Evaluating Seed Shatter of Economically Important Weed Species

The increasing occurrence of herbicide resistance, along with no new herbicide modes of action developed in over 30 yr, have increased the need for nonherbicidal weed management strategies and tactics. Harvest weed seed control (HWSC) practices have been successfully adopted in Australia to manage p...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Weed science 2016-10, Vol.64 (4), p.673-682
Hauptverfasser: Burton, Nikki R, Beckie, Hugh J, Willenborg, Christian J, Shirtliffe, Steven J, Schoenau, Jeff J, Johnson, Eric N
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 682
container_issue 4
container_start_page 673
container_title Weed science
container_volume 64
creator Burton, Nikki R
Beckie, Hugh J
Willenborg, Christian J
Shirtliffe, Steven J
Schoenau, Jeff J
Johnson, Eric N
description The increasing occurrence of herbicide resistance, along with no new herbicide modes of action developed in over 30 yr, have increased the need for nonherbicidal weed management strategies and tactics. Harvest weed seed control (HWSC) practices have been successfully adopted in Australia to manage problematic weeds. For HWSC to be effective, a high proportion of weed seeds must be retained on the plant at crop maturity. This 2-yr (2014, 2015) study evaluated seed shatter of wild oat, green foxtail, wild mustard, and cleavers in both an early (field pea) and late (spring wheat) maturity crop in field experiments at Scott, Saskatchewan. Seed shatter was assessed using shatter trays collected once a week during crop ripening stage, as well as at two crop maturation or harvest stages (swathing, direct-combining). Seed shatter differed among weed species, but was similar between crops at maturity: ca. 30% for wild oat, 5% for cleavers, < 2% for wild mustard, and < 1% for green foxtail. Overall, seed shatter of wild oat occurred sooner and at greater levels during the growing season compared with the other weed species. Viability of both shattered and plant-retained seeds was relatively high for all species. The small amount of seed shatter of cleavers, wild mustard, and green foxtail suggests that these species may be suitable candidates for HWSC. Due to the amount and timing of wild oat seed shatter, HWSC may not reduce population abundance of this grassy weed.
doi_str_mv 10.1614/WS-D-16-00081.1
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1829023501</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1614_WS_D_16_00081_1</cupid><jstor_id>26420736</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26420736</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b371t-bdb6ab518db86d28be483a74f1e927c682ea18e8f46621e54084db5ae2a0a1da3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMFLwzAUxoMoOKdnT0LBc7a8NEnTiyDb1MHAQ5UdQ9Kms6NtatoJ--_t1iFexNN78H7f9z4-hG6BTEAAm64TPMcgMCFEwgTO0Ag4J5hGPD5HI0JYiCFi_BJdte2WEBAU4hF6WHzpcqe7ot4EibVZkHzorrM-cHmwSF3tqiLVZbkPllXjfKfrLlgfscamhW2v0UWuy9benOYYvT8t3mYvePX6vJw9rrAJI-iwyYzQhoPMjBQZlcYyGeqI5WBjGqVCUqtBWpkz0ceynBHJMsO1pZpoyHQ4RveDb-Pd5862ndq6na_7lwokjQkNOYGemg5U6l3bepurxheV9nsFRB1KUutEzftNHUtSB8XdoNi2nfM_OBWMkigU_R1Ojroyvsg29tfjPz3xoDGFc7X9N8M3re2A7Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1829023501</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluating Seed Shatter of Economically Important Weed Species</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Burton, Nikki R ; Beckie, Hugh J ; Willenborg, Christian J ; Shirtliffe, Steven J ; Schoenau, Jeff J ; Johnson, Eric N</creator><creatorcontrib>Burton, Nikki R ; Beckie, Hugh J ; Willenborg, Christian J ; Shirtliffe, Steven J ; Schoenau, Jeff J ; Johnson, Eric N</creatorcontrib><description>The increasing occurrence of herbicide resistance, along with no new herbicide modes of action developed in over 30 yr, have increased the need for nonherbicidal weed management strategies and tactics. Harvest weed seed control (HWSC) practices have been successfully adopted in Australia to manage problematic weeds. For HWSC to be effective, a high proportion of weed seeds must be retained on the plant at crop maturity. This 2-yr (2014, 2015) study evaluated seed shatter of wild oat, green foxtail, wild mustard, and cleavers in both an early (field pea) and late (spring wheat) maturity crop in field experiments at Scott, Saskatchewan. Seed shatter was assessed using shatter trays collected once a week during crop ripening stage, as well as at two crop maturation or harvest stages (swathing, direct-combining). Seed shatter differed among weed species, but was similar between crops at maturity: ca. 30% for wild oat, 5% for cleavers, &lt; 2% for wild mustard, and &lt; 1% for green foxtail. Overall, seed shatter of wild oat occurred sooner and at greater levels during the growing season compared with the other weed species. Viability of both shattered and plant-retained seeds was relatively high for all species. The small amount of seed shatter of cleavers, wild mustard, and green foxtail suggests that these species may be suitable candidates for HWSC. Due to the amount and timing of wild oat seed shatter, HWSC may not reduce population abundance of this grassy weed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0043-1745</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1550-2759</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1614/WS-D-16-00081.1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: The Weed Science Society of America</publisher><subject>Barley ; Cereal crops ; Crops ; Economic importance ; Field tests ; Growing season ; Harvest weed seed control ; Harvesting ; herbicide resistance ; Herbicides ; integrated weed management ; Maturity ; Seeds ; Spring wheat ; WEED BIOLOGY AND ECOLOGY ; Weed control ; weed seed retention ; weed seed shatter ; Weeds ; Wheat</subject><ispartof>Weed science, 2016-10, Vol.64 (4), p.673-682</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2016 by the Weed Science Society of America</rights><rights>Copyright 2016 by the Weed Science Society of America</rights><rights>Copyright Allen Press Publishing Services Oct-Dec 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b371t-bdb6ab518db86d28be483a74f1e927c682ea18e8f46621e54084db5ae2a0a1da3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b371t-bdb6ab518db86d28be483a74f1e927c682ea18e8f46621e54084db5ae2a0a1da3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26420736$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S004317450002556X/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,780,784,803,27923,27924,55627,58016,58249</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Burton, Nikki R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beckie, Hugh J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Willenborg, Christian J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shirtliffe, Steven J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schoenau, Jeff J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Eric N</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluating Seed Shatter of Economically Important Weed Species</title><title>Weed science</title><addtitle>Weed sci</addtitle><description>The increasing occurrence of herbicide resistance, along with no new herbicide modes of action developed in over 30 yr, have increased the need for nonherbicidal weed management strategies and tactics. Harvest weed seed control (HWSC) practices have been successfully adopted in Australia to manage problematic weeds. For HWSC to be effective, a high proportion of weed seeds must be retained on the plant at crop maturity. This 2-yr (2014, 2015) study evaluated seed shatter of wild oat, green foxtail, wild mustard, and cleavers in both an early (field pea) and late (spring wheat) maturity crop in field experiments at Scott, Saskatchewan. Seed shatter was assessed using shatter trays collected once a week during crop ripening stage, as well as at two crop maturation or harvest stages (swathing, direct-combining). Seed shatter differed among weed species, but was similar between crops at maturity: ca. 30% for wild oat, 5% for cleavers, &lt; 2% for wild mustard, and &lt; 1% for green foxtail. Overall, seed shatter of wild oat occurred sooner and at greater levels during the growing season compared with the other weed species. Viability of both shattered and plant-retained seeds was relatively high for all species. The small amount of seed shatter of cleavers, wild mustard, and green foxtail suggests that these species may be suitable candidates for HWSC. Due to the amount and timing of wild oat seed shatter, HWSC may not reduce population abundance of this grassy weed.</description><subject>Barley</subject><subject>Cereal crops</subject><subject>Crops</subject><subject>Economic importance</subject><subject>Field tests</subject><subject>Growing season</subject><subject>Harvest weed seed control</subject><subject>Harvesting</subject><subject>herbicide resistance</subject><subject>Herbicides</subject><subject>integrated weed management</subject><subject>Maturity</subject><subject>Seeds</subject><subject>Spring wheat</subject><subject>WEED BIOLOGY AND ECOLOGY</subject><subject>Weed control</subject><subject>weed seed retention</subject><subject>weed seed shatter</subject><subject>Weeds</subject><subject>Wheat</subject><issn>0043-1745</issn><issn>1550-2759</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkMFLwzAUxoMoOKdnT0LBc7a8NEnTiyDb1MHAQ5UdQ9Kms6NtatoJ--_t1iFexNN78H7f9z4-hG6BTEAAm64TPMcgMCFEwgTO0Ag4J5hGPD5HI0JYiCFi_BJdte2WEBAU4hF6WHzpcqe7ot4EibVZkHzorrM-cHmwSF3tqiLVZbkPllXjfKfrLlgfscamhW2v0UWuy9benOYYvT8t3mYvePX6vJw9rrAJI-iwyYzQhoPMjBQZlcYyGeqI5WBjGqVCUqtBWpkz0ceynBHJMsO1pZpoyHQ4RveDb-Pd5862ndq6na_7lwokjQkNOYGemg5U6l3bepurxheV9nsFRB1KUutEzftNHUtSB8XdoNi2nfM_OBWMkigU_R1Ojroyvsg29tfjPz3xoDGFc7X9N8M3re2A7Q</recordid><startdate>20161001</startdate><enddate>20161001</enddate><creator>Burton, Nikki R</creator><creator>Beckie, Hugh J</creator><creator>Willenborg, Christian J</creator><creator>Shirtliffe, Steven J</creator><creator>Schoenau, Jeff J</creator><creator>Johnson, Eric N</creator><general>The Weed Science Society of America</general><general>Cambridge University Press</general><general>Weed Science Society of America</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20161001</creationdate><title>Evaluating Seed Shatter of Economically Important Weed Species</title><author>Burton, Nikki R ; Beckie, Hugh J ; Willenborg, Christian J ; Shirtliffe, Steven J ; Schoenau, Jeff J ; Johnson, Eric N</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b371t-bdb6ab518db86d28be483a74f1e927c682ea18e8f46621e54084db5ae2a0a1da3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Barley</topic><topic>Cereal crops</topic><topic>Crops</topic><topic>Economic importance</topic><topic>Field tests</topic><topic>Growing season</topic><topic>Harvest weed seed control</topic><topic>Harvesting</topic><topic>herbicide resistance</topic><topic>Herbicides</topic><topic>integrated weed management</topic><topic>Maturity</topic><topic>Seeds</topic><topic>Spring wheat</topic><topic>WEED BIOLOGY AND ECOLOGY</topic><topic>Weed control</topic><topic>weed seed retention</topic><topic>weed seed shatter</topic><topic>Weeds</topic><topic>Wheat</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Burton, Nikki R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beckie, Hugh J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Willenborg, Christian J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shirtliffe, Steven J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schoenau, Jeff J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Eric N</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Weed science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Burton, Nikki R</au><au>Beckie, Hugh J</au><au>Willenborg, Christian J</au><au>Shirtliffe, Steven J</au><au>Schoenau, Jeff J</au><au>Johnson, Eric N</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluating Seed Shatter of Economically Important Weed Species</atitle><jtitle>Weed science</jtitle><addtitle>Weed sci</addtitle><date>2016-10-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>64</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>673</spage><epage>682</epage><pages>673-682</pages><issn>0043-1745</issn><eissn>1550-2759</eissn><abstract>The increasing occurrence of herbicide resistance, along with no new herbicide modes of action developed in over 30 yr, have increased the need for nonherbicidal weed management strategies and tactics. Harvest weed seed control (HWSC) practices have been successfully adopted in Australia to manage problematic weeds. For HWSC to be effective, a high proportion of weed seeds must be retained on the plant at crop maturity. This 2-yr (2014, 2015) study evaluated seed shatter of wild oat, green foxtail, wild mustard, and cleavers in both an early (field pea) and late (spring wheat) maturity crop in field experiments at Scott, Saskatchewan. Seed shatter was assessed using shatter trays collected once a week during crop ripening stage, as well as at two crop maturation or harvest stages (swathing, direct-combining). Seed shatter differed among weed species, but was similar between crops at maturity: ca. 30% for wild oat, 5% for cleavers, &lt; 2% for wild mustard, and &lt; 1% for green foxtail. Overall, seed shatter of wild oat occurred sooner and at greater levels during the growing season compared with the other weed species. Viability of both shattered and plant-retained seeds was relatively high for all species. The small amount of seed shatter of cleavers, wild mustard, and green foxtail suggests that these species may be suitable candidates for HWSC. Due to the amount and timing of wild oat seed shatter, HWSC may not reduce population abundance of this grassy weed.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>The Weed Science Society of America</pub><doi>10.1614/WS-D-16-00081.1</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0043-1745
ispartof Weed science, 2016-10, Vol.64 (4), p.673-682
issn 0043-1745
1550-2759
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1829023501
source JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Cambridge University Press Journals Complete
subjects Barley
Cereal crops
Crops
Economic importance
Field tests
Growing season
Harvest weed seed control
Harvesting
herbicide resistance
Herbicides
integrated weed management
Maturity
Seeds
Spring wheat
WEED BIOLOGY AND ECOLOGY
Weed control
weed seed retention
weed seed shatter
Weeds
Wheat
title Evaluating Seed Shatter of Economically Important Weed Species
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T03%3A57%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluating%20Seed%20Shatter%20of%20Economically%20Important%20Weed%20Species&rft.jtitle=Weed%20science&rft.au=Burton,%20Nikki%20R&rft.date=2016-10-01&rft.volume=64&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=673&rft.epage=682&rft.pages=673-682&rft.issn=0043-1745&rft.eissn=1550-2759&rft_id=info:doi/10.1614/WS-D-16-00081.1&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26420736%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1829023501&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1614_WS_D_16_00081_1&rft_jstor_id=26420736&rfr_iscdi=true