P411(P) A comparative study of 300,000 IU & 600,000 IU vitamin-D for treatment of vitamin-D deficiency in young children: A Double Blind Randomized Trial

Objective To compare the efficacy and safety of 300,000 and 600,000 IU vitamin-D single-oral dose for the treatment of vitamin-D deficiency (VDD) in young children (3 mo–3yr). Design Double-blind randomised control trial. (Clinical Trail Registration-CTRI/2012/05/002621) Setting Paediatric out-patie...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Archives of disease in childhood 2014-04, Vol.99 (Suppl 1), p.A172-A173
Hauptverfasser: Verma, S, Jiyalal, H, Singhi, S, Sankhyan, N, Sachdeva, N, Bharti, B
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page A173
container_issue Suppl 1
container_start_page A172
container_title Archives of disease in childhood
container_volume 99
creator Verma, S
Jiyalal, H
Singhi, S
Sankhyan, N
Sachdeva, N
Bharti, B
description Objective To compare the efficacy and safety of 300,000 and 600,000 IU vitamin-D single-oral dose for the treatment of vitamin-D deficiency (VDD) in young children (3 mo–3yr). Design Double-blind randomised control trial. (Clinical Trail Registration-CTRI/2012/05/002621) Setting Paediatric out-patient department (OPD) at a tertiary-care referral hospital. Intervention Children (3 mo–3yr) with clinical/radiological features suggestive of VDD were screened; those found to have 25(OH)D below 15 ng/ml and meeting inclusion and exclusion criteria’s were enrolled after taking informed consent. They were randomised into two groups, one receiving 6L and other 3L vitamin-D orally stat (Stoss-therapy). Outcome measures Primary outcome measure was proportion of children developing hypercalcaemia/and hypercalceuria at day 7–10 post-therapy. Secondary outcome measures were proportion of children with hypercalceuria at day 3–5, hypercalcaemia/and hypercalceuria at day 25–30 and 25(OH)D sufficiency at day 25–30 post-therapy. Results Sixty children, 30 in each group were randomised to two study groups. Baseline variables were comparable in two groups. Primary outcome measure (proportion of children with hypercalcaemia/and hypercalciuria at 7–10th day) were 18.5%(5/27) in 6L and 10.7%(3/28) in 3L group [P = 00.47]. Secondary outcome measures were – i) Proportion of children with hypercalciuria (3–5th day) were 18.5%(5/27) in 6L and 7%(2/28) in 3L group (P = 0.25). ii) Proportion of children with hypercalcaemia/and hypercalciuria (25–30th day) were 18.5%(5/27) in 6L and 11%(3/28) in 3L group (P = 0.47). iii) All children in both groups had 25(OH)D levels in sufficiency range (25–30th day). With this sample size no significant difference in any of the group could be established. Conclusions The superiority of 3L over 6L vitamin-D single-dose oral therapy for VDD in children (3 mo–3yr) in terms of safety couldn’t be established with this sample size, although the prevalence of hypercalcaemia/and hypercalciuria was observed more with 6L group. Both the regimens were effective for treating VDD at 25–30th day post-therapy.
doi_str_mv 10.1136/archdischild-2014-306237.392
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1828888503</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4214869361</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b1293-b6ed3e6f8bcd17f22350faaca96b1fbf7487ae275cd43d8de48545dc7df2d9c23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkc1KHEEQgBtJIBvNOxQoEsFZ-29meoKX1VUjCJGg56anf2IvM91rz4ywnrz4FL6dT5JZN2Cunprqqq-qqA-hPYKnhLDiSCV9Z3yn73xjMooJzxguKCunrKJbaEJ4IcZvzj-hCcaYZZUQ4gv62nULjAkVgk3QyzUn5Pv1wevT8wx0bJcqqd4_WOj6wawgOmAYH440XN7CPhTvwYPvVetDNgcXE_TJqr61oV8j7yljndfeBr0CH2AVh_AH3tZNNvyAGczjUDcWThofDPxWwcTWP1oDN8mrZgd9dqrp7Ld_7za6PT-7Of2ZXf26uDydXWU1oRXL6sIaZgsnam1I6ShlOXZKaVUVNXG1K7kolaVlrg1nRhjLRc5zo0vjqKk0Zdtod9N3meL9YLteLuKQwjhSEjGeSYgcs7HqeFOlU-y6ZJ1cJt-qtJIEy7UO-b8OudYhNzrkqGPEyw1et4uPkX8BKo2SqA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1828888503</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>P411(P) A comparative study of 300,000 IU &amp; 600,000 IU vitamin-D for treatment of vitamin-D deficiency in young children: A Double Blind Randomized Trial</title><source>BMJ Journals - NESLi2</source><creator>Verma, S ; Jiyalal, H ; Singhi, S ; Sankhyan, N ; Sachdeva, N ; Bharti, B</creator><creatorcontrib>Verma, S ; Jiyalal, H ; Singhi, S ; Sankhyan, N ; Sachdeva, N ; Bharti, B</creatorcontrib><description>Objective To compare the efficacy and safety of 300,000 and 600,000 IU vitamin-D single-oral dose for the treatment of vitamin-D deficiency (VDD) in young children (3 mo–3yr). Design Double-blind randomised control trial. (Clinical Trail Registration-CTRI/2012/05/002621) Setting Paediatric out-patient department (OPD) at a tertiary-care referral hospital. Intervention Children (3 mo–3yr) with clinical/radiological features suggestive of VDD were screened; those found to have 25(OH)D below 15 ng/ml and meeting inclusion and exclusion criteria’s were enrolled after taking informed consent. They were randomised into two groups, one receiving 6L and other 3L vitamin-D orally stat (Stoss-therapy). Outcome measures Primary outcome measure was proportion of children developing hypercalcaemia/and hypercalceuria at day 7–10 post-therapy. Secondary outcome measures were proportion of children with hypercalceuria at day 3–5, hypercalcaemia/and hypercalceuria at day 25–30 and 25(OH)D sufficiency at day 25–30 post-therapy. Results Sixty children, 30 in each group were randomised to two study groups. Baseline variables were comparable in two groups. Primary outcome measure (proportion of children with hypercalcaemia/and hypercalciuria at 7–10th day) were 18.5%(5/27) in 6L and 10.7%(3/28) in 3L group [P = 00.47]. Secondary outcome measures were – i) Proportion of children with hypercalciuria (3–5th day) were 18.5%(5/27) in 6L and 7%(2/28) in 3L group (P = 0.25). ii) Proportion of children with hypercalcaemia/and hypercalciuria (25–30th day) were 18.5%(5/27) in 6L and 11%(3/28) in 3L group (P = 0.47). iii) All children in both groups had 25(OH)D levels in sufficiency range (25–30th day). With this sample size no significant difference in any of the group could be established. Conclusions The superiority of 3L over 6L vitamin-D single-dose oral therapy for VDD in children (3 mo–3yr) in terms of safety couldn’t be established with this sample size, although the prevalence of hypercalcaemia/and hypercalciuria was observed more with 6L group. Both the regimens were effective for treating VDD at 25–30th day post-therapy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-9888</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-2044</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2014-306237.392</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ADCHAK</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: BMJ Publishing Group LTD</publisher><subject>Comparative Analysis ; Comparative studies ; Outcome Measures ; Sample Size ; Young Children</subject><ispartof>Archives of disease in childhood, 2014-04, Vol.99 (Suppl 1), p.A172-A173</ispartof><rights>2014, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions</rights><rights>Copyright: 2014 (c) 2014, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://adc.bmj.com/content/99/Suppl_1/A172.3.full.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://adc.bmj.com/content/99/Suppl_1/A172.3.full$$EHTML$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>114,115,314,780,784,3194,23569,27922,27923,77370,77401</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Verma, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiyalal, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singhi, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sankhyan, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sachdeva, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bharti, B</creatorcontrib><title>P411(P) A comparative study of 300,000 IU &amp; 600,000 IU vitamin-D for treatment of vitamin-D deficiency in young children: A Double Blind Randomized Trial</title><title>Archives of disease in childhood</title><description>Objective To compare the efficacy and safety of 300,000 and 600,000 IU vitamin-D single-oral dose for the treatment of vitamin-D deficiency (VDD) in young children (3 mo–3yr). Design Double-blind randomised control trial. (Clinical Trail Registration-CTRI/2012/05/002621) Setting Paediatric out-patient department (OPD) at a tertiary-care referral hospital. Intervention Children (3 mo–3yr) with clinical/radiological features suggestive of VDD were screened; those found to have 25(OH)D below 15 ng/ml and meeting inclusion and exclusion criteria’s were enrolled after taking informed consent. They were randomised into two groups, one receiving 6L and other 3L vitamin-D orally stat (Stoss-therapy). Outcome measures Primary outcome measure was proportion of children developing hypercalcaemia/and hypercalceuria at day 7–10 post-therapy. Secondary outcome measures were proportion of children with hypercalceuria at day 3–5, hypercalcaemia/and hypercalceuria at day 25–30 and 25(OH)D sufficiency at day 25–30 post-therapy. Results Sixty children, 30 in each group were randomised to two study groups. Baseline variables were comparable in two groups. Primary outcome measure (proportion of children with hypercalcaemia/and hypercalciuria at 7–10th day) were 18.5%(5/27) in 6L and 10.7%(3/28) in 3L group [P = 00.47]. Secondary outcome measures were – i) Proportion of children with hypercalciuria (3–5th day) were 18.5%(5/27) in 6L and 7%(2/28) in 3L group (P = 0.25). ii) Proportion of children with hypercalcaemia/and hypercalciuria (25–30th day) were 18.5%(5/27) in 6L and 11%(3/28) in 3L group (P = 0.47). iii) All children in both groups had 25(OH)D levels in sufficiency range (25–30th day). With this sample size no significant difference in any of the group could be established. Conclusions The superiority of 3L over 6L vitamin-D single-dose oral therapy for VDD in children (3 mo–3yr) in terms of safety couldn’t be established with this sample size, although the prevalence of hypercalcaemia/and hypercalciuria was observed more with 6L group. Both the regimens were effective for treating VDD at 25–30th day post-therapy.</description><subject>Comparative Analysis</subject><subject>Comparative studies</subject><subject>Outcome Measures</subject><subject>Sample Size</subject><subject>Young Children</subject><issn>0003-9888</issn><issn>1468-2044</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkc1KHEEQgBtJIBvNOxQoEsFZ-29meoKX1VUjCJGg56anf2IvM91rz4ywnrz4FL6dT5JZN2Cunprqqq-qqA-hPYKnhLDiSCV9Z3yn73xjMooJzxguKCunrKJbaEJ4IcZvzj-hCcaYZZUQ4gv62nULjAkVgk3QyzUn5Pv1wevT8wx0bJcqqd4_WOj6wawgOmAYH440XN7CPhTvwYPvVetDNgcXE_TJqr61oV8j7yljndfeBr0CH2AVh_AH3tZNNvyAGczjUDcWThofDPxWwcTWP1oDN8mrZgd9dqrp7Ld_7za6PT-7Of2ZXf26uDydXWU1oRXL6sIaZgsnam1I6ShlOXZKaVUVNXG1K7kolaVlrg1nRhjLRc5zo0vjqKk0Zdtod9N3meL9YLteLuKQwjhSEjGeSYgcs7HqeFOlU-y6ZJ1cJt-qtJIEy7UO-b8OudYhNzrkqGPEyw1et4uPkX8BKo2SqA</recordid><startdate>201404</startdate><enddate>201404</enddate><creator>Verma, S</creator><creator>Jiyalal, H</creator><creator>Singhi, S</creator><creator>Sankhyan, N</creator><creator>Sachdeva, N</creator><creator>Bharti, B</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8A4</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201404</creationdate><title>P411(P) A comparative study of 300,000 IU &amp; 600,000 IU vitamin-D for treatment of vitamin-D deficiency in young children: A Double Blind Randomized Trial</title><author>Verma, S ; Jiyalal, H ; Singhi, S ; Sankhyan, N ; Sachdeva, N ; Bharti, B</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b1293-b6ed3e6f8bcd17f22350faaca96b1fbf7487ae275cd43d8de48545dc7df2d9c23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Comparative Analysis</topic><topic>Comparative studies</topic><topic>Outcome Measures</topic><topic>Sample Size</topic><topic>Young Children</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Verma, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiyalal, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singhi, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sankhyan, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sachdeva, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bharti, B</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Periodicals</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Archives of disease in childhood</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Verma, S</au><au>Jiyalal, H</au><au>Singhi, S</au><au>Sankhyan, N</au><au>Sachdeva, N</au><au>Bharti, B</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>P411(P) A comparative study of 300,000 IU &amp; 600,000 IU vitamin-D for treatment of vitamin-D deficiency in young children: A Double Blind Randomized Trial</atitle><jtitle>Archives of disease in childhood</jtitle><date>2014-04</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>99</volume><issue>Suppl 1</issue><spage>A172</spage><epage>A173</epage><pages>A172-A173</pages><issn>0003-9888</issn><eissn>1468-2044</eissn><coden>ADCHAK</coden><abstract>Objective To compare the efficacy and safety of 300,000 and 600,000 IU vitamin-D single-oral dose for the treatment of vitamin-D deficiency (VDD) in young children (3 mo–3yr). Design Double-blind randomised control trial. (Clinical Trail Registration-CTRI/2012/05/002621) Setting Paediatric out-patient department (OPD) at a tertiary-care referral hospital. Intervention Children (3 mo–3yr) with clinical/radiological features suggestive of VDD were screened; those found to have 25(OH)D below 15 ng/ml and meeting inclusion and exclusion criteria’s were enrolled after taking informed consent. They were randomised into two groups, one receiving 6L and other 3L vitamin-D orally stat (Stoss-therapy). Outcome measures Primary outcome measure was proportion of children developing hypercalcaemia/and hypercalceuria at day 7–10 post-therapy. Secondary outcome measures were proportion of children with hypercalceuria at day 3–5, hypercalcaemia/and hypercalceuria at day 25–30 and 25(OH)D sufficiency at day 25–30 post-therapy. Results Sixty children, 30 in each group were randomised to two study groups. Baseline variables were comparable in two groups. Primary outcome measure (proportion of children with hypercalcaemia/and hypercalciuria at 7–10th day) were 18.5%(5/27) in 6L and 10.7%(3/28) in 3L group [P = 00.47]. Secondary outcome measures were – i) Proportion of children with hypercalciuria (3–5th day) were 18.5%(5/27) in 6L and 7%(2/28) in 3L group (P = 0.25). ii) Proportion of children with hypercalcaemia/and hypercalciuria (25–30th day) were 18.5%(5/27) in 6L and 11%(3/28) in 3L group (P = 0.47). iii) All children in both groups had 25(OH)D levels in sufficiency range (25–30th day). With this sample size no significant difference in any of the group could be established. Conclusions The superiority of 3L over 6L vitamin-D single-dose oral therapy for VDD in children (3 mo–3yr) in terms of safety couldn’t be established with this sample size, although the prevalence of hypercalcaemia/and hypercalciuria was observed more with 6L group. Both the regimens were effective for treating VDD at 25–30th day post-therapy.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</pub><doi>10.1136/archdischild-2014-306237.392</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-9888
ispartof Archives of disease in childhood, 2014-04, Vol.99 (Suppl 1), p.A172-A173
issn 0003-9888
1468-2044
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1828888503
source BMJ Journals - NESLi2
subjects Comparative Analysis
Comparative studies
Outcome Measures
Sample Size
Young Children
title P411(P) A comparative study of 300,000 IU & 600,000 IU vitamin-D for treatment of vitamin-D deficiency in young children: A Double Blind Randomized Trial
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T11%3A32%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=P411(P)%E2%80%85A%20comparative%20study%20of%20300,000%20IU%20&%20600,000%20IU%20vitamin-D%20for%20treatment%20of%20vitamin-D%20deficiency%20in%20young%20children:%20A%20Double%20Blind%20Randomized%20Trial&rft.jtitle=Archives%20of%20disease%20in%20childhood&rft.au=Verma,%20S&rft.date=2014-04&rft.volume=99&rft.issue=Suppl%201&rft.spage=A172&rft.epage=A173&rft.pages=A172-A173&rft.issn=0003-9888&rft.eissn=1468-2044&rft.coden=ADCHAK&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/archdischild-2014-306237.392&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4214869361%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1828888503&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true