1274 A Comparative Study of Klimek and Ballard Methods in Determining Neonatal Maturity in Iran

Background and purpose: Severe prematurity, as the most important factor in premature neonatal mortality, is of paramount importance and accounts for 60–80 percent of neonatal mortality without abnormalities. Therefore, by defining the exact time of fetus maturity, complications and side effects cou...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Archives of disease in childhood 2012-10, Vol.97 (Suppl 2), p.A364-A364
Hauptverfasser: Saeedi, R, Rahmani, S, Loee, S
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page A364
container_issue Suppl 2
container_start_page A364
container_title Archives of disease in childhood
container_volume 97
creator Saeedi, R
Rahmani, S
Loee, S
description Background and purpose: Severe prematurity, as the most important factor in premature neonatal mortality, is of paramount importance and accounts for 60–80 percent of neonatal mortality without abnormalities. Therefore, by defining the exact time of fetus maturity, complications and side effects could be predicted and best decisions could be made. Since the present methods are complicated, time-consuming and stressful for the neonates, researchers decided to compare the simple Klimek method with the New Ballard method. Methods and materials: This study is a descriptive cross-sectional research. Qualified neonates in a single group were examined for maturity by both Klimek and New Ballard methods. Neonate was examined by the first co-researcher with New Ballard method, and immediately examined by the second co-researcher with Klimek method. The second neonate was examined by the first co-researcher with Klimek method and then immediately by the second co-researcher with Ballard method. All 229 neonates were examined in this way. The examinations were done in the first 6–12 hours after birth. Analysis of data was conducted in SPSS, using Mann Whitney U and Kappa Coefficient. Results In 74.6% (171 cases) the same gestational age was obtained by both methods (p=0.664). Also, determination of gestational age by Klimek method and LMP was not statistically different; and 75.9% (174 cases) the same gestational age was obtained by both methods (p=0.943). In 51.5% (118 cases), both methods detected mature neonates (K=0.806). Conclusion The simple Klimek Method is completely compatible with the New Ballard and LMP methods in determining neonatal maturity.
doi_str_mv 10.1136/archdischild-2012-302724.1274
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1828858201</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4214746531</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b2244-e567a8700cbc8ebc467f299ba33daaaf225fe1baa262a622672e656ebecd1f253</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkMlOwzAQhi0EEmV5B0uIY8BLYrsHDqVsFW05sPVmTRKHus1SbBfRtyclCHHlNNLo--fXfAidUnJGKRfn4LJ5bn02t2UeMUJZxAmTLD6jTMY7qEdjodp9HO-iHiGER32l1D468H5BWlop3kN6y-IBHjbVChwE-2HwY1jnG9wU-L60lVliqHN8CWUJLscTE-ZN7rGt8ZUJxlW2tvUbnpqmhgAlnkBYOxs2W2DkoD5CewWU3hz_zEP0fHP9NLyLxg-3o-FgHKWMxXFkEiFBSUKyNFMmzWIhC9bvp8B5DgAFY0lhaArABAPBmJDMiESY1GQ5LVjCD9FJd3flmve18UEvmrWr20pNVftqolpBLXXRUZlrvHem0CtnK3AbTYneOtV_neqtU905_fbU5qMub30wn79hcEstJJeJnr4M9ZjP7savfKZly6uOT6vFP6u-ABvEjw0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1828858201</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>1274 A Comparative Study of Klimek and Ballard Methods in Determining Neonatal Maturity in Iran</title><source>BMJ Journals - NESLi2</source><creator>Saeedi, R ; Rahmani, S ; Loee, S</creator><creatorcontrib>Saeedi, R ; Rahmani, S ; Loee, S</creatorcontrib><description>Background and purpose: Severe prematurity, as the most important factor in premature neonatal mortality, is of paramount importance and accounts for 60–80 percent of neonatal mortality without abnormalities. Therefore, by defining the exact time of fetus maturity, complications and side effects could be predicted and best decisions could be made. Since the present methods are complicated, time-consuming and stressful for the neonates, researchers decided to compare the simple Klimek method with the New Ballard method. Methods and materials: This study is a descriptive cross-sectional research. Qualified neonates in a single group were examined for maturity by both Klimek and New Ballard methods. Neonate was examined by the first co-researcher with New Ballard method, and immediately examined by the second co-researcher with Klimek method. The second neonate was examined by the first co-researcher with Klimek method and then immediately by the second co-researcher with Ballard method. All 229 neonates were examined in this way. The examinations were done in the first 6–12 hours after birth. Analysis of data was conducted in SPSS, using Mann Whitney U and Kappa Coefficient. Results In 74.6% (171 cases) the same gestational age was obtained by both methods (p=0.664). Also, determination of gestational age by Klimek method and LMP was not statistically different; and 75.9% (174 cases) the same gestational age was obtained by both methods (p=0.943). In 51.5% (118 cases), both methods detected mature neonates (K=0.806). Conclusion The simple Klimek Method is completely compatible with the New Ballard and LMP methods in determining neonatal maturity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-9888</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-2044</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2012-302724.1274</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ADCHAK</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health</publisher><subject>Attrition (Research Studies) ; Comparative Analysis ; Comparative studies ; Maturity ; Neonates ; Researchers</subject><ispartof>Archives of disease in childhood, 2012-10, Vol.97 (Suppl 2), p.A364-A364</ispartof><rights>2012, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.</rights><rights>Copyright: 2012 (c) 2012, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://adc.bmj.com/content/97/Suppl_2/A364.1.full.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://adc.bmj.com/content/97/Suppl_2/A364.1.full$$EHTML$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>114,115,314,780,784,3196,23571,27924,27925,77600,77631</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Saeedi, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rahmani, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loee, S</creatorcontrib><title>1274 A Comparative Study of Klimek and Ballard Methods in Determining Neonatal Maturity in Iran</title><title>Archives of disease in childhood</title><addtitle>Arch Dis Child</addtitle><description>Background and purpose: Severe prematurity, as the most important factor in premature neonatal mortality, is of paramount importance and accounts for 60–80 percent of neonatal mortality without abnormalities. Therefore, by defining the exact time of fetus maturity, complications and side effects could be predicted and best decisions could be made. Since the present methods are complicated, time-consuming and stressful for the neonates, researchers decided to compare the simple Klimek method with the New Ballard method. Methods and materials: This study is a descriptive cross-sectional research. Qualified neonates in a single group were examined for maturity by both Klimek and New Ballard methods. Neonate was examined by the first co-researcher with New Ballard method, and immediately examined by the second co-researcher with Klimek method. The second neonate was examined by the first co-researcher with Klimek method and then immediately by the second co-researcher with Ballard method. All 229 neonates were examined in this way. The examinations were done in the first 6–12 hours after birth. Analysis of data was conducted in SPSS, using Mann Whitney U and Kappa Coefficient. Results In 74.6% (171 cases) the same gestational age was obtained by both methods (p=0.664). Also, determination of gestational age by Klimek method and LMP was not statistically different; and 75.9% (174 cases) the same gestational age was obtained by both methods (p=0.943). In 51.5% (118 cases), both methods detected mature neonates (K=0.806). Conclusion The simple Klimek Method is completely compatible with the New Ballard and LMP methods in determining neonatal maturity.</description><subject>Attrition (Research Studies)</subject><subject>Comparative Analysis</subject><subject>Comparative studies</subject><subject>Maturity</subject><subject>Neonates</subject><subject>Researchers</subject><issn>0003-9888</issn><issn>1468-2044</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkMlOwzAQhi0EEmV5B0uIY8BLYrsHDqVsFW05sPVmTRKHus1SbBfRtyclCHHlNNLo--fXfAidUnJGKRfn4LJ5bn02t2UeMUJZxAmTLD6jTMY7qEdjodp9HO-iHiGER32l1D468H5BWlop3kN6y-IBHjbVChwE-2HwY1jnG9wU-L60lVliqHN8CWUJLscTE-ZN7rGt8ZUJxlW2tvUbnpqmhgAlnkBYOxs2W2DkoD5CewWU3hz_zEP0fHP9NLyLxg-3o-FgHKWMxXFkEiFBSUKyNFMmzWIhC9bvp8B5DgAFY0lhaArABAPBmJDMiESY1GQ5LVjCD9FJd3flmve18UEvmrWr20pNVftqolpBLXXRUZlrvHem0CtnK3AbTYneOtV_neqtU905_fbU5qMub30wn79hcEstJJeJnr4M9ZjP7savfKZly6uOT6vFP6u-ABvEjw0</recordid><startdate>201210</startdate><enddate>201210</enddate><creator>Saeedi, R</creator><creator>Rahmani, S</creator><creator>Loee, S</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8A4</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201210</creationdate><title>1274 A Comparative Study of Klimek and Ballard Methods in Determining Neonatal Maturity in Iran</title><author>Saeedi, R ; Rahmani, S ; Loee, S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b2244-e567a8700cbc8ebc467f299ba33daaaf225fe1baa262a622672e656ebecd1f253</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Attrition (Research Studies)</topic><topic>Comparative Analysis</topic><topic>Comparative studies</topic><topic>Maturity</topic><topic>Neonates</topic><topic>Researchers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Saeedi, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rahmani, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loee, S</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Periodicals</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Archives of disease in childhood</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Saeedi, R</au><au>Rahmani, S</au><au>Loee, S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>1274 A Comparative Study of Klimek and Ballard Methods in Determining Neonatal Maturity in Iran</atitle><jtitle>Archives of disease in childhood</jtitle><addtitle>Arch Dis Child</addtitle><date>2012-10</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>97</volume><issue>Suppl 2</issue><spage>A364</spage><epage>A364</epage><pages>A364-A364</pages><issn>0003-9888</issn><eissn>1468-2044</eissn><coden>ADCHAK</coden><abstract>Background and purpose: Severe prematurity, as the most important factor in premature neonatal mortality, is of paramount importance and accounts for 60–80 percent of neonatal mortality without abnormalities. Therefore, by defining the exact time of fetus maturity, complications and side effects could be predicted and best decisions could be made. Since the present methods are complicated, time-consuming and stressful for the neonates, researchers decided to compare the simple Klimek method with the New Ballard method. Methods and materials: This study is a descriptive cross-sectional research. Qualified neonates in a single group were examined for maturity by both Klimek and New Ballard methods. Neonate was examined by the first co-researcher with New Ballard method, and immediately examined by the second co-researcher with Klimek method. The second neonate was examined by the first co-researcher with Klimek method and then immediately by the second co-researcher with Ballard method. All 229 neonates were examined in this way. The examinations were done in the first 6–12 hours after birth. Analysis of data was conducted in SPSS, using Mann Whitney U and Kappa Coefficient. Results In 74.6% (171 cases) the same gestational age was obtained by both methods (p=0.664). Also, determination of gestational age by Klimek method and LMP was not statistically different; and 75.9% (174 cases) the same gestational age was obtained by both methods (p=0.943). In 51.5% (118 cases), both methods detected mature neonates (K=0.806). Conclusion The simple Klimek Method is completely compatible with the New Ballard and LMP methods in determining neonatal maturity.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health</pub><doi>10.1136/archdischild-2012-302724.1274</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-9888
ispartof Archives of disease in childhood, 2012-10, Vol.97 (Suppl 2), p.A364-A364
issn 0003-9888
1468-2044
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1828858201
source BMJ Journals - NESLi2
subjects Attrition (Research Studies)
Comparative Analysis
Comparative studies
Maturity
Neonates
Researchers
title 1274 A Comparative Study of Klimek and Ballard Methods in Determining Neonatal Maturity in Iran
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T14%3A34%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=1274%20A%20Comparative%20Study%20of%20Klimek%20and%20Ballard%20Methods%20in%20Determining%20Neonatal%20Maturity%20in%20Iran&rft.jtitle=Archives%20of%20disease%20in%20childhood&rft.au=Saeedi,%20R&rft.date=2012-10&rft.volume=97&rft.issue=Suppl%202&rft.spage=A364&rft.epage=A364&rft.pages=A364-A364&rft.issn=0003-9888&rft.eissn=1468-2044&rft.coden=ADCHAK&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/archdischild-2012-302724.1274&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4214746531%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1828858201&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true