GvM1LumzbEXKsslZyevn2QrXrMwJ5vXL7FUIE8a4aghfZb_6ts8ZQVe7vVQRuRF10c8R9Xda3VsIATmLujvnY96D36FLkEbbn-gWwt7ZAEiOETy60M5DcH4rtwZQp-Q4OjMsqkbaKKN29gPqwGtp0E3bo81BmvnpvFh-dQcwi6U9uXfaO6N3c0AbM8fF7-K2Qz_Ah3R6inYCbg7wL2QS-ua80hZQ67yz0j-ic5-CagivsxejNAHenOZZ9v3zpm8v8-ubL1ft-XWuKGU0L2iBCz6qLYeaNwM0Cm9xPSpaUoxJzSuGh6YcmSK1rCoqC6pUjYlUtALJ8cjOsndH3b13DzOEKCY3e5ssBWlYwXhVFSyh6BGlvAvBwyj2Xu9SXkGwWKoVk1iqFUu1AnORqk2kj0cSpPwHDV4EpcEqGLQHFcXg9P_pn_6iq9SpVtLcwyOEPzFFoAKLbvmd5XVIxUpWFw37DX-rxKM</recordid><startdate>20161101</startdate><enddate>20161101</enddate><creator>Gasior, Pawel</creator><creator>Cheng, Yanping</creator><creator>Xia, Jinggang</creator><creator>Valencia, Andres</creator><creator>Estrada, Alex</creator><creator>McGregor, Jenn</creator><creator>Ramzipoor, Kamal</creator><creator>Lee, Chang</creator><creator>Conditt, Gerard</creator><creator>Kaluza, Greg</creator><creator>Granada, Juan</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20161101</creationdate><title>TCT-31 Impact of Strut Thickness on Short-Term Healing Response after Bioresorbable Scaffold Implantation: Serial OCT Evaluation of Novel Thin Strut Sirolimus Eluting BRS Versus Thick Strut Everolimus Eluting BRS in Porcine Coronary Arteries</title><author>Gasior, Pawel ; Cheng, Yanping ; Xia, Jinggang ; Valencia, Andres ; Estrada, Alex ; McGregor, Jenn ; Ramzipoor, Kamal ; Lee, Chang ; Conditt, Gerard ; Kaluza, Greg ; Granada, Juan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2232-424049fcb9e798de8c0b07fc25200179630d85f3c17a662a42cc701ac26ea90f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Acquisitions & mergers</topic><topic>Cardiology</topic><topic>Cardiovascular</topic><topic>Coronary vessels</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Stents</topic><topic>Veins & arteries</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gasior, Pawel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Yanping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xia, Jinggang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valencia, Andres</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Estrada, Alex</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGregor, Jenn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramzipoor, Kamal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Chang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conditt, Gerard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaluza, Greg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Granada, Juan</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><jtitle>Journal of the American College of Cardiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gasior, Pawel</au><au>Cheng, Yanping</au><au>Xia, Jinggang</au><au>Valencia, Andres</au><au>Estrada, Alex</au><au>McGregor, Jenn</au><au>Ramzipoor, Kamal</au><au>Lee, Chang</au><au>Conditt, Gerard</au><au>Kaluza, Greg</au><au>Granada, Juan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>TCT-31 Impact of Strut Thickness on Short-Term Healing Response after Bioresorbable Scaffold Implantation: Serial OCT Evaluation of Novel Thin Strut Sirolimus Eluting BRS Versus Thick Strut Everolimus Eluting BRS in Porcine Coronary Arteries</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the American College of Cardiology</jtitle><date>2016-11-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>68</volume><issue>18</issue><spage>B13</spage><epage>B13</epage><pages>B13-B13</pages><issn>0735-1097</issn><eissn>1558-3597</eissn><abstract>Background The most widely commercially available bioresorbable scaffold (BRS) Absorb has strut thickness of 165 microns. [...]it has potential for higher thrombogenicity, especially in the early phase of vessel healing.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jacc.2016.09.052</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0735-1097 |
| ispartof | Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2016-11, Vol.68 (18), p.B13-B13 |
| issn | 0735-1097 1558-3597 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1834396643 |
| source | Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier); Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | Acquisitions & mergers Cardiology Cardiovascular Coronary vessels Internal Medicine Stents Veins & arteries |
| title | TCT-31 Impact of Strut Thickness on Short-Term Healing Response after Bioresorbable Scaffold Implantation: Serial OCT Evaluation of Novel Thin Strut Sirolimus Eluting BRS Versus Thick Strut Everolimus Eluting BRS in Porcine Coronary Arteries |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-14T13%3A25%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=TCT-31%20Impact%20of%20Strut%20Thickness%20on%20Short-Term%20Healing%20Response%20after%20Bioresorbable%20Scaffold%20Implantation:%20Serial%20OCT%20Evaluation%20of%20Novel%20Thin%20Strut%20Sirolimus%20Eluting%20BRS%20Versus%20Thick%20Strut%20Everolimus%20Eluting%20BRS%20in%20Porcine%20Coronary%20Arteries&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20American%20College%20of%20Cardiology&rft.au=Gasior,%20Pawel&rft.date=2016-11-01&rft.volume=68&rft.issue=18&rft.spage=B13&rft.epage=B13&rft.pages=B13-B13&rft.issn=0735-1097&rft.eissn=1558-3597&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jacc.2016.09.052&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4234665401%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1834396643&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0735109716353748&rfr_iscdi=true |