1879 Pediatric Nurses Knowledge and Attitudes Toward Vital Signs
Aim This study was planned to determine pediatric nurses’ knowledge and attitudes towards monitoring the vital signs. Methods One hundred eleven nurses working in the inpatient clinics at a children’s hospital located in İzmir participated in the study. In the study, the following three forms were u...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Archives of disease in childhood 2012-10, Vol.97 (Suppl 2), p.A530-A530 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | A530 |
---|---|
container_issue | Suppl 2 |
container_start_page | A530 |
container_title | Archives of disease in childhood |
container_volume | 97 |
creator | Sarı, H Yıldırım Yöntem, S Çevik Demir, D Karaoğlan, N Şengün, S Çimen, S |
description | Aim This study was planned to determine pediatric nurses’ knowledge and attitudes towards monitoring the vital signs. Methods One hundred eleven nurses working in the inpatient clinics at a children’s hospital located in İzmir participated in the study. In the study, the following three forms were used: “The Socio-demographic Questionnaire”, “The Vital Signs Knowledge Assessment Survey” and “The Vital Signs Attitude Assessment Survey”. Knowledge and attitude surveys were prepared in accordance with the following guidelines published by the Royal College of Nursing: “Standards for Assessing, Measuring and Monitoring Vital Signs in Infants, Children and Young People” and “The Recognition and Assessment of Acute Pain in Children”. Cronbach’s alpha value of the Knowledge Survey is 0.87, the Attitude Survey is 0.86. Results The mean scores the nurses obtained from the knowledge survey were as follows: general principles: 87.9±7.8, temperature: 87.6±10.1, Pulse: 93.1±8.0, respiration: 96.4±7.4, blood pressure: 92.8±7.0 and pain: 91.8±9.8. The mean scores the nurses obtained from the attitude survey were as follows: general principles: 81.7±11.99, temperature: 87.4±15.9, pulse: 89.6±12.5, respiration: 95.3±9.8, blood pressure: 95.8±12.2 and pain: 91.0±15.5. Of the nurses, 49% stated that nurses themselves should decide about the frequency of monitoring vital signs whereas 41.4% stated that it should be ordered by the physician. Conclusion According to our findings, nurses’ knowledge and attitude scores relating to monitoring vital signs are quite high. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1136/archdischild-2012-302724.1879 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1828855855</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4214733211</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b2249-912e171bfa35be4115a40dca0c17b4645fde9ff487c3eccc29bc3938647ad7f13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkFFLwzAQx4MoOKffoSA-diZN2qQPgrPqFMcUN_ca0iTdMrt2Ji3Tb29KRXwVDg6O3_-O-wFwgeAIIZxcCivXyji5NqUKI4iiEMOIRmSEGE0PwACRhPk5IYdgACHEYcoYOwYnzm2gpxnDA3DdscGLVkY01shg1lqnXfBU1ftSq5UORKWCcdOYplV-vqj3wqpgaRpRBnOzqtwpOCpE6fTZTx-Ct_u7RfYQTp8nj9l4GuZRRNIwRZFGFOWFwHGuCUKxIFBJASWiOUlIXCidFgVhVGItpYzSXOIUs4RQoWiB8BCc93t3tv5otWv4pm5t5U9yxPwvcezLU1c9JW3tnNUF31mzFfaLI8g7afyvNN5J47003onw-bDPG9foz9-wsO88oZjGfLbM-Gs2pxOU3vIbz7Oez7ebf576BmZCg_w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1828855855</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>1879 Pediatric Nurses Knowledge and Attitudes Toward Vital Signs</title><source>BMJ Journals - NESLi2</source><creator>Sarı, H Yıldırım ; Yöntem, S Çevik ; Demir, D ; Karaoğlan, N ; Şengün, S ; Çimen, S</creator><creatorcontrib>Sarı, H Yıldırım ; Yöntem, S Çevik ; Demir, D ; Karaoğlan, N ; Şengün, S ; Çimen, S</creatorcontrib><description>Aim This study was planned to determine pediatric nurses’ knowledge and attitudes towards monitoring the vital signs. Methods One hundred eleven nurses working in the inpatient clinics at a children’s hospital located in İzmir participated in the study. In the study, the following three forms were used: “The Socio-demographic Questionnaire”, “The Vital Signs Knowledge Assessment Survey” and “The Vital Signs Attitude Assessment Survey”. Knowledge and attitude surveys were prepared in accordance with the following guidelines published by the Royal College of Nursing: “Standards for Assessing, Measuring and Monitoring Vital Signs in Infants, Children and Young People” and “The Recognition and Assessment of Acute Pain in Children”. Cronbach’s alpha value of the Knowledge Survey is 0.87, the Attitude Survey is 0.86. Results The mean scores the nurses obtained from the knowledge survey were as follows: general principles: 87.9±7.8, temperature: 87.6±10.1, Pulse: 93.1±8.0, respiration: 96.4±7.4, blood pressure: 92.8±7.0 and pain: 91.8±9.8. The mean scores the nurses obtained from the attitude survey were as follows: general principles: 81.7±11.99, temperature: 87.4±15.9, pulse: 89.6±12.5, respiration: 95.3±9.8, blood pressure: 95.8±12.2 and pain: 91.0±15.5. Of the nurses, 49% stated that nurses themselves should decide about the frequency of monitoring vital signs whereas 41.4% stated that it should be ordered by the physician. Conclusion According to our findings, nurses’ knowledge and attitude scores relating to monitoring vital signs are quite high.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-9888</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-2044</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2012-302724.1879</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ADCHAK</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health</publisher><subject>Blood pressure ; Nurses ; Pain ; Polls & surveys ; Respiration</subject><ispartof>Archives of disease in childhood, 2012-10, Vol.97 (Suppl 2), p.A530-A530</ispartof><rights>2012, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.</rights><rights>Copyright: 2012 (c) 2012, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://adc.bmj.com/content/97/Suppl_2/A530.3.full.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://adc.bmj.com/content/97/Suppl_2/A530.3.full$$EHTML$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>114,115,314,776,780,3183,23550,27901,27902,77342,77373</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sarı, H Yıldırım</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yöntem, S Çevik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Demir, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karaoğlan, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Şengün, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Çimen, S</creatorcontrib><title>1879 Pediatric Nurses Knowledge and Attitudes Toward Vital Signs</title><title>Archives of disease in childhood</title><addtitle>Arch Dis Child</addtitle><description>Aim This study was planned to determine pediatric nurses’ knowledge and attitudes towards monitoring the vital signs. Methods One hundred eleven nurses working in the inpatient clinics at a children’s hospital located in İzmir participated in the study. In the study, the following three forms were used: “The Socio-demographic Questionnaire”, “The Vital Signs Knowledge Assessment Survey” and “The Vital Signs Attitude Assessment Survey”. Knowledge and attitude surveys were prepared in accordance with the following guidelines published by the Royal College of Nursing: “Standards for Assessing, Measuring and Monitoring Vital Signs in Infants, Children and Young People” and “The Recognition and Assessment of Acute Pain in Children”. Cronbach’s alpha value of the Knowledge Survey is 0.87, the Attitude Survey is 0.86. Results The mean scores the nurses obtained from the knowledge survey were as follows: general principles: 87.9±7.8, temperature: 87.6±10.1, Pulse: 93.1±8.0, respiration: 96.4±7.4, blood pressure: 92.8±7.0 and pain: 91.8±9.8. The mean scores the nurses obtained from the attitude survey were as follows: general principles: 81.7±11.99, temperature: 87.4±15.9, pulse: 89.6±12.5, respiration: 95.3±9.8, blood pressure: 95.8±12.2 and pain: 91.0±15.5. Of the nurses, 49% stated that nurses themselves should decide about the frequency of monitoring vital signs whereas 41.4% stated that it should be ordered by the physician. Conclusion According to our findings, nurses’ knowledge and attitude scores relating to monitoring vital signs are quite high.</description><subject>Blood pressure</subject><subject>Nurses</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Polls & surveys</subject><subject>Respiration</subject><issn>0003-9888</issn><issn>1468-2044</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkFFLwzAQx4MoOKffoSA-diZN2qQPgrPqFMcUN_ca0iTdMrt2Ji3Tb29KRXwVDg6O3_-O-wFwgeAIIZxcCivXyji5NqUKI4iiEMOIRmSEGE0PwACRhPk5IYdgACHEYcoYOwYnzm2gpxnDA3DdscGLVkY01shg1lqnXfBU1ftSq5UORKWCcdOYplV-vqj3wqpgaRpRBnOzqtwpOCpE6fTZTx-Ct_u7RfYQTp8nj9l4GuZRRNIwRZFGFOWFwHGuCUKxIFBJASWiOUlIXCidFgVhVGItpYzSXOIUs4RQoWiB8BCc93t3tv5otWv4pm5t5U9yxPwvcezLU1c9JW3tnNUF31mzFfaLI8g7afyvNN5J47003onw-bDPG9foz9-wsO88oZjGfLbM-Gs2pxOU3vIbz7Oez7ebf576BmZCg_w</recordid><startdate>201210</startdate><enddate>201210</enddate><creator>Sarı, H Yıldırım</creator><creator>Yöntem, S Çevik</creator><creator>Demir, D</creator><creator>Karaoğlan, N</creator><creator>Şengün, S</creator><creator>Çimen, S</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8A4</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201210</creationdate><title>1879 Pediatric Nurses Knowledge and Attitudes Toward Vital Signs</title><author>Sarı, H Yıldırım ; Yöntem, S Çevik ; Demir, D ; Karaoğlan, N ; Şengün, S ; Çimen, S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b2249-912e171bfa35be4115a40dca0c17b4645fde9ff487c3eccc29bc3938647ad7f13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Blood pressure</topic><topic>Nurses</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Polls & surveys</topic><topic>Respiration</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sarı, H Yıldırım</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yöntem, S Çevik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Demir, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karaoğlan, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Şengün, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Çimen, S</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Periodicals</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Archives of disease in childhood</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sarı, H Yıldırım</au><au>Yöntem, S Çevik</au><au>Demir, D</au><au>Karaoğlan, N</au><au>Şengün, S</au><au>Çimen, S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>1879 Pediatric Nurses Knowledge and Attitudes Toward Vital Signs</atitle><jtitle>Archives of disease in childhood</jtitle><addtitle>Arch Dis Child</addtitle><date>2012-10</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>97</volume><issue>Suppl 2</issue><spage>A530</spage><epage>A530</epage><pages>A530-A530</pages><issn>0003-9888</issn><eissn>1468-2044</eissn><coden>ADCHAK</coden><abstract>Aim This study was planned to determine pediatric nurses’ knowledge and attitudes towards monitoring the vital signs. Methods One hundred eleven nurses working in the inpatient clinics at a children’s hospital located in İzmir participated in the study. In the study, the following three forms were used: “The Socio-demographic Questionnaire”, “The Vital Signs Knowledge Assessment Survey” and “The Vital Signs Attitude Assessment Survey”. Knowledge and attitude surveys were prepared in accordance with the following guidelines published by the Royal College of Nursing: “Standards for Assessing, Measuring and Monitoring Vital Signs in Infants, Children and Young People” and “The Recognition and Assessment of Acute Pain in Children”. Cronbach’s alpha value of the Knowledge Survey is 0.87, the Attitude Survey is 0.86. Results The mean scores the nurses obtained from the knowledge survey were as follows: general principles: 87.9±7.8, temperature: 87.6±10.1, Pulse: 93.1±8.0, respiration: 96.4±7.4, blood pressure: 92.8±7.0 and pain: 91.8±9.8. The mean scores the nurses obtained from the attitude survey were as follows: general principles: 81.7±11.99, temperature: 87.4±15.9, pulse: 89.6±12.5, respiration: 95.3±9.8, blood pressure: 95.8±12.2 and pain: 91.0±15.5. Of the nurses, 49% stated that nurses themselves should decide about the frequency of monitoring vital signs whereas 41.4% stated that it should be ordered by the physician. Conclusion According to our findings, nurses’ knowledge and attitude scores relating to monitoring vital signs are quite high.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health</pub><doi>10.1136/archdischild-2012-302724.1879</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0003-9888 |
ispartof | Archives of disease in childhood, 2012-10, Vol.97 (Suppl 2), p.A530-A530 |
issn | 0003-9888 1468-2044 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1828855855 |
source | BMJ Journals - NESLi2 |
subjects | Blood pressure Nurses Pain Polls & surveys Respiration |
title | 1879 Pediatric Nurses Knowledge and Attitudes Toward Vital Signs |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T10%3A41%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=1879%20Pediatric%20Nurses%20Knowledge%20and%20Attitudes%20Toward%20Vital%20Signs&rft.jtitle=Archives%20of%20disease%20in%20childhood&rft.au=Sar%C4%B1,%20H%20Y%C4%B1ld%C4%B1r%C4%B1m&rft.date=2012-10&rft.volume=97&rft.issue=Suppl%202&rft.spage=A530&rft.epage=A530&rft.pages=A530-A530&rft.issn=0003-9888&rft.eissn=1468-2044&rft.coden=ADCHAK&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/archdischild-2012-302724.1879&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4214733211%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1828855855&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |