Negation in Colonial Valley Zapotec

Negation in Colonial Valley Zapotec

This paper presents an overview of negation in Colonial Valley Zapotec (CVZ) based on a corpus of texts written in Valley Zapotec between 1565 and 1808. There are four negative markers in CVZ, two bound (ya=, qui=) and two free (aca, yaca). Standard negation employs a negative word and an optional c...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Transactions of the Philological Society 2016-11, Vol.114 (3), p.391-413
Hauptverfasser: Anderson, Carolyn Jane, Lillehaugen, Brook Danielle
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Clauses
Clitics
Corpus linguistics
Negation
Syntactic analysis
Zapotec languages
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 413
container_issue 3
container_start_page 391
container_title Transactions of the Philological Society
container_volume 114
creator Anderson, Carolyn Jane
Lillehaugen, Brook Danielle
description This paper presents an overview of negation in Colonial Valley Zapotec (CVZ) based on a corpus of texts written in Valley Zapotec between 1565 and 1808. There are four negative markers in CVZ, two bound (ya=, qui=) and two free (aca, yaca). Standard negation employs a negative word and an optional clitic, =ti. Understanding the syntax of an historical form of Valley Zapotec allows us to make some observations about related forms in modern Valley Zapotec languages, in particular San Lucas Quiaviní Zapotec (SLQZ). For example, the morpheme =ti, which is required in clausal negation in SLQZ, is not obligatory in any negative constructions in CVZ until around 1800. In Vellon 1808, the youngest text in the corpus, we observe =ti required in one type of clausal negation. This allows us to observe details of the development of the modern Valley Zapotec negation system, including the fact that the remaining changes leading to obligatory =ti in clausal negation in SLQZ must have occurred within the last 200 years.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/1467-968X.12082
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1829458694</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1829458694</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3952-4e6244ae5230287fc9c7ed80bed9efde2eee0e8ce578768058ba3a843552ac373</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtLw0AUhQdRsFbXbgNdp533YynFd6mi8YGbYTq9kdSY1JkU7b83Ndqtd3Pgcr57OQehY4KHpJ0R4VKlRurnIaFY0x3U2252UQ9jZVIimdxHBzEuMCaKKtZDgym8uqaoq6SoknFd1lXhyuTRlSWskxe3rBvwh2gvd2WEo1_to4ez02x8kU5uzi_HJ5PUMyNoykFSzh0IyjDVKvfGK5hrPIO5gXwOFAAwaA9CaSU1FnrmmNOcCUGdZ4r10aC7uwz1xwpiYxf1KlTtS0s0NVxoaXjrGnUuH-oYA-R2GYp3F9aWYLtpwm5y201u-9NES8iO-CzaVP_ZbXZ3e_8Hph1YxAa-tqALb1YqpoR9mp5blV1fyYwIS9g3CaFtyw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1829458694</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Negation in Colonial Valley Zapotec</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Anderson, Carolyn Jane ; Lillehaugen, Brook Danielle</creator><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Carolyn Jane ; Lillehaugen, Brook Danielle</creatorcontrib><description>This paper presents an overview of negation in Colonial Valley Zapotec (CVZ) based on a corpus of texts written in Valley Zapotec between 1565 and 1808. There are four negative markers in CVZ, two bound (ya=, qui=) and two free (aca, yaca). Standard negation employs a negative word and an optional clitic, =ti. Understanding the syntax of an historical form of Valley Zapotec allows us to make some observations about related forms in modern Valley Zapotec languages, in particular San Lucas Quiaviní Zapotec (SLQZ). For example, the morpheme =ti, which is required in clausal negation in SLQZ, is not obligatory in any negative constructions in CVZ until around 1800. In Vellon 1808, the youngest text in the corpus, we observe =ti required in one type of clausal negation. This allows us to observe details of the development of the modern Valley Zapotec negation system, including the fact that the remaining changes leading to obligatory =ti in clausal negation in SLQZ must have occurred within the last 200 years.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0079-1636</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-968X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1467-968X.12082</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Clauses ; Clitics ; Corpus linguistics ; Negation ; Syntactic analysis ; Zapotec languages</subject><ispartof>Transactions of the Philological Society, 2016-11, Vol.114 (3), p.391-413</ispartof><rights>The authors 2016. Transactions of the Philological Society © The Philological Society 2016</rights><rights>Transactions of the Philological Society © 2016 The Philological Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3952-4e6244ae5230287fc9c7ed80bed9efde2eee0e8ce578768058ba3a843552ac373</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3952-4e6244ae5230287fc9c7ed80bed9efde2eee0e8ce578768058ba3a843552ac373</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2F1467-968X.12082$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2F1467-968X.12082$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Carolyn Jane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lillehaugen, Brook Danielle</creatorcontrib><title>Negation in Colonial Valley Zapotec</title><title>Transactions of the Philological Society</title><addtitle>Trans Philologic Soc</addtitle><description>This paper presents an overview of negation in Colonial Valley Zapotec (CVZ) based on a corpus of texts written in Valley Zapotec between 1565 and 1808. There are four negative markers in CVZ, two bound (ya=, qui=) and two free (aca, yaca). Standard negation employs a negative word and an optional clitic, =ti. Understanding the syntax of an historical form of Valley Zapotec allows us to make some observations about related forms in modern Valley Zapotec languages, in particular San Lucas Quiaviní Zapotec (SLQZ). For example, the morpheme =ti, which is required in clausal negation in SLQZ, is not obligatory in any negative constructions in CVZ until around 1800. In Vellon 1808, the youngest text in the corpus, we observe =ti required in one type of clausal negation. This allows us to observe details of the development of the modern Valley Zapotec negation system, including the fact that the remaining changes leading to obligatory =ti in clausal negation in SLQZ must have occurred within the last 200 years.</description><subject>Clauses</subject><subject>Clitics</subject><subject>Corpus linguistics</subject><subject>Negation</subject><subject>Syntactic analysis</subject><subject>Zapotec languages</subject><issn>0079-1636</issn><issn>1467-968X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkEtLw0AUhQdRsFbXbgNdp533YynFd6mi8YGbYTq9kdSY1JkU7b83Ndqtd3Pgcr57OQehY4KHpJ0R4VKlRurnIaFY0x3U2252UQ9jZVIimdxHBzEuMCaKKtZDgym8uqaoq6SoknFd1lXhyuTRlSWskxe3rBvwh2gvd2WEo1_to4ez02x8kU5uzi_HJ5PUMyNoykFSzh0IyjDVKvfGK5hrPIO5gXwOFAAwaA9CaSU1FnrmmNOcCUGdZ4r10aC7uwz1xwpiYxf1KlTtS0s0NVxoaXjrGnUuH-oYA-R2GYp3F9aWYLtpwm5y201u-9NES8iO-CzaVP_ZbXZ3e_8Hph1YxAa-tqALb1YqpoR9mp5blV1fyYwIS9g3CaFtyw</recordid><startdate>201611</startdate><enddate>201611</enddate><creator>Anderson, Carolyn Jane</creator><creator>Lillehaugen, Brook Danielle</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>8BM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201611</creationdate><title>Negation in Colonial Valley Zapotec</title><author>Anderson, Carolyn Jane ; Lillehaugen, Brook Danielle</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3952-4e6244ae5230287fc9c7ed80bed9efde2eee0e8ce578768058ba3a843552ac373</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Clauses</topic><topic>Clitics</topic><topic>Corpus linguistics</topic><topic>Negation</topic><topic>Syntactic analysis</topic><topic>Zapotec languages</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Carolyn Jane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lillehaugen, Brook Danielle</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><jtitle>Transactions of the Philological Society</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Anderson, Carolyn Jane</au><au>Lillehaugen, Brook Danielle</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Negation in Colonial Valley Zapotec</atitle><jtitle>Transactions of the Philological Society</jtitle><addtitle>Trans Philologic Soc</addtitle><date>2016-11</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>114</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>391</spage><epage>413</epage><pages>391-413</pages><issn>0079-1636</issn><eissn>1467-968X</eissn><abstract>This paper presents an overview of negation in Colonial Valley Zapotec (CVZ) based on a corpus of texts written in Valley Zapotec between 1565 and 1808. There are four negative markers in CVZ, two bound (ya=, qui=) and two free (aca, yaca). Standard negation employs a negative word and an optional clitic, =ti. Understanding the syntax of an historical form of Valley Zapotec allows us to make some observations about related forms in modern Valley Zapotec languages, in particular San Lucas Quiaviní Zapotec (SLQZ). For example, the morpheme =ti, which is required in clausal negation in SLQZ, is not obligatory in any negative constructions in CVZ until around 1800. In Vellon 1808, the youngest text in the corpus, we observe =ti required in one type of clausal negation. This allows us to observe details of the development of the modern Valley Zapotec negation system, including the fact that the remaining changes leading to obligatory =ti in clausal negation in SLQZ must have occurred within the last 200 years.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/1467-968X.12082</doi><tpages>23</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0079-1636
ispartof Transactions of the Philological Society, 2016-11, Vol.114 (3), p.391-413
issn 0079-1636
1467-968X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1829458694
source Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects Clauses
Clitics
Corpus linguistics
Negation
Syntactic analysis
Zapotec languages
title Negation in Colonial Valley Zapotec
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T14%3A35%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Negation%20in%20Colonial%20Valley%20Zapotec&rft.jtitle=Transactions%20of%20the%20Philological%20Society&rft.au=Anderson,%20Carolyn%20Jane&rft.date=2016-11&rft.volume=114&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=391&rft.epage=413&rft.pages=391-413&rft.issn=0079-1636&rft.eissn=1467-968X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1467-968X.12082&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1829458694%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1829458694&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true