1317 Arm Functions in Children with a Conservatively Treated Obstetric Brachial Plexus Palsy

Aim To determine whether conservative treatment of children with Obstetrics Plexus Brachialis Palsy (OBPP) results in restrictions of activities, participation and body functions and structure. Method 22 children, born with OBPP were examined at the age of 4 till 17 years. The activity level is asse...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Archives of disease in childhood 2012-10, Vol.97 (Suppl 2), p.A375-A376
Hauptverfasser: Boer, IK de, Stenvers, JD, Geven, WB, Jelsma, LD, Niemeijer, AS
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page A376
container_issue Suppl 2
container_start_page A375
container_title Archives of disease in childhood
container_volume 97
creator Boer, IK de
Stenvers, JD
Geven, WB
Jelsma, LD
Niemeijer, AS
description Aim To determine whether conservative treatment of children with Obstetrics Plexus Brachialis Palsy (OBPP) results in restrictions of activities, participation and body functions and structure. Method 22 children, born with OBPP were examined at the age of 4 till 17 years. The activity level is assessed by the Movement Assessment Battery for Children-2 (M-ABC 2) and the Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency, Second Edition (BOT-2). For the Body functions and structure, the muscle strength is measured by the Hand Held Dynamometer (HHD) and the joint mobility by goniometry and the Stenvers tests. In addition the scapula position is observed. The Participation is documented by Children’s Assessment of Participation and Enjoyment (CAPE). Results Concerning the body functions and structure we found differences between the arms in joint mobility and muscle strength. 45.5% of the children have a medio-rotation of the scapula. These differences lead to a different movement pattern of the affected arm. The effect of the OBPP on the level of activity and participation seems to be of no importance. The children with an OBPP do not stay behind with children of their age in physical and social activities. Conclusions Children with a conservative treaded OBPP have persisting restrictions specially on the level of body functions and structure. Despite these restrictions there is no relevant effect shown on the activity and participation level. Using the mobility tests we think there is a relation between position of the scapula and the joint mobility.
doi_str_mv 10.1136/archdischild-2012-302724.1317
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1828866891</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4214797441</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b2247-6645d36c925ba80b4f7bd8c72c849059c9a745f13d05f03dc98e8627bfa6a7c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkE1LwzAYx4MoOKffISAeq3lrkh48aHFOELfDkB2EkKYpy-xaTVp1396Uinj19MDD7_-8_AC4wOgSY8qvtDeb0gWzcXWZEIRJQhERhF1iisUBmGDGZewzdggmCCGaZFLKY3ASwhZFWko6AS8DC2_8Ds76xnSubQJ0DcyHmd428NN1G6hhHvvWf-jOfdh6D1fe6s6WcFGEznbeGXjrdbxD13BZ268-wKWuw_4UHFWx2rOfOgWr2d0qnyePi_uH_OYxKQhhIuGcpSXlJiNpoSUqWCWKUhpBjGQZSjOTacHSCtMSpRWipcmklZyIotJcC0On4Hwc--bb996GTm3b3jdxo8Iyvsm5zHCkrkfK-DYEbyv15t1O-73CSA0-1V-favCpRp9qcBTzyZh38eev37D2r4oLKlL19Jwr_MTWy7m8V-vIy5Evdtt_rvoG05CNiQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1828866891</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>1317 Arm Functions in Children with a Conservatively Treated Obstetric Brachial Plexus Palsy</title><source>BMJ Journals - NESLi2</source><creator>Boer, IK de ; Stenvers, JD ; Geven, WB ; Jelsma, LD ; Niemeijer, AS</creator><creatorcontrib>Boer, IK de ; Stenvers, JD ; Geven, WB ; Jelsma, LD ; Niemeijer, AS</creatorcontrib><description>Aim To determine whether conservative treatment of children with Obstetrics Plexus Brachialis Palsy (OBPP) results in restrictions of activities, participation and body functions and structure. Method 22 children, born with OBPP were examined at the age of 4 till 17 years. The activity level is assessed by the Movement Assessment Battery for Children-2 (M-ABC 2) and the Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency, Second Edition (BOT-2). For the Body functions and structure, the muscle strength is measured by the Hand Held Dynamometer (HHD) and the joint mobility by goniometry and the Stenvers tests. In addition the scapula position is observed. The Participation is documented by Children’s Assessment of Participation and Enjoyment (CAPE). Results Concerning the body functions and structure we found differences between the arms in joint mobility and muscle strength. 45.5% of the children have a medio-rotation of the scapula. These differences lead to a different movement pattern of the affected arm. The effect of the OBPP on the level of activity and participation seems to be of no importance. The children with an OBPP do not stay behind with children of their age in physical and social activities. Conclusions Children with a conservative treaded OBPP have persisting restrictions specially on the level of body functions and structure. Despite these restrictions there is no relevant effect shown on the activity and participation level. Using the mobility tests we think there is a relation between position of the scapula and the joint mobility.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-9888</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-2044</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2012-302724.1317</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ADCHAK</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health</publisher><subject>Mobility ; Muscular Strength ; Physical Fitness</subject><ispartof>Archives of disease in childhood, 2012-10, Vol.97 (Suppl 2), p.A375-A376</ispartof><rights>2012, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.</rights><rights>Copyright: 2012 (c) 2012, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://adc.bmj.com/content/97/Suppl_2/A375.4.full.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://adc.bmj.com/content/97/Suppl_2/A375.4.full$$EHTML$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>114,115,314,780,784,3196,23571,27924,27925,77600,77631</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Boer, IK de</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stenvers, JD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geven, WB</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jelsma, LD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niemeijer, AS</creatorcontrib><title>1317 Arm Functions in Children with a Conservatively Treated Obstetric Brachial Plexus Palsy</title><title>Archives of disease in childhood</title><addtitle>Arch Dis Child</addtitle><description>Aim To determine whether conservative treatment of children with Obstetrics Plexus Brachialis Palsy (OBPP) results in restrictions of activities, participation and body functions and structure. Method 22 children, born with OBPP were examined at the age of 4 till 17 years. The activity level is assessed by the Movement Assessment Battery for Children-2 (M-ABC 2) and the Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency, Second Edition (BOT-2). For the Body functions and structure, the muscle strength is measured by the Hand Held Dynamometer (HHD) and the joint mobility by goniometry and the Stenvers tests. In addition the scapula position is observed. The Participation is documented by Children’s Assessment of Participation and Enjoyment (CAPE). Results Concerning the body functions and structure we found differences between the arms in joint mobility and muscle strength. 45.5% of the children have a medio-rotation of the scapula. These differences lead to a different movement pattern of the affected arm. The effect of the OBPP on the level of activity and participation seems to be of no importance. The children with an OBPP do not stay behind with children of their age in physical and social activities. Conclusions Children with a conservative treaded OBPP have persisting restrictions specially on the level of body functions and structure. Despite these restrictions there is no relevant effect shown on the activity and participation level. Using the mobility tests we think there is a relation between position of the scapula and the joint mobility.</description><subject>Mobility</subject><subject>Muscular Strength</subject><subject>Physical Fitness</subject><issn>0003-9888</issn><issn>1468-2044</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkE1LwzAYx4MoOKffISAeq3lrkh48aHFOELfDkB2EkKYpy-xaTVp1396Uinj19MDD7_-8_AC4wOgSY8qvtDeb0gWzcXWZEIRJQhERhF1iisUBmGDGZewzdggmCCGaZFLKY3ASwhZFWko6AS8DC2_8Ds76xnSubQJ0DcyHmd428NN1G6hhHvvWf-jOfdh6D1fe6s6WcFGEznbeGXjrdbxD13BZ268-wKWuw_4UHFWx2rOfOgWr2d0qnyePi_uH_OYxKQhhIuGcpSXlJiNpoSUqWCWKUhpBjGQZSjOTacHSCtMSpRWipcmklZyIotJcC0On4Hwc--bb996GTm3b3jdxo8Iyvsm5zHCkrkfK-DYEbyv15t1O-73CSA0-1V-favCpRp9qcBTzyZh38eev37D2r4oLKlL19Jwr_MTWy7m8V-vIy5Evdtt_rvoG05CNiQ</recordid><startdate>201210</startdate><enddate>201210</enddate><creator>Boer, IK de</creator><creator>Stenvers, JD</creator><creator>Geven, WB</creator><creator>Jelsma, LD</creator><creator>Niemeijer, AS</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8A4</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201210</creationdate><title>1317 Arm Functions in Children with a Conservatively Treated Obstetric Brachial Plexus Palsy</title><author>Boer, IK de ; Stenvers, JD ; Geven, WB ; Jelsma, LD ; Niemeijer, AS</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b2247-6645d36c925ba80b4f7bd8c72c849059c9a745f13d05f03dc98e8627bfa6a7c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Mobility</topic><topic>Muscular Strength</topic><topic>Physical Fitness</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Boer, IK de</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stenvers, JD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geven, WB</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jelsma, LD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niemeijer, AS</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Periodicals</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Archives of disease in childhood</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Boer, IK de</au><au>Stenvers, JD</au><au>Geven, WB</au><au>Jelsma, LD</au><au>Niemeijer, AS</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>1317 Arm Functions in Children with a Conservatively Treated Obstetric Brachial Plexus Palsy</atitle><jtitle>Archives of disease in childhood</jtitle><addtitle>Arch Dis Child</addtitle><date>2012-10</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>97</volume><issue>Suppl 2</issue><spage>A375</spage><epage>A376</epage><pages>A375-A376</pages><issn>0003-9888</issn><eissn>1468-2044</eissn><coden>ADCHAK</coden><abstract>Aim To determine whether conservative treatment of children with Obstetrics Plexus Brachialis Palsy (OBPP) results in restrictions of activities, participation and body functions and structure. Method 22 children, born with OBPP were examined at the age of 4 till 17 years. The activity level is assessed by the Movement Assessment Battery for Children-2 (M-ABC 2) and the Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency, Second Edition (BOT-2). For the Body functions and structure, the muscle strength is measured by the Hand Held Dynamometer (HHD) and the joint mobility by goniometry and the Stenvers tests. In addition the scapula position is observed. The Participation is documented by Children’s Assessment of Participation and Enjoyment (CAPE). Results Concerning the body functions and structure we found differences between the arms in joint mobility and muscle strength. 45.5% of the children have a medio-rotation of the scapula. These differences lead to a different movement pattern of the affected arm. The effect of the OBPP on the level of activity and participation seems to be of no importance. The children with an OBPP do not stay behind with children of their age in physical and social activities. Conclusions Children with a conservative treaded OBPP have persisting restrictions specially on the level of body functions and structure. Despite these restrictions there is no relevant effect shown on the activity and participation level. Using the mobility tests we think there is a relation between position of the scapula and the joint mobility.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health</pub><doi>10.1136/archdischild-2012-302724.1317</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-9888
ispartof Archives of disease in childhood, 2012-10, Vol.97 (Suppl 2), p.A375-A376
issn 0003-9888
1468-2044
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1828866891
source BMJ Journals - NESLi2
subjects Mobility
Muscular Strength
Physical Fitness
title 1317 Arm Functions in Children with a Conservatively Treated Obstetric Brachial Plexus Palsy
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T09%3A35%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=1317%20Arm%20Functions%20in%20Children%20with%20a%20Conservatively%20Treated%20Obstetric%20Brachial%20Plexus%20Palsy&rft.jtitle=Archives%20of%20disease%20in%20childhood&rft.au=Boer,%20IK%20de&rft.date=2012-10&rft.volume=97&rft.issue=Suppl%202&rft.spage=A375&rft.epage=A376&rft.pages=A375-A376&rft.issn=0003-9888&rft.eissn=1468-2044&rft.coden=ADCHAK&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/archdischild-2012-302724.1317&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4214797441%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1828866891&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true